matedog wrote:First off, it was great finally reading a first hand account of such a nebulous period of a band I enjoy so much. Thank you for stepping up and doing it and doing it well.
Random questions that would be awesome if you could answer:
1. Did you play all leads on the boots I hear? For example the solo on Pouring Rain and the fills on Straight to Hell?
2. What songs did you love playing and what songs did you hate playing?
3. Did you keep in touch with ANYONE related to your Clash experience? The Italian girl, Bernie's lady, Kosmo???
Thanks again.
Rat Patrol wrote:Few of mine. I'll keep them related to the music since I'm still saving up my spare change to order the book.
1. How did you and Nick divide up guitar parts? I know Nick doubled-up on the bassline more often than not...was that a set rule where you sort of stuck to your roles or did you approach each song case-by-case based on who/what sounded better. I'm curious since a lot of the older songs weren't arranged for 3 guitars.
2. Which of the older songs were really hard to play? Any Mick leads that were especially difficult to replicate? Were there any songs you felt just didn't mesh well with your guitar style (I bring this up because Mick was more textures/FX/"bigness"-of-sound driven whereas you guys seemed a little more precision-of-playing focused)?
3. We heard a lot about how Bernie was hellbent on having you and Nick play Les Pauls to replicate the Pistols' guitar sound. Did you and Nick have any leeway as the guys who had to actually play the notes as to the sound you wanted and the equipment you used. Would you have personally gone for that direction or did you have different ideas of what equipment you wanted to use, sound you wanted to have, style you wanted to play in The Clash?
4. You'd mentioned on another thread that you thought the lead-backing vocal melodies were an absolutely essential part of The Clash's sound that had to be preserved in the new lineup (and obviously wasn't). If they had actually tried to do that instead of going for terrace chants ( ), do you think that could've worked with the available personnel? Nick was more serviceable than Paul on backing, but that's about it...and there was no one who could do the high-low harmonies like Mick. Would you have been the guy to step up instead? (I really don't know what your singing voice sounds like beyond a couple snippets from the Roskilde show).
5. Any older tracks that you would've liked to have played live but couldn't because of the orders to stick heavily to the first album-type stuff? I really liked hearing the band's take on Mag 7 and some of the rarer material like Broadway, Pressure Drop, and Straight to Hell that got trotted out in later on...seemed like you guys got to flex your styles a little more when you veered outside the P-U-N-K constraints. Was there any more where that came from, such as other songs you worked up in rehearsal that sounded really good?
6. (semi-related question) The core older songs in the set (first-album material, the core tracks from GEER and LC) obviously had to sound completely faithful to the originals, whereas you guys did get a little more leeway to make alterations to the rarer material to fit Clash II's style. Were there any of those core setlist songs in particular where you really would've preferred to tweak something or approach differently to recast them in the new lineup's personality?
7. Most of the new tour material was already written and mostly arranged before you even joined the band. How much input did you have in finishing them off? Which song did you have the most writing input in (for example, did you have a big hand in the mid-tour rewrite of Pouring Rain?)? Did you have a lot of songwriting ideas ready to contribute which, for obvious reasons, you weren't allowed to? What kind of role would you have been best-suited for had you been allowed to contribute to songwriting, and how would you have influenced the band's musical direction from it?
8. Have you listened to very many of the shows from your time in the band within the last 20 years (either from old tapes you kept or boots traded online on sites like this). Curious as to how you'd critique the band's and also your own performances years later. Any shows in particular where you think you/the band really nailed it spot on? We spend a lot of time debating "quintessential" bootlegs here, so very curious to hear the insider's pick of the pinnacle '84-85 show(s).
Rat Patrol wrote:Wow! Thanks, Vince, for answering everything. I probably learned more in that one post than I have devouring book after book about the band.
Athens is one of those holy grail recordings that's yet to surface. Unfortunately that was the only time any incarnation of the band ever played in Greece so it's been tough to tease a recording out of the woodwork from the locals even though 40,000 or so people were in the audience. Graham from the blackmarketclash site, who has bar none got the best connections in the world for finding and cataloguing tapes and accounts of gigs, has been trying for years to locate one for years...a possible recording surfaced earlier this year, but turned out to be a false alarm. The Cure's set from that festival is widely traded and had several tracks broadcast on TV (also traded), so there's hope of a soundboard and even some pro-shot video to come out of that gig.
BTW...your high guitar blasts on the attached version of This Is England from Atlanta are probably my fave Vince guitar moment. Adds a whole fuck lot of life to the song.
Of course. Barring a handful of exceptions, the best performances of the Clash always seem to be either AWOL or in the worse recording possible.moving target wrote: Athens ( the last) was the best show I played.
Users browsing this forum: Alexa [Bot] and 4 guests