HOME | News | Classifieds | Yellowpages | Real Estate | Forum | Blogs | Biz Services | Websites | Tickets | Events | Newsletters | Contact us

India Varta iVarta.com

News, Classifieds, Yellow Pages, Real Estate, Property, Events, Ticketing, Forums
Business, Social and Community Networking
Worldwide Website Open Directory Listing


Blog Home

News Home

Write your Column at iVarta


India, Asia and Global Breaking Stories, Latest News Headlines, Opinion, Analysis

Columns and Discussions Business, Social and Community Networking.
Comprehensive Collection of India News, Articles, Columns, Analysis and Research Papers. Facts about India, Indian History, Culture, Yoga, Meditation & Ayurveda and more…

Aryan vs Dravidian — Lord Rama vs E V Ramaswamy ???

By: V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.
11/2/2007 2:54:41 PM
Author's Home Page
Views expressed here are author"s own and not of this website. Full disclaimer is at the bottom.


Feedback to author

The DMK Party which was trounced by MGR’s AIADMK in 1977 and kept out of Government until 1989 (MGR died in December 1988), routed by Jayalalitha’s AIADMK in 1991 and again in 2001, seems to have forgotten that only the people of Tamilnadu (not Aryans — more particularly Brahmins —from Northern India!) kept them out of power for 12 years from 1977 to 1989 and again for 10 years in two spells from 1991 to 1996 and 2001 to 2006.

This Party which has become globally famous for "scientific’ Himalayan corruption and aboriginal racism, raised on a solidly rational Periyar-Dravidian Foundation, has now reverted to its original policy of "Dravidian-Aryan’ controversy in its fight for the implementation of the Sethusamudram project.

A leader of Global Stature(!) and one who is fully equipped to become the Prime Minister of India even today if only Sonia wills it, Kanimozhi, Member of the Rajya Sabha made a clarion call to the following effect at a welfare distribution function, organized by the Thoothukudi Municipal Administration on 21 October, 2007: “We must launch an organised fight against the "anti-Tamil groups’, who are using Ramar Sethu issue against Periyarism. I charge that the Ramar Sethu row has been raked up by people like Cho. Ramaswamy, Dr Subramanian Swamy and Jayalalithaa and they all come from a Brahminical background. The issue is neither against an individual nor the DMK and not even against the project itself, but clearly an attempt to strip off the self-respect we had won after our 2000-year-long struggle”

I have spoken to more than 15,000 common men and women in the streets in Tamilnadu (99 per cent of them not Brahmins!) and all of them have declared in one voice: “If Cho Ramaswamy, Dr Subramanian Swamy and Jayalalithaa had known criminal antecedents, without any Brahminical background whatsoever, Kanimozhi, with the full moral and official approval of her father, would have upheld them as the most shining symbols and scions of the rational Dravidian Race.

In that case, they would have been recommended by Tamilnadu government for the award of Bharat Ratna with the full official sanction of Sonia Gandhi and may be Rahul Gandhi—with the servile compliance of Dr Manmohan Singh and the CPI(M). Tamilnadu Government would do well to approach the World Bank for funding a global project called “Rational Dravidian Project for Rational Upgradation of World Human Stock” headed by Kanimozhi with branches in every Capital of the World.” That would be the greatest moment in the history of Periyarism, Dravidianism and the Dravidian Race (which does not include the people of Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh!).

I fully endorse the non-rational and audaciously Aryan view of Thiruvanmiyur Thudikkum Thikku Theriyathandi: “In a function in Toothukudi (21.10.2007), Kanimozhi had said that those who are against SSCP are anti-Tamil and Aryans, and to imply that the "Aryans’ are "Brahmins’, she had referred Mr Cho, Dr Swamy and Ms Jayalalithaa.

In her anxiety, she had also included journalist "Gnani’, who is a known atheist despite being a Brahmin! Right from Agasthiyar & Tholgappiyar, to Barathiyar & Rajaji, to Kalki & Gopalaiyar to Cho & Subramaniam Swamy, the so-called Aryans have done greater service to the betterment of Tamils and Tamilnadu than the self-styled Dravidian leaders. In fact, the Dravidian leaders have done more damages to Tamilnadu, degraded Tamil Culture, distorted Tamil History and insulted the Tamil People in the last sixty years. Kanimozhi’s assertion that the Tamils have gained "self-respect’ after fighting the 2000 years of oppression is "Dravidian Hogwash’.

Invoking the name of Periyar and now Kanimozhi, should not Dr Subramanian Swamy be severely condemned (!), for having been born to condemnable Brahmin parents? Should he not be banished from India to Antarctica or the North Pole or any other Aryan region excepting New Delhi, in the larger interest of Dravidian peace and security? While all of us may be in doubt, Dr Subramanian Swamy never seems to be in such a state of quandary. He has issued the following press release giving a highly superstitious and irrational answer to the Periyar rationalist Kanimozhi:

“The statement of Kanimozhi the daughter of the Chief Minister Karunanidhi made yesterday at a party function in Thootukudi that Jayalalitha, Cho Ramaswamy and myself are opposing the Sethusamudram Canal Project (SSCP) because the three of us are “Brahmins”, is ridiculous. Ms Kanimozhi, probably wants to hide the fact that the three of us are Tamils, while she and her parents are not Tamils but Telugu migrants.

Moreover the Brahmin community overwhelmingly participated in the Freedom Struggle for Independence from British Imperialism and colonial rule, while the DMK, DK etc., functioned as stooges of the British oppressors. In fact, on 15 August, 1947 while the nation was celebrating the victory of the Freedom Struggle, the ideological Thanthai (father) of the Dravidian Movement E V Ramaswamy Naicker with other DMK leaders were at the Governor General’s Palace in Madras, pleading with their British masters to remain in Tamilnadu to rule over them!

Kanimozhi seems to have learnt about India and the SSCP from the LTTE whose formal member she was while residing in Malaysia and Singapore. The LTTE favours the SSCP because it will provide a canal passage way, on the medial line in the Palk Strait, to travel to Thootukudi from Jaffna for its nefarious terrorist activities against India”.

The Union Home Minister, RAW, CBI, Central Intelligence Bureau, the Defence Minister of India (to the total exclusion of Sonia Gandhi and her family) should take due note of the threat to our national integrity indicate by Dr Subramanian Swamy in the last paragraph of his press release above.

One of the most controversial ideas about Hindu history is the Aryan invasion theory. This theory, originally devised by F. Max Muller in 1848, traces the history of Hinduism to the invasion of India’s indigenous people by Aryans around 1500 BCE. The theory was reinforced by other research over the next 120 years, and became the accepted history of Hinduism, not only in the West but in India. There is now ample evidence to show that Muller, and those who followed him, were wrong.

The theory was not just wrong, it included unacceptably racist ideas. The people of Tamilnadu owe a deep debt of gratitude to Dr Subramanian Swamy for bringing out the fact that Kanimozhi’s ancestors (including her father) are not Tamils but Telugu Migrants. I fervently hope that Dr. Subramanian Swamy will be in a state of combat readiness to face a threatening legal notice from Kanimozhi, duly whetted by chosen Dravidian legal giants, challenging the Telugu Origins referred to by Dr Subramanian Swamy.

I remember reading an article in the Indian Express, Chennai to the same effect some time in 1983. This was with reference to Karunanidhi’s allegation that Dr MGR was from Kerala and not from Tamilnadu.The whole of Tamilnadu knows that without even coming to attend a single election meeting in Tamilnadu in 1984 (MGR was lying unconscious in a hospital in USA!), he defeated Karunanidhi and the DMK and formed the Government.

The BBC (BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION and tragically for Karunanidhi and Kanimozhi not "Brahminical Broadcasting Corporation’) in a full-fledged programme debunked the "Aryan Invasion Theory’ in 2004, now being loudly proclaimed by Kanimozhi, and declared that it is a myth with no foundation in fact or reality.

Dr Subramanian Swamy has rightly dismissed Kanimozhi’s recent anti-Aryan statement as absurd and ridiculous. Winston Churchill was absolutely right when he spoke about the “Essential unteachability of most of the Political Leaders of India”. Kanimozhi cannot be a special exception to this general rule.

Kanimozhi’s rational Periyar Dravidian message for the instantaneous collective suicide of the Tamil race can be summarised into three points:

A. Since Kanimozhi proclaims herself to be a self - respecting Periyar Dravidian, she should violently deny herself the privilege of serving as a Minister in the Central Aryan Government controlled by an Aryan from Italy with a white skin (a colour politically hated by Periyar and his men). White Colour is superstitious and anti -Dravidian: Black Colour is rational, Dravidian and anti - Aryan – and of course anti-Brahminical!

B. No Periyar Dravidian should step out of blessed Dravidian Tamilnadu into accursed Aryan India. To remain unemployed in Tamilnadu is rational Dravidianism. To seek outside employment in accursed Aryan India is anti-Dravidian Aryanism and pro-Brahminism.

C. No Periyar Dravidian should seek employment outside India or study outside India in Europe, USA etc because anti-Dravidian Aryans with known white skin are controlling Governments in those accursed countries.
I do not want to dwell further on the disgusting dichotomies, inconsistencies, incongruities and inexplicable perversities in the dastardly Dravidian Drama.

The quintessence of rational- Dravidianism is that spiritual knowledge is superstitious and secular ignorance is rational; character is superstitious and debauchery is rational; chastity is superstitious and prostitution of mind, body, heart and soul is rational; discipline is superstitious and indiscipline is rational; accepted truth is superstitious and blatant untruth is rational, refinement is superstitious and banality is rational; justice is superstitious and rapacity is rational, counsels of the wise and the good are generally superstitious and the flattery of knaves particularly rational.

One can go on like this in this vein endlessly in a superstitious and irrational manner, because the clear stream of Dravidian perversity and unabashed bestiality is indeed perpetual and even perennial.

V Sundaram, IAS, Retd.

Feedback to author

References & Notes:

Author's Home Page


Copyright and Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this article (Aryan vs Dravidian — Lord Rama vs E V Ramaswamy ???) are the authors own and not of this website. The author is solely responsible for the contents of this article (Aryan vs Dravidian — Lord Rama vs E V Ramaswamy ???). This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy, completeness or reliability of any opinion, statement, appeal, advice or any other information in the article. Our readers are free to forward this page URL to anyone. This column may NOT be transmitted or distributed by others in any manner whatsoever (other than forwarding or web listing page URL) without the prior permission us and the author.

India Varta iVarta.com

Visit iVarta.com for Classifieds, Yellow Pages, and Business Networking 

Free Classified and Yellowpages Listing
Americas Best Classified and Yellowpage Search Engine
Post Asia UK Canada America USA and India classifieds FREE
Reach Worldwide Community by listing your posting at iVarta Open Directory
Terms of Service | Join mailing list