Review of Oxford preparation course for the TOEIC test
Why this webpage?
This webpage is meant to be an extended version of a textbook review appearing in JALT's December 2003 issue of The Language Teacher. The textbook reviewed is the Oxford preparation course for the TOEIC test, by Oxford University Press, copyright 2002. Book reviews have a 700-word limit, and I realized in the process of writing that it was difficult to fully support some of my statements within that limit, so I made this page as a way to provide more examples. I also realize that what I wrote may be subject to debate among some users of the textbook, so by making this page, I can post the opinions of other people, making for a review that expresses a wider range of viewpoints than just my own. If any readers choose to comment or rebut, their messages will be posted at the bottom of this page.
| Speed Links |
Articles & commentary on TOEIC by Kevin Miller
The Pitfalls of Implementing TOEIC Preparation Courses
Article appearing in the March 2003 issue of the Yoshinogawa Review, the academic journal published by Shikoku University's Department of English Language & Culture.
Commentary on TOEIC Booster column of April 30, 2004
"A new-look TOEIC possible," from The Daily Yomiuri.
Commentary on TOEIC Booster column of Oct. 24, 2003
"Vocabulary Muscle Counts," from The Daily Yomiuri.
Original review of Oxford preparation course for the TOEIC Test as it appeared in The Language Teacher, December 2003, Volume 27, Number 12
|
* Writing TOEIC practice tests and having them appear TOEIC-like is no simple task. Having tried many TOEIC preparation materials, I commend the author of the Oxford text for basically getting it right, with a few exceptions. My biggest complaint with the TOEIC preparation materials on the market is that they don't follow the conventions of TOEIC perfectly. I once contacted one of the major TOEIC materials writers by e-mail and was fairly shocked when he wrote that he did not feel that TOEIC prep materials need to strictly conform to TOEIC conventions. He stated that improving the English ability of the students was his goal, not duplicating TOEIC test writing. Personally, I think teachers aiming to improve the general English ability of their students should stay as far as possible from TOEIC preparation materials. There are far more engaging materials on the market for that purpose. However, if teachers are placed in the position of having to prepare students for TOEIC, then they should spend a good deal of their time on practice tests and exercises that conform as much as possible to TOEIC conventions. Students who take the TOEIC test will base their test-taking strategies on what they've been exposed to in their preparation materials. The closer the exercises are to the real thing, the more likely they will be able to internalize the thought processes necessary for selecting the answers quickly and with greater accuracy. |
Un-TOEIC-like examples from the Oxford text
Many TOEIC materials writers have trouble writing TOEIC-like test items. One reason is that they may not have access to actual previous TOEIC tests. Often these writers make assumptions about TOEIC items based on other published TOEIC preparation materials. Even writers with access to previous TOEIC tests don't necessarily imitate the TOEIC writing conventions exactly. Further complicating the matter is that TOEIC item writing conventions have evolved over the years, so items that would have appeared on TOEIC some years ago may not appear now.
The Oxford author should be commended for basically getting it right. In particular, the Reading Part VI, Error Identification items appear to be fairly close to actual TOEIC items. The distractors in the Listening Part I, Photographs section, however, are good, but not 100% perfect. Additionally, some items, while closely following TOEIC conventions are simply not well-written, the most common problem being the absence of one indisputably correct answer choice.
Practice Test One, tapescript in Teacher's Book, p. 8.
Listening Part I, Photographs
1. (photo shows airplane flying over some buildings, shot from directly below)
"(A) The fly is flying over our heads."
2. "(C) They're buying a new tie for the meeting."
3. "(A) He's writing an article for publication."
Practice Test One, p. 24 in text, p. 13 & 20 in Teacher's Book.
Listening Part IV, Short Talks
88. "(C) Television programming identifies the main purpose of the business." (p. 20)
Practice Test One, p. 25 in text, p. 13 & 20 in Teacher's Book.
Listening Part IV, Short Talks
98. "(C) The purpose of the talk is to introduce the new president." (p. 20)
Practice Test Two, p. 196 in text, p. 106 in Teacher's Book.
Reading Part V, Incomplete Sentences
125. "(A) Around the last year, a number of upscale restaurants and shops have opened in the area. (A) Around (B) Approximately (C) Whereby (D) Almost"
My biggest complaint is the so-called "strategies." In ESL today, the word strategies has several meanings. Recently, it is most often used in the sense of learning strategies. However, when dealing with TOEIC preparation textbooks, there are other more likely meanings, including test-taking strategies and test-preparation strategies. When I first examined the Oxford textbook, I made the erroneous assumption that strategies referred to test-taking strategies. I gradually came to understand that the author has no clear policy as to what strategies means. Sometimes they read like test-taking strategies, sometimes like test preparation strategies, and sometimes they read like directions for dealing with the exercises that follow them. At times they read like none of these. Had the author not labeled them all "strategies," I would have probably been more inclined to accept the concept of this textbook.
Use of the word "strategies" aside, I strongly object to the verbose writing style featured in this textbook. In ESL, there is a point of diminishing returns for explanations given. For my money, I want short, concise explanations followed by a range of examples that illustrate them. The examples are here, but you have to wade through too many lines of verbiage to get to them. I understand that some people may want extensive explanations. However, my experience tells me that those people will generally not be found among the students I teach.
There are TOEIC textbooks out there that offer legitimate test-taking strategies. At this time, I will refrain from recommending any of those, as the purpose of this webpage is to focus on the Oxford materials. For the record, I have not authored any TOEIC preparation materials myself, except for what I use in my own classes.
Reader Comments
Comments, if any, will be posted as they arrive, generally within one week. Please state your name and affiliation (or explain why you don't want to). Comments and rebuttals may be sent to: kmiller@shikoku-u.ac.jp
As of March 17, 2005, there are still no reader comments, but interestingly, a person who reviewed the Oxford text for TESL-EJ chose to link to this page. Ms. Voelz appears to endorse the Oxford text, which I do not, but in the spirit of friendly logrolling, I will link back to her review.
Return to Kevin Miller's webpage
| Return to Eng. Dept. homepage | ||||