•  
  •  

Politics

Four empty lecterns.

They loomed large over tonight’s Republican presidential debate at Morgan State University in Maryland, an historically black college, where four of the leading candidates for their party’s presidential nomination were nowhere to be found.

Tavis Smiley, the talk show host and moderator of the event, drew some sharp responses from the candidates who showed up with his first question: “Please tell me and this audience, in your own words, why you chose to be here tonight and what you say to those who chose not to be here tonight.”

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee said he was “embarrassed” for his party and for tonight’s no-shows — Rudolph W. Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Fred D. Thompson and Senator John McCain — and cited his own support among the black community.

“I want to be president of the United States, not just president of the Republican party,” Mr. Huckabee said. “Quite frankly for a lot of people there’s a perception that black Americans don’t vote for Republicans. I proved that wrong in Arkansas with 48 percent of African-Americans voting for me.”

Kansas Senator Sam Brownback said the absence of the leading Republican candidates was a “disgrace.”

“I think it’s a disgrace for our country, I think it’s bad for our party and I don’t think it’s good for our future,” he said. “You grow political parties by expanding your base … what they’re doing is sending a message of narrowing the base.”
Read more …

In just three days, former Senator Fred Thompson will make official his bid for the Republican presidential nomination after a summer-long dance that has left his conservative supporters waiting and waiting and waiting. His announcement on Thursday gets a major advance on this week’s cover of Newsweek, titled “Lazy Like a Fox.” By the end of this week, you’ll probably know a lot more about the politician-turned-actor-turned-candidate than his co-star on Law & Order, Sam Waterston.

Texans certainly know him a bit. This past weekend, the state held its straw poll among Republicans, and Mr. Thompson came in second. Only 1,300 people took part, with 41 percent choosing Congressman Duncan Hunter of California. The one candidate who actually hails from Texas, Congressman Ron Paul, came in third. While some of the major contenders like Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani and John McCain weren’t participating in the straw poll, neither was Mr. Thompson. Read more …

This week marks the second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, and several of the presidential candidates are traveling to New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, the site of the hurricane’s devastation, to focus on the unfinished business of recovery and restoration.

The New Orleans Times-Picayune reports that Illinois Senator Barack Obama visited the city on Sunday to discuss his plans to “quicken the pace of storm recovery” there. The Times’s Jeff Zeleny has more detail on Mr. Obama’s proposals, including ideas for “restructuring how the federal government responds to future catastrophes in America.”

Tonight Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and former Senator John Edwards, who announced his presidential bid in New Orleans, will appear there at a “Hope and Recovery” summit held by Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu. Republican candidates Mike Huckabee, the former governor of Arkansas, and Representative Duncan Hunter of California, will also visit New Orleans this week.
Read more …

Rock 'n Roll Huckabee(Photo: David Lienemann/Associated Press)

AMES, Iowa — Mike Huckabee played bass for much of the morning with his rock-and-roll band “Capitol Offense,” taking the stage at one point with an Elvis impersonator and Lynn Hunter, the wife of his rival for
the Republican nomination, Representative Duncan Hunter, to sing Johnny B. Goode.

“Is Elvis with you Lynn?” he asked?

“I’m afraid so,” she said. “He’s voting for Hunter.”

“Elvis is dead everyone,” Mr. Huckabee said.

When the Elvis impersonator came out, Mr. Huckabee, an ordained Baptist minister, told the audience, “You are witnessing a miracle. The dead has risen.”

With that, he rocked out.

CHICAGO — As union leaders gathered here today for the Democratic presidential debate they are holding tomorrow at Soldier Field, the International Association of Machinists announced a novel political strategy: for the first time in its 119-year history, it plans to endorse both a Republican presidential candidate and a Democratic presidential candidate before the two parties hold their primaries.

Rick Sloan, communications director for the 410,000-member union, said that endorsing a candidate from each party, after years of the union just endorsing a Democratic candidate, would improve the union’s ties with the 35 percent of its members who vote Republican. He added that endorsing a Republican might also help his union come out of the political cold, “because for the last seven years we’ve been completely closed out from having any relationship with this president, this White House, this administration.”

Mr. Sloan, who is close to the union’s president, Tom Buffenbarger, had kind words for several Republican candidates. He praised Rudy Giuliani for having opposed the North American Free Trade Agreement. He said Representative Duncan Hunter of California was “very good on defending jobs and the impact of trade on our shrinking manufacturing base.” In addition, he lauded former Gov. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas for his ideas on doing more to prepare the nation’s youth for the work force.
Read more …

Campaign wordsmiths have been hard at work finding just the right pitch to nudge, cajole and smooth-talk their supporters into sending in a contribution before tomorrow’s midnight fund-raising deadline. In a flurry of e-mails and Web site messages, the campaigns have been trying out increasingly novel pleas.

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s team sent an e-mail message to supporters today pegged to Vice President Cheney’s recent assertions about whether he’s covered under the executive branch or not. The message features a fairly unflattering picture of Mr. Cheney along with the following pitch: “We promise that during a Biden Administration, Dick Cheney will not be a member of the executive or legislative branch of government.”

Former Senator John Edwards, who used his own birthday earlier this month to entice potential donors, today made a similar appeal on behalf of his wife: “July 3rd is Elizabeth’s birthday and a great way to celebrate would be a donation by our June 30th deadline to help us hit our goal.” In the same message Mr. Edwards praised his wife for tangling with conservative commentator Ann Coulter earlier this week.

On the “Five Brothers” blog, a section of Mitt Romney’s Web site where his sons talk up their dad’s campaign, Tagg Romney appeals for a donation and emphasizes the campaign’s thriftiness.
Read more …

Even though the White House has announced no timeline for a final decision in the midst of its renewed deliberations about whether to close the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, some of the Republican presidential candidates are taking the opportunity to remind their base where they stand.

Speaking with reporters in Helena, Mont., Mitt Romney reiterated his support for the facility.

“I believe that Guantanamo plays an important role in protecting our nation from violent, heinous terrorists,” the former Massachusetts governor said. “Guantanamo is a symbol of our resolve.”

He added, “Evil still exists in the world. It did not go away when the Soviet Union collapsed.”

Mr. Romney raised eyebrows when he called for doubling Guantanamo during the last G.O.P. debate.

Representative Duncan Hunter, a G.O.P. candidate and member of the House Armed Services Committee, sought to arouse NIMBY sentiments in his San Diego-area district on Friday, warning that Democratic legislation to close the prison would send terrorists to military bases nearby. “We should keep them isolated from the criminal population in this country,” he said.

Read more …

Iraq takes front and center in this Sunday’s morning talk show lineup, with top Defense and State Department officials monopolizing some programs.

Fox News Sunday, for example, has Gen. David H. Petraeus. The ground commander in Iraq has been a proponent of the Bush administration’s troop buildup, which has just been completed.

Ryan C. Crocker, the United States ambassador to Iraq, is the primary guest on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

CBS’s “Face the Nation” has Senator Mitch McConnell, the minority leader and Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. Also scheduled to appear is Lee Hamilton, a co-chairman of the Iraq Study Group. Read more …

Conservative bloggers and pundits have been weighing in with their thoughts on last night’s Republican debate in New Hampshire, and while the reviews are somewhat mixed, many gave high marks to former mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani.

The National Review’s Jim Geraghty wasn’t willing to take sides about the top-tier candidates, instead preferring to call the debate a “four-way win.” Mr. Geraghty said Senator John McCain did the best he could to defend the immigration bill he is co-sponsoring, but doesn’t “think he changed that many minds.” He called former Governor Mitt Romney “unflappable,” and said that while Mr. Giuliani did well, “it might be a bit early to go after the opposing party.” The bottom line for Mr. Geraghty: last night’s debate featured “policy disagreements and actual arguments, instead of can-you-top-this-I’m-so-committed-to-this-issue contests the Democrats have.”
Read more …

Third G.O.P. Debate(Photo: Patrick Andrade for The New York Times)

GOFFSTOWN, N.H.

Postscript; 10 p.m.
This debate tonight seemed a less tightly choreographed event than the Democratic debate, perhaps because the views of the eight Democrats are more or less similar, while those of the 10 Republicans are all over the map.

The Republicans, too, are saddled with an unpopular war and an unpopular president. Mr. Giuliani and Mr. McCain dominated the show; somehow, Mr. Romney seemed less of a presence tonight than in earlier debates.

Fred Thomspon, apparently, seems to see his opening as the “common sense” alternative. We’ll see if his Republican conferees let him persist with that image when he finally joins the debate for real.

9 p.m.That’s it. We’re going to check out what Fred Thompson has to say over on Fox News. We’ll circle back with some wrap up thoughts shortly.

8:58 p.m.Mr. Giuliani has hijacked the straight talk express. The question: How to bring moderates into the party. Mr. Giuliani’s answer: “Nominate me.” That includes respecting our differences, he said. Mr. Romney and Mr. McCain fell back on their stump speeches.

8:54 p.m.Mr. McCain seems especially relaxed tonight. On a question about Hispanics, he opened with, “Muchas gracias governor,” and turned to Mr. Romney. And he went on to advise people that when they are in Washington — no, he wasn’t trashing Washington here — he told them to visit the Vietnam Memorial, where they would see a lot of Hispanic names. He has had a few days of appearing on television defending the immigration bill and has been by turns angry and adamant; this is definitely a moderate, but impassioned presentation of his views.

8:41 p.m. A question from a professor of ethics and philosophy at St. Anselm: What is the most pressing moral issue of the day? Mr. Huckabee, a minister, first jokes that he’s getting all the moral questions tonight — better, he guesses, than getting immoral ones. But then, seriously, he says that Americans value and celebrate life.

Mr. Giuliani says Mr. Huckabee is correct, even though Mr. Giuliani has reaffirmed his support for abortion rights. He goes on to say that the challenge for our generation is to share American values like freedom of the press and freedom of religion with the rest of the world. Mr. Paul: the end of the war in Iraq. Mr. Brownback: being pro-life. In the midst of his answer, Mr. Blitzer asked Mr. Brownback if he could support Mr. Giuliani, because of his support for abortion rights. Mr. Brownback responded, “I don’t think we’re going to nominate someone who isn’t pro-life,” but went on to say that he would support the party’s nominee.

8:24 p.m. Mr. McCain just did what few candidates, Republican or Democrat, have done so sure-footedly in this campaign. When a woman from the audience said that her brother had been killed in Iraq, Mr. McCain stepped up and addressed her in a totally human way. Mr. McCain said he still believed in the war and President Bush’s surge, thanked her for her “endurance,” and added:
(Update)

“This war — I’m going to give you a little straight talk. This war was very badly mismanaged for a long time, and Americans have made great sacrifices, some of which were unnecessary because of this management of the — mismanagement of this conflict.

I believe we have a fine general. I believe we have a strategy which can succeed, so that the sacrifice of your brother would not be in vain; that a whole 20 or 30 million people would have a chance to live a free life in an open society and practice their religion no matter what those differences are.

And I believe if we fail, it will become a center of terrorism, and we will ask more young Americans to sacrifice, as your brother did. This is long and hard and tough, but I think we can succeed. And God bless you.”

He seems to have well learned the Dukakis lesson from 1988: Show your heart.

8:15 p.m. More of a mixed bag on pardoning I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby — the former top Cheney aide — than there was at the last debate. Last time, only Mr. Tancredo specifically said he would definitely pardon Mr. Libby. The only thing that has changed since then is that Mr. Libby was sentenced today to 30 months in prison. And Fred Thompson, the not-yet-announced candidate, has said he would pardon Mr. Libby. Tonight, Mr. McCain again said he would not.

Mr. Giuliani, a former prosecutor, first proclaimed: “I think the sentence was way out of line. I think the sentence was excessive.” But he then gave a multi-layered answer, the upshot of which was he would consider a pardon. When he was at the Justice Department in the Reagan administration, he recommended more than 1,000 pardons, he said, and in this case he would wait for the appeal. “A man’s life is at stake,” Mr. Giuliani declared.

He also called this “an incomprehensible situation” and noted that no underlying crime had been committed. Mr. Romney said that there was clearly prosecutorial abuse involved and he would keep open the option of a pardon. Senator Sam Brownback said he would pardon Mr. Libby, saying “the basic crime didn’t happen.”

Mr. Tancredo said yes, he would pardon Mr. Libby.

Correction: An earlier version of this post erroneously stated that Representative Ron Paul would pardon I. Lewis Libby. Mr. Paul said he would not pardon the former aide to Vice President Cheney. Representative Tom Tancredo said he would pardon Mr. Libby.

8:05 p.m.Former Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson doesn’t disappoint. Asked how he, as president, would use President Bush, he joked that he certainly wouldn’t send him to the United Nations.

8 p.m. While all the Democrats said the other night that they wanted to revise the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy to allow gays to serve openly in the military, the Republicans all say no. Mr. Giuliani said that in a time of war, “you don’t want to make fundamental changes like this.” Mr. Romney and Mr. McCain seconded Mr. Giuliani’s stance against allowing gays to serve openly.

7:55 p.m. These Republicans are joining in on saying that global warming exists. To some degree, they’re even blaming the big oil companies. Shows how much this issue has been mainstreamed.

7:51 p.m. Here’s the Mormon question to Mr. Romney, whose religion has troubled some voters. Mr. Romney quotes JFK and portrays Mormon beliefs as similar to those of other faiths. He said some pundits were hoping he would distance himself from his church for political reasons, but “that’s not going to happen.”

7:48 p.m. That Mr. Giuliani, you got to give him credit for a sense of theater. The sound system went on the fritz just when he was addressing the matter of the Rhode Island bishop comparing him to Pontius Pilate. He lifted up his hands unto the Lord…then when it happened again (from lightning outside), he said he was a little freaked given that he attended parochial schools as a child.

7:45 p.m. Fred is in the room! Well, figuratively. Mr. Blitzer asked a couple of candidates what they thought of Fred Thompson, the conservative who is lurkiing on the sidelines and ready to wade into this crowd of 10. They welcomed him. But the question wasn’t asked of the three front-runners, Mr. Giuliani, Mr. McCain and Mr. Romney.

7:40 p.m. On immigration, Mr. Giuliani broadsided the McCain bill, and tilted against Washington at the same time. “It has no unifying purpose,” he said of the McCain bill. “It’s a typical Washington mess,” full of compromises. Mr. Giuliani is not a compromise kind of guy. Mr. McCain said that Mr. Giuliani sounded as if he supported the bill, while Mr. Giuliani shook his head and then started pacing in the background. Mr. McCain made his big pitch for his bill here and reiterated that silence on the issue is the equivalent of amnesty for the 12 million illegal aliens who are here.

He seems to be the biggest supporter of President Bush in the group, having earlier supported him on the war and now calling for everyone to “come together with the president, the leader of our party.” Mr. Giuliani said the big problem with the bill is that it doesn’t provide a uniform data base; Mr. Romney said the problem is that the current law should be enforced and the borders secured.

7:25 p.m. Rudolph W. Giuliani is criticizing the Democrats too. (Hmmm.) He was typically direct — yes, he said, he would not rule out the nuclear option against Iran if Iran developed nuclear weapons — but he got in a dig at the Democrats. He said that during their debate, they sounded like they were “back in the 1990’s.” Those were the Clinton years, lest anyone has forgotten.

7:18 p.m. The Iraq war is obviously the overwhelming issue facing the nation and both sets of presidential candidates. The first questions here tonight are about the war, as they were Sunday night for the Democrats. Senator John McCain got our attention. He was asked if there was a Plan B if the Bush surge in Iraq doesn’t work. He had said a few weeks ago that he had no Plan B. Tonight, he answered by attacking Senator Hillary Clinton. At the Democratic debate, she had called Iraq “President Bush’s war.” Mr. McCain complained tonight that when her husband was president, “I didn’t say Bosnia was President Clinton’s war.”

He went on to say that she didn’t understand that president’s don’t lose wars, political parties don’t lose wars, nations lose wars. Interesting that he went after the front-running Democrat. He has a couple of Republicans to get out of the way first.

6:59 p.m. Hi everyone. We’re in New Hampshire, at St. Anselm’s College outside Manchester, for the third Republican debate. The candidates are just getting to the stage now. Those of us in the media filing center are at a bit of a disadvantage at the moment because we can’t hear anything. They’re working on it, they say.

Like bacon, eggs and cereal, the topics of immigration, Iraq and presidential politics once again dominate Sunday’s Breakfast Menu.

“This Week with George Stephanopoulos” features two of the regular participants in the negotiations that produced the current bill. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, who represented the Bush administration’s position in the talks, and Senator Robert Menendez, Democrat of New Jersey, are scheduled to appear on the ABC show. Mr. Menendez has refused to endorse the bill and is the co-sponsor of an amendment that would eliminate limits on how many green cards legal immigrants can secure for spouses and young children.
Read more …

Long before the immigration deal was announced on Thursday, candidates in the 2008 presidential field and indeed, the down-ballot field, had faced a lot of questions inside and outside the border states over the nation’s policies.

Particularly for some of the Republican contenders seeking the G.O.P. presidential nomination, the issue has confronted them in places like Iowa as well as in California and Texas. But Democrats, too, have been challenged on the campaign trail, especially in swing districts and states where immigration has practically become a new third-rail in politics.

President Bush has repeatedly pushed for a plan that would straddle his desire to bring immigrants into the fold legally as well as assuage the Republicans’ concerns for tough border security. In praising the new proposal, he said it included neither amnesty nor animosity. “Immigration is a tough issue for a lot of Americans,” he acknowledged.
News coverage outlines the proposals here, in The Times, in the Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times, to name just a few publications. (We, like others, are still waiting on links to the actual bill.)

It’s been a tough issue in Congress, where Democrats in the House asserted that they’ll need 50 to 60 Republicans to get on board and where some of the senators who worked on the compromise were noticeably absent from the public announcement. (The Senate may take it up as early as Monday, but the House may not act before mid-to-late summer.) Among some Democrats, objections already raised were the moves toward a point-based system that shifts a bit from the family-based connection to citizenship, and others, including some labor groups like the AFL-CIO, worried that the plan would drive down wages and create two classes of workers.

Several of the Democratic candidates said they wanted to study the bill’s provisions before making a judgment on it. The Republican field was not as reticent, so we’ll focus on their statements as well as on the busy right blogosphere, where this issue is a touchstone. (Before the compromise was announced, we had posted a graphic on the 2008 candidates’s positions. ) Read more …

Republicans are gathering in Columbia, S.C. today for what will be their second debate. It begins at 9 p.m. Eastern time, and is being broadcast on Fox News Channel. We’ve learned long ago not to try to make predictions about what can happen in these very free-for-all events, but there are a few things to watch for.

1) Who will be the most effusive in paying tribute to the Rev. Jerry Falwell, the founder of the Moral Majority and a great power in the evangelical wing of the party? Will Mr. Falwell be to this debate what Ronald Reagan was to the Republican presidential candidates debate 12 days ago at the Ronald Reagan Library? Watch Senator John McCain of Arizona in particular: as part of his overall move to the right earlier in the campaign, he made a point of publicly embracing Mr. Falwell after having criticized him as an agent of “intolerance.”

2) What will the candidates say about what they would do to block Iran from building nuclear weapons, in light of this week’s report that the International Atomic Energy Agency has concluded that it has made great strides in producing weapons-grade material? Could Iran overtake Iraq as the foreign policy issue in the debate? Read more …

Duncan Hunter

The power to pardon traditionally belongs to the president. But Representative Duncan Hunter, who is seeking the 2008 Republican nomination, isn’t waiting for Inauguration Day.

Mr. Hunter introduced a bill in January to initiate an unprecedented Congressional pardon of two former border patrol agents currently serving 11- and 12-year sentences after shooting a drug smuggler on the Texas-Mexico border in 2005.

For Mr. Hunter and other immigration hardliners, their conviction is an “extreme injustice.”

While Constitutional objections are “very much a possibility,” said Joe Kasper, Mr. Hunter’s spokesman, he doesn’t see the measure threatening executive power. The president’s required signature on the bill “would obviously be synonymous with his authority to execute a pardon,” he said. “The Congress is doing nothing more than initiating a pardon.”

A House Judiciary Committee spokesperson said a subcommittee will hold a hearing about sentencing guidelines related to the border patrol case in the coming weeks, but “no decisions have been made yet” on Mr. Hunter’s bill, which has 98 cosponsors.

Formal debate over general immigration legislation is set to begin May 14 in the Senate.

H.R. 563

Carol Waselenchuck and her daughter-in-law, Jami Waselenchuk, landed a meeting with two of Senator Bill Nelson’s legislative aides and his deputy chief of staff—and the first topic was shoes. Five thousand pairs of them in Washington, a few thousand more back in Florida.

Joyce Kaufman, a talk radio host from South Florida who was also at the meeting, explained that her listeners “sent their soles to Washington” to call for tighter border security. (We’re glad she didn’t follow through on her threat to bring the “smelliest” pairs to the Capitol.) The Waselenchuks, fans of Ms. Kaufman’s show, were visiting members of Congress to lobby for stricter immigration enforcement.

Armed with report cards from Americans for Better Immigration and figures from Numbers USA, two groups that push for tighter immigration enforcement, the Waselenchuks quickly told Daniel McLaughlin, the deputy chief of staff to Mr. Nelson, what they’d do, in what order.

“Secure the borders,” said the elder Mrs. Waselenchuk, “stop the flow, stop the bleed.” Then, she said “attrition through enforcement.” She and her daughter-in-law believe that if the government starts enforcing existing laws—punishing employers who hire illegal immigrants, denying medical and other benefits, etc.—people here illegally will leave on their own. They see this as a middle ground between a pathway to citizenship and extensive raids and round-ups. Read more …

Archive

Duncan Hunter for September 2007
Duncan Hunter for September 2007
S M T W T F S
« August 
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
Duncan Hunter for September 2007
Duncan Hunter for September 2007
S M T W T F S
« August 
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

About The Caucus

Kate Phillips and The Times's politics staff are analyzing the latest news from Washington and around the nation and looking ahead to the 2008 presidential elections.
Caucus Chatter: A Q&A; on reader comments.

Candidates

Democrats
Joseph R. Biden Jr.
Joseph R. Biden Jr.
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Christopher J. Dodd
Christopher J. Dodd
John Edwards
John Edwards
Mike Gravel
Mike Gravel
Dennis J. Kucinich
Dennis J. Kucinich
Barack Obama
Barack Obama
Bill Richardson
Bill Richardson
Republicans
Sam Brownback
Sam Brownback
Rudolph W. Giuliani
Rudolph W. Giuliani
Mike Huckabee
Mike Huckabee
Duncan Hunter
Duncan Hunter
John McCain
John McCain
Ron Paul
Ron Paul
Mitt Romney
Mitt Romney
Tom Tancredo
Tom Tancredo
Fred Thompson
Fred Thompson

Feeds