Science and the UFO phenomenon:

STATEMENT ON UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS:

This statement has been submitted by James E. McDonald, Senior Physicist, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, and professor, Department of Meteorology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, to the House Committee on Science and Astronautics at July 29, 1968, Symposium on Unidentified Flying Objects, Rayburn Bldg., Washington, D.C.

I have created a table of content underneath, which is not part of the original scientific publication. The 56 pages publication is some 250Kb and I have broken it in several files for acceptable web access speed.

Please go to the Science section of this site for more scientific papers by James E. McDonald and other scientists, and comments and information regarding scientists' work and position about the UFO phenomenon.

TABLE OF CONTENT:

Introduction (This page)
Scope and background of present comments
The unconventional nature of the UFO problem
Some alternative hypothesis
Some remarks on interviewing experience and types of UFO cases encountered
Why don't pilots see UFOs?
Why are UFOs only seen by lone individuals, with no multiple-witness sightings?
Why aren't UFOs ever seen in cities? Why just in out-of-the-way places?
Why don't astronomers ever see UFOs?
Meteorologists and weather observers look at the skies frequently. Why don't they see UFOs?
Don't weather balloons and research balloons account for many UFOs?
Why aren't UFOs ever tracked by radar?
Why aren't there numerous photos of UFOs if they really exist?
If UFOs are real, shouldn't they produce some real physical effects?
Is there any evidence of hazard or hostility in the UFO phenomena?
Misapplications of atmospheric physics in past UFO explanations
Summary and recommendation
References

INTRODUCTION:

STATEMENT ON UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS

submitted to the House Committee on Science and Astronautics at July 29, 1968, Symposium on Unidentified Flying Objects, Rayburn Bldg., Washington, D.C., by James E. McDonald.

by

James E. McDonald, Senior Physicist, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, and professor, Department of Meteorology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

Prepared statement submitted to the House Committee on Science and Astronautics at July 29, 1968, Symposium on Unidentified Flying Objects, Rayburn Bldg., Washington, D.C., by James E. McDonald.
INTRODUCTION:

I should like first to commend the House Committee on Science and Astronautics for recognizing the need for a closer look at scientific aspects of the long-standing puzzle of the Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs). From time to time in the history of science, situations have arisen in which a problem of ultimately enormous importance went begging for adequate attention simply because that problem appeared to involve phenomena so far outside the current bounds of scientific knowledge that it was not even regarded as a legitimate subject of serious scientific concern. That is precisely the situation in which the UFO problem now lies. One of the principal results of my own recent intensive study of the UFO enigma is this: I have become convinced that the scientific community, not only in this country but throughout the world, has been casually ignoring as nonsense a matter of extraordinary scientific importance. The attention of your Committee can, and I hope will, aid greatly in correcting this situation. As you will note in the following, my own present opinion, based on two years of careful study, is that UFOs are probably extraterrestrial devices engaged in something that might very tentatively be termed "surveillance."
If the extraterrestrial hypothesis is proved correct (and I emphasize that the present evidence only points in that direction but cannot be said to constitute irrefutable proof), then clearly UFOs will become a top-priority scientific problem. I believe you might agree that, even if there were a slight chance of the correctness of that hypothesis, the UFOs would demand the most careful attention. In fact, that chance seems to some of us a long way from trivial. We share the view of Vice Adm. R. H. Hillenkoetter, former CIA Director, who said eight years ago, "It is imperative that we learn where the UFOs come from and what their purpose is." (Ref. 1) Since your committee is concerned only with broad aspects of our national scientific program but also with the prosecution of our entire space program, and since that space program has been tied in for some years now with the dramatic goal of a search for life in the universe, I submit that the topic of today's Symposium is eminently deserving of your attention. Indeed, I have to state, for the record, that I believe no other problem within your jurisdiction is of comparable scientific and national importance. Those are strong words, and I intend them to be.
In addition to your Committee responsibilities with respect to science and the aerospace programs, there is another still broader basis upon which it is highly appropriate that you now take up the UFO problem: Twenty years of public interest, public puzzlement, and even some public disquiet demand that we all push toward early clarification of this unparalleled scientific mystery. I hope that our session here today will prove a significant turning point, orienting new scientific efforts towards illumination of this scientific problem that has been with us for over 20 years.

TABLE OF CONTENT:

This page was last updated on September 21, 2002