Breaking News
Get 4 extra free issues and unlimited free access to NewScientist.com
New Scientist is now partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

The World's No.1 Science & Technology News Service

 

Superflares could kill unprotected astronauts

  • 09:30 21 March 2005
  • Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues.
  • Stephen Battersby
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
Hunting aliens

Hunting aliens

Movie Camera
Astronomer Seth Shostak discusses what he would do if he found a signal from ET
 
Space billiards?

Space billiards

Did a planet with an extremely wonky orbit get knocked there by another planet?
 
Pregnancy supplements may trigger asthma in kids

Asthma risk?

Pregnancy supplements that protect kids from birth defects could also predispose them to asthma, says a study in mice
 
Why albino monks won't conduct stem cell research

The Opus Dei labs

The secretive Catholic group is going into bioresearch – but stem cells are off-limits
 

A study of the most powerful solar flare of the past 500 years suggests that another like it would carry enough punch to kill astronauts in a poorly shielded spacecraft. The crew of a future mission to Mars might be at risk unless their craft is made of the right materials.

Solar flares send high-energy protons streaming through the solar system, and the radiation is sometimes intense enough to endanger the health of astronauts. In January, the two men on the International Space Station had to shelter in the bulkier Russian side of the station during a particularly powerful series of flares.

Scientists have only been able to directly measure the radiation from solar eruptions for the past four decades. The sun probably produces flares bigger than any seen during this time, so to estimate the worst-case event, they used to simply add together the intensities of two known events, or combine the properties peculiar to each.

Now, Lawrence Townsend of the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, US, and his colleagues have calculated the radiation effects of the most powerful solar flare ever recorded, based on evidence that the flare left behind in Greenland's ice nearly 150 years ago.

The event was seen by the British astronomer Richard Carrington in September 1859 (New Scientist print edition, 4 September 2004). It easily surpassed the monster eruption of March 1989, which knocked out the power grid in Quebec, Canada.

High-energy protons

The radiation from the Carrington flare created nitrates and beryllium-10 in Earth's upper atmosphere. These ended up frozen into Greenland ice, allowing scientists today to measure their levels in ice cores.

The amount of nitrates implies that Earth's atmosphere was hit by about 20 billion high-energy protons per square centimetre, more than in any other event of the past 500 years. And the beryllium reveals that the energy spectrum of these protons was roughly equivalent to that of a flare recorded in August 1972.

Townsend's team used this information to calculate the radiation doses astronauts would receive from a Carrington-type flare, given different levels of shielding. They found that astronauts behind only a few centimetres of aluminium - the shielding found in the average spacecraft - would suffer a dose that could cause acute radiation sickness and possibly even death.

This should not alarm astronauts on the space station, says Townsend. Parts of the station have enough shielding even for this worst-case event, and the Sun's activity is closely monitored, so the crew should get several hours' warning to hide if a huge flare erupts.

But it may have implications for the design of long-duration interplanetary manned missions. Conventional aluminium might not be the best choice of building material for a spacecraft for Mars. "Aluminium is not a good radiation shield," says Townsend. "We are looking at alternative materials, such as polyethylene and carbon foams impregnated with hydrogen. A worst-case event would probably be survivable if you use some other material than aluminium."

 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 
There are 2 comments on 1 page

Superflares

By Dr Mathew Joseph

Thu Nov 15 01:57:47 GMT 2007

The current concern is about the saftey of the astronauts. But can a really massive superflare pose any danger to life on earth? Can it destroy most of the Ozone layer? If so, which life forms are likely to be the most affected? Humans alone?

REPORT | REPLY

Superflares

By Ian Suzuki

Mon Dec 10 20:15:38 GMT 2007

Bill Bryson, in <i>A Short History of Nearly Everything</i> states that it would take a direct hit of a solar flare roughly 100 times the normal strength of flares to overcome the magnetosphere, and that all advanced life forms would be severely affected by such an event unless they were somehow protected. Some bacteria, like <i>Deinococcus radiodurans</i>, are pretty much impervious to radiation, so I expect that many of the so-called "lower" life forms would be less strongly affected.

Also, the Ozone layer, unless I am very much mistaken, absorbs UV rays instead of alpha particles - the main concern over the destruction of the Ozone layer is of increased rates of cancer in areas of high latitude. I don't know if a flare would have the same effect as CFCs, however.

REPORT | REPLY

There are 2 comments on 1 page

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

 
 
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine