February 11, 2008
Much Ado About Campbell
First and foremost, I would just like to take a minute to praise the sabres medical staff for the great job they did with the Zednik incident yesterday. Yesterday’s game really took on a surreal feel to it and I think even if the Sabres lost and Zednik was ok, I doubt we’d have any complaints from most fans. Everyone here at Sabre Rattling’s thoughts and prayers are with the Zednik family and we hope you have a quick and speedy recovery.
Now, on to more mundane (and much less important) issue(s) of the day. Namely, Brian Campbell. Should he stay or should he go? His name is undoubtedly on the wishlist of most contending teams at the deadline as well as several teams entering the offseason. For the Sabres, however, the Campbell situation should transcend simple dollars and sense. How the Sabres handle Campbell is going to really shape the direction of this team over the next couple of years, regardless of this years outcome in the standings and playoffs.
Imagine you are a NHL player. You are a heart and soul guy, have made millions already and you have one passion, and thats to win a cup. Now, you have two offers on the table, one from a team who hasn’t had a ton of recent success, but has been a consistent playoff team, lets say the Minnesota Wild, and the other is the Buffalo Sabres. The terms are similar enough, which city are you going to choose? Obviously, there are going to be a lot of factors in your decision, but one of concerns you are going to have is the front office’s commitment to winning the cup, your #1 goal. We’ve already seen this happen with Mike Grier, where he decided to go to San Jose over Buffalo even though Buffalo had offered more money. A big reason wasn’t the weather and it wasn’t the small town, it was the fact he felt that San Jose offered him a better chance to win the cup over the course of his contract. And while it seemed like a minor loss at the time, a player like Mike Grier would have made Buffalo a much better team last year.
Now, back to the Campbell situation. The first question I have is, what is Campbell’s market value. Looking at last year’s puck moving D-men, you had five big contracts.
- Kimmo Timonen, 6 years, 38 million
- Brian Rafalski, 5 years, 30 million.
- Mathieu Schneider, 2 years, 11.25 million
- Tom Poti, 4 years, 14 million
- Tom Preissing, 4 years, 11 million.
The stats tell us that Campbell is a much better d-man than either Preissing or Poti, Campbell logs more ice time, takes fewer penalties, and puts up more points. Rafalski has been a 40-50 point defensemen and has contributed quite a bit on the PP. Schneider also has been a consistent offensive defensemen throughout his career, his point range is also in the 40’s-50’s. Timonen is also fits in that same criteria. Now, considering the salary cap shouldn’t rise all that much this year (early projections have it listed at a 3-5 million increase), teams shouldn’t be spending a whole lot more on free agents this year than they did last year. However, given that Campbell is five years younger than Rafalski and almost 10 years younger than Schneider, there will be more interest from teams who are maybe aren’t quite contending yet, but want to add a puck moving d-man long term in his prime. So, given than, I fully expect Campbell to, if he hit the market, receive several offers in the 6.0-6.75 million per season and anywhere from 6-8 years in length.
So all this brings us to the question: What to do with Campbell? This has really been a struggle for me all season, I’ve sat squarely on both sides of the fence. On one hand you have the bushel of sweet sweet rental overpayment you could get for an asset like Campbell at the deadline and on the other you have the prospect of losing an offensive d-man who is a big part of your team and is just hitting his stride. However, when you view this Campbell situation in light of last year’s mind boggling gaffs with both Briere and Drury, the answer becomes clear. As Teddy KGB said at the end of rounders, you “Pay that man his money”, bad eastern european accent optional (*warning, link has swearing, probably NSFW*). If I’m Regier, I’d call up his agent and offer him a 6 year, 33 million dollar deal to get conversations going again. Sure, 5.5 is more than most people, myself included, would have dreamed of paying him before the season, the fact is, I don’t think this team (and fanbase) can take another big ticket name leaving town.
IF you let Campbell leave, either by trade or by just letting him walk, you are in essence putting Miller one foot out the door as well next summer. What would his motivation be to stay in Buffalo, regardless of the money that will be thrown at him by the front office? He knows he can get a similar contract anywhere and he would have seen a president trophy winning team stripped down to a marginal playoff team in less than two seasons. What indications would he see that things are going to get any better if he commits the prime of his career to the Sabres if Campbell is shown the door? There would have to be some serious free agent shopping or huge deals to prove to Miller (and any other prospective free agents) that Buffalo is a team who wants to win a cup.
Campbell is, in my mind, the defining contract of the next few seasons. Signing Campbell long term is a sign that the front office will not simply be the Oakland A’s of the NHL, developing players into their prime before sending them off into the greener pastures of UFA-dom while enjoying moderate success, but rather a team who is serious about winning and will pay to put together a core than could some day win a championship. And while signing him would send a positive message to the team as well as the players in the NHL about Buffalo, letting him move on would send an equally bad one. That this team isn’t willing to pay the cost for good players unless they are up against a wall (see the Thomas Vanek contract) and are contented with enough success to pay the electric bills at HSBC while the sitting on the team like a piece of prime real estate, letting it gain value.