| |
|
PCR II - A Practical Approach Mutational Analysis: New Mutations
K. Michaelides, R. Schwaab, M.R.A. Lalloz, W. Schmidt and E.G.D. Tuddenham
The very excellent book from which this review is taken (PCR II: A Practical Approach) may be ordered from
the Oxford University Press. Many thanks to OUP
for allowing HAMSTeRS to reproduce it below.
Introduction
In the last few years the search for mutations and sequence polymorphisms
has been dramatically accelerated by the use of PCR and subsequently by
direct sequencing of PCR products (1,2). In spite of these powerful new
methods, direct sequencing is not always practicable in detecting mutations
because they may be positioned anywhere in some of the very large genes
which are being studied. For example, mutations have now been found in nearly
every one of the 26 exons of the factor VIII gene. Thus a number of prescreening
methods have been developed, such as discriminant oligonucleotide hybridization
(3), enzymatic (4) and chemical cleavage methods (5), single stranded conformation
polymorphism (SSCP) (6) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)
(7). We will describe these methods, and show by way of example, some results
of their application to screening the coding sequences and splice sites
of the factor VIII gene for mutations amongst haemophilia A patients (8-10).
2. Genomic DNA amplification
The exon scanning techniques described in this chapter are all based on
PCR. Genomic DNA is extracted from peripheral blood samples by conventional
means (11,12). The test DNA is then amplified by PCR (refs. 1,13 and Protocol
1) and the resulting amplification product used in the chosen mutation screening
technique. The quality of the amplified DNA can determine the success of
the method and the clarity of the results, especially for SSCP. The selection
of oligonucleotide primers for PCR is very important. Primer pairs with
a similar dissociation temperature (Td) will give a cleaner product since
the annealing temperatures will be similar for both. As a rough guide, primers
with a Td of 60oC will anneal to their template at approximately 55oC. Trial
amplification with a control DNA is recommended to fine tune the reaction
conditions. Non-specific background bands can often be eliminated by increasing
the annealing temperature by 1 - 2oC. When very little genomic DNA is available
and needs to be conserved (e.g. the patient is deceased), secondary PCR
reactions can be seeded from the primary amplification. This enhances the
yield of PCR product and leaves the genomic DNA in reserve. The same oligonucleotides
can be used for both primary and secondary PCR reactions. Any mutation detected
must be confirmed by going back to the genomic DNA sample and sequencing
a freshly-amplified PCR product. In this way possible infidelities introduced
by the Taq polymerase enzyme may be excluded.
Protocol 1. PCR amplification of genomic DNA
Equipment and reagents
Thermal cycler
Positive displacement pipettes, capillaries and pistons (Microman, Anachem)a.
0.5ml sterile microcentrifuge tubes.
100mM dNTPs in sterile distilled water (Pharmacia #27-2035-01).
Taq DNA polymerase 5 units/æl (Promega #M 1862)
1 x PCR buffer : 10 x buffer is supplied with the enzyme and should be diluted
with sterile distilled water. Add 20æl each of 100mM dATP, dGTP, dCTP, dTTP
for each 10 ml of 1 x buffer. The buffer will now contain 50mM KCl, 10mM
Tris-HCl pH 8.8, 1.5mM MgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100 and 200æmol of each dNTPb.
Aliquot in 1ml amounts and store at -20oC.
Oligonucleotide primers 200-300ng/æl.
Mineral oil (Sigma molecular biology grade M5904).
Genomic DNA 400ng/æl.
10 x TBE buffer, pH 8.0 (0.9M Tris-HCl, 0.9M boric acid, 20mM EDTA)
Method
Thaw all the reagents and keep on ice.
- Prepare sufficient 1 x PCR master mix for the required number of reactions
(100æl per reaction). To do this, add 10æl of each oligonucleotide primer
and 4æl Taq DNA polymerase per ml of 1 x PCR buffer. Mix well by inversion.
- Aliquot 100æl of the 1 x PCR master mix into each 0.5ml sterile microcentrifuge
tube.
- Add 1æl of genomic DNA and mix by tapping gently.
- Overlay each reaction with 50æl of mineral oil. The PCR reaction mixture
will now contain 400 ng genomic DNA 200-300 ng of each oligonucleotide primer
2 units Taq DNA polymerase
- Include a negative (no DNA) control with each batch of amplifications.
- Programme the thermal cycler. The following conditions are a guide:
| Step | Temp | Time |
| Denature | 94oC | 5 mins |
| Denature | 94oC | 35 secs |
| Anneal | 47-59oC | 1 min 30 cycles |
| Extend | 72oC | 1 minc |
Final extension 72oC 10 mins
Soak 10oC
The annealing temperature will depend on the oligonucleotide primer sequences.
- Check the amplification by running 10æl of the PCR product on a 1-2% agarose
gel in 1 x TBE. aFilter tips are now also available for most pipettes to
avoid aerosol contamination. bMgCl2 is sometimes supplied separately to
the 10 x PCR buffer and should be added at this stage. cAn additional 3
sec/cycle extension time is often recommended for long amplification products
but this is not always essential.
3. Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism (SSCP)
The mobility of single-stranded nucleic acid molecules, electrophoresed
under non-denaturing conditions is determined by both their fragment length
and their secondary structure which is sequence dependent (6,14). A fragment
may adopt several conformations for any given set of electrophoretic conditions
and these are visualised as separate bands in the gel. Some or all of these
bands may show a shift in a mutated sequence, a single base change being
sufficient to alter secondary structure and hence mobility.
Screening genomic DNA for unknown mutations is now possible, provided that
the gene under scrutiny has already been at least partially sequenced to
enable oligonucleotide primers to be designed. Selected regions of very
large genes, for example the factor VIII gene, consisting of 186Kb of genomic
DNA and 26 exons, can now readily be screened. However, this method is equally
applicable to any gene however large or small. Even when only cDNA sequence
is available, it is possible in some cases to screen small genes at the
genomic level by designing primers within the known coding sequence and
amplify across introns. Fragments can then be directly sequenced, the only
limit being intron size and the limits of the PCR reaction.
3.1 Standard SSCP
A wide variety of electrophoresis and gel conditions for SSCP have been
cited in the literature (15); polyacrylamide concentrations varying from
4-6%, differing gel cross- linking ratios, the presence or absence of glycerol
in the gel, and electrophoresis at either room temperature or 4oC. The addition
of glycerol allows gels to be run at room temperature but with a considerable
increase in electrophoresis time. Cooling to 4oC can produce erratic results
when cooling fans are used, if a cold room is available carrying out electrophoresis
at 4oC is the best option.
The most important criteria for successful SSCP are as follows:
- DNA fragments should be less than 300bp, since mobility shifts may not be
detected in larger fragments.
- Polyacrylamide gels should be prepared with a low cross-linking ratio such
as 39:1 acrylamide to bisacrylamide. Protocol 2 describes a suitable procedure.
- A stable temperature environment must be maintained during the electrophoretic
run, preferably in a cold room at 4oC.
- Use 33P -dATP which will give crisper bands during autoradiography than
32P - dATP (9). The latter, gives more diffuse bands because of its higher
energy of emission. These diffuse bands can obscure minor shifts of mobility
of fragments eg. 1-2mm.
- Gels should be run for a sufficient length of time to enhance the possible
shifts. It is also highly advisable to run samples for two different lengths
of time (e.g. 3h and 4h) to minimise the risk of missing band shifts. The
exact times chosen for electrophoresis depend on fragment length.
- Always run a double-stranded DNA control. This will enable identification
of single- and double-stranded fragments, especially when samples have been
digested with restriction enzymes and several fragments are visualised.
Band shifts can frequently be seen with double-stranded fragments and sometimes
are only seen with the double-stranded fragments.
Protocol 2 Preparation of a polyacrylamide gel for SSCP
Equipment and Reagentsa Acrylamide and bisacrylamide are known neurotoxins and potential mutagens
and teratogens in man. Always wear disposable plastic gloves, a dust mask
and safety glasses during handling of these reagents in powder form and
plastic disposable gloves at least when handling their solutions.
40% acrylamide-bisacrylamide (39:1) stock solution.b Prepare by mixing 35.1g
acrylamide (Electran, Grade 1, BDH 44313 5B), 0.9g N,N'- methylenebisacrylamide
(Life Technologies 540-5516UB) and 90ml distilled water. Dissolve at 65oC
for 10 min
4.5% acrylamide stock solution. Prepare by mixing 90ml 40% acrylamide- bisacrylamide
(39:1), 80ml 10xTBE buffer (see Protocol 1), and 630ml distilled water.
Store at 4oC
10% ammonium persulphate (Sigma A9164)
TEMED (Sigma T7024)
Polyacrylamide gel mould (or 5mm thick float glass sequencing plates) using
0.4mm spacers and 0.4mm comb
Method
- Filter the 4.5% acrylamide solution through a 0.45æ filter (Sartorius) just
before use. Degas the solution under vacuumc.
- Mix: 4.5% acrylamide solution 80ml 10% ammonium persulphate 460æl TEMED
60æl
- Pour the gel immediately and allow it to polymerise. aIt is important to
use only the highest quality reagents. bThe 39:1 ratio of acrylamide to
bisacrylamide is very important since the detection of mobility shifts will
be decreased if lower ratios are used. cDegassing prevents the formation
of bubbles in the polymerised gel.
Protocol 3
describes a procedure for standard SSCP which satisfies all of these criteria.
The conditions used in this protocol have produced a greater than 95% success
rate in detecting mutated sequences in our laboratory. Results obtained
from the standard SSCP protocol described here are illustrated in Figs.
1 and 2.
Protocol 3. Standard SSCP
Equipment and reagents
High voltage power supply (e.g. Multidrive XL, Pharmacia).
Vertical gel electrophoresis apparatus (e.g. Model S2, Life Technologies
580- 1165SC or similar).
Heated driblock.
à33P -dATP (1000-3000 Ci/mmol). (Dupont NEN #NEG-312H).
Restriction enzymes as required.
Sample running buffer. For single stranded DNA samples, this is prepared
by mixing (per 1ml buffer), 800æl formamide, 100æl of 1% Bromophenol blue,
100æl of 1% Xylene Cyanol, 2æl 0.5M EDTA, 1æl 10M NaOH.a Double stranded
DNA samples require the same sample buffer but without NaOH.
4.5% polyacrylamide gel (poured using 0.4mm spacers and a 0.4mm comb; see
Protocol 2).
Agarose gel (1-2%).
Method
- 1. Amplify the test DNA fragment (Protocol 1) in the presence of a radiolabelled
nucleotide (e.g. 3æCi à33P -dATP) per 100æl reaction). This will label the
PCR product during amplification. Some methods involve end-labelling the
PCR primers by treating with polynucleotide kinase using 32P -ATP and so
generate fragments which are only end-labelled. This is more laborious than
the method described here and cannot be used where larger amplification
products need to be digested since internal digestion products are then
not labelled.
- Confirm the amplification by running 10æl of the PCR product on a 1-2% agarose
gel.
- Digest fragments larger than 300bp with suitable restriction enzymes.
- Take 5-10æl of the labelled PCR product and make up to 25æl with sample
running buffer.
- For single-stranded DNA only, denature the samples at 90-95oC for 5 mina
and transfer immediately to ice.
- After 5 min on ice, load 3-8æl of each sample onto the 4.5% polyacrylamide
gel. (Vary the sample volume according to the efficiency of amplification,
whether the samples have been restricted or not, and the specific radioactivity
of the label used).
- Electrophorese the gel in 1 x TBE at 4oC (preferably in a cold room) and
at 40W constant power for 2-6h depending on the DNA fragment sizes. In a
4.5% polyacrylamide gel, Xylene cyanole migrates at a position expected
for single- stranded DNA fragments of 210 nt long.
- After 1 h, load a second batch of the same samples as in step 6 above. By
running for two different periods, the risk of missing shifted bands is
reduced.
- A lane of double-stranded DNAa should be run with each batch of samples
to enable distinction between single-stranded and the double-stranded bands.
- Transfer the gel to Whatmann 3MM paper, cover with cling film and dry under
vacuum at 80oC for 30-45 min.
- Expose the gel to X-ray film at room temperature without a screen. Develop
the autoradiograph.
a Double-stranded DNA should be prepared in the same way as single-stranded
DNA except that it is made up in sample running buffer without NaOH and
the sample is not preheated before applying to the gel.
3.2 Consecutive
SSCP
As stated earlier, large PCR fragments (e.g. 1kb in length) have to be digested
in order to detect a mobility shift by standard SSCP. However, the localisation
of a mobility shift can then prove to be difficult because multiple bands
are visualised on the gel. Fortunately, the accurate assignment of a mobility
shift can be achieved in such situations by applying consecutive SSCP (16).
The DNA fragment to be screened is amplified in the presence of an à-33P
dNTP and using a biotinylated antisense primer (Protocol 4). The PCR product
can then be bound by its biotinylated 3' end to streptavidin coated- magnetic
beads. A magnetic separator is used to remove the biotinylated product from
the unincorporated primers, dNTP's and radiolabelled nucleotides ready for
restriction enzyme digestion. Careful selection of restriction enzymes allows
sequential digestion of the biotinylated product and the individual collection
of the restricted DNA fragments. The restriction enzymes are chosen so as
to generate suitable DNA fragment sizes (100-300bp) in a consecutive manner
(see Figure 3). SSCP is then performed with each separate DNA fragment loaded
individually onto the gel. In this way, previously observed shifts can be
accurately assigned to a precise DNA fragment for subsequent direct sequencing.
This adaptation of SSCP is therefore the approach of choice for rapid mutation
screening of larger segments of DNA.
Protocol 4. Consecutive SSCP
Equipment and reagents
Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (e.g. Dynabeads M-280 Streptavidin Dynal
#112,05)
Magnetic particle concentrator (e.g. Dynal MPC-E #120.04)
PCR primers. The 3' antisense primer must be biotinylated on its 5' end
Radiolabelled nucleotide e.g. à-33P -dATP (Dupont NEN)
Selected restriction enzymes. Choose these so as to generate suitable DNA
fragment sizes (100-300bp) in a consecutive manner (see Figure 3).
Sample running buffer (see Protocol 3)
2 x washing and binding buffer (WBB) (10mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 1mM EDTA, 2M
NaCl)
4.5% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel (see Protocol 2)
Agarose gel (1-2%)
1 x TBE buffer (see Protocol 1)
Method
- Amplify the DNA (see Protocol 3) using 100-150ng of the biotinylated primer
per 100æl reaction and 200ng of the unbiotinylated primer. Remember to add
3æCi of à33P -dATP to the 100æl reaction mix.
- Run 10æl on a 1-2% agarose gel to confirm amplification.
- Wash 40-50æl of magnetic beads twice with 1 x WBB using the magnetic separator
to remove the beads from the supernatant after each wash.
- Resuspend the magnetic beads in 50æl of 2 x WBB.
- Add 90æl of PCR product to the beads and mix gently by pipetting. Do not
vortex. Less PCR product can be used if the amplification is very efficient.
- Incubate at 37oC for 10 min. This will bind the biotinylated PCR product
to the magnetic beads. Incubation at room temperature is possible, but can
be less efficient as the ambient temperature is variable.
- Use the magnetic separator to remove the WBB buffer from the magnetic beads.
Pipette off the buffer completely.
- Add 17æl sterile distilled water to the beads. Mix gently by pipetting.
- Add 2æl of the appropriate 10 x restriction buffer and 1æl of restriction
enzyme. Mix by gentle pipetting.
- Incubate at 37oC for 1 h.
- Separate the magnetic beads from the supernatant using the magnetic separator.
Transfer the supernatant to a clean 1.5ml microcentrifuge tube and keep
on ice. This contains fragment 1.
- Wash the beads once with sterile distilled water and resuspend in 17æl of
sterile distilled water ready for the next digestion.
- Repeat steps 9-12 as required until all the DNA fragments have been restricted
leaving the final fragment still attached to the beadsa.
- Take 5-10æl of each restricted fragment including the final segment bound
to the beads and make each one up to 20æl in sample running buffer.
- Denature the DNA samples at 90-95oC for 5 min. This will also cleave the
final DNA fragment from the beads.
- Immediately transfer to ice for 5 min.
- Load 3-8æl of each sample (single-stranded and double-stranded DNA) onto
the gel.
- Run the gel in 1 x TBE at 4oC (preferably in a cold room) at 40W, constant
power for 2-6 h depending on fragment length.
- Continue as for Protocol 3, steps 10-11.
- Examination of the developed autoradiograph will reveal the shift in one
specific restricted fragment. This fragment can then be directly sequenced
(see Protocol 6).
a2æl of each completed digest can be run on an agarose gel to confirm that
the reactions have gone to completion. This information can be useful during
interpretation of the consecutive SSCP gels.
3.3 PCR-SSCP multiplexed analysis; application to the factor VIII gene
The aim of multiplexed analysis of very large genes like the factor VIII
gene is to speed up SSCP analysis by amplifying several gene fragments simultaneously
by the PCR method. All essential coding regions of the factor VIII gene
(exons 1-13, 15-26) can be amplified as individual exons including intron/exon
splice junctions. PCR fragment sizes range from 143 bp (exon 20) to 352
bp (exon 8). Exon flanking sequences range from 27- 88 bp. Multiplexed PCR
amplification was carried out in eight groups: three groups of 4 exons,
three groups of 3 exons and two groups of 2 exons were multiplexed at an
annealing temperature of 50oC (Table 1). The exons within each group were
separated by appropriate size differences and by large genomic map distances
(the shortest distance between exon fragments being 5.63 Kb) to avoid artifacts
resulting from intronic sequence amplification.
The advantages of the method are fourfold;
speed of analysis
economy of reagents and sample
simplicity of method
sensitivity of detection
The whole of the essential coding region of the factor VIII gene is PCR
amplified in only 8 tubes. All primer pairs anneal at the same temperature
(50oC). Thus a single patient DNA sample and a control (16 tubes) could
have the essential coding region of the factor VIII gene amplified by the
PCR-multiplexing system in about 4-5h. All fragments are suitably small
enough for SSCP gel analysis without prior restriction enzyme digestion.
Thus, the preparation, running and drying of the gel, and the exposure of
the dry gel to X-ray film determine the time taken before results are available.
With appropriate forethought, results could be available within three days.
Multiplexed amplification is more economical on sample and reagents than
individual PCRs performed for each exon; less Taq polymerase enzyme, radioactive
isotope (making the procedure safer), nucleotides and buffer are used, and
considerably less patient genomic DNA sample is required. The multiplexed
PCR-SSCP analysis described here (Protocol 5) is essentially a two step
procedure, each strand of the target DNA sequence is labelled as it is amplified
in the thermal cycler and then transferred directly to electrophoresis on
easily prepared gels. Since both strands of multiplexed PCR fragments are
labelled, SSCP analysis may reveal a shift in either of the amplified complementary
DNA strands after denaturation or in the double-stranded DNA product (Figure
4).
Protocol 5. Multiplexed PCR
Equipment and reagents
Genomic DNA
Oligonucleotide primers for PCR
Taq DNA polymerase (e.g. Promega)
à-33P -dATP (1000-3000 Ci/mmol; 10 Ci/ml) (NEN Radiochemicals)
1 X PCR buffer (Promega) containing 200æM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP
(Pharmacia)
Mineral oil (Molecular biology grade: Sigma)
Thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer Cetus)
2% agarose gel
Method
- Use the oligonucleotide primers directly after uncoupling and deprotection.
Mix them in groups (as in Table 1 for the factor VIII gene), dry down and
reconstitute such that 1æl contains 200ng of each primer.
- For PCR, add 400-800ng genomic DNA, 200ng of each primer, 1.25 units Taq
DNA polymerase/primer pair and 0.25æl of à-33P -dATP/primer pair to 100æl
of PCR buffer containing 200æM of dNTPs.
- Overlay the reaction mixture with mineral oil.
- Carry out PCR. The PCR conditions for a Perkin-Elmer Cetus thermal cycler
are: Denature at 94oC for 5 min. Then perform 30 cycles of PCR as follows:
denaturation 94o for 30 sec annealing 50oC for 1 min extension 72oC for
1 min with 3 sec additional elongation per cycle. The final extension is
72oC for 10 min.
- Check 10æl of the PCR product on a 2% agarose gel to confirm amplification.
- Continue as in Protocol 3, steps 4-11.
4. Direct sequencing of biotinylated PCR products using Streptavidin coated
magnetic beads in a solid support system
Once a suspected mutation is detected using the exon scanning techniques
described in this chapter, confirmation is required by DNA sequencing. The
DNA fragments could be cloned and sequenced using traditional methods. Although
easily achievable using T-vectors (17) or blunt-end ligation, the cloning
of PCR products is time- consuming. Furthermore, in order to exclude artifacts
introduced by the infidelity of the Taq polymerase during amplification,
several clones must be sequenced from each DNA sample being analysed.
This tedious approach can be avoided by direct sequencing of the PCR products.
The DNA template must be clean and the excess primers and excess dNTP's
must be removed. Various column, gel purification, and electroelution methods
have been described but again these are time-consuming and often good readable
sequence is difficult to achieve.
A very elegant approach which avoids these problems utilises Streptavidin-
coated magnetic beads (18,19) in a solid phase system which is both rapid
and reliable. Efficient concentration of the PCR product while simultaneously
removing excess primers and nucleotides results in excellent readable sequence.
Amplified DNA template prepared using this solid phase system can be the
initial step to incorporate into Taq cycle sequencing in a thermal cycler
using Taq DNA polymerase (20), or T7 DNA sequencing (21) in a conventional
dideoxy chain termination protocol (22). Both variations are easily adapted
for automated DNA sequencing simply by substituting four fluorescently-labelled
nucleotides in place of a radiolabelled nucleotide (usually à35S -dATP).
In Protocol 6 we describe the direct sequencing of biotinylated PCR products
by preparing single-stranded DNA templates and directly sequencing them
using T7 DNA polymerase. Both DNA strands can be sequenced in this way.
A schematic representation is shown in Figure 5.
Protocol 6. Preparation of single stranded DNA template and direct sequencing
using Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads and biotinylated PCR products.
Equipment and reagents
Genomic DNA
PCR primers with the 3' antisense primer biotinylated at its 5' end.
Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (e.g. Dynabeads M280- Streptavidin, Dynal
112.05).
Magnetic particle concentrator (MPC) (e.g. Dynal MPC-E, 120.04).
2 x washing and binding buffer (WBB) (see Protocol 4).
0.1M NaOH.
Internal primers for sequencing (20ng/æl).
T7 sequencing kit (e.g. Pharmacia 27-1682-01) and sequencing polyacrylamide
gel. (Taq cycle sequencing can also be used).
Agarose gel (1-2%).
Amplification
- Amplify the genomic DNA using only 100-150ng of the biotinylated 3' primer
and 200ng of the 5' primer per 100æl reaction. There should be little or
no primer left after amplification.
- Run 10æl on a 1-2% agarose gel to check amplification. Binding of PCR product
to the Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads
- Pipette 50æl of the beads into a 1.5ml sterile microcentrifuge tube and
remove the supernatant.
- Resuspend the beads in 50æl of 1 x WBB. Mix gently. Discard the supernatant.
- Repeat the wash using 1 x WBB. Discard the supernatant.
- Resuspend the beads in 50æl of 2 x WBB. Vary the volume according to the
quantity of PCR product. The final concentration of NaCl should be 1-2M
for efficient binding of PCR product to the beads.
- Add an equal volume of PCR product i.e. 50æl. Mix gently. Incubate at 37oC
for 10 min. Cool the tubes to room temperature.
- Discard the supernatant and resuspend the beads in 50æl of 1 x WBB. Mix
gently. The PCR/magnetic bead complex can be stored for up to 1 week at
4oC prior to sequencing.
Preparation of single-stranded DNA template
- Discard the 1 x WBB.
- Add 50æl of 0.1M NaOH and incubate at room temperature for 10 min.
- Remove the supernatant and keep this. This contains the DNA sense strand
for subsequent sequencing (see below).
- Wash the beads with 0.1M NaOH. Discard the supernatant.
- The Streptavidin coated magnetic beads are now bound to the biotinylated
antisense DNA strand. Wash the beads once in 50æl of 1 x WBB and then once
in 50æl H2O.
- Resuspend the beads in 10æl H2O ready for sequencing.
DNA sequencing.
- Using an internal primer, sequence the antisense single-stranded DNA template
using the T7 sequencing kit following the manufacturer's instructions for
single-stranded DNA. This will generate sense strand sequence.
- Just prior to loading the polyacrylamide sequencing gel, heat the sequencing
reactions at 72oC for 2-5 min. Load 3æl per lane. If required, the magnetic
beads can be kept to one side of the tube using the MPC to facilitate easier
gel loading.
- The sense strand template (see step 3 in the previous section) can be sequenced
after neutralising with an equal volume of 0.1M HCl and subsequent ethanol
precipitation. Redissolve the DNA in 10æl H20 and continue with the sequencing
reactions.
(a)Use the MPC to isolate the beads from the supernatants between steps.
(b)Only mix by gentle pipetting. (c)Agitate the beads during incubation
steps to ensure contact of the beads with the reagents.
5. Chemical cleavage detection of mismatched base pairs
This technique is based on the ability of hydroxylamine and osmium tetroxide
(OsO4) to modify single base mismatches (5,23). This is used to identify
point mutations at the genomic level by amplifying the DNA fragment of interest,
creating a heteroduplex with the radiolabelled wild-type DNA and subjecting
the heteroduplex to chemical modification and cleavage.
Hydroxylamine at pH 6.0 modifies the C5=C6 double bond in cytosine and
OsO4 oxidises the C5=C6 double bond in a thymine specific reaction. At the
point of mismatch in the heteroduplex, there is effectively single-stranded
DNA which is readily recognised and modified. Piperidine is subsequently
used to cleave at the modified points of mismatch. Hydroxylamine modifies
C-C, C-T and C-A mismatches. OsO4 modifies T-G, T-C and T-T mismatches.
However by forming heteroduplexes between the mutant and wild-type sequences,
all 12 possible point mutations and deletions give rise to at least one
detectable mismatch or loop out..
After chemical modification and cleavage, the DNA heteroduplexes are run
on a urea/polyacrylamide gel and mutations are identified by the presence
of cleaved DNA fragments. Examples are shown in Figure 6 where 3 mutations
have been identified in Exon 11 of the factor VIII gene. The size of the
cleaved product gives positional information regarding the mutation which
is confirmed by sequencing..
Protocol 7 describes the preparation of 6% urea/acrylamide gels for chemical
cleavage analysis and Protocol 8 describes the cleavage detection procedure
itself. .
Protocol 7 Preparation of 6% urea/acrylamide gels for chemical cleavage
analysis
Equipment and Reagents
30% stock acrylamide solution. Prepare by mixing 28.5gm acrylamide, 1.5gm
N,N'-methylene bisacrylamide and making up to 100ml with sterile distilled
water. Store at 4oC.
Urea buffer. Prepare by mixing 210gm urea and 50ml 10 x TBE buffer (see
Protocol 1). Make up to a total volume of 400ml with sterile distilled water.
Dissolve by heating at 50oC and filter through Whatman No. 1 filter paper.
Store at 4oC.
TEMED
10% ammonium persulphate
Polyacrylamide gel mould with gradient spacers (0.4-1.2mm thick) and a 0.4mm
comb.
Method
- Prepare the 6% urea/acrylamide gel mixturea by mixing: Urea buffer 96ml
30% acrylamide 24ml TEMED 54æl 10% ammonium persulphate 960æl
- Pour the gel immediately and allow it to polymerise. a The quantity prepared
here is for a gel of dimensions 394 x 300mm.
Protocol 8. Chemical cleavage detection of mismatched base pairs. Equipment
and reagents
Precipitation solution (0.3M sodium acetate pH 5.2, 0.1mM EDTA)
Ethanol (100% and 70%)
32P -ATP (4500 Ci/mmol) (ICN Radiochemicals)
T4 polynucleotide kinase (Pharmacia #27-0736-02)
Kinase buffer (500mM imidazole-HCl, 100mM MgCl2, 1mM EDTA, 50mM DTT, 1mM
spermidine, 3mM ADP)
Nick columns (Pharmacia #17-0855-02 or similar Sephadex G50 columns)
5 x HET buffer (1.5M NaCl, 0.5M Tris-HCl pH 8.0)
Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (Aldrich #25,558-0)
Diethylamine
1M Tris-HCl pH 8.0
500mM EDTA
Pyridine (Aldrich #18,452-7)
4% OsO4 solution (Aldrich #25175-5)
tRNA (10mg/ml), from yeast (Sigma #RO128)
1M Piperidine (Sigma P5881, supplied as 10M, dilute in sterile distilled
water to 1M just before use)
1Kb DNA size marker ladder (GIBCO-BRL) and/or íX174 HaeIII fragments
1 x TBE buffer (see Protocol 1)
1% agarose gel
6% urea/acrylamide gel (see Protocol 7)
Stop solution (80% formamide, 0.1% Bromophenol Blue, 1mM EDTA, 10mM NaOH)
Methanol/dry ice bath
Speed Vac (Life Sciences International)
High voltage power supply
Screw capped tubes (1.5ml, Sarstedt)
Amplification
- Design the oligonucleotide PCR primers within the intron sequences to enable
analysis of whole exons and splice junctions. Allow 20-100bp between the
primer and the 5'/3' end of each exon; otherwise the cleavage products may
be too small to be detected.
- Amplify the test DNA's (see Protocol 1) and include two normal DNA samples,
one to be used as a labelled probe, the other as a negative control. Purification
of the normal DNA fragment for use as the probe.
- Run the total PCR product on a 1% agarose gel at a constant 30V for 1-2
h, in 1 x TBE containing 1æg/ml ethidium bromide.
- View the DNA fragment using a UV transilluminator and cut out the gel slice
containing the DNA fragment. Place the gel slice into a 1.5ml sterile microcentrifuge
tube.
- Place the tube in a dry ice/methanol bath for 30 min.
- Centrifuge at 14,000 rpm for 30 min.
- Transfer the supernatant to a clean 1.5ml sterile microcentrifuge tube and
concentrate in a Speed Vac until the volume is reduced to 100æl.
- Add the following:
200æl precipitation solution
750æl 100% ethanol Place in a dry ice/methanol bath for 30 min
- Centrifuge at 14,000 rpm for 30min. Wash the pellet in 1ml of 70% ethanol.
- Dry the pellet in the Speed Vac and store at -20oC until required.
Labelling the probe.
- Dissolve the DNA pellet in 10.5æl sterile distilled water.
- Add the following:
- 10æl 32P -ATP (equivalent to 100æCi)
- 2æl T4 polynucleotide kinase
- 2.5æl kinase buffer Mix and incubate at 37oC - for 35 min.
- Remove the unincorporated radioactivity by passing the reaction through
a Nick column.
- Dry the probe in a Speed Vac and then redissolve in 75æl sterile distilled
water. Count 1æl - in a liquid scintillation counter.
- Use 3-5 x 105 dpm/sample for the heteroduplex reaction (about 7æl).
Heteroduplex reaction.
- Dry the PCR products in the Speed Vac (all of the test DNAs and the normal
DNA).
- Dissolve each DNA pellet in 25æl sterile distilled water and then add:
- 8æl 5 x HET buffer
- 7æl labelled probe (adjust volume as necessary to give 3-5 x 105dpm)
- Incubate for 5 min at 95oC then allow the reactions to cool down overnight
by floating the tubes in the switched off water bath.
Hydroxylamine and OsO4 modifications.
NB. The hydroxylamine and OsO4 reactions should be performed in a fume cupboard.
- For the hydroxylamine reaction proceed as follows:
(a) Mix 1.39g Hydroxylamine with 1.6ml sterile distilled water. Adjust
to pH 6.0 with diethylamine (about 1ml).
(b) Into a sterile 1.5ml screw-capped tube add:
- 7æl heteroduplex
- 20æl hydroxylamine solution Incubate for 2 h at 37oC.
- For the OsO4 modification proceed as follows: (a) Prepare a fresh OsO4 solution
in a 1.5ml screw capped tube by adding:
- 6.9æl 1M Tris HCl pH 8.0
- 1.4æl 500mM EDTA
- 41.6æl pyridine
- 86.8æl 4% OsO4
- 863æl Sterile distilled water Keep on ice.
(b) Vortex to mix. The solution should be lemon yellow in colour and turbid.
(c) Into a clean 1.5ml screw capped tube add:
- 7æl heteroduplex
- 18æl OsO4 solution Mix and incubate on ice for 2 h.
- Precipitate the products of the hydroxylamine and OsO4 modifications as
follows:
(a) Add to each reaction in order:
- 1æl tRNA
- 200æl precipitation solution
- 750æl 100% ethanol
(b) Mix and leave in a methanol/dry ice bath for 15 min. Then centrifuge
for 15 min at 14,000rpm.
(c) Wash the pellet in 1ml 70% ethanol, centrifuge for 15 min at 14,000rpm,
and Speed Vac dry.
Piperidine cleavage.
- Prepare a fresh 1M piperidine solution in sterile distilled water.
- Add 50æl of 1M piperidine to each sample, vortex and briefly spin in a microcentrifuge.
- Incubate at 90oC for 25 min. Dry in the Speed Vac.
- Add 200æl of sterile distilled water, mix, and dry in the Speed Vac. Repeat
the wash.
- Store the pellets at -20oC overnight.
Labelling of the 1kb ladder or HaeIII digest of í X 174.
- Into a 1.5ml sterile screw-capped tube add:
- 5æl 1kb ladder or í X 174 digest
- 2.5æl Kinase buffer
- 2æl T4 polynucleotide kinase
- 5æl 32P -ATP (equivalent to 50æCi)
- 25.5æl Sterile distilled water Mix and incubate at 37oC for 35 min.
- Pass the reaction through a Nick column.
- Dry the labelled product in the Speed Vac and redissolve in 25æl sterile
distilled water. The labelled size markers (1kb ladder or í X 174 digest)
are usable for several weeks. Electrophoresis of the reactions.
- Add 20æl of stop solution to each reaction.
- Vortex and then denature the samples at 95oC for 5 min and immediately snap
cool on ice.
- Load 2-10æl onto a 6% urea/acrylamide gel depending on the radioactivity
of the sample.
- Also load 1æl of labelled 1kb ladder or í X 174 fragments as size markers.
- Run the gel at 2000V, 60mA, 60W, constant power, until the bromophenol blue
reaches the bottom.
- Transfer the gel to 3MM Whatman paper, cover with cling film and dry under
vacuum at 80oC for 60 min.
- Expose to Kodak XAR film at -20oC with an intensifying screen overnight.
- Develop the autoradiograph.
6. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)
The DGGE method detects mutations (small deletions and insertions, point
mutations) by separating PCR amplified DNA fragments, which differ from
wild-type DNA in their melting behaviour, on a denaturing gradient gel.
The amplification products are composed of two different melting regions:
a very high melting domain which is arbitrarily synthesized on the 5' end
of one primer (40 bases of GC's called the GC-clamp) and a lower melting
domain which could vary in length between 25 bases and about 350 bases (24).
The lower melting domain is the domain of interest which is to be screened
for mutations. When a fragment migrating within the gel reaches a discrete
denaturing concentration, the double-stranded DNA of the lower melting domain
is melted into single-strands with the effect that the amplification product
will cease migrating at this position in the gel. Both strands are still
connected by the higher melting domain. The position where the melting takes
place within the gel depends on the base pair sequence and the base pair
composition of the lower melting domain. Even when two equal double-stranded
DNA fragments differ by only one base pair, they melt at different denaturing
positions. A schematic diagram of this method is given in Figure 7. The
separated amplification products can be made visible on an UV-transilluminator
after incubating the gel with an ethidium bromide solution.
Although DGGE is a powerful method for screening DNA regions for mutations
or sequence polymorphisms, substantial theoretical and practical work is
required to optimize it for each DNA segment under analysis.
6.1 Preliminary theoretical work
To identify all mutations within a DNA fragment by means of the DGGE method,
it is first necessary to find a unit melting domain of the region. The computer
programs MELT87- and the SQHTX-program of Lerman (25,26) have been designed
for this purpose. MELT87 is very helpful for finding the ideal unit melting
domain of a DNA fragment of interest (Figure 8). Defining such a melting
domain is also influenced by the position of the artificial GC-clamp, which
could be attached to either end of the amplification product. SQHTX calculates
the running distance on a gradient gel between a wild-type and a mutated
DNA-fragment. The displacement is given for a helix defect for each pair
in the fragment as a function of gel running time (Figure 8). Further explanation
of the operation and interpretation of the two programs is supplied with
the software.
6.1.1 MELT87
When the unit melting domain is determined with the computer program MELT87,
the positions of the amplification primers are automatically assigned. However,
in most cases an optimal melting domain is not optimal for amplification
primers. Therefore, since the composition of the amplification primers is
very important for good PCR results, it is often necessary to find a compromise
between a useful amplification primer and a unit melting domain of an amplification
product. The melting temperature (Tm) of this unit melting domain should
not deviate more than 0.5oC up or down from the median temperature of its
domain.
In our experience the following rules are helpful guidlines:
an effective primer is 21-26bp long (without the GC-clamp), having a well-balanced
composition of bases.
Parts of one primer and parts of both primers, respectively, should not
be able to hybridize against one another more than four base pairs in series.
The two external bases of one primer's end should have no more than one
base complementary to the bases at the end of the other primer.
The Tm of one primer should lie between 56oC and 60oC.
Programs are available to determine the Tm of the amplification primers.
Besides its effect in helping to create a unit melting domain of a DNA fragment,
the GC-clamp is absolutely necessary for the gel run. When the DNA fragment
has reached the point where the denaturing conditions, produced by the urea
gradient, corresponds to its Tm, then the unit melting domain will melt
at once into single strands. Only the GC-clamps, by keeping the single strands
together as double strands in this region, fix them at this level. This
short section of double-stranded DNA also allows easy visualisation of the
migrated DNA fragment by ethidium bromide staining.
6.1.2 SQHTX
The values given by the program are temperature differences ( ToC) which
exist between the wild-type DNA fragment and a fragment with any kind of
mutation (Figure 8). The relationship between these temperature values and
the denaturing concentration is 1oC = 3% denaturing concentration = 1cm
distance within a 20% urea gradient gel approximately. For a given gel running
time, the T (oC) temperature values for all possible mutations within the
melting domain should be higher than 0.1. Otherwise it is not possible to
separate the wild-type homoduplex fragment from the mutated one.
6.2 Optimising the conditions for DGGE
6.2.1 Amplification
We have found that the same basic amplification conditions can be used for
each different amplification reaction. To optimize the reaction for each
amplification, it is necessary only to vary the annealing temperature. This
is also the only value which has to be changed when using a different thermal
cycler. When using a primer with an additional sequence (GC-clamp) on its
5'- or 3'- end, better results are obtained when the time of each annealing
step is longer than in an ordinary amplification reaction. In our hands
2 min annealing is sufficient.
6.2.2 DGGE
Although computer analysis is essential before one can start the practical
procedure, it still takes some practical work to find the optimal running
conditions. This optimisation is carried out by running several 'travel
gels' which differ in the electrophoresis conditions (variation of the urea
gradient and the voltage). Experience in finding the right running conditions
for several different amplification products makes it easier in future work
to select running conditions directly from the theoretical values since
a strong correlation exists between theoretical and practical values. Use
a chosen constant voltage and a given denaturing gradient (it seems reasonable
to use only gradient gels, which differ by 20%) to determine the running
time. If the results are not satisfactory [no distinct band(s), or retardation]
choose another voltage and/or denaturing gradient. However, to find the
right running conditions, change only one variable at a time. In our experience,
more distinct bands are obtained when the running time is longer, rather
than the voltage higher. In our laboratory best results could be obtained
by using a voltage range between 25 to 60V. All three variables (voltage,
running time and gradient) are dependent on the size and base content of
the amplification products.
At the optimum running time the bands are well separated. In contrast to
the slower migrating material a distinct pattern develops due to focusing
in the gradient. In the example shown in Figure 9, the optimum running time
is 20-22h (see the bands in lanes 5/6, 9/10 and 15/16.
Having established the running conditions for a DNA fragment spanning a
specific gene region, these conditions can now be used to run analytical
gels for mutation screening.
6.3 Practical Procedures
Full descriptions of the amplification and DGGE procedures are given in
Protocol 9
The assembled equipment for DGGE is shown in Figure 10.
Protocol 9. DGGE
Equipment and Reagents
10xTAE buffer pH 7.4 (0.4M Tris-HCl, 0.2M sodium acetate, 10mM EDTA)
40% formamide deionised with a mixed bed resin and filtered through a solution
filter (Schleicher & Schull)
1 x loading buffer (20% Ficoll 400, 10mM Tris-HCl pH 7.8, 1mM EDTA, pH 8.0,
0.1% orange G)
40% polyacrylamide stock solution (acrylamide:bisacrylamide = 37.5:1)
100% denaturing solution (7.0% polyacrylamide, 7.0M urea, 40% formamide,
in 1 x TAE buffer pH 7.4)
0% denaturing solution (7.0% polyacryalmide in 1 x TAE buffer pH 7.4)
10% ammonium persulfate stock solution
TEMED
Ethidium bromide stock solution (10mg/ml)
electrophoresis unit (Hoefer SE 600); (glass plates 180mmx160mm; spacer
thickness 0.75mm)
power supply
heating water bath with circulating pump to hold constant gel temperature
(62oC) during gel run
gradient mixer in combination with a magnetic stirrer and a butterfly intravenous
infusion set (a needle of outside diameter 1.9mm, connected to a tube) for
pouring a denaturing gradient gel
microsyringe for loading the samples
peristaltic pump between buffer tanks to prevent significant increase in
pH during electrophoresis
an UV-transilluminator for visualising gels
a documentation system (e.g. polaroid camera)
a personal computer with Lerman's software SQHTX and MELT87
Amplification
1.
Mix the following compounds for the amplification reaction (total volume
of 50æl):
5æl 10 x PCR buffer
8æl dNTP-mix
500ng DNA
300ng oligonucleotide primer
900ng oligonucleotide primer with GC-clamp
2.5U Taq DNA polymerase
make up to 50æl H20
2.
Amplify according to the following conditions:
| Step | Temp | Time |
| Denature | 94oC | 420 sec |
| Denature | 94oC | 35 secs |
| Anneal | 50-57oC | 120 sec 40 cycles |
| Extend | 772oC for | 60 sec + 3 secs/cycle |
| Extend | 72oC for | 600 sec |
Final extension 72oC 10 mins
Soak 10oC
3.
Check the amplification by running 1/10th of the PCR product on a 1-2% agarose
gel.
Travel schedule gels
Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis can be carried out very successfully
in a Hoefer SE 600 electrophoresis unit, attached to a circulating water
bath set to a constant temperature of 62oC. All electrophoresis is performed
at this temperature.
- Preparing the appropriate solutions as follows:
- Prepare a 40% acrylamide stock solution consisting of an acrylamide:bisacrylamide
ratio of 37.5:1
- Using this acrylamide stock solution, prepare two additional solutions:
- a 0% denaturing solution [7.0% polyacrylamide in 1 x TAE- buffer, pH 7.4]
- a 100% denaturing solution [7.0% polyacrylamide, 7.0 M urea, 40% formamide,
in 1 x TAE buffer pH 7.4]
Both solutions (the 0% denaturing and the 100% denaturing solution) should
be prepared in large amounts, because every new preparation has a slightly
different urea concentration, which changes the practical conditions of
the gel run. It is necessary to reoptimise running parameters when new solutions
are prepared.
- Using these two stock solutions, prepare the two denaturing solutions (10ml
each) which are needed for the gradient gel (For example, for a denaturing
gradient ranging between 30% and 50% prepare a 30% and a 50% denaturing
solution).
- Prepare the travel schedule gel as follows:
- Clean the glass plates scrupulously first with warm water, then with iso-propanol
and finally with distilled water
- Fix the glass plates within the equipment by slightly greasing the bottom
of the glass plates
- Add 5.0æl TEMED and 100æl of 10% ammonium persulphate solution to the prepared
solutions for the gradient gel and pour the solutions into the appropriate
chambers of a gradient mixer. Make sure that the higher concentration solution
is put in the anterior chamber, while the lower concentrated solution is
put in the posterior chamber. Stand the gradient mixer on a magnetic stirrer
with a stirring bar inside the anterior chamber. Stir the anterior chamber
fast but without producing any air bubbles. To avoid the use of a peristaltic
pump, it is very important that the gradient mixer is positioned on a higher
level than the glass plates within the fixation equipment. The connection
between gradient mixer and glass plates is made with a "butterfly" intravenous
infusion set (a needle of outside diameter 1.9mm, connected to a tube).
The free end of the tube is connected to the output channel of the gradient
mixer and the butterfly needle is put between the glass plates.
- Pour the gel by opening the channel between both mixer chambers first and
by opening the output channel second. Pour the gel slowly (about 5 min),
as this helps to exclude air bubbles from the gel and to achieve a gradient
without waves. To start the solution running within the tube, it is sometimes
necessary to tap the tube.
- Put in the comb and allow the gel to polymerise. Normally this takes about
2 h.
- In the meantime, mix the amplification products with the loading buffer.
- Gel electrophoresis:
- Load a wild-type DNA sample onto the gel using 1xTAE (pH 7.4) as running
buffer.
- Begin the electrophoresis (for example 25V for a 25-45% urea/formamide gradient
gel).
- Load additional DNA samples consecutively five times with a 2h gap between
each loading.
- Stop the gel run after 24h running time.
- Stain the gel with ethidium bromide solution and evaluate the results on
a UV-transilluminator.
- Select the optimum running time for the analytical gel.
Analytical Gel
- Select the same gel running conditions established by the travel schedule
gel (denaturing gradient, voltage and running time).
- Pour the gel in the same manner as explained for the travel schedule gel
above.
- Form heteroduplexesa before loading the amplification products as follows:
(a) Mix 10æl (80ng) of a wild-type PCR-amplified DNA with 10æl (80ng) of
a patient DNA or preferably mix 10æl of two different patient DNAs (c) Heat
the mixture for 5 min at 96oC in a closed water bath, switch the power off
and let it cool down to room temperature overnight (b) Add sample buffer
equal to one third of this volume
- Load the DNA samples onto the analytical gel and start the gel run
- After the gel run is completed, stain the gel with ethidium bromide for
1 h and evaluate the results on a UV-transilluminator aHeteroduplexes can
also be formed using a thermal cycler as follows: denature at 96oC for 10
min, then leave at 55oC for 10 mins.
Comments on the DGGE Protocol
Heteroduplex formation improves the detection of mutations for two reasons:
it allows the simultaneous analysis of two amplification products of two
different patients
it produces two additional bands and therefore allows the detection of mutations
that do not change melting behaviour of the homoduplex Sometimes a point
mutation results in the same base pairing, except that it is reversed (e.g.
A/T T/A). In such cases, the running behaviour of the mutated and the normal
DNA fragment cannot be distinguished. This problem is solved by mixing a
normal and a mutated DNA sample. The formation of two additional heteroduplexes,
which present now a T/T and a A/A mismatch base pair, differ much more in
their melting behaviour than the original complete double-stranded DNA,
thus resulting in a different running distance.
An example of the different melting behaviour of amplification products,
which represents the same DNA region, but differ only in one base pair (point
mutation), can be seen in Figure 11. If the base change of one DNA sample
results in a completely different base pairing, we are able to identify
4 different bands: the original homoduplexes of the wild-type DNA and the
patient DNA and two different heteroduplexes.
Examples of a three band pattern, where the wild-type and the mutated homoduplexes
cannot be distinguished, can be seen in lanes 5 and 9 of Figure 11. If two
different patient samples are used for the heteroduplex formation and a
mutation pattern is found, it is not possible to decide, which patient shows
the mutation. In this case, the choice is to sequence both amplification
products directly or to identify the mutated DNA by mixing them each with
a definitive wild-type DNA before loading onto a new analytical gel.
7. Discussion and conclusions
The three powerful screening techniques described in this chapter are able
to detect all or virtually all mutations. The choice between these methods
depends on a number of factors.
DGGE is useful for screening a large number of individual cases for diverse
mutations in a large gene. Once the conditions have been optimised it can
be rapidly used to work through very large numbers of DNA segments as was
successfully demonstrated for haemophilia A (8). However, the DGGE method
is not the method of choice in every case of mutation or sequence polymorphism
screening since:
it take substantial effort and time to find the optimal melting domain in
connection with the primer determination and to transpose the theory into
practice.
DNA fragments which are about 350bp in size give good results. However,
mutation screening within fragments which are larger than 400bp seems to
be less sensitive and fails to identify every mutation, depending on the
different migration behaviour of the mutant fragments within the gradient
gel. As a consequence of this, exons (or amplification products), which
are more than 400bp in size should be divided into two separate smaller
overlapping amplifications.
Some genes are resistant to the DGGE method due to high G+C content, and
for these an alternative screening procedure must be selected.
SSCP has the advantage of simplicity in operation although conditions need
to be carefully defined to obtain optimal results. This may explain why
some workers have reported rather lower sensitivity than we have found in
careful comparative studies (>95%). The size of fragment screened should
not exceed 350bp preferably 300bp. By multiplexing it is possible to increase
throughput to approach that achievable by DGGE.
Chemical cleavage remains the standard by which other screening methods
should be assessed since sensitivity approaches 100% and large fragments
can be screened. However, the method is very laborious and technically demanding
with requirements for toxic chemicals and a high energy emitting radiolabel.
The combination of chemical cleavage with reverse transcribed transcript
analysis allows large complex genes such as factor VIII or dystrophin to
be screened.
However well these screening methods are performed, there remains a number
of cases where no mutation is detected. Possible reasons for failure include
the following:-
The wrong gene is being screened due to mis-diagnosis at the phenotype level.
The gene has been rearranged in a subtle way not detectable by exon screening.
For example, about half of all cases of severe haemophilia A are due to
an inversion event that leaves two halves of the gene intact but separated
by several megabases (27).
The mutation causing the disease lies in an unscreened region of the gene.
Despite these difficulties and the technical demands of screening, the evident
advantages of mutation specific diagnosis will probably lead to this becoming
the preferred approach to genetic diagnosis in future. Large databases of
mutations are accumulating for several disorders based on the results of
gene screening. These have already contributed greatly to our understanding
of the mechanisms of mutagenesis and the correlation between genotype and
phenotype, as well as contributing to the analysis of structure and function
of individual gene products. Another eventual benefit that may arise from
precise identification of disease causing mutations would be the ability
to repair genes through homologous recombination, as the ideal means of
gene therapy. Figure 1. PCR-SSCP of exon 12 of the factor VIII gene. Clear
shifts are seen in the main single-stranded doublet of lane 1. Fainter bands
above the main doublet of single- stranded DNA are presumed to represent
minor alternative conformations. Each of these is shifted in lane 1, confirming
this interpretation. The line diagram at the base of the figure represents
the PCR fragment analysed consisting of the whole of exon 12 (151bp) and
87bp and 82bp of flanking intron sequence. Lanes 1-10, patient samples;
lane 11, normal DNA control; lane 12, double-stranded non-denatured DNA
control. Figure 2. PCR-SSCP of a 1182 bp fragment of the 5' untranslated
region of factor VIII digested with AvaII/EcoRI. Four fragments are generated,
three are shown here. There is a clear shift in a single-stranded fragment
of lane 10 near the 464bp double-stranded DNA. A shift in the 271bp double-stranded
DNA fragment is also seen. Consecutive SSCP subsequently confirmed this
shift to be from the 271bp single strands in this patient. Lanes 1-12, patient
samples; lane 13, normal DNA control; ds, double-stranded non-denatured
DNA control. The line diagram at the base of the figure illustrates the
DNA fragments generated by restriction of the 1182bp fragment with the enzymes
AvaII and EcoRI. The small hatched area represents the first 15bp of exon
1. Figure 3. Schematic representation of consecutive digestion of biotinylated
PCR products in preparation for consecutive SSCP. R.E. A refers to restriction
enzyme A; R.E. B refers to restriction enzyme B. Figure 4. Multiplexed SSCP
analysis of the factor VIII gene. Analysis of individual normal factor VIII
exons as single stranded DNA are shown in lanes 1 and 21 = exon 20, lanes
3 and 22 = exon 3, lanes 5 and 23 = exon 25 and lanes 7 and 24 = exon 16.
The same normal exons 20, 3, 25 and 16 are shown as double stranded DNA
in lanes 2, 4, 6 and 8, respectively. Genomic DNA samples from 12 haemophilia
A patients after group 1 multiplexed analysis (see Table 1), are shown in
lanes 9 to 20. Despite the complexity of the multiplexed pattern, the bands
are well defined, migrate consistently and can be individually assigned
to exons of origin, enabling rapid localisation of mutations. Figure 5.
Schematic representation of the preparation of single-stranded DNA for direct
sequencing using biotinylated oligonucleotide primers and streptavidin-coated
magnetic beads. Figure 6. Chemical cleavage of exon 11 of the Factor VIII
gene showing cleaved fragments in lanes 1, 2 and 3. The cleaved products
in lanes 1 and 2 are identical, consistent with the same single base substitution
in these patients. The cleaved product in lane 3 was due to a different
missense mutation. All three mutations were detected by both hydroxylamine
and OsO4. No cleavage products were detected in the samples run in lanes
4-6. Figure 7. Diagram representing a denaturing gradient gel showing the
separation of two mixed wild-type DNAs (homoduplexes) and a wild-type DNA
mixed with a mutant DNA (heteroduplexes). While the wild-type homoduplexes
melt at one position, the heteroduplexes show 4 bands (two different heteroduplexes
and the original homoduplexes) which differ in their melting behaviour.
The position of the two heteroduplexes always lies above the melting point
of the homoduplexes. The mutated original homoduplex may be positioned above
or below the wild-type homoduplexes. At their melting point the single strands
are still held together by the GC-clamp, shown as the thick line. Figure
8. Graphic demonstration of the melt map (MELT87) and the displacement map
(SQHTX-program) of the factor VIII gene exon 16. The thin solid line represents
the melting map [Tm(oC)] of the amplification product (exon 16 and flanking
sequences) without the GC-clamp. While the x-axis indicates the base pairs
of the exon 16 PCR- product, the y-axis on the left side additionally gives
the melting temperature of each base pair within this amplification product.
The thin line shows that the melting behaviour of the exon 16 product without
the GC-clamp is very heterogenous. The thicker solid line represents the
effect of an attached GC-clamp on the exon 16 PCR-product. Starting from
a melting temperature of about 95oC, the line drops after 40 base pairs
to a unit melting temperature of about 69oC and keeps constant over the
whole amplification product. The higher melting domain in the first 40 bases
represents the GC-clamp, the lower melting domain represents exon 16 and
flanking sequences which can now be screened for mutations because of its
unit melting behaviour. The dashed line demonstrates the displacement temperature
map of factor VIII exon 16 complete with GC-clamp. The y-axis on the right
side gives the different temperature values ( ToC) of each base pair within
the PCR-product. These values arise, if the SQHTX-program compares the temperature
differences between a possible mutation at each base pair position within
a mutated fragment to the same position in a wild-type DNA duplex. The figure
demonstrates, that an average temperature difference of about 0.35 and 0.40
exists over the whole of exon 16. Since we know that under practical conditions
the lower limit is T 0.1oC for detecting mutations ( 0.1oC = 0.3% denaturing
concentration = 0.1cm running distance in the gel), we are able to calculate
that each possible mutation is detectable within exon 16. The arrows show
the position of some mutations which were detected in an analytical gel.
Figure 9. Travel schedule gel for the factor VIII gene exon 16. Lanes 2-7
represent a normal wild-type PCR-product which is normally used to find
the right running time for the analytical gel by a chosen voltage and denaturing
gradient. Samples of the same amplification product have been loaded successively
from the right to the left every 2 h during the first 10 h running time
(total running time = 24 h). The optimal running time for the exon 16 PCR-product
is 20-22 h represented by lane 5 and 6. In these lanes retardation has already
taken place (bands keep sticking on the same position) and bands are well
focused compared to those in lanes 2 and 3. To demonstrate the right running
conditions for an analytical gel, we have additionally loaded a mutant exon
16 amplification product (lanes 14-19) successively at the same time as
the normal PCR- product from the left to the right. The different retardation
compared to the wild-type fragment can be observed best after 20-22 h (lanes
5, 6 and 15, 16). In addition lanes 8-13 represent the advantage of the
heteroduplex formation between a wild-type and a mutant DNA-fragment. The
amplification products were also loaded from the left to the right. Besides
the two different homoduplexes which are the two bands below, two additional
heteroduplex bands appear, thus allowing a better mutation identification
in critical cases. For further explanation see pages 38 and 39. Figure 10.
Assembled equipment for DGGE. Top left, pump circulating buffer from lower
to upper reservoirs of the gel electrophoresis apparatus, top right, power
supply. Centre right, gel electrophoresis apparatus. Bottom right, magnetic
stirrer. Bottom left, water bath set at 62oC. Centre left, pump circulating
water from bath through electrophoresis tank. Figure 11. Analytical gel
of the factor VIII gene exon 16 after heteroduplex formation of patient
DNA-samples with a normal DNA. Mutations can be seen by identification of
additional bands above the normal band (see lanes 3-9). Controls consisting
of heteroduplexes formed between two normal DNAs, are in lane 2 and 10.
Lane 1 and 11 contain a HindIII digest of í x 174 DNA as size markers.
| |
Table 1. Mutiplexed factor VIII exon groups |
| |
| Group | Proportion of essential coding sequence (bp) |
| 1 | 585 (exons 3,16,20,25) |
| 2 | 727 (exons 6,7,18,23) |
| 3 | 619 (exons 2,12,17,19) |
| 4 | 528 (exons 1,4,9) |
| 5 | 520 (exons 11,24,26) |
| 6 | 425 (exons 5,8,10) |
| 7 | 310 (exons 15,22) |
| 8 | 296 (exons 13,21) |
| |
Primers for PCR amplification. These primers may be used for amplification of FVIII exons. You can check
their positions in the relevant genomic sequence.
|
| |
| | Primer | Sequence (5'-3') | Annealing temperature (C) |
| P1 | CAT GGC TAC ATT CTG ATG TAA | 57 |
| P2 | GAG CTC TAT TTG CAT GAC TTA | " |
| El-1 | AAT CCT ATC GGT TAC TGC TTA | 53 |
| E1-2 | AGC ATC ACA ACC ATC CTA AC | " |
| E2-1 | TGG AAG CAT TAC TTC CAG CT | 56/57 |
| E2-2 | AAC TGC AAC CTC AAG ATT GG | " |
| E3-1 | TGC TTC TCC ACT GTG ACC T | 49 |
| E3-2 | ATC TAG TAA ATG TTA AGA AAT ACA | " |
| E4-1 | GTA CAG TGG ATA TAG AAA GGA C | 50 |
| E4-2 | GAG AAG TAC AAA CAA CTG AAT C | " |
| E5-1 | CTT ACT GTC AAG TAA CTG ATG | 53 |
| E5-2 | CTT CAT TCC TGA ACA GTA ATG | " |
| E6-1 | TCC CAC TTA TTG TCA TGG AC | 53 |
| E6-2 | TAC AGA ACT CTG GTG CTG AA | " |
| E7-1 | GGC AAG AGC TGT TGG TTT G | 49 |
| E7-2 | TGT CCA GTA AAT TTT ATT AAA AGT | " |
| E8-1 | CCA TAT AGC CTG CAG AAC AT | 53 |
| E8-2 | CTG ATG CTC AGC TAT GTT AG | " |
| E9-1 | CTA ACA TAG CTG AGC ATC AG | 53 |
| E9-2 | AGA TAT GTC CAT TGG AGA CAA | " |
| E10-1 | CTA GCC TCA AAT TAC TAT AAT G | 56 |
| E10-2 | ACT TTA GAC TGG AGC TTG AG | " |
| E11-1 | TGC GAC TTT AGC TTC CAC TT | 56 |
| E11-2 | ACT GAC CTA TAT TGC AAA CCA | " |
| E12-1 | TGC CAT CGC TTT CAT CAT AG | 53 |
| E12-2 | CAT CAT TAT CTG GAC ATC AC | " |
| E13-1 | AAC AAT CTA CTTTTT TGG AAG A | 50 |
| E13-2 | CCT CAA GCA AGA GAA TGC TA | " |
| E14-1 | ACA GGC ATA GTA CAA CAG CA | 57 |
| E14-2 | CTT GGC TAT TCA TTA AACCTG | " |
| E14-3 | TCC ATC AGA CAA TTT GGC AG | 57 |
| E14-4 | CTA CAT TTT GCC TAG TGC TC | " |
| E14-5 | AGT AGG AAA GGG TGA ATT TAC | 53 |
| E14-6 | AGG TCC TTC TGA TAA ATG TGA | " |
| El4-7 | AGC AGT CAT TTC TTA CAA GGA | 57 |
| E14-8 | GTT GAT AGG TGA GGT TGA CT | " |
| E15-1 | AGA TGA AGT GGT TAA CTA TGC | 53 |
| E15-2 | GTG GGA ATA CAT TAT AGT CAG | " |
| E16-1 | AGC ATC CAT CTT CTG TAC CA | 53 |
| E16-2 | TCA GTA GATTCC AGA ATG ACA | " |
| E17-1 | TGT CAT TCT GGA ATC TAC TGA | 54 |
| E17-2 | CAC TCC CAC AGA TAT ACT CT | " |
| E18-1 | AGA GTA TAT CTG TGG GAG TG | 54 |
| E18-2 | CTT AAG AGC ATG GAG CTT GT | " |
| El9-l | GCA AGC ACTTTG CAT TTG AG | 53 |
| E19-2 | AGC AAC CAT TCC AGA AAG GA | " |
| E20-1 | ACG TTG AGT ACA GTT CTT GG | 53 |
| E20-2 | ACT AAT AGA AGC ATG GAG ATG | " |
| E21-1 | GAA TTT AAT CTC TGA TTT CTC TA | 52/53 |
| E21-2 | GAG TGA ATG TGA TAC ATT TCC | " |
| E22-1 | AAA TAG GTT AAA ATA AAG TGT TAT | 50 |
| E22-2 | TTA ATG GTA TGT AAT TAG TCA TTT A | " |
| E23-1 | GTC TTA TGT AGA TGT TGG ATG | 53 |
| E23-2 | AGT CTC AGG ATA ACT AGA ACA | " |
| E24-1 | GCT CAG TAT AAC TGA GGC TG | See reference |
| E24-2 | CTC TGA GTC AGT TAA ACA GT | " |
| E25-1 | AGT GCT GTG GTA TGG TTA AG | 57 |
| E25-2 | TTG CTC TGA AAA TTT GGT CAT A | " |
| E26-1 | GGT TTA ATC CTG GAC TAC TG | 52/53 |
| E26-2 | GTG TCT GCT AGG ATT TAG CA | " |
The primer sequences are taken from:
David, D., Moreira, I., Lalloz, M.R., Rosa, H.A., Schwaab, R., Morais, S.,
Diniz, M.J., de Deus, G., Campos, M., Lavinha, J., Johnson, D. and Tuddenham,
E.G.D. (1994) Analysis of the essential sequences of the factor VIII gene
in twelve haemophilia A patients by single-stranded conformation polymorphism.
Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 5, 257-264.
| |
|
References
1. Saiki, R.K., Gelfand, D.H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S.J., Higuchi, J., Horn,
G.T., Mullis,
K.B., and Erlich, H.A. (1988). Science, 239, 487-491.
2. Wong, C., Dowling, C.E., Saiki, R.K., Higuchi, R.G., Ehrlich, H.A., and
Kazazian,
H.H. (1987). Nature, 330, 384-386.
3. Pattinson, J.K., McVey, J.H., Boon, M., Ajani, A., and Tuddenham, E.G.D.
(1990).
Br. J. Haematol., 75, 73-77.
4. Meyers, R.M. Sheffield, V., and Cox, D.R. In Genomic Analysis: A Practical
Approach (ed. K. Davies), pp. 95-139. IRL Oxford.
5. Cotton, R.G.H., Rodrigues, N.R., and Campbell, R.D. (1988). Proc. Natl.
Acad.
Sci. USA., 85, 4397-4401.
6. Orita, M., Iwahana, H., Kanazawa, H., Hayashi, K., and Sekiya, T. (1989).
Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 86, 2766-2770.
7. Meyers, R.M., Maniatis, T., and Lerman, L.S. (1987). In Methods in Enzymology
(ed. R. Wu), Vol. 155, pp. 501-527, Academic Press, London.
8. Higuchi, M., Antonarakis, S.E., Kasch, L., Oldenburg, J., Economou-Peterson,
E.,
Olek, K., Arai, M., Inaba, H., and Kazazian, H.H.Jr. (1991). Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci.
USA., 88, 8307-8311.
9. Michaelides, K., David, D., Schwaab, R., Lalloz, M.R.A., McVey, J.H.,
Brackmann,
H., and Tuddenham, E.G.D. (1992). 24th Congress of the International Society
of
Haematology. 506 Abstract.
10. Lalloz, M.R.A., Tuddenham, E.G.D., Schwaab, R., and David, D. (1993)
In
Excerpta Medica International Congress Series (ed. E.E. Polli), Vol. 1029,
pp. 101-
108. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam.
11. Kunkel, L.M., Smith, K.D., Boyer, S.H., Borgaonkar, D.S., Wachtel, S.S.,
Miller,
O.J., Breg, W.R., Jones Jr. H.W., and Rary, J.M. (1977). Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci.
USA., 74, 1245-1249.
12. Blin, N., and Stafford, D.W. (1976). Nucleic Acids Res., 3, 2303-2308.
13. Saiki, R.K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K.B., Horn, G.T., Erlich,
H.A., and
Arnheim, N. (1985). Science 230, 1350-1354.
14. Orita, M., Suzuki, Y., Sekiya, T., and Hayashi, K. (1989). Genomics,
5, 874-879.
15. Hayashi, K. (1991). PCR Methods and Applications, 1, 34-38.
16. Wright, S.D., Michaelides, K., Johnson, D.J.D., West, N.C., and Tuddenham,
E.G.D. (1993). Blood, 81, 2339-2347.
17. Marchuck, D. (1990). Nucleic Acids Res., 19, 1154.
18. Hultman, T., Sthl, S., Hornes, E., and Uhln, M. (1989). Nucleic Acids
Res., 17,
4937-4946.
19. Thein, S.L., and Hinton, J. (1991). Brit. J. Haem., 79, 113-115.
20. Innis, M.A., Myambo, K.B., Gelfand, D.H. and Brow, M.A.D. (1988). Proc.
Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA., 85, 9436-9440.
21. Tabor, S., and Richardson, C.C. (1987). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.,
84, 4767-
4771.
22. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A.R. (1977). Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA., 74,
5463-5467.
23. Montandon, A.J., Green, P.M., Giannelli, F., and Bentley, D.R. (1989).
Nucleic
Acids Res., 17, 3347-3358.
24. Sheffield, V.C., Cox, D.R., Lerman, L.S., and Meyers, R.M. (1989). Proc.
Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA., 86, 232-236.
25. Lerman, L., and Silverstein, K. (1987). In Methods in Enzymology, (ed.
R. Wu),
Vol. 155, pp. 482-501. Academic Press, London.
26. Abrams, E.S., Murdaugh, S.E., and Lerman, L.S. (1990). Genomics, 7,
463-475.
27. Lakich, D., Kazazian, H.H., Antonarakis, S.E., and Gitschier, J. (1993).
Nature
Genetics, Vol. 5, no. 3, pp.236-241. Suppliers names and addresses
Anachem Ltd, 20 Charles Street, Luton, Beds. LU2 OEB.
Aldrich Chemical Co. Ltd., The Old Brickyard, New Road, Gillingham, Dorset
SP8 4JL,
U.K.
Boehringer Mannheim U.K., Diagnostics and Biochemicals Ltd., Bell Lane,
Lewes, East
Sussex, BN7 1LG, U.K.
Boehringer Mannheim, Biochemicals, P.O. Box 50414, Indianapolis, IN 46250,
U.S.A.
Dynal (U.K.) Ltd., Station House, 26 Grove Street, New Ferry, Wirral, Merseyside,
L62
5A2, U.K.
Dynal Inc., 45 North Station Plaza, Great Neck, NY 11021, U.S.A.
DuPont (U.K.) Ltd., NEN, Diagnostics and Biotechnology Systems, Medical
Products, Wedgewood Way, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 4QN, U.K.
Life Technologies (GIBCO-BRL), P.O. Box 35, Trident House, Renfrew Road,
Paisley,
PA3 4EF, Scotland.
Life Sciences International, Chadwick Road, Astmoor, Runcorn, Cheshire,
U.K. WA7 1PR,
U.K.
Sarstedt Ltd., 68 Boston Road, Beaumont, Leys, Leic. LE4 1AW, U.K.
Sigma Chemical Co. Ltd., Fancy Road, Poole, Dorset, BH17 7BR, U.K.
Sigma Chemical Company, 3050 Spruce Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, U.S.A.
Pharmacia Biotech Ltd., 23 Grosvenor Road, St. Albans, Herts. AL1 3AW, U.K.
Pharmacia Biotech Inc., 800 Centennial Avenue, Piscataway, New Jersey 08834,
U.S.A.
Promega Ltd., Epsilon House, Enterprise Road, Chilworth Research Centre,
Southampton, S01 7NS, U.K.
Promega Corporation, 2800 Woods Hollow Road, Madison, W1 53711-5399, U.S.A.
Perkin Elmer, Swergreen Support Centre, Beaconsfield, Bucks. HP9 1QA, U.K.
|
|