Print Edition
Get 4 extra free issues and unlimited free access to NewScientist.com
New Scientist is now partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.

The World's No.1 Science & Technology News Service

 

Copyright traps

  • 25 November 2006
  • From New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues.
  • John Lackie, Aspatria, Cumbria, UK
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate
 
A short heel helps runners go the distance

Well heeled

If you're thinking of taking up distance running, measure your heel first
 
Fred's Footprint: What does the credit crunch mean for the environment?

Eco-economics

What does the credit crunch mean for the environment?
 
A phantom penis, and how to remove it

Phantom penis

Surgeons correct a rare side effect of sex-change surgery
 
$7.5 trillion for a 'transitional' fossil?

Easy money?

Find a fossil that proves evolution and win $7.5 trillion
 
Gecko-grip material aims to be the end of glue

Sticky lizards

Movie Camera
A clingy material inspired by geckos' feet could replace some types of glue
 

I read with interest your recent article on copyright traps (21 October, p 62). Some years ago my colleague, Julian Dow and I put the second edition of our Dictionary of Cell and Molecular Biology onto the web as a resource for bioscientists. We had more than one-third of a million hits on the site, and by logging the abortive searches we knew how to choose the new headwords for the third edition. Interestingly, the hard copy (published by Academic Press) continued to sell.

Recently, preparing the fourth edition (which will be published by Elsevier next year), again using the abortive searches list, I've come across several examples of our dictionary entries being copied verbatim and without acknowledgement into other on-line dictionaries. Included amongst these was one that was a copyright trap, exactly as you describe, and it brought a wry smile. It illustrates nicely how misinformation can propagate, though this particular trap is sprung in the new edition. Sadly, we could do nothing for those unable to spell - and I've collected more than 50 recognisable attempts to spell "mitochondrion" so far!

From issue 2579 of New Scientist magazine, 25 November 2006, page 23
 
Comment subject
Comment
No HTML except lower case italic tags or lower case bold tags, please:
<i> or <b>
Your name
Your email
 

We need your email in case we need to contact you about the comment. We will not use it for any other purpose.

 
 

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

 
 
 
Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine
  • For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to New Scientist Print Edition
  • For what's in New Scientist magazine this week see contents
  • Search all stories
  • Contact us about this story
  • Sign up for our free newsletter
 
PASSWORD LOGIN
Subscribe to New Scientist magazine