The Democrat race for Attorney General may have taken a weird and nasty turn last night at the NY1's A.G. debate. Mark Green openly accused front-runner Andrew Cuomo of "poisoning children" as head of the Department of Housing and Urban Development because pesticides were used by some government workers to combat bugs and weeds.
This is typical of Mark Green --- he gets extremely shrill when he knows he is behind. His campaign doesn't have the legs that he thought it would and he needs to drag the front-runner back to the pack. But to make this type of accusation is probably more than shrill. It is sickening.
I love negative campaigning as well as the next person, but to accuse someone of poisoning children, it is just below the belt.
Charlie King and Sean Patrick Mahoney, the two other candidates in the race who receive scant media coverage, said that Green's attack would only help one person: Republican Jeanine Pirro, their potential November opponent who has benefited in recent polls from Green's "slash and burn" campaign tactics against Cuomo.
Charlie King, a former employee of Cuomo's HUD administration who was
his 2002 gubernatorial running mate, and Sean Patrick Maloney, an
investigative lawyer in Manhattan and former aide to President Bill
Clinton, stressed that Green's "negative" campaigning is bad for their
party. "Mark should knock it off," Maloney said. "It hurts Democrats. I
realize this is a contact sport. It's not because I think Andrew Cuomo
candidate is the best candidate in this race ... I don't think he's the
best candidate on this stage, or even the second-best. We will not beat
Jeanine Pirro with this."
Maloney is right.
MORE on the debate: check out the New York Post.
Recent Comments