Give Me Liberty by Rose Wilder Lane
More Anti-Statism: 20th Century Proponent
At the age of 79, Rose Wilder Lane (1886-1968) was a
correspondent from Vietnam for Woman's Day. This was simply one
phase of a life dedicated to the individualism and liberty
expressed in Lane's two major works, The Discovery of Freedom
(1943) and Give Me Liberty (1936) which revolve around the
American ideal of personal freedom. Give Me Liberty, from which
the following essay is extracted, charts Lane's progress from
socialism to libertarianism as a result of directly experiencing
life under socialist regimes. First published during the Great
Depression by the Saturday Evening Post, it served as a warning
against the state socialism inherent in Roosevelt's New Deal.
An early and consistent critic of Roosevelt, Lane withdrew
to her farm in Danbury, Connecticut (1938), where she refused to
participate in Social Security or to publish writing which would
be a source of revenue, through taxes, for government. "Taxation
is armed robbery," she declared. "Tax collectors are armed
robbers." In regard to the state, she maintained: "I am
law-abiding purely for expediency, for self-defense, in the main
against my conscientious principles, so at bottom I am ashamed of
not being a conscientious objector practicing Gandhi's or
Thoreau's civil disobedience."
Give Me Liberty
by Rose Wilder Lane
I came out of the Soviet Union no longer a communist,
because I believed in personal freedom. Like all Americans, I
took for granted the individual liberty to which I had been born.
It seemed as necessary and as inevitable as the air I breathed;
it seemed the natural element in which human beings lived.
The thought that I might lose it had never remotely
occurred to me. And I could not conceive that multitudes of
human beings would ever willingly live without it.
It happened that I spent many years in the countries of
Europe and Western Asia, so that at last I learned something, not
only of the words that various peoples speak, but of the real
meanings of those words. No word, of course, is ever exactly
translatable into another language; the words we use are the most
clumsy symbols for meanings, and to suppose that such words as
"war," "glory," "justice," "liberty...home," mean the same in two
languages, is an error.
Everywhere in Europe I encountered the living facts of
medieval caste and of the static medieval social order. I saw
them resisting, and vitally resisting, individual freedom and the
It was impossible to know France without knowing that the
French demand order, discipline, the restraint of traditional
forms, the bureaucratic regulation of human lives by centralized
police power, and that the fierce French democracy is not a cry
for individual liberty but an insistence that the upper classes
shall not too harshly exploit the lower classes.
I saw in Germany and in Austria scattered and leaderless
sheep running this way and that, longing for the lost security of
the flock and the shepherd.
Resisting step by step, I was finally compelled to admit to
my Italian friends that I had seen the spirit of Italy revive
under Mussolini. And it seemed to me that this revival was based
on a separation of individual liberty from the industrial
revolution whose cause and source is individual liberty. I said
that in Italy, as in Russia, an essentially medieval, planned and
controlled economic order was taking over the fruits of the
industrial revolution while destroying its root, the freedom of
"Why will you talk about the rights of individuals!"
Italians exclaimed, at last impatient. "An individual is
nothing. As individuals we have no importance whatever. I will
die, you will die, millions will live and die, but Italy does not
die. Italy is important. Nothing matters but Italy."
This rejection of one's self as an individual was, I knew,
the spirit animating the members of the Communist Party. I heard
that it was the spirit beginning to animate Russia. It was the
spirit of Fascism, the spirit that indubitably did revive Italy.
Scores, hundreds of the smallest incidents revealed it.
In 1920, Italy was a fleas' nest of beggars and thieves.
They fell on the stranger and devoured him. There was no instant
in which baggage could be left unguarded; every bill was an
over-charge and no service however small was unaccompanied by a bill; taxis dodged into vacant streets and boats stopped midway to ships, that drivers and boatmen might terrorize timid passengers into paying twice. Every step in Italy
was a wrangle and a fight.
In 1927, my car broke down after nightfall in the edge of a small
Italian village. Three men, a waiter, a charcoal burner, and the uniformed chauffeur of wealthy travelers sleeping in the inn, worked all
night on the engine. When it was running smoothly in the bleak dawn,
all three refused to take any payment. Americans in a similar situation
would have refused from human friendliness and personal pride. The
Italians said firmly, "No, signora. We did it for Italy." This was typical.
Italians were no longer centered in themselves, but in that mythical creation of their imaginations unto which they poured their lives, Italy, immortal Italy.
I began at last to question the value of this personal freedom which
had seemed so inherently right. I saw how rare, how new in history,
is a recognition of human rights. From Brittany to Basra I considered
the ruins of brilliant civilizations whose peoples had never glimpsed
the idea that men are born free. In sixty centuries of human history
that idea was an element of Jewish-Christian-Moslem religious faith,
never used as a political principle.
It has been a political principle to only a few men on earth, for little
more than two centuries. Asia did not know it. Africa did not know it.
Europe had never wholly accepted it, and was now rejecting it.
I began to question, What is individual liberty? When I asked myself,
"Am I truly free?" I began slowly to understand the nature of man and
man's situation on this planet. I understood at last that every human being is free; that I am endowed by the Creator with inalienable liberty
as I am endowed with life; that my freedom is inseparable from my
life, since freedom is the individual's self-controlling nature. My freedom is my control of my own life-energy, for the uses of which I, alone,
am therefore responsible.
But the exercise of this freedom is another thing, since in every use
of my life-energy I encounter obstacles. Some of these obstacles, such
as time, space, weather, are eternal in the human situation on this
planet. Some are self-imposed and come from my own ignorance of
realities. And for all the years of my residence in Europe, a great many
obstacles were enforced upon me by the police-power of the men ruling
the European States.
I hold the truth to be self-evident, that all men are endowed by the
Creator with inalienable liberty, with individual self-control and
responsibility for thoughts, speech and acts, in every situation. The
extent to which this natural liberty can be exercised depends upon the
amount of external coercion imposed upon the individual. No jailer
can compel any prisoner to speak or act against that prisoner's will,
but chains can prevent his acting, and a gag can prevent his speaking.
Americans have had more freedom of thought, of choice, and of
movement than other peoples have ever had. We inherited no limitations of caste to restrict our range of desires and of ambition to the class
in which we were born.
We had no governmental bureaucracy to watch our every move, to
make a record of friends who called at our homes and the hours at which they arrived and left, in order that the police might be fully
informed in case we were murdered. We had no officials who, in the
interests of a just and equitable collection of gasoline taxes, stopped
our cars and measured the gasoline in the tanks whenever we entered
or left an American city.
We were not obliged, as Continental Europeans have been, to carry
at all times a police card, renewed and paid for at intervals, bearing
our pictures properly stamped and stating our names, ages, addresses,
parentage, religion and occupation.
American workers were not classified; they did not carry police cards
on which employers recorded each day they work; they have no places
of amusement separate from those of higher classes, and their amusements are not subject to interruption by raiding policemen inspecting
their workingmen's cards and acting on the assumption that any workingman is a thief whose card shows he has not worked during the past
In 1922, as a foreign correspondent in Budapest, I accompanied such
a police raid. The Chief of Police was showing the mechanisms of his
work to a visiting operative from Scotland Yard. We set out at ten
o'clock at night, leading sixty policemen who moved with the beautiful
precision of soldiers.
They surrounded a section of the workingmen's quarter of the city
and closed in, while the Chief explained that this was ordinary routine;
the whole quarter was combed in this way every week.
We appeared suddenly in the doorways of workingmen's cafes,
dingy places with sawdust on earthen floors where one musician forlornly tried to make music on a cheap fiddle and men and women in
the gray rags of poverty sat at bare tables and economically sipped beer
or coffee. Their terror at the sight of uniforms was abject. All rose and
meekly raised their hands. The policemen grinned with that peculiar
enjoyment of human beings in possessing such power.
They went through the men's pockets, making some little jest at this
object and that. They found the Labor cards, inspected them, thrust
them back in the pockets. At their curt word of release, the men
dropped into chairs and wiped their foreheads.
In every place, a few cards failed to pass the examination. No employer
had stamped them during the past three days. Men and women were
loaded into the patrol wagon.
Now and then, at our entrance, someone tried to escape from back
door or window and ran, of course, into the clutch of policemen. We
could hear the policemen laughing. The Chief accepted the compliments of the British detective. Everything was perfectly done; no one escaped.
Several women frantically protested, crying, pleading on their knees,
so that they had almost to be carried to the wagon. One young girl
fought, screaming horribly. It took two policemen to handle her; they
were not rough, but when she bit at their hands on her arms, a third
slapped her face. In the wagon she went on screaming insanely. I could
not understand Hungarian. The Chief explained that some women
objected to being given prostitutes' cards.
When a domestic servant had been several days without work, the
police took away the card that identified her as a working girl and
permitted her to work; they gave her instead a prostitute's card. Men
who had not worked recently were sentenced to a brief imprisonment
for theft. Obviously, the Chief said, if they were not working, they
were prostitutes and thieves; how else were they living?
Perhaps on their savings? I suggested.
Working people make only enough to live on from day to day, they
can not save, the Chief said. Of course, if by any remarkable chance
one of them had got some money honestly and could prove it, the
judge would release him.
Having gone through all the cafes, we began on the tenements. I
have lived in the slums of New York and of San Francisco. Americans
who have not seen European slums have not the slightest idea of what
Until dawn, the police were clambering through those filthy tenements and down into their basements, stirring up masses of rags and
demanding from staring faces their police cards. We did not capture
so many unemployed there, because it costs more to sleep under a roof
than to sit in a cafe; the very fact that these people had any shelter
argued that they were working. But the police were thorough and
awakened everyone. They were quiet and good-humored; this raid had
none of the violence of an American police raid. When a locked door
was not opened, the police tried all their master keys before they set
their shoulders to the door and went in.
The Scotland Yard man said, "Admirable, sir, admirable. Continental
police systems are marvelous, really.'You have absolute control over
here." Then his British pride spoke, deprecatingly, as it always speaks.
"We could never do anything like this in London, don't you know. An
Englishman's home is his castle, and all that. We have to have a warrant
before we can search the premises or touch a man's person. Beastly handicap, you know. We have nothing like your control over here on
This is the only police search of workingmen's quarters that I saw in
Europe. I do not believe that regimentation elsewhere went so far then
as to force women into prostitution, and it may be that it no longer
does so in Hungary. But that the systematic surrounding and searching
of workingmen's quarters went on normally everywhere in Europe,
and that unemployment was assumed to push them over the edge of
destitution into crime, I do know.
Like everyone else domiciled in Europe, I was many times stopped
on my way home by two courteous policemen who asked to see my
identification card. This became too commonplace to need explanation.
I knew that my thoroughly respectable, middle-class quarter was surrounded, simply as a matter of police routine, and that everyone in it
was being required to show police cards.
Nevertheless, I question whether there was less crime in police-
controlled Europe than in America. Plenty of crimes were reported in
brief paragraphs of small type in every paper. There is no section of an
American city which I would fear to go into alone at night. There were
always many quarters of European cities that were definitely dangerous
after nightfall, and whole classes of criminals who would kill any
moderately well-dressed man, woman or child for the clothes alone.
The terrible thing is that the motive behind all this supervision of the
individual is a good motive, and a rational one. How is any ruler to
maintain a social order without it?
There is a certain instinct of orderliness and of self-preservation
which enables multitudes of free human beings to get along after a
fashion. No crowd leaves a theatre with any efficiency, nor without
discomfort, impatience and wasted time, yet we usually reach the
sidewalk without a fight. Order is another thing. Any teacher knows
that order cannot be maintained without regulation, supervision and
discipline. It is a question of degree; the more rigid and autocratic the
discipline, the greater the order. Any genuine social order requires, as
its first fundamental, the classification, regulation and obedience of
individuals. Individuals being what they are, infinitely various and
willful, their obedience must be enforced.
The serious loss in a social order is in time and energy. Sitting around
in waiting rooms until one can stand in line before a bureaucrat's desk
seems to any American a dead loss, and living in a social order thus
shortens every person's life. Outside the bureaucrat's office, too, these
regulations for the public good constantly hamper every action. It is as impossible to move freely in one's daily life as it is to saunter or hasten
while keeping step in a procession.
In America, commercial decrees did not hamper every clerk and
customer, as they did in France, so that an extra half-hour was consumed in every department-store purchase. French merchants are as
intelligent as American, but they could not install vacuum tubes and a
swift accounting system in a central cashier's department. What is the
use? they asked you. They would still be obliged to have every purchase
recorded in writing in a ledger, in the presence of both buyer and seller,
as Napoleon decreed.
It was an intelligent decree, too, when Napoleon issued it. Could
French merchants change it now? It is to laugh, as they say; a phrase
with no mirth in it. The decree was entangled with a hundred years of
bureaucratic complications, and besides, think how much unemployment its repeal would have caused among those weary cashiers, dipping their pens in the prescribed ink, setting down the date and hour
on a new line and asking, "Your name, madame?" writing. "Your
address?" writing. "You pay cash?" writing. "You will take the purchase with you? Ah, good," writing. "Ah, I see. One reel of thread,
cotton, black, what size?" writing. "You pay for it how much?" writing.
"And you offer in payment-Good; one franc," writing. "From one
franc, perceive, madame, I give you fifty centimes change. Good. And
you are satisfied, madame?"
No one considered how much unemployment this caused to the
daily multitudes of patiently waiting customers, nor that if these clerks
had never been thus employed they might have been doing something
useful, something creative of wealth. Napoleon wished to stop the
waste of disorganization, of cheating and quarreling, in the markets of
his time. And he did so. The result is that so much of France was
permanently fixed firmly in Napoleon's time. If he had let Frenchmen
waste and quarrel, and cheat and lose, as Americans were then doing
in equally primitive markets, French department stores certainly would
have been made as briskly efficient and time-saving as America's.
No one who dreams of the ideal social order, the economy planned
to eliminate waste and injustice, considers how much energy, how
much human life, is wasted in administering and in obeying the best
of regulations. No one considers how rigid such regulations become,
nor that they must become rigid and resist change because their underlying purpose is to preserve men from the risks of chance and change
in flowing time.
Americans have had in our country no experience of the discipline of a social order. We speak of a better social order when in fact we do
not know what any social order is. We say that something is wrong
with this system, when in fact we have no system. We use phrases
learned from Europe, with no conception of the meaning of those
phrases in actual living experience.
In America we do not have even universal military training, that
basis of a social order which teaches every male citizen his subservience
to The State and subtracts some years from every young man's life,
and has thereby weakened the military power of every nation that has
An apartment lease in America is legal when it is signed; it is not
necessary to take it to the police to be stamped, nor to file triplicate
copies of it with the collector of internal revenue, so that for taxation
purposes our incomes may be set down as ten times what we pay for
rent. In economic theory, no doubt it is not proper to pay for rent more
than 10 per cent of income, and perhaps it is economic justice that
anyone so extravagant as to pay more should be fined by taxation. It
was never possible to quarrel with the motives behind these bureaucracies of Europe; they were invariably excellent motives.
An American could look at the whole world around him and take what he wanted from it, if he were able. Only criminal law and his own character, abilities and luck restrained him.
That is what Europeans meant when, after a few days in this country,
they exclaimed, "You are so free here!" And it was the most infinite
relief to an American returning after long living abroad, to be able to
move from hotel to hotel, from city to city, to be able to rush into a
store and buy a spool of thread, to decide at half past three to take a
four o'clock train, to buy an automobile if one had the money or the
credit and to drive it wherever one liked, all without making any reports
whatever to the government.
But anyone whose freedom has been, as mine has always been,
freedom to earn a living if possible, knows that this independence is
another name for responsibility.
The American pioneers phrased this clearly and bluntly. They said,
"Root, hog, or die."
There can be no third alternative for the shoat let out of the pen, to
go where he pleases and do what he likes. Individual liberty is individual responsibility. Whoever makes decisions is responsible for results.
When common men were slaves and serfs, they obeyed and they were
fed, but they died by thousands in plagues and famines. Free men paid
for their freedom by leaving that false and illusory security.
The question is whether personal freedom is worth the terrible effort,
the never-lifted burden, and the risks, the unavoidable risks, of self-
For each of us, the answer to that question is a personal one. But the
final answer cannot be personal, for individual freedom of choice and
of action cannot long exist except among multitudes of individuals who
choose it and who are willing to pay for it.
Multitudes of human beings will not do this unless their freedom is
worth more than it costs, not only in value to their own souls but also
in terms of the general welfare and the future of their country, which
means the welfare and the future of their children.
The test of the worth of personal freedom, then, can only be its
practical results in a country whose institutions and ways of life and of
thought have grown from individualism. The only such country is the
United States of America.
Here, on a new continent, peoples with no common tradition founded
this republic on the rights of the individual. This country was the only
country in the western world whose territory was largely settled and
whose culture is dominated by those northwestern Europeans from
whom the idea of individual liberty came into the world's history as a
When one thinks of it, that's an odd fact. Why did this territory
become American? How did it happen that those British colonists
released from England spread across half this continent?
Spaniards were in Missouri before Englishmen were in Virginia or
Massachusetts. French settlements were old in Illinois, French mines
in Missouri were furnishing the western world with bullets, French
trading posts were in Arkansas, half a century before farmers fired on
British soldiers at Lexington.
Why did Americans, spreading westward, not find a populated country, a vigorous colony to protest in France against the sale of Louisiana?
This is an important fact: Americans were the only settlers who built
their houses far apart, each on his own land. America is the only
country I have seen where farmers do not live today in close, safe
village-groups. It is the only country I know where each person does
not feel an essential, permanent solidarity with a certain class, and
with a certain group within that class. The first Americans came from
such groups in Europe, but they came because they were individuals
rebelling against groups. Each in his own way built his own house at
a distance from others in the American wilderness. This is individualism.
The natural diversity of human beings, the natural tendency of man
to go into the future like an explorer finding his own way, was released
in those English colonies on the Atlantic coast. Men from the British
islands rushed so eagerly toward that freedom that Parliament and the
King refused to open any more land for settlement; the statistics of the
time proved clearly that a western expansion of the American colonies
would depopulate England.
Nevertheless, before tea went overboard in Boston harbor the lawless
settlers had penetrated to the crests and valleys of the Appalachians
and were scouting into forbidden lands beyond.
There was no plan that these young United States should ever cover
half this continent. The thought of New York and Washington lagged
far behind that surge. It was the released energies of individuals that
poured westward at a speed never imagined, sweeping away and
overwhelming settlements of more cohesive peoples and reaching the
Pacific in the time that Jefferson thought it would take to settle Ohio.
I have no illusions about the pioneers. My own people for eight
generations were American pioneers, and when as a child I remembered too proudly an ancestry older than Plymouth, my mother would
remind me of a great-great-uncle, jailed for stealing a cow.
The pioneers were by no means the best of Europe. In general they
were trouble-makers of the lower classes, and Europe was glad to be
rid of them. They brought no great amount of intelligence or culture.
Their principal desire was to do as they pleased, and they were no
idealists. When they could not pay their debts, they skipped out between
two days. When their manners, their personal habits or their loudly
expressed and usually ignorant opinions offended the gently bred,
they remarked, "It's a free country, ain't it?" A frequent phrase of
theirs was "free and independent." They also said, "I'll try anything
once," and "Sure, I'll take a chance!"
They were riotous speculators; they gambled in land, in furs, in
lumber and canals and settlements. They were town-lot salesmen for
towns that did not yet exist and, more often than not, never did
materialize. They were ignorant peasants, prospectors, self-educated
teachers and lawyers, ranting politicians, printers, lumberjacks, horse
thieves and cattle rustlers.
Each was out to get what he could for himself, and devil take the
hindmost. At every touch of adversity they fell apart, each on his own;
there was human pity and kindness, but not a trace of community
spirit. The pioneer had horse sense, and card sense, and money sense,
but not a particle of social sense. The pioneers were individualists. And
they did stand the gaff .
This was the human stuff of America. It was not the stuff one would
have chosen to make a nation or an admirable national character. And
Americans today are the most reckless and lawless of peoples. We are
also the most imaginative, the most temperamental, the most infinitely
varied people. We are the kindest people on earth; kind every day to
one another and sympathetically responsive to every rumor of distress.
It is only in America that a passing car will stop to lend a stranded
stranger a tire-tool. Only Americans ever made millions of small personal sacrifices in order to pour wealth over the world, relieving suffering in such distant places as Armenia and Japan.
Everywhere, in shops, streets, factories, elevators, on highways and
on farms, Americans are the most friendly and courteous people. There
is more laughter and more song in America than anywhere else. Such
are a few of the human values that grew from individualism while
individualism was creating this nation.
✳ ✳ ✳