The Iraq Gamble

At the pundits' table, the losing bet still takes the pot


A few years ago, David Brooks, New York Times columnist and media pundit extraordinaire, penned a love letter to the idea of meritocracy. It is "a way of life that emphasizes ... perpetual improvement, and permanent exertion," he effused, and is essential to America's dynamism and character. Fellow glorifiers of meritocracy have noted that our society is superior to nepotistic backwaters like Krygystan or France because we assign the most important jobs based on excellence. This makes us less prone to stagnancy or, worse yet, hideous national clusterfucks like fighting unwinnable wars for reasons nobody understands.

At Radar we are devoted re-readers of the Brooks oeuvre and were struck by this particular column. It raised interesting questions. Noticing our nation is stuck in an unwinnable war (or two), we wondered if America hasn't stumbled off the meritocratic path. More specifically, since political pundits like Brooks play such a central role in our national decision-making process, maybe something is amiss in the world of punditry. Are the incentives well-aligned? Surely those who warned us not to invade Iraq have been recognized and rewarded, and those who pushed for this disaster face tattered credibility and waning career prospects. Could it be any other way in America?

Noticing our nation is stuck in an unwinnable war, 'Radar' wondered: Is something amiss in the world of punditry?So we selected the four pundits who were in our judgment the most influentially and disturbingly misguided in their pro-war arguments and the four who were most prescient and forceful in their opposition. (Because conservative pundits generally acted as a well-coordinated bloc, more or less interchangeable, all four of our hawks are moderates or liberals who might have been important opponents of the war—so, sadly, we are not able to revisit Brooks's eloquent and thoroughly meritless prognostications.)

Then we did a career check ... and found that something is rotten in the fourth estate.

Continue >>


Homosexual Agenda
Gayest Person Ever? Author Joel Derfner wants the title

Full Court Press
Frank Rich leads this week's list of Winners and Sinners

Bad Tattoos
From Dr. Phil to gay unicorns, the new book No Regrets looks at the worst tattoos on the planet

Unfinished Business
Everything you need to know about the R. Kelly sex trial

But Is It Obscene?
"Shock art" director Ira Isaacs is about to go on trial for obscenity



Email us at:
or IM: TipRadar

Good Night, Suge Knight!

People Magazine Thinks All Asians Look the Same

Papa Bear O'Reilly Fights Back

Meet the Also-rans: 'Doc Hollywood' Steven Hoefflin

Is Balthazar's Keith McNally Buying the Beatrice Inn?

Los Angeles Surges in War Against NYC

Obama is a Burberry Man

James Frey's 'Bright Shiny Morning' is Either the Next Great American Novel, or Terrible

Jennifer Aniston And John Mayer, Publicity-Friendly New Pals

Vito Fossella's Leather Jackets: A Sign?

A younger Bill O'Reilly gets angry
But did he ever have it?

Sloane Crosley's book told with finger puppets
A publicist gets some puppeteering publicity

A friend's cancer is good for your health: study
Promising new findings

Scientology Recruitment Video
They almost had us there for a minute!

The Heinous Crimes of the Polygamist Wives
Let's just say the husbands aren't the only guilty ones