WOW- The real 1930 Geneva Convention Books
01/13/2001
Just a teaser for
ATGPRESS:
I am in the process
of reading the three volumes of the 1930 Geneva Convention which includes the
League of Nations. Of course you know the League of Nations was broken up but
the UN is really the old League of Nations with a reorganization, that's all.
The United States and Great Britain appear to be running the whole
deal.
So far there is no
hint of US bankruptcy at all. In fact the United States forgave the German War
debt among other debts and was loaning Germany over $100 million through
American Banks. Now get this, they were going to loan $300 million to Germany
for their post offices and rail system but in a letter from the Governor of the
Federal Reserve Bank he advised the United States to back off to $100 million
because of Congress McFadden's speech that stirred up too much
controversy.
From what I am
reading the whole patriot theory of the bankruptcy taking place in the Geneva
Convention is pure myth. It appears that with all the loans the United States
was making it was rolling in money; and, it was the banks that claimed they had
no money in 1933, three years later, because of all the loans the United States
was making to all the countries. J.P. Morgan was very instrumental in giving
away the people's money. Not only that; but big business such as Firestone
Rubber co. was dictating that it would redeem the Liberian outstanding
indebtedness, and, make a further loan to Liberian government to grow Rubber in
that country in 1925. How was Firestone writing off the debt it was absorbing?
Why - through tax write-offs that YOU or your parents were paying the pickup on
while they were rolling in dough. Does this sound like pure
fascism?
Noooo.... couldn't
be, here in America? And what about J.P Morgan and all his enterprises. Why are
they involved in treaty convention? I thought only YOUR elected officials were
to do that.
Not only that but
you should see what and how the IRS was addressed. There are letters in here
that prove what I have been saying that the IRS employees are not considered
government employees. Of course they are tied directly to the Federal
reserve.
In fact The Finance
Corporation of America in a letter dated June 14, 1930, to the National City
Bank of New York, told them they were not giving the loan to Liberia because of
20 deficiencies. One being, now read this closely, "The Government has refused
to make payment of the salaries of the employees of the revenue service, both
customs and internal from the funds available and due such employees, in
violation of the express terms of Section 1 of Article XIII of the Loan
Agreement, and has notified the Financial Adviser that it proposes to continue
to refuse to make such payments out of the SPECIFICALLY ASSIGNED revenues of the
Government in priority to payment of salaries to OTHER employees of the
Government not entitled to such priority under the express terms of ARTICLE XIII
of the Loan Agreement."
There you have only
a part of the proof that the IRS employees are not paid directly by the US
Government but by the Loan Agreement. Now for more proof why the IRS is all over
the world, and are private, is this other reason they were not giving the
loan. Read and weep. "In derogation of the express terms on intent of the
Loan Agreement, the Government addressed a communication from its Solicitor
General to the Financial Adviser in writing, asserting that the Supervisor of
the Internal Revenue is a member of the Treasury Department of Liberia and is
subject to the Secretary of the Treasury."
Now, who runs the
really hires and runs the IRS? Read the next stipulation of the Finance
Corporation.
"From time to time
the Government has appointed to the Customs and Internal Revenue Service
Officials and employees WITHOUT the previous advice of the Financial Adviser as
contemplated in Article IX; and without previous consultation with or the
information to the Financial Adviser."
Every treaty has a
tax agreement that concerns the IRS. Also in these treaties you see that only
Nationals are subject to the United States income taxes.. Oh yeah, it is spelled
out in spades. Like this treaty with France in letter from the Secretary of
State to the Ambassador of France where he states;
"This draft treaty
is only applicable in this country to the Federal Government. The OMISSION of
the WORD "national" in the second line of the first paragraph would seemingly
make it applicable to the several States. . . ." There is more - but pressed for
time.
Here, reading the
rest of the letter, is the fact that the term National ONLY means the UNITED
STATES and NOT the several States -- shoots those in the foot that claim they
are a National. Guess what? Further on it states that it is the National that is
subject to the Income tax, NOT the people in the several States. I'm telling -
you this Geneva Stuff is a killer. Vol. I is 564 pages, Vol. II is 797 pages and
Vol. III is 904 pages.
This is a lot of
reading so I can't tell you any more. I will be scanning some, very little of
the pages, and be putting it on atgpress at a much later date because of
the time consuming reading every word after scanning because it misses whole
words in scanning, and I have access to a pretty good scanner. It just might be
3 months down the road. You people are going to have a very rude awakening after
reading how you have been screwed by the bankers, the big businesses and "your
congressmen?" They run you, not the other way around. And treaties galore abound
because they have to bring in treaties from 1833 and earlier to amend them for
this 1930 treaty at Geneva. This, people, was the beginning of your further
screwing and loss of all your property that was pledged as the backing for all
these loans the US was handing out. McFadden was killed over this and he was
crying in the wilderness. Just like Montgomery, Big Al and I and maybe a handful
at best, that have been trying to tell you we have never been in control of any
Congress since the country was formed and this Geneva Convention proves it in
spades.
Contrary to what most people
think the Geneva Convention was not a group of nations getting together in one place and
an orderly recording of minutes taken. Rather it was a series of letters and telegrams over the course
of a few months between
all interested nations and private concerns, and also including banking. These are found in Foreign
Relations books that were loaned me. There are no books titled Convention in Geneva.
See ya all later.
The Informer
|