World

null 21° London Hi 21°C / Lo 9°C

The mountain that lost its top

It's the one environmental crime that no US politician will confront – the destruction of Kentucky's mountains. Leonard Doyle visits the Appalachian peaks being blasted by Big Coal

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

 

SOUTHWING

Photo of a mountaintop removal operation in the Appalachians

The road slicing through the thickly forested hills of eastern Kentucky used to be called the Daniel Boone Parkway. It was named for the controversial American folk hero who fought his way across Indian country to settle a state where many of his descendants still live.

That was before the coal industry began blowing up the Appalachian Mountains as a cheap way of getting at the black stuff below, behaviour decried by the environmental group Appalachian Voices as "one of the greatest human rights and environmental tragedies in America's recent history".

Daniel Boone's road is now the Hal Rogers Parkway, named after one of the Kentucky coal industry's closest friends in Washington, a Republican Congressman of 34 years. It passes through a mountain range older than the Himalayas and is blanketed in broadleaf forests rivalled only by the Amazon basin in its biodiversity.

But the canopy of trees which lines the parkway as it rises from the bluegrass horse country to the mountains is a trompe l'oeil. The lush forest gives way to scraggly trees along the ridge-line, and behind those trees is evidence of unspeakable ecological violence. In a process known as mountaintop removal an upland moonscape is being created, which is incapable of regenerating trees. As far as the eye can see, the land is grey and pockmarked with huge black lakes, filled with toxic coal slurry.

This has come about because of America's insatiable appetite for cheap coal to generate electricity, a process enthusiastically backed by the Bush administration as it tries to displace the consumption of imported oil. And the Democrats are little better. They control Kentucky and neither Barack Obama nor Hillary Clinton have dared to challenge "King Coal" while campaigning.

The devastation being wrought on Appalachia is best appreciated from the air. An organisation called Southwinds offers people an eagle-eye view of the carnage, not readily appreciated from the road. Another way to see what's going on behind the ridge-line is to take a Google Earth virtual tour of an online memorial to the 470 mountains blown up and levelled in recent years.

The act of destroying a million-year-old mountain has several distinct stages. First it is earmarked for removal and the hardwood forest cover, containing over 500 species of tree per acre in this region, is bulldozed away. The trees are typically burnt rather than logged, because mining companies are not in the lumber business. Then topsoil is scraped away and high explosives laid in the sandstone. Thousands of blasts go off across the region every day, blowing up what the mining industry calls "overburden".

The rubble is then tipped into the valleys – more than 7,000 have already been filled – and more than 700 miles of rivers and streams have disappeared under rubble and thousands more soiled with toxic waste.

The process has accelerated wildly under George Bush. His pro-business-at-any-price credo led to the tossing out of strict federal restrictions against dumping mining rubble within 250 feet of a mountain stream. The toxic spoil laden with heavy metals, which results from blowing up mountains, was renamed "fill", enabling the mining companies to use the cheapest method possible of disposing of it. Once the rock is blown up and the coal separated out, the flattened mountaintops can only support a thin cover of grass. Tens of thousands of acres of mountain have been transformed in this way in Kentucky, West Virginia and Virginia.

Deep in the Kentucky woods McKinley Sumner's yapping dachshund was no match for the mine company's bulldozer. It arrived unannounced on Mr Sumner's land earlier this year and was soon snapping off full-grown trees as if they were twigs.

Mr Sumner, in his seventies, recalls putting on his high-top boots "because the copperheads and rattlesnakes were still out" and hotfooting it up the small mountain at the back of his house, to confront the miners by himself.

By the time he had shooed them off what he calls the "Sumner estate", all 93 acres of it, and had obtained a restraining order against the mining company the damage was done. The forest his parents had started homesteading in the 1930s, and which he has worked since he was a boy, had been devastated by the blade of the bulldozer. Trees were piled one on top of the other and all the topsoil had been shoved into the valley below.

With the help of a lawyer and a social justice organisation called Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Mr Sumner won his court battle and the mining company was ordered to repair the damage to his land. Instead of doing what the court has ordered, the company is trying to break him in other more subtle ways. Mr Sumner's lands have been listed in the local paper every one of the past five weeks as earmarked for "mountaintop removal", something he has never agreed to.

Company executives have put the word out that he is "holding up mining in the area", setting him against the coal mining families in the area. Strange people showed up on his land to remove the markers of a land survey, which cost $6,000, in order to delineate his hillside from a neighbour's, which has been approved for mountaintop removal.

"I feel just awful," Mr Sumner, said. "We live in a democracy and this is not supposed to happen in a democracy. They are taking our rights away from us."

The daughter and sister of miners, Teri Blanton is a self-described anti-coal activist and prime mover of Kentuckians for the Commonwealth. As a young single mother she returned to Harlan County from Chicago in search of what she hoped would be a healthier lifestyle for her children. What Ms Blanton could not have known is that the well water her family and community were drinking from was contaminated by the toxic chemical run-off from a mining equipment repair shop.

"They had this great big vat filled with degreasing chemicals which they would dump into the ground every few months," Ms Blanton said. "They even sprayed the gravel roads with the stuff in summer to keep the dust down."

At 29, Ms Blanton developed cancer, which she survived. But many of her friends and neighbours from Harlan County died young, and she has dedicated the past two decades of her life to helping those threatened by coal-mining interests and getting the word out to an uninterested American public about the ecological devastation which is taking place in Appalachia.

"For the last 100 years Kentucky has provided the coal that fuelled America's growth and wealth," she said. "But our wages are low and our schools and hospitals are lousy. This is one of the poorest places in America and I often think that it is deliberately so, so that they can do whatever they want to this polluted community."

The headwaters of several major rivers on America's eastern seaboard rise in the Kentucky Mountain. They should be teeming with steelhead trout at this time of the year, with fishermen working the banks. But the rivers have been dead for much of the past 100 years, and the Kentucky Tourist Authority came up blank when asked to find a fly fishing destination within 50 miles of where the mountaintop removal takes place.

There is plenty of public money being spent promoting the coal industry, including the practice of blowing up mountains. Each year the state gives about $400,000 (£200,000) to groups controlled by the coal industry.

A website describes mountaintop mining as "simply the right thing to do – both for the environment and the local economy – a true win win".

"The environmentalists throw out a lot of negative stuff, like kids are suffering from asthma because they breathe particulate matter from living near coal-fired power plants, or deaths caused on the roads by big coal trucks," says Bill Caylor of the Kentucky Coal Association. "We're trying to counteract that."

The message he gives out is that mountaintop removal is actually good for the environment because "what's left is flatter, more useful land on top of the mountain". Teri Blanton laughs off the audacity of the propaganda effort and takes me to see Damon Morgan, at least 80 years old, in yet another part of the mountains.

A veteran of Second World War (he survived Iowa Jima,) Mr Morgan returned to the mountains after a career on the railways. A couple of years ago, he claims, two mining companies, Horizon Resources and International Coal Group, trespassed along one of his property lines. "They have done damage to the land and to my personal property – trees, rock and dirt debris have been pushed on to my property and down the side of the mountain."

But worse was to come and now land he calls his own is threatened with being mined because an estranged relative is challenging his title. "We made the biggest part of our living on that land." he said. "We planted vegetables, and we had apple orchards, and there was a lot of wild huckleberry back up on that mountain ... we picked them. And I've hunted in there, I've dug herbs. And now, that is all gone. It's completely moved away.

"The coal industry is an outlaw industry that does not consider the rights of its neighbours or the rights of the land and environment. The industry is out to make a profit and has no regard for the damages done to the citizens of this country," Mr Morgan said.

He has now been gagged by the courts and but for Teri Blanton his story would remain untold. She takes me to another part of the mountains. Mary Jane and Raleigh Adams, also in their seventies, are fighting Whymore Coal Company. When the Adams family declared that the mining company had violated its lease to cross their land the fight went to court. The ruling went against the Adamses and the court ruling now bars them from walking on their own land.

"We believe we were just run over by the Circuit Judge House and by the coal company lawyers who lied and said that we had said that the lease was valid," said a traumatised Mary Jane Adams. When Raleigh Adams took a picture of the mining taking place on his land and sent it to the local paper he was found to be in contempt.

"We now can't get on our own land, and the mining is going forward without our permission. We are even blocked from stepping on our property even when they aren't working," Mr Adams said. "Who knows what will be left of it when they are finished."

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Post a comment

Limit: 1000 characters

View all comments that have been posted about this article

Comment
Your details

* Required field

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by Independent.co.uk's Terms of Use

Comments

20 Comments

the voters get what they deserve. if they voted for a person who cared about the workers things would be different. if the formed unions they would have enough power to compete with the companies.
if they really cared about nature instead of greed they would still have mountains.
if this newspaper listed the names and addresses of the ceo and managers and employees of the companies who destroyed the land we could disgrace them.

Posted by JTW | 21.05.08, 02:40 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

At least this is getting press. I am Kentuckian and living in Eastern Kentucky now, and a campaign is growing here to stop these atrocities. Mountain(top) removal is part of a long, troubling history of exploiting the nations and regions within nations classified as "underdeveloped" or "uneducated" (terms that obscure more than they clarify anyway). Longstanding disrespect allows for appalling exploitation, but what is now clear is that the eastern seaboard of the US has enjoyed cheap energy, while the Appalachian forested ridges are dynamited away.

Posted by Garrett Graddy | 20.05.08, 22:16 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

That's what happens when a country is led by a little man such as Mr. Bush.

Posted by Roberto Ruggiu | 20.05.08, 21:42 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

Fortunately, there is a path to stopping the horrific practice of mountaintop removal coal mining. The first step would be to go to the website: IloveMountains.org, and once there you can enter your zipcode (U.S. residents) to see whether or not you are directly or indirectly connected to mountaintop removal coal mining. One can also write a letter to congress urging them to support the clean water protection act (hr 2169). The clean water protection act would once and for all define the rubble from mountain top removal coal mining operations as waste, and therefore make it illegal to dump it into any body of water in the U.S., and that would end the creation of valley fills from the waste.

The only time you lose is when you quit!

Posted by Lenny Kohm | 20.05.08, 21:03 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

I can't whine and moan about the evils of "King Coal" or their political pawns. I know the environmental rape of the Earth goes on every day and it's certainly not just in Appalachia. King Coal (like Big Oil) does this ONLY because I pay them to do it! Every time I turn on the computer or the microwave or drive my car I'm personally responsible for another wound to the planet. So far I haven't stopped.

Burning any fossil fuel is and will always be dirty. Partial oxidation of carbon creates byproducts. The day that burning fossil fuels is superceded by clean and renewable sources of energy (geothermal, wind, tide, solar, ???) is the day the Earth can begin recovering from these horrific scars we have each inflicted. Until that happens this kind of environmental damage is the price humanity has happily inflicted on its only home in the name of "civilization".

Walt Kelly's great Pogo said in a classic Earth Day comic strip in 1971, "We have met the enemy and he is us." Nothing has changed.

Posted by Dave H | 20.05.08, 19:21 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

"This is what you voted FOR! When you voted for Bush, you agreed to allow the coal industry to destroy your state (among other things).

I don't see why you are all so surprised. We liberals tried to warn all of you, but we were ridiculed merely for pointing out the obvious.

You get what you voted for, and you all voted for the Republican plan to totally destroy America."

Comrade, you're full of crap. Coal mining has been going on for a hundred years or so. Don't blame Bush for this. Kentucky is a Democratic state, not Republican.

BTW there is no such thing as Steelhead trout in Ky, the writer is playing loose with the facts.

Posted by Jerry | 20.05.08, 19:06 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

I know why it's happening...

The Democrats and Republicans are very worried with the "rain forest" in Brazil, and they're forgeting their own environment.

Posted by Rafael | 20.05.08, 18:13 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

The GoogleEarth images, such as Twin Hollows Mining district, seem unusually blurry. I wonder if this is simply a coincidence.

Posted by Barbara Harper | 20.05.08, 17:04 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

I was unaware of this sort of behaviour.
What is so great about the dollar that the earth and all of its sources and natural beauty have to be destroyed?!
I think they know exactly what they are doing but for moneys sake they carry on destroying everything in their path.
And what is awful is the small amount of people actually prepared to do something about this and speak up! The community needs to stand together and raise their voices so they are heard.
It's mans greed that will lead to his downfall.

Posted by CJ | 20.05.08, 17:03 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

In response to Rutherfords comment:

Unfortunately, the Democrats don't promise a solution either. Both of the currrent U.S. democratic candidates are pushing for energy policies that include "Clean Coal" technology. For Appalachian communities, this means more mountaintop removal.

This isn't a simple Republican vs. Democratic issue and while it's easy to demonize the Bush Administration, they are not the sole guilty party. Each consumer of electrical power is a responsible party and witness to the destruction of one of the oldest mountain ranges on the planet. So let he who doesn't flip the switch cast the first stone.

People across the globe must demand and invest in true renewables and tell our elected officials to craft an energy policy that supports the development of truly clean energy, not clean coal.

Oh and for the record...many of the coalfield counties you wag you finger at have historically voted democratic. It would be nice to think of homogenized wholes of red and blue states, but things are rarely that simple either.

Posted by Kentucky Girl | 20.05.08, 15:52 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note Name and E-mail are required.

Contact details

20 Comments


Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date