And then there’s Maude. Wow, was there “Maude.” Producer Norman Lear announced his first “All in the Family” spinoff in a big way back in 1972. Star Beatrice Arthur’s mouthy suburban liberal counterpoint to Queens conservative Archie Bunker had barely hit CBS that fall when, just nine episodes into her run, she debated having an abortion.
It was a sitcom, remember. But it was the ’70s, and “All in the Family” had blown topical humor wide open with its boisterous debates on the Vietnam War, feminism, racism and so many other –isms, it was hard to keep count. This was a tough one, though. Archie and radical son-in-law Mike might debate the war, but they weren’t actually fighting it. Affluent Westchester housewife Maude Findlay, at age 47, was considering an abortion a year before the Supreme Court’s landmark Roe v. Wade decision, when the procedure was legal in only a few states like New York.
What’s surprising looking back at the two-part episode “Maude’s Dilemma,” part of the series’ first season just arriving on DVD (out Tuesday from Sony, list price $30), is how funny it aims to be. Lots of the humor is broad, with wild double-takes and double-entendres as friends and family react to Maude’s big news. Lear’s brassy, videotaped sitcoms were more theatrical than we’re used to today. There’s also frequent speechifying by the characters, blatantly advocating a position or imparting information, something else Lear’s audience was expecting.
That advocacy is the central focus of the storyline. It’s hardly a nuanced look at the issue. But we forget now that abortion then hadn’t yet become such a political lightning rod, with positions on both sides of the issue polarized by activists to motivate their supporters. Much thinking was that it was a personal matter, and that’s the way “Maude” eventually treats the tale.
“The rabbit died -- laughing, no doubt,” star Arthur deadpans upon telling Maude’s middle-aged friend her pregnancy has been confirmed. With a husband, a divorced adult daughter and an 8-year-old grandson living in the house, she moans, “An uncle is about to inherit his nephew’s potty seat.” Daughter Carol suggests “one sensible way out of this -- you don’t have to have the baby . . . When you were young, abortion was a dirty word. It’s not anymore.”
Maude does allow at one point that “part of me feels guilty for even thinking about it.” But that’s a passing doubt. Moral qualms aren’t the issue. Making the “right” decision for their family is. Husband Walter wants Maude to do what she wants, she wants to do what he wants, and there’s sitcom failure-to-communicate throughout the two-parter’s second half. Finally deciding “we’d make awful parents” at such an advanced age -- yes, it was a different era -- Maude decides not to have the baby, and Walter assures her, “In the privacy of our own lives, you’re doing the right thing.”
Contrast that with the recent no-privacy-allowed abortion debate on ABC’s “General Hospital.” The daytime drama bent over backward, forward and sideways when teen character Lulu found out she was pregnant. The scripts took pains to repeat that she and her partner had used a condom, which was defective (and manufactured by his family’s company, to boot). Her boyfriend, her friends, her brother, her relatives, his relatives -- everybody had their say, for days on end. Lulu agonized over what to do, at length, both before she did decide to have an abortion and long afterward, too.
It’s not that this isn’t a difficult topic on a personal level. But just as “Maude” gave speeches, “General Hospital” presented position papers offering equal time a bit too blatantly -- especially for a genre in which everybody gets pregnant all the time and abortion is rarely even mentioned. No matter which era visits this topic, characters get converted into mouthpieces for espousing viewpoints that threaten to overshadow the humanity we connected with in the first place. Some things never change.