Back to regular view     Print this page

Subscribe   •   EasyPay   •   e-paper
Reader Rewards   •   Customer Service

Become a member of our community!


Sun-Times Blogs ::

Find out more aboutjump2web View today's jump2web features jump2web

TOP STORIES ::
Sun-Times exclusive: Pfleger opens his heart, soul

Condo plan not just for rich

Only big change for Sox is offensive production

'Swingtown' is all sex and love on the North Shore

Local hotels make staying in the city more enticing


VIDEO ::   MORE »




Blackwater likely to avoid charges

IRAQ | Some guards may be indicted in slaying of civilians, but security firm would keep pact

May 10, 2008

WASHINGTON -- Blackwater Worldwide, the security contractor blamed by an angry Iraqi government for the shooting deaths of 17 civilians, is not expected to face criminal charges -- all but ensuring the company will keep its multimillion-dollar contract to protect U.S. diplomats.

Instead, the seven-month-old Justice Department investigation is focused on as few as three or four Blackwater guards who could be indicted in the Sept. 16 shootings, according to interviews with people close to the investigation.

The final decision on any charges will not be made until late summer at the earliest, a law enforcement official said. All spoke on condition of anonymity.

The State Department raised the question of Blackwater's corporate liability last month when it extended the company's contract by one year. The contract could be canceled if criminal charges are brought, but the department said it was unlikely to penalize the corporation if only its employees were charged.

''I think that's really what the FBI investigation needs to look at: Is the company culpable or are the individuals culpable?'' Greg Starr, the department's top security officer, said last month.

Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd declined to comment.

Blackwater spokeswoman Anne Tyrrell said, ''If it is determined that there are any individuals who need to be held accountable, we support that.''

The shootings began when a Blackwater convoy was responding to a Baghdad car bombing. Blackwater says the convoy was ambushed by insurgents, touching off a firefight. Iraqi witnesses, however, described an unprovoked attack in which security guards fired indiscriminately, killing motorists, bystanders and children.

The shooting enraged the Iraqi government, which originally sought to expel the company from the country, and strained diplomatic relations between Washington and Baghdad. The shooting also raised questions about U.S. reliance on heavily armed private contractors in war zones. With nearly 1,000 personnel working in Iraq, Blackwater is the largest State Department security contractor; critics have compared its guards to mercenaries.

Since the shooting, Blackwater has also come to symbolize the legal gray area in which such security contractors operate. Iraqi officials wanted to charge Blackwater guards in Baghdad, but U.S. contractors are immune from prosecution in Iraqi courts. U.S. prosecutors say they have jurisdiction to bring a case in Washington, but that's an untested legal theory.

This week, the Justice Department continued its secret grand jury interviews in the case with the testimony of a U.S. military official. An estimated 40 witnesses have so far been brought before the grand jury in Washington, including Blackwater security guards and company managers. Iraqi witnesses also are expected to testify in coming months, according to people close to the case.

Companies are sometimes charged for the wrongdoing of their employees, but the standard is high. Prosecutors must prove that the corporation -- not just the employees -- intended to break the law.

AP

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.