Home  -  Articles  -  Forums  -  Blog  -  Billboard  -  Projects  -  Newsletters  -  EcoWorld.org  -  Register!  -  About EcoWorld
Air  -  Water  -  Earth  -  Plants  -  Trees  -  Animals  -  People  -  Energy & Technology  -  Goods  -  Funds  -  Media  -  Tours

Join EcoWorld
REGISTER with EcoWorld, and help us build the Global Environmental Community

Recent Commentary
Trees, Water & Climate
Antarctica’s Ice Mass
GM’s Volt on track for 2010
Unions - Ideals vs. Reality
Strategic Green
Venrock’s Matt Trevithick
Aquabirds & Aquabuoys
Revisiting Biofuel
Greens and James Inhofe
100% EVs vs. Series Hybrids
Rational Environmentalism
Farallon’s Fur Seals
Hydrogen Hydrogen Oxygen
Natural Gas Series Hybrids
Freeways, Cars & Trucks
Photovoltaic vs. Thermal
Utility Scale Photovoltaics
CO2 & Global Warming
Sprawl & Climate Change
Smart Growth’s Hidden Agenda
Smart Growth & Housing Prices
Biofuel in Madagascar
India’s Green Publishing
PML Flightlink’s Wheelmotors
Jatropha Reality Check
E-Cards
Send an
Electronic
Postcard
EcoWorld Tours
EcoWorld '05 EcoTour Survey
OneWorld Journeys
EcoWorld Forums
Biofuel Forum
Electricity Forum
Reforesting Forum
EcoWorld Feature Articles
Optimizing Biofuel
China's Eco-Crisis
India's Hydro Power
French Nuclear Debate
Markets Solve Scarcity
India's Water Consciousness
EcoWorld EV Gallery
Free Market Greens
Biofuel's Mixed Blessings
Reforesting the Tropics
China's Energy Demand
India's Solar Power
Our Endangered Oceans
India's Green Future
Global Warming Priorities
CO2 Taxes
China's Renewable Energy
Biofuel Bonanza
Inconvenient Truth Rebuttal
Reforesting the World
Inconvenient Skeptics
Solar Energy in Egypt
Saving Wild Species
Factory Farmed Biofuel
Global Warming Facts
Electrifying Central Asia
India's Nuclear Power
Climate Catastrophe?
Bioethanol vs. Biodiesel
Asia's Embattled Tigers
Factory Hog Farming
China's Wind Power
Ethanol in Africa
Biodynamic Farming
Global Warming
Growing Biofuel
India's Biodiesel Scene
Saving Giant Sea Turtles
India's Water Future
Clean Coal Technology
Central American Biocorridors
Arctic Rivers Save Aral Sea
Profitable Reforestation
Earth Projects
Arctic to Aral
India's Rishi Valley
Mesoamerican Biocorridor
Clean the Ganges
Refill the Aral Sea
Deforesting to Reforesting
more Projects . . .
Maps & Information
Countries - Watersheds
EcoRegions

Knowledge is Power!
Support EcoWorld
Buy Books Here
(Amazon Affiliate)

The Hydrogen Economy:
The Creation of the
Worldwide Energy Web
and the Redistribution
of Power on Earth

Blue Gold:
The Fight to Stop
the Corporate Theft
of the World's Water
Today is April 17, 2008
Editor's Commentary

Solar Integrated BIPVs

That they are pioneers in ”BIPV” technology (building integrated photovoltaics) makes Los Angeles based Solar Integrated a very interesting company.  But the what makes Solar Integrated really, really interesting is they very likely have the most inexpensive photovoltaic solution in the world today.

Solar Integrated’s flexible PV
panels being installed on the
CocaCola plant in Los Angeles.

Large scale photovoltaic installations are still very expensive.  Even when you get up into the 500 kilowatt or 1.0 megawatt range, which spreads the “balance of plant” costs (the inverter, the power management system, the utility interties) over a higher quantity of photovoltaic panels, you are still looking at a total cost of around $7.00 to $8.00 per watt.  Solar Integrated can beat these prices, and the reason is because they have come up with some of the first commercially available flexible thin-film photovoltaic panels.

Solar Integrated takes flexible amorphous silicon solar panels, supplied by Uni-Solar, and laminates them onto a flexible PVC roofing membrane.  Their standard 9′ by 19′ foot panel delivers 816 watts in full sun, which equates to 4.8 watts per square foot.  They also offer a standard 9′ x 19′ panel that delivers 864 watts; 5.0 watts per square foot.

Amorphous silicon, however, delivers output in overcast conditions or in conditions when the sun is low in the sky.  Crystalline photovoltaics don’t share this characteristic, which means their efficiency advantages over amorphous photovoltaics is overstated unless this is taken into account.  In Los Angeles, for example, there are 5.0 ”full sun equivalent” hours of sunlight per day.  But because amorphous silicon photovoltaics can absorb light in multiple spectra, they produce energy when there is less sunlight, and can stretch these 5.0 hours by about 20%.  This translates directly into more watt-hours per square foot of PV, which in-turn translates directly into lower costs.

The reason Solar Integrated’s installation costs are probably the most competitive in the USA is because installation costs - the cost for skilled electricians and roofers - are now the largest portion of the installed cost of most photovoltaic systems.  If state-of-the-art manufacturing costs of PVs are crossing below $1.00 per watt, and they are, there really isn’t much left to squeeze out of overall costs for PVs through technological advancements in their manufacture.  But with installation costs in the industry averaging $5.00 per watt (the margin on PVs and balance-of-plant comprising the rest), it is crucial to bring installation costs down for the price of kilowatt-hours from PVs to attain grid parity.  Solar Integrated’s flexible solar panels, which only weigh 12 ounces per square foot and can literally be unrolled onto rooftops, are extremely time-efficient to install.  From an economic perspective, this innovation is a breakthrough as significant as anything that happens in the world of PV fabrication.

Randall Corey, Solar Integrated’s VP of Construction Operations said one of the primary reasons they have been able to get their installation costs so low was because the product was designed by roofers in the first place.  As he put it, “The background of our people in roofing is one of our strengths, because with their help we developed a product where the integration of the photovoltaics into the building doesn’t compromise the roofing solution at all.”

Solar Integrated’s new factory has an output of 24 megawatts per year, and their installed base at this point is over 17 megawatts.  Their 2.0 megawatt system at the Tesco Group building in Riverside, California, is the biggest building integrated photovoltaic system in the world to-date.

Solar Integrated has been a public company since 2001 and is traded (SIT) on the AIM market on the London Stock Exchange.  They have 250 employees and revenues in 2006 were US$ 38M.  While their 2007 revenues haven’t been announced, they experienced year over year growth of about 100%.  How low can they get the cost of a large photovoltaic install?  Give them a call.

One Response to “Solar Integrated BIPVs”

  1. Green Man Says:

    Wait! You say that state-of-the-art manufacturing costs of PVs are crossing below $1.00 per watt. So then SIT is not using state-of-the art! Because Uni-Solar manufacturing costs are $2.57 per Watt (according to the presentations on ECD’s web page)

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word


Google

Learn Much More!
Click & Buy Books
(Amazon Affiliate)
Cradle to Cradle:
Remaking the Way
We Make Things

World Encyclopedia
of Trees


Natural Capitalism:
Creating the Next
Industrial Revolution


Encyclopedia
of Mammals

Support EcoWorld!
Click & Buy Books
(Amazon Affiliate)
Copyright 1993 through 2007 EcoWorld Inc., All Rights Reserved
EcoWorld, EcoWorld Tours, and "EcoWorld - Nature & Technology in Harmony" are registered Trademarks of EcoWorld Inc.
Credits, acknowledgements, disclaimers, and how to obtain permission to reprint EcoWorld content.