About Contact Archives RSS Columns Photos

Crooked Carol Browner: Obama’s ethically-challenged energy czar

By Michelle Malkin  •  December 12, 2008 09:10 AM

My syndicated column today puts the screws on Clintonite Carol Browner, rumored to be Obama’s choice for energy czar. She’s not so fresh and so clean. And conservatives should raise their voices for, you know, real change.

***

Same old, same old.

The trouble with Obama’s energy czar
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2008

Yet another Clintonite has been wheeled out of the political morgue to serve in the Obama administration. Carol Browner, a neon green radical who headed the Environmental Protection Agency from 1993-2000, is widely rumored to be the president-elect’s choice for “energy czar.” But an ethical cloud still hangs over Browner’s EPA legacy. It doesn’t take a team of Ivy League-degreed lawyers to figure out that this is one more headache the Hope and Change crew doesn’t need.

In the spirit of reaching across the aisle, let me dust off the cobwebs and help out all the smarty-pants vetters on the Obama team with a little background on Browner’s stained past:

On her last day in office, nearly eight years ago, Browner oversaw the destruction of agency computer files in brazen violation of a federal judge’s order requiring the agency to preserve its records. This from a public official who bragged about her tenure: “One of the things I’m the proudest of at EPA is the work we’ve done to expand the public’s right to know.”

Asked to explain her track-covering actions, the savvy career lawyer Browner played dumb. Figuratively batting her eyelashes, she claimed she had no clue about a court injunction signed by U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth on the same day she commanded an underling to wipe her hard drives clean. Golly gee willikers, how could that have slipped by her?

According to testimony in a freedom of information lawsuit filed against EPA by the Landmark Legal Foundation, a Virginia-based conservative legal watchdog group, Browner commanded a computer technician on Jan. 19, 2001: “‘I would like my files deleted. I want you to delete my files.” Not coincidentally, the Landmark Legal Foundation had been pressing Browner to fully and publicly disclose the names of any special interest groups that may have influenced her wave of last-minute regulatory actions. Two days before she told her technician to purge all her records, EPA had gone to court to file a motion opposing the federal court injunction protecting those government documents.

Plausible deniability? Not bloody likely.

Incredibly, Browner asserted that there was no work-related material on her work computer. She explained she was merely cleaning the hard drive of computer games she had downloaded for her son, and that she wanted to expunge the hard drive as a “courtesy” to the incoming Bush administration. How thoughtful. Later, her agency admitted that three other top EPA officials had their computers erased despite the federal court order and ongoing FOIA case (the record is silent on whether Browner’s son was playing games on their desktops, too). A further belated admission revealed that the agency had failed to search Browner’s office for public documents as required by Landmark’s public disclosure lawsuit.

Not only were all the top officials’ hard drives cleared and reformatted, but e-mail backup tapes were erased and reused in violation of records preservation practices.

After a two-year legal battle, Judge Lamberth finally held the EPA in contempt of court for the systemic file destruction – actions Lambert lambasted as “contumacious conduct” (obstinate resistance to authority). As is typical in Washington, Browner weaseled out of any serious repercussions. Lamberth inexplicably decided that slapping the agency as a whole with contempt – rather than any individual – would deter future cover-ups.

Is this a gamble the Obama administration wants to take? Browner has crossed the line and violated public trust before in her capacity as eco-chief. Early in her first term as EPA head, Browner got caught by a congressional subcommittee using taxpayer funds to create and send out illegal lobbying material to over 100 grassroots environmental lobbying organizations. Browner exploited her office to orchestrate a political campaign by left-wing groups, who turned around and attacked Republican lawmakers for supporting regulatory reform. These are the very same groups – anti-business, anti-sound science, pro-eco-hysteria – that Browner would be working arm in arm with as Obama’s “energy czar.”

This is regression we can’t afford.

***

Max Schulz adds more background here.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Carol Browner: Obama’s Rumored Energy Czar | Skeptics Global Warming
  2. Obama's Energy Czarina - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
  3. Mark Levin Fan » Blog Archive » Obama’s ‘energy czar’ erased public records while Clinton’s EPA chief
  4. Is anyone Else Sick of All the Czars? | Pirates! Man Your Women!
  5. Obama’s Chosen Energy Secretary A Liability? « Jane Q. Republican
  6. Its begining to look a lot like communism! Hussein Obama’s next ‘czar’, the crooked Carol Browner | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  7. The French Connection–Chicago Corruption Cesspool–Climate Change–Big Al and BO–Gore Obama–The GO Team! « Pronk Palisades
  8. Maybe We Should Have Billy Mays Run Our Health Care System « Grand Rants
  9. BizzyBlog » Couldn’t Help But Comment (121308, Morning)
  10. Crooked is as Crooked Does « Mark Epstein
  11. “Righteous Wind” or “Foul Odor”?; Scandal before even taking office « Northern Thoughts And Reflections
  12. Michelle Malkin » Carol Browner: You were warned
  13. AllMilitary.com - Official Military Blog, Military Updates » Blog Archive » The Weekly Claw 12-16-08
  14. Obama’s Cabinet continues to fail to impress « Wellsy’s World
  15. Jeremiah Films
  16. Celebrity Paycut - Encouraging celebrities all over the world to save us from global warming by taking a paycut.
  17. There's My Two Cents
  18. Another Clinton Retread Joins Obama Administration « Obama Spy
  19. Slouching Towards Change…and the American Politburo Being Assembled to Make Sure We Get There - ntrepid’s blog - RedState
  20. Slouching Towards Change…and the American Politburo Being Assembled to Make Sure We Get There - ntrepid’s blog - RedState
  21. ChooseTheHero.com » Blog Archive » Slouching Towards Change…and the American Politburo Being Assembled to Make Sure We Get There
  22. Hard Starboard
  23. Michelle Malkin » Adios! Bill Richardson drops out as Commerce Secretary
  24. A Quarterback or a Halfwit? - streiff’s blog - RedState
  25. ChooseTheHero.com » Blog Archive » A Quarterback or a Halfwit?
  26. Should Tennessee emulate Oklahoma?? - Page 2 - VolNation
  27. Barack Obama’s Socialist Green Commissar Carol Browner « Pronk Palisades
  28. AllMilitary.com - Official Military Blog, Military Updates » Blog Archive » The Saturday Claw 1-17-09
  29. Carol Browner; The Face of Barack Obama Socialism « Northern Thoughts And Reflections

Trackback URL

Comments

  1. #1
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:19 am, txvet2 said:

    Using the words crooked, Democrat, and Clintonite are a triple redundancy.

  2. #2
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:21 am, longbow said:

    But you see, if you have no ethics, you can never have an ethics violation…

    People who believe there are accepted standards of behavior and who believe in concepts like duty, honor and truth will always be at a disadvantage when they are up against the unprincipled. Conservatives and the right must understand that the left has no rules by which they play in any arena. Unless you call lying, cheating and stealing rules.

  3. #3
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:27 am, cpodug said:

    More Illinois politics, it looks like. There is much truth in the phrase, “change you can believe in.” Change for the worst, and the changes are happening faster and faster. Not much chance of things changing for the better under this administration, is there? (Rhetorical question)

  4. #4
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:29 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    Add her to this list.

  5. #5
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:30 am, jjmurphy said:

    This will be an appropriate quote for the next four years:

    “George Costanza: Jerry, just remember, it’s not a lie if you believe it.”

  6. #6
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:31 am, ThatSamIAm said:

    So blatantly unethical. But you see no outrage from the MSM. You hear no hard hitting questions.

    If Obama signed Manson up for his cabinet none of them would blink an eye. The scam of “change” being worked by the Dems and the media is insulting to anyone with a brain.

  7. #7
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:31 am, TK-421 said:

    Well maybe getting a Clinton goverment back is the change they wanted? Alot of fools think Clinton was a good president. He wasn’t, we might have had no wars but that was because Clinton’s budget cuts to the military cut the legs from under us and left us with a force that has problems compleating its missions currently. His education plans allowed liberals a foot hold, his anti gun positions brought about the highest rise in crime (with said illegal weapons) seen since the 1930’s.

    His stance on buisness DID bring a wealth of trading partners, however with the WTO and doing away with terrifs, it was a lie. Only high inflation rate kept the wool pulled over the commoners eyes. In fact shortly into this our factories closed left and right and we recive substandard products and nearly outragous prices do to capitialistic corruption from retailers.

    But hey the people didn’t have to fight or think, so may the O is what they need.

  8. #8
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:38 am, RedRepub said:

    If I were in Congress, I’d oppose her confirmation simply due to that smirk on her face in the above photo. It almost begs to be captioned…….

    Caption contest, anyone?

  9. #9
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:39 am, Socky said:

    As regards Obama, the hard-eyed cynics seem to have been vindicated over the glassy-eyed cultists.

  10. #10
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:39 am, BKennedy said:

    I dunno Michelle, I think you missed something here.

    This woman isn’t really neon green.

    Acid green is more like it.

  11. #11
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:44 am, jt3151 said:

    If she didn’t have any work on her work computer she should have to pay back eight years of salary.

    Thank you for posting this; I had no knowledge of this history.

  12. #12
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:46 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Horrible as it is why did not the Bush Justice Department take action? Why? Because President Bush spent 8 years trying to deal with people who had no interest in trying to deal with him on a fair bases.

    I hope our President enjoys his retirement. We deserve it. That BroBama is appointing liars, thieves, bums and such is a given–he is a Democrat, a Liberal and from Chicago’s Daly machine.

    And we have Democrats jawing about War Crimes Trials. We are in for a ride.

    That everyman be armed.

  13. #13
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:46 am, TheSageOfSedgwick said:

    Good morning, Longbow,

    Your post reminds me that, if you piss into a vat of fine wine, the wine is ruined; but if you pour fine wine into a vat of piss, the piss is not improved.

    The application of this truism to the left-right balance is achingly frustrating. How do you deal with it?

    Best,

    The not-so-sage Sage of Sedgwick

  14. #14
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:48 am, traffic_robot said:

    This 90’s flashback is depressing. Why don’t we bring back Hazel O’Leary while we’re at it?

  15. #15
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:52 am, CantCureStupid said:

    The only difference between Obozo’s administration and Clinton’s is that there will be an actual black guy in the White House instead of a pasty-faced wannabe.

    Corruption is as corruption does. Good work, Mr. Hopenchange.

  16. #16
    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:57 am, sonofdy said:

    OFF TOPIC, but werid. My unit has somehow avoided being deployed to iraq dispite asking to go. Odd but not the werid thing. My non-military dad is going to Iraq as a contractor before his enlisted son does. That is werid. He will actualy be handling water supplies for a base there.

  17. #17
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:02 am, FamilyMan said:

    How many billions will she have to play with?
    GEEES!

  18. #18
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:02 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:57 am, sonofdy said:

    OFF TOPIC, but werid. My unit has somehow avoided being deployed to iraq dispite asking to go.

    Thanks and God’s Speed eitherway sonofdy.

  19. #19
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:03 am, Azygos said:

    On December 12th, 2008 at 9:52 am, CantCureStupid said:
    The only difference between Obozo’s administration and Clinton’s is that there will be an actual black guy in the White House instead of a pasty-faced wannabe.

    Sorry, he does not have enough black in him to qualify for affirmative action. He has at best 6.25% black. He is Arab not black.

    Michelle,
    I can’t quite figure out what it is that you are trying to say with this article. What is it you are saying this woman is covering up? That a government employee would have no work related files on their computer after eight years on the job is not a surprise to me.

  20. #20
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:09 am, Mister P said:

    Early in her first term as EPA head, Browner got caught by a congressional subcommittee using taxpayer funds to create and send out illegal lobbying material to over 100 grassroots environmental lobbying organizations

    Now we know her qualifications.

  21. #21
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:09 am, Marc said:

    First, just a bit of historical trivia for those of us who are buffs on useless information. Want to know where the phrase “contumacious conduct” comes from? Judge Royce Lamberth did not invent the phrase. It was used in the impeachment of Andrew Johnson. If you read the articles of impeachment, I think you will find the language “contumacious conduct”.
    Second, what was Carol Browner doing downloading games off the internet on a government computer? Isn’t she supposed to be using her government computer for strictly government work?
    Third, I guess in the world of Obama, “change” means bring back the Clinton administration. This means that Janet Reno and Warren Christopher can’t be far behind, if they can be taken out of mothballs.

  22. #22
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:18 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    None of this is surprising. Obama’s corrupt roots in Chicago, as we see with his relationship to Blago-Scam, is par for the Obama course.

    His presidiency won’t be about doing what’s best for our country, it will be about doing what’s best for him and his cronies.

    Welcome to the United States of Chicago.

  23. #23
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:19 am, johnsteele said:

    Give it up Michelle. We are simply scr*wed for the next four years, and depending on how much damage they can cause in that time, perhaps for all time.

    Remember, these appointments are the tipof the icebreg. The nameless, faceless second tier bureaucrats write the regulations and they are all going to be radical anti-American leftists.

    Welcome to the People’s Socialist Worker’s Republic of The Obama™. All Hail The Obama™.

  24. #24
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:24 am, Mister P said:

    Give it up Michelle. We are simply scr*wed for the next four years, and depending on how much damage they can cause in that time, perhaps for all time.

    How many millions have died for this country and you want to give up? I am glad you weren’t in my squad in the Army.

  25. #25
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:28 am, wighttrasch said:

    She’s not so fresh and so clean.

    I’ll send her a case of ‘Summer’s Eve’ for that not so clean feeling

  26. #26
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:29 am, PKAmmoTroop said:

    O.M.G.!!!

    I Called for the public execution of this moron over a decade ago!!!

    Her insane, stupid, touchy-feely security policies during the Clinton debacle insured a wide open conduit of US Nuclear Information to flow freely from US Security vaults to the Chinese.

    This woman’s shallow, moronic, tunnel-vision view of energy and the environment also helped insure a pipeline to Saudi Arabia where oil trickles one way and US Dollars gush the other…

    This pathetic waste of skin should be locked up for her mindboggling stupid policies, it is SHE that is responsible for 90% of what the long haired whackos are complaining about - if she had bothered to work WITH US business instead of AGAINST them in regard to environmental policy the US environment would now be drastically cleaner and our economy would be much much stronger.

    Which unindited Clinton co-conspirator is going to win big next on this nonstop Crap-a-thon? Sandy Berger as National Archivist? Susan McDougall as White House Real Estate Agent? Craig Firestone as head of the CIA?

    I no longer request a judicial review of B. Hussein Obama, I now DEMAND psychiatric examination of his brain - where the frell is it???

  27. #27
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:30 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    Johnsteele

    We never give up…… Ever.

  28. #28
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:34 am, dutchcedar said:

    There’s a story out on AP this morning, saying that Steven Chu is Obama’s choice for energy secretary.

    He’s all about wind, solar and seaweed based fuel for NASCAR and our daily drivers.

    I’m not sure if that means he’ll have a czar AND a secretary for all things UN energy approved… but that’s the news.

  29. #29
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:37 am, pueblo1032 said:

    Makes you wonder who the hell is doing CHECKS AND BALANCES for B.HUSSEIN’S transition team… When MM has this info readily available to her, where is the TEAM??? Where is MSM… Oh, I forgot, they are already camping out in DC to get the best seats for “THE CORONATION” It’s going to be a ROUGH

  30. #30
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:37 am, tarpon said:

    Do Czars need Senate approval? I nice way to sidestep that requirement don’t you think.

  31. #31
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:40 am, pueblo1032 said:

    ref 29: crashed in the middle of post… It’s going to be a ROUGH 4 years… SORRY!!!

  32. #32
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:52 am, johnsteele said:

    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:24 am, Mister P said:
    Give it up Michelle. We are simply scr*wed for the next four years, and depending on how much damage they can cause in that time, perhaps for all time.
    How many millions have died for this country and you want to give up? I am glad you weren’t in my squad in the Army.

    Its a joke!!!! Lighten up.

  33. #33
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:53 am, johnsteele said:

    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:30 am, NJ-Aviator said:
    Johnsteele

    We never give up…… Ever.

    Redux. Its a joke!!!! Lighten up.

  34. #34
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:54 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Give it up Michelle. We are simply scr*wed for the next four years, and depending on how much damage they can cause in that time, perhaps for all time.

    We all get that way from time to time. Shake it off, get up, gird your loins and prepare for battle. Saddle up lad-we ride at dawn.

  35. #35
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:57 am, jjmurphy said:

    Regarding JohnSteele’s comment. I think he might feel like I do. There is the pessimistic side which screams “we are sooo scr…d”! You wonder if we can ever recover from the damage Obama and crew will do. And he does have a very good point about all the tens of thousand of lower level position that will impact us for a long time. You see no hope.

    Then there is the “never give up side”. This side looks at my young kids and says ” nope, I will not give up, ever!” I WLL make this country a great place again for them to grow up and prosper.

    So, don’t be too quick to denigrate commenters who are probably right there with ya, but just need to vent a bit.

  36. #36
    On December 12th, 2008 at 11:00 am, HotWeaver said:

    But being ethically challenged is a job requirement for positions involved with boosting the climate change fraud.

  37. #37
    On December 12th, 2008 at 11:00 am, DBNinKY said:

    Not only were all the top officials’ hard drives cleared and reformatted, but e-mail backup tapes were erased and reused in violation of records preservation practices.

    To all our usual suspects here, who decried Gov Palin’s use of personal e-mail in making contacts, this is what real non-transparency looks like - just so you know the difference!

  38. #38
    On December 12th, 2008 at 11:01 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Crooked? Ethically challenged? She’ll fit right in with the others.

  39. #39
    On December 12th, 2008 at 11:04 am, mojack420 said:

    how long will it take to toss Carol Browner under the bus???

  40. #40
    On December 12th, 2008 at 11:06 am, DBNinKY said:

    Oops! A thousand and one thank-yous, MM, for a great article that informs and exposes!

    Once again, you’re doing the job the MSM refuses to do -

  41. #41
    On December 12th, 2008 at 11:11 am, thejim said:

    Lost elections have consequences, this is only one of them. Be prepared to be outraged more than once. The real question will be: How do we recover our country?

  42. #42
    On December 12th, 2008 at 11:13 am, irving said:

    Browner sounds like exactly the kind of appointee the Chicago political set Obama works for - er, with - admires.

  43. #43
    On December 12th, 2008 at 11:28 am, mattymatt10 said:

    Of course, if we didn’t have something as g*d-d****d unecessary as the EPA in the first place, her name would likely be unknown.

  44. #44
    On December 12th, 2008 at 12:05 pm, Speakup said:

    We know that’s why HillBill is on for Sec. Def.

    Mi Mafioso e su Mafioso.

    The Thugs is us administration.

  45. #45
    On December 12th, 2008 at 12:37 pm, Southpaw said:

    I normally like to quote a source when I find one, but the site I found this didn’t give one. Anyway this is too good to pass up:

    *The Heaviest Element Known to Science*

    Lawrence Livermore Laboratories has discovered the heaviest element yet known to science.

    The new element, Governmentium (Gv), has one neutron, 25 assistant
    neutrons, 88 deputy neutrons, and 198 assistant deputy neutrons, giving
    it an atomic mass of 312.

    These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are
    surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons.

    Since Governmentium has no electrons, it is inert; however, it can be
    detected, because it impedes every reaction with which it comes into
    contact. A tiny amount of Governmentium can cause a reaction that would
    normally take less than a second, to take from 4 days to 4 years to
    complete.

    Governmentium has a normal half-life of 2-6 years. It does not decay,
    but instead undergoes a reorganization in which a portion of the
    assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places.

    In fact, Governmentium’s mass will actually increase over time, since
    each reorganization will cause more morons to become neutrons, forming
    isodopes.

    This characteristic of morons promotion leads some scientists to believe
    that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a critical
    concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as critical morass.

    When catalysed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium, an element that radiates just as much energy as Governmentium since it has half as many peons but twice as many morons.

  46. #46
    On December 12th, 2008 at 1:05 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Southpaw #45: You’re killing me…LMAO. Best description of the scientific view of too much government I ever read. You are a force to be reckoned with intellectually. Good work, guy or lady.

  47. #47
    On December 12th, 2008 at 1:07 pm, rocketman said:

    GO SOUTHPAW! Funny but true.
    ***
    John Bibb

  48. #48
    On December 12th, 2008 at 1:37 pm, WoodyP said:

    Michelle- Thanks for writing this. Browner, a Gore crony, was a horribile administrator. Her cover up caused Judge Lamberth to order that all EPA computer hard drives be archived and preserved for 4 years, even every student intern. This caused huge headaches and costs, while Browner slinked away.to do some lobbying with Madeline Albright.

    Other appealling Browner traits: She refused to drink tap water, not a good thing when you are in charge of Safe Drinking Water, and she routinely sent staffers ahead to sanatize restrooms before her royal rear end took a seat.

    Change you can believe in!

  49. #49
    On December 12th, 2008 at 1:40 pm, jjmurphy said:

    she routinely sent staffers ahead to sanatize restrooms before her royal rear end took a seat.

    You have got to be making that up!?!

  50. #50
    On December 12th, 2008 at 1:48 pm, right_on said:

    The argument in favor of adding all the former Clintonistas to the administration of Barack Obama doesn’t hold water, for a “newcomer” trying to bring “hope and change” to the country.

    He comes to Washington from one of the most corrupt areas of the country, and he is naming appointees from another inept/corrupt administration to be his advisors? He obviously feels comfortable around that kind of influence.

    I fail to understand why no “real” fresh faces can’t be found in the Democrat pyramid, looking from “the ground up!” That concept is used in the “spread the wealth” propaganda as a good thing, but it is apparently not extended to the political arena. If you haven’t paid your dues, politically, you will not get advanced over all the “old” footsoldiers, to a position of promenence.

    So, why name people from a former troubled administration, to be in your own cabinet? Maybe because Obama is going to be a P.O.T.U.S.I.N.O? My earlier conjecture, theorizing that Obama was getting support for the Presidency from the DNC, with no real experience or track record, was because the politicos in the DNC believed they could control him, once in office. Yes, I suggested that Obama would be a marionette!

    Perhaps a new Obama theme song…”I’m Your Puppet” is in order?

  51. #51
    On December 12th, 2008 at 2:23 pm, Perk said:

    I pass by the EPA office at Ft Meade every day on my way to work. They have a huge parking lot that normally is only 1/3 full. The only times I have seen it 2/3 full is when VIPs are due to visit.

  52. #52
    On December 12th, 2008 at 2:26 pm, happy2behere said:

    Anyone who destroys hard drives in defiance of a court order is not the kind of person “…who gets into politics for public service,” as Obama recently opined in another political controversy.

  53. #53
    On December 12th, 2008 at 2:38 pm, constructionbook said:

    PKAmmoTroop said:
    I Called for the public execution of this moron over a decade ago!!!

    Be sure to include Jamie Gorlic (another moron) with Clintonite Carol Browner, when the firing squad convenes!!

    karl ‘n the girls

  54. #54
    On December 12th, 2008 at 3:17 pm, ITookTheRedPill said:
  55. #55
    On December 12th, 2008 at 4:04 pm, wayiwalk said:

    Great report Michelle -

    This potential apppointment makes complete sense.

    The whole energy economy (green energy) that obama plans to “invest” in, will be nothing less than political patronage, picking “winners”, and the willingness to cut backroom deals.

    From the sound of it, she is just the misguided, power-hungry, and arrogant lawyer they’re looking for.

    I’m sorry to hear about this one.

    I haven’t hated any of the picks yet, you do need to get people who know how to “get things done”, even things I hate.

    That said, this woman is bad news for moving forward with energy independence. She’s a clueless lawyer.

    And I sure as heck wouldn’t want to be the incoming EPA chief with Browner hanging around.

    Rumours here in NJ, by the way (and I have a neighbor who is connected to the environmental engineering community) that NJ’s Lisa Jackson will get the nod for EPA. The word is that she’s done nothing but screw up the NJDEP during her tenure.

  56. #56
    On December 12th, 2008 at 4:10 pm, Chief RZ said:

    I ran into women (girls then) like this while teaching school. I asked one, “where did you learn to lie like that?” Women are some of the best liars because of the double standard. They are past masters at dramatics. I caught just a few red handed.

  57. #57
    On December 12th, 2008 at 4:17 pm, b-cat said:

    Southpaw, I just read your post on governmentium and am blown away! Brilliant.

  58. #58
    On December 12th, 2008 at 4:19 pm, b-cat said:

    BTW Southpaw, what was the site you referenced?

  59. #59
    On December 12th, 2008 at 4:19 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    To all our usual suspects here, who decried Gov Palin’s use of personal e-mail in making contacts, this is what real non-transparency looks like - just so you know the difference!

    Exactly, and they seem awfully quiet.

    The technician who erased them is an idiot. They could have refused, and if they got disciplined - big payday from the lawsuit…

  60. #60
    On December 12th, 2008 at 4:23 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    This woman is an idiot. She worked at EPA when Fannie and Freddie were the gravy boats for crooks? Stupid.

  61. #61
    On December 12th, 2008 at 5:07 pm, reverenddon said:

    Interesting story … she sounds like the Bush administrations type of department head!

  62. #62
    On December 12th, 2008 at 5:14 pm, tiredofit08 said:

    from booosh back to clinton…so much for “change”….change we don’t need….

  63. #63
    On December 12th, 2008 at 5:36 pm, Durangodarlin said:

    The door swings both ways, Tiny Dancer.

    Just piling on :)

  64. #64
    On December 12th, 2008 at 6:20 pm, FamilyMan said:

    johnsteele said:
    Give it up Michelle. We are simply scr*wed for the next four years, and depending on how much damage they can cause in that time, perhaps for all time.

    Come on John. Giving up is not in a true constitutionalist conservatives vocabulary.

  65. #65
    On December 12th, 2008 at 8:30 pm, travlinman said:

    So another Clintonite who was in the inner circle of the highly educated and intelligent pretty people, mostly lawyers, who did not have knowledge of a judge’s ruling, or remember simple details. I thought that ignorance (even of the law) was not a valid legal excuse! Naaaahhhh, nothing makes me suspicious here.

  66. #66
    On December 12th, 2008 at 8:42 pm, Southpaw said:

    On December 12th, 2008 at 4:19 pm, b-cat said:
    BTW Southpaw, what was the site you referenced?

    Heres where I found it, it’s on page 2. Wish I could take credit for it. PerhapsI can pester SinCal for the original source. Whoever came up with it deserves all of the credit.

    http://bearinsider.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7296

  67. #67
    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:37 pm, torabora said:

    HomerCissellmonster likes to play around with hard drives that don’t belong to him too.

    This kind of arrogance permeates all of our governmental agencies. These kind of people need government jobs manufacturing license plates, not jobs overseeing our agencies.

  68. #68
    On December 12th, 2008 at 11:30 pm, Wellsy said:

    New slogan for Obama: “The more things change, the more they stay the same.”

    New campaign song? Hint: “Meet the new boss … same as the old boss …”

  69. #69
    On December 13th, 2008 at 12:17 am, Christian Soldier said:

    No Thing was done about the theft and scamming of the ‘Old Boss’-Clinton—
    No follow through by the ‘leaders’ of the r party-
    No Thing will be done about the corrupt practices of the advisers of the ‘old boss’ by the ‘new boss’…

  70. #70
    On December 13th, 2008 at 1:42 am, BlackFlag55 said:

    Carol Browner.

    That’s a name brings back memories.

    When she was first tapped for the EPA, I was consulting with a small but wildly innovative company in the Atlanta area. One of of the attorneys for that company was THE big deal in Florida politics and had more or less gotten her into the Clinton Administration as head of the EPA. The company I was working with had invented a fantastic way to rid the USA of our landfills … by creating a ‘landfill in a box’.

    In short, we could make pure compost out of anything but batteries and nuclear-related materials in less than 24 hours. 50,000 sqft tilt up concrete building, sorting line, hammermills, retort cooker and genetically tailored microbial agents and shazzam, out came nutrient rich soil. No More Land Fills.

    This attorney arranged for Browner to visit our test facility, and when she arrived she gushed and oohed and aaahed and promised immediate attention by the Clinton Admin. and the support of the EPA. Got on her jet and waved kisses at us.

    And we never heard boo from her again, and in fact all sorts of federal types began to pick us apart over innumerable bureaucratic details and state and federal financial types began looking into our backers and in short … something ran that company down the road and out of business.

    I can’t swear it was Browner, but we were tearing it up until Browner visited us. And the USA still has landfills and garbage problems and the technology languishes.

  71. #71
    On December 13th, 2008 at 2:01 am, Christian Soldier said:

    BlackFlagg-considering the perfidious nature of the Clinton administration…It would no be a surprise that Carol Browner would be slickly treacherous too…

    We must be VERY WATCHFUL…..

  72. #72
    On December 13th, 2008 at 8:21 am, jangar said:

    On December 12th, 2008 at 10:19 am, johnsteele said:
    Give it up Michelle. We are simply scr*wed for the next four years, and depending on how much damage they can cause in that time, perhaps for all time.

    Perhaps the underlying theme to all entries to MM’s site over the next 4 years should be that elections have consequences, and that non-conservative GOP candidates do not win elections.

  73. #73
    On December 13th, 2008 at 8:27 am, jangar said:

    I can’t swear it was Browner, but we were tearing it up until Browner visited us. And the USA still has landfills and garbage problems and the technology languishes.

    Well of course…liberals don’t want to fix anything, they exist strictly for the purpose of perpetuating misery and moving NOTHING forward.

  74. #74
    On December 13th, 2008 at 8:27 am, Chief RZ said:

    Or crooks abuse good people, jangar. Remember how the Jews just complied back in the 1930 Germany?

  75. #75
    On December 13th, 2008 at 9:22 am, Flyoverman said:

    Carter II Clinton III

  76. #76
    On December 13th, 2008 at 10:58 am, LOBOMAN said:

    And the beat goes on!

  77. #77
    On December 13th, 2008 at 12:04 pm, moonshot said:

    Since we didn’t vote for any change…

  78. #78
    On December 13th, 2008 at 12:48 pm, Laree said:

    Speaking of left overs -warmed over?

    New Poll up- What do you think about Colin Powell endorsing Barack Obama Democrat. My husband who spent 27 years in the U.S. Army, thinks Secretary of State Colin Powell Republican? is a phony. My husband identifies Independent as I do. I don’t know Joe Lieberman Democrat and he endorsed John McCain Republican…that didn’t help Joe with the Democrat Party…did Colin Powell help himself politically with either party? Is that what the endorsement was all about? Positioning himself on the winning side? American Politics is not for the Timid.

    http://sarah-palin-2012.blogspot.com/2008/12/audacity-of-colin-powell.html

  79. #79
    On December 13th, 2008 at 1:13 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    With the Clintonites back in power now…

    Are we finally going to have all of those ‘W’ computer keys that were stolen from the White House back in 2001 returned?

    (do I dare ask if Monica will be invited back to the Oval Office for old time sakes?)

  80. #80
    On December 13th, 2008 at 1:40 pm, lgm said:

    This might be the first time you actually have the goods on a Democrat. However, the NYTimes article you link to only quotes a conservative Republican saying she’s dirty. It doesn’t given any evidence.

    As for mysteriously deleted or lost files, the Bush administration runs circles around anything the Clintonites accomplished. They’ve “lost” years of email records, recordings of “questioning” sessions at Gitmo, etc.

  81. #81
    On December 13th, 2008 at 2:30 pm, travlinman said:

    On December 13th, 2008 at 1:40 pm, lgm said:

    lgm, as usual, you are so far off that… well, nevermind. There is one hell of a difference in sand-bagging a ‘witchhunt’ investigation that is really a testing of presidential privilege by the opposing party, and deleting/destroying evidence that could be entered into criminal or civil court. You know it as well as we do. Quit blowing smoke up our posteriors.

  82. #82
    On December 13th, 2008 at 3:28 pm, Wade said:

    She looks like John Kerry in a dress.

  83. #83
    On December 13th, 2008 at 4:27 pm, Christian Soldier said:

    L#78-I am told that there two types of leaders in the military:
    Lead from the Front OR/
    REMF–
    From observation-I draw the conclusion that Colin Powell is the REMF /CYA type…

  84. #84
    On December 13th, 2008 at 5:01 pm, wayiwalk said:

    On December 13th, 2008 at 3:28 pm, Wade said:
    She looks like John Kerry in a dress

    Nice, I was thinking there was something about her that looked familiar…

    …what hurts about the face is that you can see that she’s mastered the “two-face”.

    Dangerous person.

    Hopefully she’s still got to be vetted.

    Like it or not, the next administration is putting alot of money and hope into the new energy stuff.

    We all know that the gov’t can’t pick winners, but people of her temperment can only pick losers nad defend them like wild animals.

  85. #85
    On December 13th, 2008 at 7:56 pm, allrsn said:

    To quote Max Shultz: Fortunately, many of the Browner EPA’s more aggressive actions were reversed in the legislature or through the courts — in fact, some of her employees wound up facing criminal charges for falsifying evidence and manipulating lab results

    Slowly, little by little, Obama is finally being vetted. Just a little late, Thank-you MSM.

  86. #86
    On December 13th, 2008 at 8:15 pm, allrsn said:

    My receintly deceased mother had a song book tucked away.

    It is a 1927 union book of fight songs. LOL I had to laugh as I realized the left then is the same as the left now.

    One song starts with the ‘Roman masters killing Christ’ and ends with ‘Labor killing their bosses’.

  87. #87
    On December 13th, 2008 at 9:34 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On December 13th, 2008 at 1:40 pm, lgm said:

    This might be the first time you actually have the goods on a Democrat.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHa…gasp …sorry I hyperventilated.

    Son, you just crack me up! :)

  88. #88
    On December 13th, 2008 at 9:38 pm, TheCityTroll said:

    off topic

    Did any of you read what that idiot Powell had to say

    http://thecitytroll.blogspot.com/2008/12/gop-rino-or-in-reality-democrat-colin.html

  89. #89
    On December 13th, 2008 at 11:46 pm, emjem24 said:

    lgm said:

    As for mysteriously deleted or lost files, the Bush administration runs circles around anything the Clintonites accomplished. They’ve “lost” years of email records, recordings of “questioning” sessions at Gitmo, etc.

    So, I suppose that the conspicuous “suicides” (cough cough deaths) of certain Clinton acquaintances should be ignored because it was a Dem presidency. Yet, Pres. Bush being scapegoated for things that were also done during Clinton’s presidency (firing federal prosecutors and believing erroneous intelligence) that’s a crime for sure!

    Just love the 20/20 hindsight, lgm. My, you put Nostradamus to shame. :roll:

  90. #90
    On December 14th, 2008 at 12:11 am, Member-VRWC said:

    Is this a gamble the Obama administration wants to take?

    What gamble? Browner got away with malfeasance while working for Clinton, and she’ll do the same while working for Obama.

    It should be obvious: Nowadays, most people who are involved in politics at any level are there for two reasons — to push other people around and to grab as many goodies as possible.

  91. #91
    On December 14th, 2008 at 11:50 am, franksalterego said:

    Carol Browner?

    Perfect description of the color of the contents of Obama’s punchbowl of aides and associates.

    if you get my drift

  92. #92
    On December 14th, 2008 at 2:57 pm, graysonret said:

    I usually ignore what IGM says most of the time, but I’ve noticed, over the weeks, that he has become the master of rationalization. His constant defense is “So-and-so” did it too. Have you noticed? I wonder how he would be facing a judge on some charge sometime….”Well, he did it too!”. Great defense.

  93. #93
    On December 15th, 2008 at 4:31 pm, RedDog said:

    That is precisely why the Obamites want her. She has the proven Clintonista ability to evade the law. With the cover of the MSM…. it’s all good.

  94. #94
    On December 26th, 2008 at 12:32 am, Dread Pirate Roberts VIII said:

    No hope, and no change. Just a successful lib-Dem marketing campaign after a difficult eight years with the GOP in charge.

    Obama is just a token and a puppet to those actually in charge. He increasingly looks like a putz, as well.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Not all conservatives are singing O-Kumbaya

January 18, 2009 11:12 AM by Michelle Malkin

115 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

Holder: My Marc Rich screw-up makes me a better AG nominee!

January 15, 2009 10:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Screw up, move up. Plus: Holder’s vitally important basketball qualifications.

A speech-free bubble around Bill Ayers

January 15, 2009 10:25 AM by Michelle Malkin

57 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Obama and indicted B’more mayor Dixon

January 14, 2009 11:02 AM by Michelle Malkin

22 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

More schlock: Team Obama peddles a $20 inaugural poster

January 13, 2009 01:29 PM by Michelle Malkin

119 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

“Donate now.”

Obama will eat Abe Lincoln’s food

January 13, 2009 01:06 PM by Michelle Malkin

56 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Picture of the day: Burning Obama’s flag

January 13, 2009 11:57 AM by Michelle Malkin

91 Comments | 13 Trackbacks

Yes, they can.

Illinois lawmakers water down ethics reform law

January 13, 2009 11:12 AM by Michelle Malkin

24 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

The Chicago way.


Categories: Barack Obama, Corruption, Enviro-nitwits


TigerHawk

» The Blackberry

Blog Maverick

» Me and JR Smith