A commenter (”Citizen”) on another post opines that because thermometers are imprecise, and not continually calibrated, it’s not possible to discern temperature changes precisely enough to support the temperature increase claimed by climate researchers. In fact, he (she?) states:
Do you think that continually averaging imprecise information makes that information more precise? Don’t you think that’s a stretch? It’s not rational you know.
It’s certainly not intuitive. But in fact it is true.
Categories: Global Warming · astronomy · climate change
 | george on Open Thread (#2) |
 | steven mosher on Open Thread (#2) |
 | Tenney Naumer on Attack of the 50-foot Tor… |
 | Hank Roberts on Open Thread (#2) |
| steven mosher on Open Thread (#2) |
 | David B. Benson on Open Thread (#2) |
| David B. Benson on Open Thread (#2) |
 | Dave Andrews on Open Thread (#2) |
| Dave Andrews on Open Thread (#2) |
 | dhogaza on Open Thread (#2) |
| David B. Benson on Open Thread (#2) |
 | Deech56 on Open Thread (#2) |
 | luminous beauty on Open Thread (#2) |
| dhogaza on Open Thread (#2) |
| dhogaza on Open Thread (#2) |
