Main >> Education & News >> Science

 
Relativity?? $50,000(US) Awards for mathematical Proof "...You may fool all of the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all the time; but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." -Abraham Lincoln

This author has no intention of accusing relativity of being motivated to fool people. The point of quoting Lincoln's famous words here is to say that anything that deviates from truth must have its day in which its erroneous nature is unveiled.
 
 

Relativity Mathematically Fails!

(Copyright © 1996 by Cameron Y. Rebigsol)

Awards of up to US.$50,000.00 each are hereby offered by the author, Cameron Y. Rebigsol, of this web site to people who can successfully defend Relativity - the most dominating theory in physics - in mathematical terms, and thus disprove the mathematical arguments made against relativity shown in Rebigsol's text MATHEMATICAL INVALIDITY OF RELATIVITY published at this web site.

This web sits hosts 3 papers that challenges 3 most popular beliefs that dominate the modern physcs:

1. RELATIVITY, CONDTRADICTIONS AND CONFUSIONS  This paper will reveal the mathematical invalidity of relativity and explore  in mathematical terms how relativity has been fallaciously formulated.
2. MATHEMATICAL DEMONSTRATION ON HUBBLE'S LAW  This paper differs itself from the belief that is preached by the Big Bang Theory and is able to  unify all major astronomical observations in one systematic explanation.
3. DIFFERENT VIEWS ON THE FORMATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM  Any explanation of the  formation of the solar system must be coherent with, but not contradicting to,  the explanation about  the evolution of the universe.  Therefore, the solar system cannot have been the remnant of a single cloud, but a community consisted of  members coming from various remote locations in the boundless universe billions of years ago.

A visitor can just click on the titles in the following to get to each paper.
 

1. MATHEMATICAL INVALIDITY OF RELATIVITY (The US.$50,000.00 award paper)
Relativity has no respect to nature.  Its "success" relies on many irresponsible assertions and on the violation of many  rules of mother nature, both in mathematics and physics.
*Relativity “predicts” that no speed addition could result in a speed that will exceed the speed of light.  By the same exact mathematical demonstration, however, relativity must lead us to conclude that any object is destined to move at the speed of light, and at the speed of light only, regardless.
* The Lorentzian transformation equations are actually a "solution" set of an equation set whose individual equations are contradicting to each other.
* Special relativity affirms one speed limit in nature, which is the speed of light in vacuum space, but general relativity precisely rejects it, and, with equation, further establishes another speed limit, which is the speed of light at the mass center of a gravity body!
* General relativity is here shown totally incompetent in explaining the movement of the heavenly objects.
* The famous twin paradox should have never been there to make people feel mystified; it lacks any validity to puzzle people right at its birth.  It has only the same mental value as the following "paradoxes":
Paradox one:  General relativity claims that it "discovers" ( circumference/diameter)>3.1415926... for a spinning circle.  With the method it advocates, however, calculation shows ( circumference/diameter)<3.1415926... for the same spinning circle.
Paradox two: It has been overwhelmingly announced that Newton's Third Law must be subordinated to relativity in accuracy.  At the same time, however, with its own mathematics, relativity  "confirms" that the accuracy of Newton's Third Law is indisputable.
Paradox three: 1= 0.2= 0,   0.6=0.48,   3=5=2 ,... all can be derived with relativity!
Paradox four: Relativity claims that light in vacuum space possesses the maximum speed in nature, then it uses this speed to claim, with equation, that speed of light at the mass center of a gravity body to be the highest in nature.
Paradox five: A homogeneous gravitational field, a term "invented" by relativity, must be interpreted as a homogeneously inhomogeneous field by the same theory; the supposed existing homogeneity is exactly rejected and proven non-existing by the same theory that advocates it.
A special challenge for relativity: What is the definition of speed and how should it be expressed in mathematical terms?

2.   MATHEMATICAL DEMONSTRATION ON HUBBLE'S LAW
Hubbles’s Law is shown potentially existing, both in mathematical terms and physical deduction in this paper.  However, the potential existence of Hubble's Law is by no means a support to the Big Bang Theory.  On the contrary, its existence contradicts the believes that lead to the formulation of the Big Bang Theory.  This paper also offers answers to
1. The energy source of rotation of all rotational galaxies,
2. The reason of the co-existence of red shift and blue shift of celestial objects,
3. Why distribution of heavenly objects appearing in layers,
4. The reason of the isotropic characteristics of background noise and its mathematical limit.
After all, the cosmological model presented in this paper also offers a consistent explanation about the formation of the solar system and the various phenomena observed with respect to the solar system.
**Before you start reading this paper, please answer to yourself this question: What is the reason for a train to move away from a station?  You may say the reason is the train running on the railroad track.  The Bing Bang supporters will say you are wrong, but the reason is that the track is expanding in length.

3.   DIFFERENT VIEWS ON THE FORMATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
As a coherent extension of the idea concerning the above cosmological model, this paper presents the explanation to the following:
1. Where each member of the system came from and why the outer planets get far more satellites than the inner planets,
2. Why Venus has a retrograding spinning while rotating in the same orbital direction as the other planets,
3. Why the Sun possesses so little angular momentum in the system while having concentrated so much mass of this system,
4. Why the Moon must face the Earth with the same side all the time and why this side must also be full of maria (frozen lava),
5. The periodicity of the sunspot activity,
6. Why, as a spinning body of fluid, the Sun appears perfectly spherical and it has differential rotation,
7. Why Earth had its magnetic field reversed several times in her history.

To win the awards of maximumUS.$50,000.00 each, all you have to do is to examine the arguments in the text MATHEMATICAL INVALIDITY OF RELATIVITY  at this web site and then spend some time to disprove Rebigsol's calculations.  Details regarding how a paper to be qualified in presenting arguments against Rebigsol's calculations for the awards are listed at the end of the simplified versions of both of the following papers: (The materials contained in the following papers, unless where specified by this author, do not belong to the text of MATHEMATICAL INVALIDITY OF RELATIVITY)

1.   MATHEMATICAL DEMONSTRATION ON HUBBLE'S LAW

2.   DIFFERENT VIEWS ON THE FORMATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM

For more articles containing theoretical and factual disagreement with relativity, Rebigsol suggests the following web sites.   Although Rebigsol found some outstanding argument or facts against relativity in each of these pages, it does not necessarily mean that Rebigsol has agreed on every point of view from them.

Sapere Aude!, by G Walton

Special Relativity~Physics, by W. Babin

PYTHAGOREAN PHYSICS , By Todd Matthews Kelso  

The GPS and the Velocity of Light , Paul Marmet

DISPROVING RELATIVITY, by Pawel Kolasa

 Revolution in Modern Physics ,by John Hatman

You are visitor: 

Comments are welcome.