Text: Small Text  Normal Text  Large Text  Larger Text
  • Blog
  • MPAA & RIAA Criticize USTR Position on Canada

Must Act

Posts On Hot Issues

Blog Archive

PrevPrevJuly 2008NextNext
SMTWTFS
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031

MPAA & RIAA Criticize USTR Position on Canada

PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Monday April 30, 2007
One of the big surprises in this year's USTR Special 301 Report was the decision to keep Canada at the lowest level of priority (the Watch List) rather than elevate it to the Priority Watch List.  Indeed, all the political signs pointed to an elevation - all the major U.S. lobby groups recommended it, the USTR conducted a special review of Canadian IP enforcement, and there has been growing criticism of Canadian IP law by U.S. officials.  Yet, despite those signals, Canada remains on the Watch List and the U.S. lobby groups are left to criticize the USTR.  Immediately following its release, the MPAA registered specific disappointment with the USTR decision on Canada, while the RIAA also responded that it had proposed elevating Canada to the priority watch list.

Why the change of heart?  While it would be nice to think that perhaps the U.S. is recognizing the Canada is already compliant with its international copyright obligations or that it appreciates the fact that we haven't addressed DRM interoperability (an issue that received specific mention in the report with the warning that interoperability mandates may harm both DRM makers and works locked by DRM), the RIAA hints at the more likely reason.  It notes that "we hope that its [Canada's] recent engagement on trying to advance the protection of intellectual property in global markets reflects the government's intention to address these matters at home as well."  In other words, joining the WTO IP complaint against China may have bought Canada considerable goodwill on the IP front with the United States.
Tags:
, , , , ,
Share: Slashdot, Digg, Del.icio.us, Newsfeeder, Reddit, StumbleUponEmailPrintPDF

Comments
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 5

Written by Jeff Hume on 2007-05-04 21:33:58
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 
 
This is why we should keep these organizations hands out of our legislation.
Written by Adeel Khan on 2007-05-07 15:35:50
Seems like there is a dearth of communication btwn the "Office of the U.S trade representative (USTR)" and the "United States Patent and trademark office (USPTO)" 
 
Cause if there was, then USPTO would have brought to USTR's attention that...well gee our system is b0rked right now...it has been for some time. And perhaps for a reason. Our judicial system keeps on doling out decisions in favour of American companies even though the patent information/evidence would prove to be on the contrary. (example: RIM vs NTP)  
 
Yet we continue finger pointing and laying the blame on other countries for patent infringement.  
 
This mixture of finger pointing, broken patent system, and manipulating decision in some cases is only going to lead to one thing ---> "curb innovation" ---> which by every measure can only cause REAL HURT to our economy in the long run.  
 
Can someone say Lessig?

Write Comment

Name
Subject
This image contains a scrambled text, it is using a combination of colors, font size, background, angle in order to disallow computer to automate reading. You will have to reproduce it to post on my homepage

Enter text from image

Powered by AkoComment 2.0! and SecurityImage 3.0.4

Related Items: