Current Events

Holocaust Historian David Irving Released From Prison: First Interview From The Outside

David Irving, Goethe memorial, arrest

Irving in front of the Goethe memorial, one hour before his arrest in Austria November 11, 2005..


If you write from primary sources, then you are bound to come up with a different picture and a different perspective than historians who just copy what other historians have written. '
David Irving , U.K.
Date Posted: 01/05/07
Reader Rating: rating

What follows is an article contributed by controversial figure David Irving; The views, opinions, beliefs and all other material are not those of Orato or any of its affiliates, assigns or employees.

The recent Holocaust Denial Conference, hosted by Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, met with outrage from world leaders. Attendees included many of the world's most notorious Holocaust denial figures, such as former KuKluxKlan Imperial Wizard David Duke. It cast doubt on what most historians accept as incontrovertible fact: that the Nazis systematically executed 6 million Jewish people in World War II. Controversial historian David Irving wasn't at the conference, and could not attend even if he was invited - he was serving the final days of a jail term in Austria for violating that country's laws prohibiting Holocaust denial. Irving has always maintained he is a legitimate historian and laws against Holocaust denial violate free speech and inhibit scholarship. His critics reply that what he calls scholarship is merely thinly veiled anti-Semitism.

Here, in his first interview since he was released December 21, 2006, Irving comments on the Tehran conference. He also talks about being imprisoned for his beliefs, saying the worst thing was being denied a pen and paper and being away from his daughter. Despite the ongoing threat of new charges, Irving remains passionate and vocal about his right to choose how he writes his history and discusses how his work will be viewed by generations to come.

Everybody has crossroads in their lives where they have the alternative of taking the right-hand fork or the left-hand fork. There have been several such forks in my life, and I've always taken the right track. But, looking back I can see turnings that I shouldn't have taken. However, when I started to write my Hitler book, it was the most important turning I took. It was back in 1964 when I decided to write the biography of Adolf Hitler.

I decided to write that biography the way I've written all my books, which is based entirely on original, primary sources. If you write from primary sources, then you are bound to come up with a different picture and a different perspective than historians who just copy what other historians have written.

In certain respects, it has become very difficult to write Real History. I call it Real History with a capital 'R,' and it's difficult to write Real History because there is legislation against it in different countries. The legislation is different in the different countries, but it always has the same purpose. In France, for example, the legislation makes it a criminal offense to dispute the history that was laid down in the Nuremburg trial in 1945. In Germany, the law is called Defaming the Memory of the Dead, and in Austria, the law is called The Reactivation of the Nazi Party. The general effect is to make it very difficult to write Real History about the Holocaust.

The Holocaust has been chiseled in stone, and anybody who wants to have a closer look at that stone is running the risk of being sentenced.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 next






Tags:

Comments

No historians dispute what

By JillHenri, January 6, 2007 at 05:04

No historians dispute what really happened to the Jews during WWII, the forensic evidence for this is immeasurable, the credible eyewitnesses abundant. To deny this would be like denying that WWII occurred, at all.

What is disputed is the history added onto WWII via these very Medieval Nuremberg Trials where torture and threats of death were common against defendants who refused to sign confessions written up for them, based upon the rumors promoted by Zionists during the war, rumors similar to those during the first world war, the holocaust industry, itself, acknowledging there is no forensic evidence to support these charges, the Nazis cleverly covering it all up.

The "reality" of this great calamity also served to create the needed sympathy in the West to accept and promote the creation of a Jewish state, and the instability it would create, viewed also as just another European colonial adventure, the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, something the West had no stomach for, anymore.

As this story is discussed,

By Paul Sullivan, January 8, 2007 at 10:42

As this story is discussed, it may be necessary to restate the ground rules governing feedback to Orato. One of Orato's foremost goals is to promote and foster freedom of expression for all citizens. We welcome feedback to our stories, and would like to remind our correspondents that we require that feedback to abide by laws governing public expression. And to create an atmosphere that encourages all viewpoints we ask that correspondents avoid incendiary language. Posts that don't respect these two requirements will be edited or removed. Thank you.
Paul Sullivan,
Editor-In-Chief

Hottest Stories