Answers Magazine

Answers Magazine

Answers magazine is the Bible-affirming, creation-based magazine from Answers in Genesis. In it you will find fascinating content and stunning photographs that present creation and worldview articles along with relevant cultural topics from different authors. Each quarterly issue includes a detachable chart, a pullout children’s magazine, a unique animal highlight, excellent layman and semi-technical articles plus bonus content from the website. Our purpose is to equip you, our reader, with practical answers so you can confidently communicate the gospel and biblical authority with accuracy. Why wait? Subscribe today!

Evolution and social evil

by Carl Wieland

27 April 2004

To be subsequently published in Creation

Creationists are often accused of making a false connection between evolution and the various social evils of our modern world.

The charge is that we are claiming evolution causes immoral behaviour, holocausts, and the like.  Is this AiG’s stance?  Do we think evolution causes such things? Not directly; sin is of course responsible.  But evolutionary thought permeating a culture will inevitably lead to a magnification of the effects of sin in one form or another.  For one thing, it weakens the shared cultural restraints that arise out of a commonly adhered-to basis for morality.

If we are all accountable to the biblical God who made (and thus owns) everything, then it makes sense to speak of moral absolutes: the unchanging rules of an unchanging God. 

In a consistent evolutionary worldview, there can be no unchanging rules—there is only what is expedient for the society or individual.  And there is no distinction in kind between people and animals, nor ultimately between people and grass, nor even rocks.  Thus Stalin is said to have claimed that killing a million people was no different from mowing a lawn.  This is chillingly consistent with a materialist view (matter is all there is, we are just evolved arrangements of atoms).  

All this does not deny the possibility of moral behaviour by evolutionists or amoral behaviour by Christians.  But because amorality is logically consistent with evolution, and inconsistent with biblical Christianity, an evolutionary worldview gives a much more fertile ground for the exhibition of the sin nature in all its aspects.

Thus, the (late) famous evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould could write that the sin of racism, for instance, increased by ‘orders of magnitude’ due to Darwin’s work being used as justification.  Antiracist Darwinists (including Gould) have howled with indignation when we have brought such things up, claiming that this increase in racism was due to a ‘misuse’ of Darwinism.  But it was in fact logically consistent with Darwin’s premises.

Gould, despite his evolutionary materialism, was still a person created in God’s image with a God-given conscience, as well as having been raised in a culture founded on Judeo-Christian morality.  He would have condemned the actions of Hitler as immoral (felt more keenly perhaps as a Jew), but his materialism could not provide any rational basis for doing so.  Hitler might reply: ‘By what standard?  I’m doing what is best for the evolutionary struggle between my race and yours, consistent with my belief in evolution.’  Whereas when a biblical Christian does such things, his actions are inconsistent with his professed beliefs. 

Goering actually said at the Nuremburg trials that the Nazis did nothing wrong according to their own laws, and were on trial only because they lost.  Rebutting this, Prosecutor Jackson invoked  a ‘universal law’.  But this only has meaning if there is a Creator/Lawgiver.

Thus, given a large enough group of people who share a Darwinian worldview, especially given a culture in which a small group of convinced Darwinists has the power to impose their will on the population, one will overall see more immoral behaviour, even atrocities.  The 20th century of Stalin, Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot made this clear.  Hitler made his debt to evolution abundantly clear. The ideology of the other three, Marxism-Leninism, is firmly based on the notion of materialism, which means by definition that everything just evolved.

There were indeed atrocities and wrongful wars in the name of ‘religion’ before then.  But many more people have been killed (most by their own governments) in the name of evolution-inspired ideologies than in all the wars of recorded history put together, religious or otherwise. 

Help keep these daily articles coming. Find out how to support AiG.

ECFAEvangelical Press AssociationGospel Communications Alliance Member