eFoods Listen to Alex Jones
    • Fabled Enemies
    • Endgame
  • Renowned economist Mikhail Khazin : U.S. will soon face second “Great Depression”

    Yevgeniy Chernyx
    Sunday, Nov 9, 2008

    Five years ago, I ran the cultural section at Komsomolskaya Pravda. Publishing houses used to send me their new releases now and again for review. One day, after digging through the latest shipment of such literature, I stumbled upon a book titled, “Sunset of the Dollar Empire and the End of the Pax Americana.”

    I remember reading the title over to myself several times in disbelief. Way back when, Soviet Americanologists loved to debate the collapse of the U.S. financial empire. But this book was published in 2003.

    I flipped through the pages, skimming over the text. The conclusions of the author — an economist named Mikhail Khazin — seemed convincing enough. So I gave the book to our economics columnist at KP Jenya Anisimov, who wrote a review and interviewed the author later at our editorial offices.

    All these years, I kept Khazin in the back of my mind, and followed his career as he spoke at various conferences throughout Russia. He seemed certain the U.S. was teetering on the verge of an economic collapse, while other analysts were quick to refute his theory. Now, as his once unfathomable prognosis begins to come true, KP contacted Khazin for an interview.

    (Article continues below)

    Fired from the Kremlin!

    KP: Mikhail Leonidovich, how did you end up predicting the current financial crisis?

    Khazin: In the spring of 1997, the Kremlin established the Presidential Economic Department. I was made the deputy head of the unit. Our first task was to prepare a report for [former President Boris] Yeltsin about the economic situation. We realized an economic crisis was pending in Russia and would take place in the late summer or early fall of 1998 if the country’’s economic policies weren’t changed.

    KP: What view did the higher echelons take of your report?

    Khazin: They didn’t really take any view at all. No one read the text except for the deputy head of the administration and Yeltsin himself. In the summer of 1998, we were fired from the presidential administration for trying to stop a business project titled, “State Treasury Bills— Exchange Rate Corridor.” This was the biggest financial scheme of the post-Soviet era. Just as we had predicted, an economic crisis gave way that August. Together with my colleagues, I continued researching the reasons behind the crisis.

    After becoming seriously consumed in our studies of the U.S. financial system, we found an unprecedented parallel. Just as our T-bill market had sucked all the juices out of the Russian economy, the U.S. financial market was sucking the resources out of the entire planet. We realized a similar fate awaited the U.S. financial system. Our article was published in the summer of 2000 in the “Ekspert” magazine, titled, “Is the U.S. Digging for an Apocalypse.” We concluded that it was just as impossible to avoid an economic crisis in the U.S. as the financial collapse in Russia.

    Playing the idiot

    KP: The U.S. obviously didn’t listen to the song written by [the renowned Russian rock group] LUBE during perestroika, “Don’t Play the Fool, America!” Seriously, though, what’s the real reason for the economic collapse? Let’s try to do this without any heavy duty financial terms…

    Khazin: I’ll try! The economic model that led to the collapse was the result of a crisis in the 1970s. This was a terrible financial crisis that was the result of surplus capital. Even the 19th-Century classics in economics literature concluded that capital grows faster than labor provides compensation. As a result, there is a lack of demand. In traditional capitalism, this problem is solved on account of crises in excess production. And in an imperialistic system, the problem is solved on account of capital outflow. But by the 1970s, these solutions had run their course. However, the internatinoal situation demanded the U.S. either make a great scientific and technological leap forward or lose the Cold War to the USSR. The administration of [President Jimmy] Carter and the head of the Financial Reserve System Paul Walker developed a very tricky concept. For the first time in the history of capitalism, capitalists began helping others, issuing new currency in an effort to stimulate aggregate demand .

    KP: They decided to switch on the printing press?

    Khazin: Exactly. In the early 1980s, they started to stimulate demand through state support. For example, they launched the “Star Wars” program. As of 1983, they placed an emphasis on the household economies.

    KP: You mean, they relied on the average citizens?

    Khazin: Yes. For an entire quarter century, households received funds as a result of issuing new currency in larger and larger quantities.

    KP: In other words, credit?

    Khazin: Yes. The U.S. was able to make the next step in technological progress as a result of this excess demand. They accomplished the collapse of the USSR and numerous other significant fears. But… The boom took place thanks to resources that were supposed to provide for future growth. The country ate its own resources two generations ahead of time. The U.S. built up tremendous debt. This is clearly seen if we compare the growth of debt in U.S. households with the entire U.S. debt and GDP. The economy is growing at an annual rate of 2-3, or at a maximum 4 percent. But debt is increasing at a rate of 8-10 percent.

    KP: Well, let the debt keep growing… The U.S. lived fine up until now without a problem… Better than we did!

    Khazin: Yes, the U.S. did create a very high standard of living by stimulating consumer demand. Generations lived without having to experience poverty. But it’s impossible to live forever in debt. Household debt has now surpassed the national economy — more than $14 trillion. Now it’s time to pay up. Of course, Wall Street tried to postpone this collapse. I won’t go into detail about derivatives and other such financial assets, but this was just a gasp for air before an inevitable death.

    Another problem in the U.S. is that powerful industries were built around this growing demand. Whatever decision Wall Street takes right now, the demand is going to fall. What will happen to these industries? In 2000, we estimated that 25 percent of the U.S. economy would disappear. Today, we think the number is closest to one-third — if not more.

    KP: That’s a lot!

    Khazin: That’s an incredible amount! But what exactly does this mean — the destruction of one-fourth of the U.S. economy? It means an uncontrollable increase in unemployment, a horrible depression, a sharp increase in the effect of social services on the budget… Now, the U.S. is jumping all over the place doing everything its can to rescue this fraction of the economy. The government is stimulating banks and manufacturing… But regardless, in 2-3 years, the U.S. will face a crisis similar to the Great Depression.

    Who is Who

    Mikhail Leonidovich Khazin was born in 1962. He studied mathematics at the Yaroslavl University and Moscow State University. In 1984-1991, he worked at the Soviet Academy of Sciences. In 1993-1994, he worked at the State Working Center of Economic Reforms. In 1995-1997, he was the head of the Credit Policy Department at the Economics Ministry. In 1997-1998, he was the deputy head of the Presidential Economics Department. In June 1998, he left state service. At the moment, he is president of the consulting firm, Neokon.


    • Social bookmarks
    • Social bookmarks
    • Email this article
    • Email this article
    • Print
    • Print this page

    53 Responses to “Renowned economist Mikhail Khazin : U.S. will soon face second “Great Depression””

    Pages: [6] 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

    1. 53
      John the Electrician Says:

      Long time this disaster was forseen. My old uncle said we (US Government) can’t just keep spending and making things go up forever and now it’s the Day of Reconning (oops sp) Anyway the chickens come home to roost. The enemy is the Fed and the tool of its power is unrestrained printing press, electronic money. Corruption and dislocations, social erosion is all part of the result of going off the Gold standard. Vietnam was financed by inflation and the story still goes on, now its Iraq and tomorrow Iran but who knows. Make enemies then you have a reason to make war, it’s for the money. Almost half of the Federal Budget is just to pay the interest on Uncle Sam’s Debt. Hmmm… How life could have been if they kept the controls in place….

    2. 52
      Dan the man Says:

      The 70’s were sure a catalyst for change as evidenced, yet again. The use of derivatives in “absorbing shock” became quite prevelant. This is all on the backdrop of the demise of Bretton Woods and the closing of the gold window, but before the “paper lions” get their balls all in a knot, let me say that Bretton Woods had to go ! Didn’t work, but contrary to popular belief, it was not the gold that created the problem !!! It was the fixed peg. Gold , as a currency, will not serve the system of global finance if it pegged and unreflective of real time fundamentals.

      Now that gold can be “split” using real time valuations of weight vs currency valuations, allocated gold title can be distributed from A to B in an instant, anywhere, even if you only want to buy a stick of gum.

      Store of value with instant seamless liquidity ! SWEET !

      Will it be top-down ? Don’t count on it. The script isn’t written that way. Demand must assert its rightful power in the balancing act between supply and demand. We’ve been supply driven long enough, going right back to when the “apple was shoved in our faces”.

      The end of an age and the beginning of a new one. Rejoice in that !

    3. 51
      Pavel Says:

      This is a translation roughly of one haft of the text. I am surprised that this trancated version made aby discussion. Here it looks like a couple of unsupported forcasts of what is more-or-less clear now. But maybe it even better like this… in particular, in the omotted part Khazin claimed that 9/11 was organized by US as a measure to postpone the crisis.

    Pages: [6] 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

    Leave a Reply

    Comments may take some time to appear when server is under heavy loads.