(Circulation. 2000;102:I-1.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
ECC Guidelines |
International Guidelines |
---|
Top International Guidelines 2000The First... Evidence-Based Resuscitation... The Effectiveness of ECC The Chain of Survival The Preventive Cardiology-CPR... The "Risk Factors Modification... Final Comments: Have We... References |
---|
At all stages of planning, coordination, and implementation, conference planners sought and achieved active involvement of individuals and councils outside the United States.
Important new recommendations were developed either at the 2000 conference or during the post-conference period of writing, review, and rewriting. Positive new additions had to pass our rigorous evidence-based review. Revisions of or deletions from existing guidelines occurred for any of 3 reasons: (1) lack of evidence to confirm effectiveness, (2) additional evidence to suggest harm or ineffectiveness, or (3) evidence that superior therapies have become available.
We have also produced the International Consensus on Science: Proceedings of the 2000 Guidelines Conference on CPR and ECC. The proceedings are detailed articles that recount the discussions and debates at the 2 conferences.
The International Guidelines 2000 represent a consensus of experts from a variety of countries, cultures, and disciplines. The conference experts, participants, and resuscitation councils do not dictate or impose these recommendations on any person, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system, hospital, healthcare facility, community, state, country, or resuscitation council. The majority of the therapeutic interventions in the guidelines are "acts of medical practice." Most resuscitation personnel in the conference countries can use these interventions on a human being only when authorized by the "proper" local, state, or national agencies. Enforcement, authorization, and certification are medicolegal concepts with no role to play in the science-based International Guidelines 2000.
The recommendations of the Guidelines 2000 Conference confirm safety and effectiveness for many approaches, acknowledge ineffectiveness for others, and introduce new treatments that have survived intensive evidence-based evaluation. These new recommendations do not imply that care using past guidelines is either unsafe or ineffective. The conference participants consider these new guidelines to be the most effective and easily teachable guidelines that current knowledge, research, and experience can provide.
Historical Perspective
During the 40 years since the introduction of modern CPR and ECC
there have been many advances in ECC for cardiac arrest victims. These
interventions have restored the lives of many people when breathing has
ceased and the heart has stopped. For those with preserved neurological
function and treatable cardiopulmonary disease, a lengthy,
vigorous, and high-quality life may often follow.
Until 1960 successful resuscitation was limited to victims of respiratory arrest. Emergency thoracotomy with "open-chest heart massage" was sometimes successful when proper personnel and equipment were readily available.8 Termination of ventricular fibrillation by externally applied electricity was first described in 1956.9 The ability of defibrillators to reverse a fatal arrhythmia was a dramatic achievement. Defibrillators challenged the medical community to develop ways to get the defibrillator to the patients fibrillating heart as fast as possible while simultaneously sustaining ventilation and circulation. These challenges will continue into the next millenium.
In the 1950s Safar et al10 and Elam et al11 "rediscovered" mouth-to-mouth ventilation by reading how midwives used the technique to resuscitate newly born infants. In 1958 Safar et al confirmed the effectiveness of the mouth-to-mouth ventilation technique of Elam et al. In 1960 Kouwenhoven et al12 observed that forceful chest compressions produced respectable arterial pulses. In a series consisting chiefly of anesthesia-induced cardiac arrests they confirmed that chest compressions alone could sustain life while awaiting more definitive care. The critical steps of modern CPR"closed-chest" compressions and "mouth-to-mouth" ventilationshad arrived.12
Over the next several years, through casual conversations, Safar and Kouwenhoven saw the rationale for combining closed-chest compressions with mouth-to-mouth ventilations. Soon Safar confirmed the combined technique, now known as basic CPR. The simplicity of this technique has led to its widespread dissemination: "All that is needed is 2 hands." The technique gives hope for reducing the nearly 1000 sudden deaths (on average) that occur each day, both in the United States and also in the whole of Europe, before patients reach the hospital.
Achievements and Recommendations from Previous Guideline
Conferences
The Guidelines 2000 Conference must not be considered an American
conference or an AHA conference. The most valid descriptive term is
international. This conference, planned and organized by a
liaison of the worlds major resuscitation councils, embraced a wide
range of topics and issues. Each previous conference also established
important milestones (Table 1).
|
Beginning with the original 1966 conference of the National Academy of SciencesNational Research Council, every AHA conference has invited numerous international experts as well as delegates from international resuscitation councils. International intellectual exchange was pervasive, and all perspectives benefited from the exchange. Whether we think of ourselves as AHA delegates or European Resuscitation Council delegates matters nothing. We are now the Worlds Resuscitation Council; we hold a sobering responsibility to rise above national pride and self-interest and work together to achieve our simple goalto reduce morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary disease. Table 1 summarizes the important work that paved the way for modern CPR and ECC. The scientists, clinicians, experts, leaders, managers, and instructors who planned, developed, and conducted these conferences deserve our thanks and gratitude. We are in debt to their creativity, industry, and hard work.
Scientific Advances: ILCOR, Stroke, Acute Coronary
Syndromes, and Public Access Defibrillation
Resuscitation is an active and exciting area of research. By 1997
ECC leaders recognized the need to incorporate new scientific advances
into international guidelines in a timely fashion. The member councils
of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR)
provided strong support for this idea. As an international "council
of councils," ILCOR embarked on a 2-year plan to develop a series of
"advisory statements." These statements pursued 2 objectives: to
identify all differences and inconsistencies among existing guideline
publications and to conduct evidence-based review of resuscitation
topics and advise the liaison councils on topics to revise, delete, or
insert. ILCOR has published these advisory statements in
Circulation and Resuscitation.
Rapid change occurred in the management of acute ischemic stroke and acute coronary syndromes between 1992 and 1997. In collaboration with other societies, a Stroke Task Force plus an Acute Coronary Syndrome Working Group developed interim guidelines. These guidelines have appeared in the 1995, 1997, 1999, and 2000 ECC handbooks.
New guidelines for the lay-responders use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) were developed following 2 national conferences on public access defibrillation (PAD).15 This led directly to the development of the Heartsaver AED program, which provides a 3- to 4-hour course in both CPR and the use of an AED. The course is addressed to lay rescuers and first responders in the community.16
2000The First International Conference on Guidelines for CPR and ECC |
---|
Top International Guidelines 2000The First... Evidence-Based Resuscitation... The Effectiveness of ECC The Chain of Survival The Preventive Cardiology-CPR... The "Risk Factors Modification... Final Comments: Have We... References |
---|
Evidence-Based Resuscitation Guidelines |
---|
Top International Guidelines 2000The First... Evidence-Based Resuscitation... The Effectiveness of ECC The Chain of Survival The Preventive Cardiology-CPR... The "Risk Factors Modification... Final Comments: Have We... References |
---|
All resuscitation councils and experts that participated in the Guidelines 2000 Conference applied the tools and principles of evidence-based medicine on all proposed guidelines:
|
|
|
The Effectiveness of ECC |
---|
Top International Guidelines 2000The First... Evidence-Based Resuscitation... The Effectiveness of ECC The Chain of Survival The Preventive Cardiology-CPR... The "Risk Factors Modification... Final Comments: Have We... References |
---|
The Chain of Survival |
---|
Top International Guidelines 2000The First... Evidence-Based Resuscitation... The Effectiveness of ECC The Chain of Survival The Preventive Cardiology-CPR... The "Risk Factors Modification... Final Comments: Have We... References |
---|
Effectiveness of the Chain of Survival
Cost-effectiveness studies relate money expended to lives
saved.18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ECC-CPR leaders have asked questions about
the proven effectiveness of the Chain of Survival and the separate
links in the Chain. Is there a positive balance between the outcomes
from adding new drugs or medical devices and the costs to obtain the
new interventions?25 26
Our Most Effective Intervention: Defibrillation
Defibrillation, as an intervention, can be analyzed as a balance
between costs expended and the clinical outcome. One study examined how
many person-years of life would be added to a community if firefighters
not currently providing any emergency medical care were trained to do
CPR and defibrillation.21 Another model estimated how many
years of quality-adjusted person-years of life would be
gained by decreasing time to defibrillation by 1 minute with a new PAD
program.22 If PAD is implemented with lay responders,
the program costs 1.5 times more per added quality-adjusted life-year
than if implemented with police.
Decision analysis was used recently to assess the effectiveness of decreasing time to defibrillation by adding an early defibrillation program to the gaming casinos of Las Vegas, Nevada (USA). The program enrolled casino security guards and trained and equipped them to respond within 2 to 4 minutes to any arrest in the facility.23 This early defibrillation program published the lowest cost per year of added life of any published out-of-hospital care program.
Decreasing time to defibrillation appears most cost-effective when a low-intensity intervention is used, such as police or lay responder defibrillation. Currently adding more professional responders to an existing EMS system to decrease the collapse-to-first-shock interval is economically unattractive.
Advanced Life Support
Studies that have evaluated the cost of ACLS for out-of-hospital
sudden cardiac arrest have been severely limited. The best methodology,
using the most comprehensive costing methods, confirmed the value of
decreasing time to defibrillation by implementing early defibrillation
in gaming establishments.
The goal of CPR-ECC programs is to increase the number of lives saved by prevention, risk factor modification, and emergency intervention at comparatively little cost.27 Improving the efficacy of emergency cardiovascular intervention for victims of cardiopulmonary arrest requires aggressive implementation strategies.
Cardiopulmonary-Cerebral Resuscitation
Although the importance of CPR and BLS is undisputed, the efficacy
of CPR in prolonged arrest is modest at best. When CPR and
defibrillation are delayed or when definitive care is not closely
followed, the Chain of Survival is broken. The cerebral cortex, the
tissue most susceptible to hypoxia, is irreversibly damaged,
resulting in death or severe neurological damage. The need to preserve
cerebral viability must be stressed both in research endeavors and in
practical interventions. The term
cardiopulmonary-cerebral resuscitation has been used
to further emphasize this need.28 29
The initial hope for closed-chest CPR was that circulation and oxygenation could maintain viability long enough to bring the defibrillator to the victims aid.12 BLS is often successful if defibrillation (and other modes of definitive care) occurs sooner than 8 to 10 minutes after collapse.30 31 32 If restoration of spontaneous circulation occurs after the 8- to 10-minute limit, the frequency of significant, permanent neurological damage becomes unacceptably high. Responding and shocking as fast as possible, seldom exceeding 8 to 10 minutes, is a central objective of all EMS systems. In many communities it rarely happens.
The Hope of Public Access Defibrillation
By the mid and late 1990s great optimism arose because of reports
of success from early PAD-like programs. PAD programs stay within the
limit of 8 to 10 minutes, and can even decrease the response interval
to as little as 3 to 5 minutes.33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 These and
other preliminary data from PAD programs confirm epidemiological
observations that every minute increment from the time of collapse to
defibrillation will result in a substantial decrease in
survival. This objective of earlier defibrillation has been attained in
multiple PAD venues, including police, first responders, airports, and
commercial airline flights. These researchers also reported substantial
increases in the frequency of neurologically intact survivors.
With reported survival rates of up to 49%, PAD has the potential to be the single greatest advance in the treatment of prehospital sudden cardiac death since the invention of CPR.
The Preventive CardiologyCPR Paradox |
---|
Top International Guidelines 2000The First... Evidence-Based Resuscitation... The Effectiveness of ECC The Chain of Survival The Preventive Cardiology-CPR... The "Risk Factors Modification... Final Comments: Have We... References |
---|
The "Risk Factors Modification and Prevention Message" for Preventive Cardiology. |
---|
Top International Guidelines 2000The First... Evidence-Based Resuscitation... The Effectiveness of ECC The Chain of Survival The Preventive Cardiology-CPR... The "Risk Factors Modification... Final Comments: Have We... References |
---|
The perspective of preventive cardiology is to point out the strange paradox of investing so much time and so many resources into an EMS response when such a death would have been so easy to prevent or at least delay through the principles of preventive cardiology.
The sidebar reprints statements endorsed by the 1992 Guidelines Conference. The elimination of most of this material from lay and healthcare provider CPR training implies no disagreement with these concepts and recommendations. Neither does this imply rejection of the concept that prevention is the best way to reduce the heavy toll of premature morbidity and mortality from heart disease and stroke. The goals of teaching the community to function as a prevention intervention and as the ultimate coronary care unit are as follows:
Final Comments: Have We Achieved "International Guidelines" at the Guidelines 2000 Conference on CPR and ECC? |
---|
Top International Guidelines 2000The First... Evidence-Based Resuscitation... The Effectiveness of ECC The Chain of Survival The Preventive Cardiology-CPR... The "Risk Factors Modification... Final Comments: Have We... References |
---|
During the Guidelines 2000 Conference the ECC Committee delegated final review of the guidelines to the existing AHA Scientific Product Development Panel. This Panel comprises the chairs of the ECC subcommittees, the panel of Science Editors (1 or 2 for each subcommittee), and the 2 Senior Science Editors. The ILCOR and other international delegates appointed an International Editorial Board.
Resource staff posted drafts of the guidelines on a secure website accessible to the 2 editorial groups for review and comment. Most scientific issues had been resolved by the end of the conference.
Some issues did arise as a product of the international nature of this process. Most occurred during the months of postconference writing and review. The scientific infrastructure, the debates and discussions, and the final recommendations were close to identical for all of the participating organizations. Some differences, however, remained. Thematically these issues grew out of preexisting international differences in law, ethics, system management, and local regulations. Scientific issues were virtually nonexistent.
Resuscitation councils must confront geographic and economic differences in the availability of medical devices and pharmacological agents. Each resuscitation council struggles with international differences in instructional methods, teaching aids, and training networks. The worlds resuscitation councils must develop organized plans to support instruction in the new guidelines to citizen responders, BLS providers, and advanced healthcare professionals.
The worldwide distribution of these guidelines will be enhanced by publication in an official journal of the AHA, Circulation, and the official journal of the European Resuscitation Council, Resuscitation. Circulation and Resuscitation will publish the International Guidelines 2000 as a statement that strongly merits the description "international." Publication of the guidelines is the product of these councils:
Appendix: Educational and Training Issues in ECC and
CPRExperiences and Plans of the AHA
Editors Note: Throughout the process of writing
the International Guidelines 2000 the Senior Science Editors and the
Editorial Board have attempted to create a work that is
geopolitically neutral. Guidelines dominated by the
perspectives of 1 country or 1 resuscitation council would be
unacceptable. This Appendix breaches this objective of
geopolitical neutrality. This discussion of educational and training
issues depicts the experiences of the AHA. In addition to being
actively involved in resuscitation research, the AHA is responsible for
an immense infrastructure supporting resuscitation training and
education across the United States. The experiences of the AHA have
accumulated for more than a quarter century. We have learned from both
our mistakes and our successes. We share these experiences with you
with the hope that they will facilitate development and improvement of
ECC programs in your community. R.O.C. and M.F.H.
Long-Term View of CPR Training
Training in CPR has been recommended for healthcare
professionals for more than 3 decades13 14 and for the lay
public since 1974.1 These recommendations have resulted in
the development of a wide variety of BLS programs sponsored by ECC
organizations around the world. In most programs BLS instructors are
trained by the sponsoring organization to deliver information, to teach
skills, and to evaluate the knowledge and skills of those they
teach.41 42 43 This type of training relies on a traditional
course format of lecture, skills demonstrations, skills practice, and
evaluation using detailed skills performance checklists. In
essence such courses are "instructor centered" because the
instructor is free to organize the course as he or she desires,
including deciding how much time to devote to lectures, demonstrations,
and practice; how to communicate the information; and how to evaluate
the knowledge and performance of each student. Courses cover
numerous topics, including anatomy and physiology, recognition
of heart attack and stroke, actions to increase survival, risk factors
for heart disease and stroke, lifestyle behaviors, recognition of
foreign-body airway obstruction (FBAO), and the skills of rescue
breathing, CPR, and relief of FBAO. This material is typically covered
in a 4- to 8-hour course.44 The amount of time for each
specific unit of the course often is not defined, which allows the
instructor to choose which units should be emphasized and how
information should be distributed.
Numerous studies have evaluated this type of program for instructor performance,45 postcourse skills performance,46 and retention 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after training.47 48 49 50 51 Most studies have documented poor postcourse performance and poor retention of core BLS skills. This educational failure has been attributed to multiple factors, including insufficient practice time, the complexity and large amount of information covered, and numerous other factors across the educational spectrum. One study showed that instructors tend to spend too much time lecturing and allow too little time for practice. In addition, instructors provided poor feedback and correction of skills and did not follow the prescribed curriculum.45 The quality and accuracy of skills evaluation by instructors has also been questioned. Studies have noted poor interinstructor reliability during skills evaluation even when standardized checklists were used.52 53 Use of manikins with tape readouts in conjunction with instructor observation and computerized feedback with instructor observation have been shown to be the most objective and accurate forms of evaluation, but these methods were criticized as a cause of "strict constructionist" behavior in the classroom. Instructors tended to expect an unrealistic skill level during evaluation, which in turn led to excessive criticism and negative feedback to students. Beginning in the early 1990s, instructors and trainers started to reshape CPR training by developing simpler skills checklists and equipment manufacturers simplified the design of manikins.
In addition, studies have shown that participants are frequently reluctant to perform CPR even after they are trained.54 This reluctance is related to such concerns as anxiety, guilt, fear of imperfect performance, responsibility, and infection. These issues must be addressed during the CPR course to alleviate participants concerns.
Numerous innovative instructional methods have been used to improve performance. These include overtraining,55 simplification of course content, videotaped instruction for initial learning and reinforcement,56 57 58 videotaped self-instruction with manikins,59 60 61 use of "practice-after-watching" videotapes with instructor support,16 and use of audio prompts.62 63 64
Simplification
There is now widespread consensus that BLS training needs to be
simplified so that students can focus on learning the essential skills
of CPR. Skills performance sheets have been revised to reduce
the number of critical steps needed to successfully perform CPR. The
complexity of the sequences and the precision required to perform them
contribute to widespread learning difficulties. No evidence supports
rigorous training requirements as a way to improve outcomes.
Simplification of the educational content of materials will improve
learning and retention in both basic and advanced ECC programs. A
comparison of video self-instruction and traditional CPR training
revealed that students who watched a 34-minute video focusing on a
single task (1-rescuer adult CPR) retained more information and skills
than students taught in a 4-hour course covering numerous
topics.59 Audio prompts and home learning systems have
also been used successfully to simplify CPR
education.63 64
In 1 study, reducing the number of steps in CPR from 8 steps to 4 resulted in superior skills retention. Shorter, objective-focused ACLS courses do a better job at teaching core skills and improving retention than long courses do.65 Peer training provides a mechanism for training large numbers of people in a cost-effective manner. Simplification of the design of peer-training courses has significantly improved learning and retention.66
Use of core objectives to determine the essential content of a course may be a helpful method for focusing on the essential information needed for a target audience. Table 5 describes the core objectives of BLS and thus the core content of BLS courses defined in a recent consensus process.
|
Future research should focus on controlled trials of simplified action sequences and skills in ECC courses. Outcome studies should be performed to verify proficiency when new, simpler sequences and skills are used, and clinical studies should be conducted if there are significant changes in resuscitation sequences or procedures.
Targeting Populations for CPR Education
Target: Family Members of High-Risk Cardiac Patients
Past CPR guidelines recommended aiming courses at relatives and
close friends of persons at risk.67 The International
Guidelines 2000 also recommend that the public be taught both adult and
pediatric BLS on the basis of individual need for CPR training. In
particular, pediatric BLS training is recommended for caretakers of
children, including parents, teachers, baby-sitters, daycare workers,
and in some cases siblings.
Scientific evaluations support establishment of priority groups to guide CPR education, training, practice, and research. Several studies68 69 70 have shown that family members of high-risk populations benefit from learning CPR. Research confirms that tailoring CPR education to family members results in positive attitudes toward learning and implementing CPR.68 70 71 Many family members of high-risk patients learn CPR successfully without deleterious psychosocial consequences,69 yet they are less likely to seek CPR training and least likely actually to receive CPR training. We must continue to aim CPR courses at family members of high-risk patients.
On the basis of evidence presented at the international Guidelines 2000 Conference, we recommend that strong recruitment efforts be directed at
After thorough discussion this was made a Class IIa recommendation.
Additional studies are needed (1) to determine which individual characteristics of courses lead to increased participation in CPR training, (2) to describe the factors that prevent healthcare professionals from recommending CPR training to families of at-risk patients, and (3) to identify the CPR training methods that are most attractive to families and caretakers of at-risk patients.
A New Era? Video-Mediated Instruction
Video self-instruction, like many other learning methods, is
effective in teaching the initial cognitive and psychomotor skills of
CPR. Unfortunately most people who learn CPR by this method do not
retain their skills for long. Even those who care for high-risk
patients tend to forget what they have learned,72 73
probably because they do not practice their skills. Only highly
motivated family members use video self-instruction or other materials
to practice, review, and maintain their knowledge and
skills.72 The less educated, males, and elderly learn CPR
poorly without instructor training and support.
Studies72 73 of these groups show that instructor-led CPR
training is more effective in terms of CPR knowledge and skills than
video self-instruction. Participants at the international Guidelines
2000 Conference agreed that the evidence supports the following
conclusions:
Validated learning systems are effective methods for conveying initial CPR skills but only for motivated families and caretakers (Class IIb).
Video self-instruction without manikins or instructor feedback fails to yield an adequate level of BLS skills after initial training (Class Indeterminate; not recommended).
Summary: Innovative Teaching Featuring Video-Based Instruction for
Healthcare Professionals and the General Public
Any reference to video-based instruction and learning must be
placed in context with the ways in which videotapes are used in modern
CPR training.
Passive Watching
The passive watching technique conveys information only. The
video gives an overview of knowledge and skills and may be
motivational. We do not know how much of the information is actually
learned, but students reportedly "feel more comfortable" after
passively watching a video.
Learn or Practice While Watching
In this technique the student watches the instructor on a
monitor and attempts to follow the actions demonstrated by the
instructor. This technique was used in the pioneering studies of
Brennan, Braslow, Kaye, Todd, and others. Researchers have evaluated
this technique more than any other video-based technique using the
highest level of methodology. This technique does not require the
presence of an on-site instructor but does require personal manikins
for each student.
Learn or Practice After Watching
In this technique students watch a video with an
instructor demonstrating brief but critical actions (eg, head
tiltchin lift). The on-site instructor pauses the video after each
action and closely observes the students as they perform the actions
demonstrated by the video instructor. This sequence of "watch then
practice" is repeated until all students learn the particular action.
On-site instructors and manikins for each student are required. This
technique can lead to standardized CPR education if the same videotape
is used across the country. Such courses are so tightly scripted that
instructor flexibility is markedly restricted. Nevertheless this
approach is popular among instructors because their role is important
and demanding.
The traditional CPR training model that allows maximum instructor flexibility has resulted in transmission of inconsistent information and insufficient practice time for students, resulting in poor outcomes at the end of training.46 47 48 49 50 51 59 Rather than prohibit instructor flexibility, the AHA ECC Committee aims to improve the consistency of information presented and maximize skill practice time by incorporating more video-based experiences and extra time for hands-on practice.
Past attempts at video-based training without manikin practice (passive watching model) resulted in poor initial and long-term outcomes.58 Passive watching combined with review of written materials is a somewhat successful model for renewal courses.56 In 1 study investigators mailed videotapes to laypersons in a countywide area to determine whether a free 10-minute lesson in CPR would result in an increase in the percentage of arrests in which a witness or bystander started CPR. Under the actual arrest situations in this study, the investigators could detect no effect of the videotape.57
The same investigators attempted to provide CPR instruction through public service announcements delivered in the early morning hours. This initiative did result in a statistically significant increase in performance of bystander CPR.74 Recently Braslow and Todd59 60 61 showed that video self-instruction could teach adequate adult 1-rescuer CPR skills in 30 minutes. This contrasted with the 4 hours required in the traditional CPR course. The study noted that less hands-on practice time occurred during the traditional 4-hour course than during the 30-minute video-based course.
Video instruction was initially incorporated into AHA courses during pilot studies conducted by Edward Stapleton and Tom Aufderheide of the Heartsaver AED Course. The Heartsaver AED Course teaches 1-rescuer adult CPR, use of the pocket mask, and use of an AED.16 All of these skills are taught and learned using the practice after watching technique.
Video-based instruction has many advantages: consistency of content, less time required for skills demonstration, more time for skill practice, and a shift from a teacher-centered to a student-centered classroom environment. Video also has the potential to motivate students by presenting real-life cases. Video is a visually stimulating educational tool. Practice after watching video-based instruction with instructor feedback is a validated primary learning strategy for training of lay rescuers (Class IIa).
Audio devices that talk the rescuer through the steps of CPR in the classroom have also been used to enhance performance during CPR instruction.63 64 These devices can enhance learning for individuals who cannot be reached by traditional lecture methods. Audio prompting devices facilitate consistent repetitive practice, which results in improved initial acquisition and retention of skills. Use of audio prompting devices is recommended (Class IIb).
CPR in the Schools
Several studies in the 1990s led to rediscovery of the
value of teaching CPR in schools. In 1998 the AHA began a large-scale
evaluation of CPR in schools in the United States. Experts at the
international Guidelines 2000 Conference strongly recommended
development of in-school CPR programs as a primary educational
strategy to ensure widespread learning of CPR and other BLS
skills. Because 70% to 80% of cardiac arrests occur at
home,3 widespread training of a national population
is needed to increase the likelihood of CPR being performed before the
arrival of EMS personnel.
PAD programs that provide AEDs for individual homes are not expected to provide much benefit because of the small population that would be served and the cost of AEDs.15 CPR is a critical action that can be performed in the home, where adolescents are often present. In addition, the major causes of death in school-aged children are unintentional injury, drowning, suffocation, and other conditions treatable with BLS. In 1998 the AHA trained 2.4 million lay rescuers in adult and pediatric CPR,75 approximately 0.9% of the US population. Evidence gathered about CPR in schools included findings of 7 studies (level of evidence 3). All 7 studies support this guideline and present no opposing evidence. These studies have consistently demonstrated the effectiveness of school-based curriculums in ensuring both knowledge and skills retention consistent with outcomes among adult populations.76 77 78 79 80 81
Teaching CPR in schools is a powerful educational strategy. Research is needed to identify the best content, process, and structure of the curricula. Such a program will ensure widespread dissemination of CPR and other BLS skills to citizens around the world. The evidence for these recommendations does not include evidence from prospective, randomized clinical trials. Therefore, the concept of CPR in midlevel schools does not yet merit a Class I recommendation.
Evaluation: A Process to Improve Learning
Evaluation in ECC courses is critical for both instructors and
students. Evaluation helps achieve the overall course goal of having
each participant acquire the skills and knowledge needed for his or her
role in a potentially life-threatening situation. Teachers must
teach effectively and students must learn effectively. Evaluation
provides the tools by which instructors and students measure their
success and plan for improvement. Evaluation of ECC courses has
multiple overlapping purposes:
Variability in Students Versus Variability in Courses
Persons who participate in ECC courses have different needs,
skills, experiences, motivation, and learning styles. This diversity
requires flexibility in presentation and format that must
be balanced against the need for predictable educational outcomes.
Course objectives, however, must remain consistent across the
training network. Uniform course objectives can be maintained by use of
standardized evaluation instruments. Table 6 lists the elements of ECC courses,
areas in which variability is allowable, and the level of variability
that is allowable.
|
Footnotes |
---|
References |
---|
Top International Guidelines 2000The First... Evidence-Based Resuscitation... The Effectiveness of ECC The Chain of Survival The Preventive Cardiology-CPR... The "Risk Factors Modification... Final Comments: Have We... References |
---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
M. A. Halm The Healing Power of the Human-Animal Connection Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2008; 17(4): 373 - 376. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
M. A. Halm Effects of Local Anesthetics on Pain With Intravenous Catheter Insertion Am. J. Crit. Care., May 1, 2008; 17(3): 265 - 268. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
H. M Draper and J A. Eppert Association of Pharmacist Presence on Compliance with Advanced Cardiac Life Support Guidelines During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2008; 42(4): 469 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
R. S. Twibell, D. Siela, C. Riwitis, J. Wheatley, T. Riegle, D. Bousman, S. Cable, P. Caudill, S. Harrigan, R. Hollars, et al. Nurses' Perceptions of Their Self-confidence and the Benefits and Risks of Family Presence During Resuscitation Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2008; 17(2): 101 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
M. P. Anstadt and J. E. Lowe Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 487 - 506. [Full Text] |
||||
|
H. Losert, F. Sterz, K. Kohler, G. Sodeck, R. Fleischhackl, P. Eisenburger, A. Kliegel, H. Herkner, H. Myklebust, J. Nysaether, et al. Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Among Highly Trained Staff in an Emergency Department Setting Arch Intern Med, November 27, 2006; 166(21): 2375 - 2380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Part 7.2: Management of Cardiac Arrest Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-58 - IV-66. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
M. A. Halm Family Presence During Resuscitation: A Critical Review of the Literature Am. J. Crit. Care., November 1, 2005; 14(6): 494 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
T. D. Valenzuela, K. B. Kern, L. L. Clark, R. A. Berg, M. D. Berg, D. D. Berg, R. W. Hilwig, C. W. Otto, D. Newburn, and G. A. Ewy Interruptions of Chest Compressions During Emergency Medical Systems Resuscitation Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9): 1259 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
G. A. Ewy Cardiocerebral Resuscitation: The New Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Circulation, April 26, 2005; 111(16): 2134 - 2142. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
B. S. Abella, N. Sandbo, P. Vassilatos, J. P. Alvarado, N. O'Hearn, H. N. Wigder, P. Hoffman, K. Tynus, T. L. Vanden Hoek, and L. B. Becker Chest Compression Rates During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Are Suboptimal: A Prospective Study During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Circulation, February 1, 2005; 111(4): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
I. Jacobs, V. Nadkarni, the ILCOR Task Force on Cardiac Arrest and Cardiop, J. Bahr, R. A. Berg, J. E. Billi, L. Bossaert, P. Cassan, A. Coovadia, K. D'Este, et al. Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcome Reports: Update and Simplification of the Utstein Templates for Resuscitation Registries: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa) Circulation, November 23, 2004; 110(21): 3385 - 3397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
C. Raedler, W. G. Voelckel, V. Wenzel, A. C. Krismer, C. A. Schmittinger, H. Herff, V. D. Mayr, K. H. Stadlbauer, K. H. Lindner, and A. Konigsrainer Treatment of Uncontrolled Hemorrhagic Shock After Liver Trauma: Fatal Effects of Fluid Resuscitation Versus Improved Outcome After Vasopressin Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2004; 98(6): 1759 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
T. P. Aufderheide, G. Sigurdsson, R. G. Pirrallo, D. Yannopoulos, S. McKnite, C. von Briesen, C. W. Sparks, C. J. Conrad, T. A. Provo, and K. G. Lurie Hyperventilation-Induced Hypotension During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Circulation, April 27, 2004; 109(16): 1960 - 1965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
A.H. Idris, R.A. Berg, J. Bierens, L. Bossaert, C.M. Branche, A. Gabrielli, S.A. Graves, A.J. Handley, R. Hoelle, P.T. Morley, et al. Recommended Guidelines for Uniform Reporting of Data From Drowning: The "Utstein Style" Circulation, November 18, 2003; 108(20): 2565 - 2574. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
D. A. Chamberlain, M. F. Hazinski, On behalf of the European Resuscitation Council, the American Heart Association, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, the Australia and New Zealand Resuscitation Counci, and the Consejo Latino-Americano de Resusucitacion Education in Resuscitation: An ILCOR Symposium: Utstein Abbey: Stavanger, Norway: June 22-24, 2001 Circulation, November 18, 2003; 108(20): 2575 - 2594. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, M. M. Scheinman, E. M. Aliot, J. S. Alpert, H. Calkins, A. J. Camm, W. B. Campbell, D. E. Haines, K. H. Kuck, B. B. Lerman, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias*--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias) Circulation, October 14, 2003; 108(15): 1871 - 1909. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
M. H. Weil, W. Tang, and J. Bisera Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: One Size Does Not Fit All Circulation, February 18, 2003; 107(6): 794 - 794. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
A. Kleinsasser, K. H. Lindner, A. Schaefer, and A. Loeckinger Decompression-Triggered Positive-Pressure Ventilation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves Pulmonary Gas Exchange and Oxygen Uptake Circulation, July 16, 2002; 106(3): 373 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
G. J. Balady, B. Chaitman, C. Foster, E. Froelicher, N. Gordon, and S. Van Camp Automated External Defibrillators in Health/Fitness Facilities: Supplement to the AHA/ACSM Recommendations for Cardiovascular Screening, Staffing, and Emergency Policies at Health/Fitness Facilities Circulation, March 5, 2002; 105(9): 1147 - 1150. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
A. Denault, Y. Beaulieu, S. Belisle, and G. Peachey Best evidence in anesthetic practice: Treatment: vasopressin neither improves nor worsens survival from cardiac arrest Can J Anesth, March 1, 2002; 49(3): 312 - 314. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
H.-U. Strohmenger, T. Eftestol, K. Sunde, V. Wenzel, M. Mair, H. Ulmer, K. H. Lindner, and P. A. Steen The Predictive Value of Ventricular Fibrillation Electrocardiogram Signal Frequency and Amplitude Variables in Patients with Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1428 - 1433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
A. S Lockey and J. P Nolan Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults BMJ, October 13, 2001; 323(7317): 819 - 820. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
V. Wenzel and K. H. Lindner Employing vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and vasodilatory shock as a lifesaving vasopressor Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2001; 51(3): 529 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |