Local Weather Site Web

WeatherInsights®: The Weather Channel Blog

January 9, 2009
Hurricanes and Property Insurance
Dr. Steve Lyons, Tropical Weather Expert

About 15 years ago I became very interested in hurricane property insurance, and cost trends in it. I continue to follow those trends today. Of particular concern to me were those states most vulnerable to big hurricane strikes (namely Florida, Texas, Louisiana and North Carolina) and how/where "stuff" was being built at alarming rates in very hurricane vulnerable coastal zones and inland. Of course any hurricane prone state from Texas to New England has potential for a hugely costly hurricane disaster.

I had made a forecast back then (known only to me and a number of people I have lobbied to some in talks I have given over the years) that rising insurance costs from hurricane disasters would lead to widespread disaster mitigation; namely everything new would be built far better and everything old (especially when it was damaged by a hurricane) would be rebuilt or retrofit to withstand FAR more effectively the perils of hurricane winds the next time around. Thus far, my forecast has been a big bust, at least on a national level! For example look at the overall damage associated with hurricane Wilma in greater Miami in 2005, about 13 years after hurricane Andrew devastated the area in 1992! There has been some success along these lines, but they have come far too slowly and occurred on far too small a scale compared to what I had envisioned in my forecast 15 years ago.

I was convinced then and am still convinced now that the solution to these multi-billion dollar hurricane disasters is not to bail out the problem with huge federal disaster relief programs (effectively a giant Band-Aid slapped over each big hurricane event). These programs cost the entire nation a huge amount of money, and government disaster relief has been wrought with huge inefficiency, overhead costs and individual cheating, none of which I will discuss here. None of all this disaster relief prevents or lessens the impacts from the next disaster!

Rather, I proposed something 15 years ago and do so today to eliminate the potential for a large "cut" needing a giant Band-Aid in the first place! Very much along the lines of health care costs and "preventative health care": namely, instead of just healing the sick with rising health care costs, how about preventing people from getting sick in the first place? Bring the idea to the hurricane insured: a FAR lesser insurance rate should be available for the home owner that buys/builds his/her house out of bricks on dry land than for the home owner that buys/builds his/her house out of straw on the beach!

It turns out that if you move to Florida these days, it is very likely you will not be able to get home insurance unless you go through Florida's state owned, regulated and managed insurance now called "Citizens Insurance." It was and is an effort to keep home and business insurance costs affordable to Florida citizens and business owners, whether "affordable" really covers the cost of hurricane disaster risk or not has been debated.

An overview of that Florida insurance plan and the perils currently associated with it were written up by Brent Winans in 2008 in the link below. I like it because it concisely captures the perilous dance the state of Florida is doing with a big hurricane threat(s) and Citizens insurance money. Would it not be far safer to prevent a major portion of a disaster from being able to occur in the first place than to go a high risk route?

Winans Citizens Hurricane CAT Fund

This reminds of a similar corollary that goes like this; you pay a monthly mortgage on your home and have looked for the cheapest one possible in order to afford the biggest, best home for your money. Perhaps you found a temporary zero interest balloon loan or maybe just a balloon loan, thinking you would move before you ever had to pay a dime toward interest on your loan or begin to pay the inflated interest rate. But as the saying goes "stuff happens." The local real estate market crashes and you now have a home worth only 60 or 70% of what you owe on it. You can no longer move, you cannot trade up and if the payments become too much for your current job situation you cannot sell it for what you owe on it. You are stuck in place "upside-down" in a home you no longer want and can no longer afford. Gee, this is the current horrible state of the US home loan economy, much of which was driven by companies that made loans to individuals they knew would likely have great difficulty making payments and/or to people who asked for those loans knowing that unless their rosy view of their future didn't pan out or they could sell for a profit they were doomed.

In my opinion this is a similar situation the state of Florida has gotten itself into relative to hurricane insurance! In the process of trying to keep insurance rates low (relative to business practices of many private companies), Florida has undercut costs of many conscientious, smart and fiscally responsible private sector insurers that did or do business in that state. I know no one wants high home insurance rates, I sure don't, but I do want my insurance to pay off if I ever have to use it. The hurricane disaster hammer could fall on Florida at any time, perhaps in 2009, perhaps in 2010 or maybe with some "luck" Florida will be spared from a big hurricane disaster for a number of years and will be able to accumulate enough cash in the Citizens fund between now and then to be able to pay off all claims from a big disaster(s) when it finally arrives; it will arrive. All I can say is keep your fingers crossed that big hurricane disasters remain at bay because it sounds similar to that rosy outlook the homeowner had when taking that high risk home loan!

So what will the future hold for states with their own hurricane insurance businesses? Perhaps they will be lucky and dodge big hurricane disasters for a while and residents will be thankful to those who saved them money. If the disasters do come, be ready for more government bail-outs.

My best suggestion is to do everything possible to prevent the need for another Band-Aid before the next big injury is too large for one! If I could give our incoming President some quick (10 seconds) hurricane advice, it would be to immediately redirect much of government's disaster relief budget into a greatly expanded disaster mitigation program with a focus on personal responsibility. What insurance you have would likely become much less an issue, and its cost would likely fall, especially if far less damage occurred because of mitigation measures. In the long run it would be far cheaper for everyone and a better idea than "hoping" the big hurricane disaster misses your state in 2009 or beyond!

Posted at 5:28 pm ET
Comments on this entry (14)
IN REPLY TO THIS RESPONSE... Dr. Lyons, don't you agree with the TWC position that if there weren't any manmade global warming then we wouldn't have any weather problems to worry about? I heard it on Forecast Earth... I HOPE YOU HEARD INCORRECTLY AS THE WORLD WILL NEVER BE VOID OF WEATHER PROBLEMS WHETHER THERE IS GLOBAL WARMING OR NOT. PERHAPS IT WAS IN CONTEXT TO CHANGE FROM EXISTING LONG-TERM WEATHER (PAST 50-100 YEARS) BUT EVEN SO BAD WEATHER ALWAYS HAPPENS.
Posted by Dr. Steve | January 20, 2009
Dr. Lyons, don't you agree with the TWC position that if there weren't any manmade global warming then we wouldn't have any weather problems to worry about? I heard it on Forecast Earth.
Posted by Johnny | January 18, 2009
I'll never forget those dreaded words.....was it water or hurricane damage?? Beats the bleap outta me I told'em. Even before Rita hit......I had evacuees staying in my neighborhood (Katrina) and having to access my computer, pulling a satellite link of folks homes to see if they hopefully had a tree thru their roofs so they could get their insurance companies to $$$$ pay off. If you only had flood/surge damage .........outta luck in a lot of cases. Many don't have flood insurance. Never seen so much high 5 -ing and chest bumping and hugging going on. Was it flood or hurricane damage.....it made a big difference back in the day!! I have never seen folks so happy to visually see that big trees were parked in the middle of their homes. That was the way the game works as I found out a month later with Rita.
Posted by PCM | January 13, 2009
Very interesting comments from many of you. I generally agree with many of them. Regards New greater Orleans, there are few areas that can escape the flooding from a large, major hurricane there. Flood insurance is a necessity, but it will very likely rise in cost if we see more hurricane disasters there or anywhere else in the U.S.
Posted by Dr. Steve | January 12, 2009
My husband and I bought a home along the Florida West Coast beaches area around St. Pete originally as a retirement home in 2006. It is 2 blocks from the beach so hurricanes are a real threat. The home is elevated above FEMA requirements but it was built in 1980 so it is a wood framed house. It does have the gable hip style roof which is the recommended roof style for hurricanes. We immediately installed hurricane impact windows and roll down shutters for the french doors. Fortunately due to the flexibility of our jobs we are living in the house full time and it is our permanent residence. We would like to do some more mitigation work but just don't know what else to do. We do have Citizens insurance and aren't sure what that means in the case of a real disaster but that is what our insurance agent obtained for us. I would be willing to pay a higher cost for insurance that would actually pay in the case of a disaster. I think Citizens should at least raise the deductible to $10,000 or $20,000 per event but not sure if that would even help.
Posted by Mary | January 12, 2009
Let's try this: if you choose to live near water (vulnerable to flooding, storm surge, hurricanes, etc.), on a hillside (mudslides), in Tornado Alley, earthquake areas, etc., then following a disaster you will receive a one-time payment to build a home --equivalent in size and features to the one you lost--designed to withstand the threats in your area(and yes, weather-resistant homes DO exist). If you use the $$$ to build a regular home, you're on your own for future disasters. Private insurance would be needed for replacement of interior items only. This plan should drastically cut insurance costs. Secondly, recognize that when one chooses to live in one of these areas, you most likely will, at some point, experience a disaster. Please don't tempt fate and then expect the rest of the nation to fork over tax dollars to help you recoup your losses. Don't build a regular home on a beach, etc., unless you're prepared to lose it. If your town relies on levees, move the town (or yourself) or invest in raising it above sea level or 500-year flood stage (tax help would be given to do this). $$$ would also be available for construction of new weather-proof homes for those moving to an area or those who want to replace a vulnurable home. This may sound harsh, but the size of our national debt should frighten us all. Spending billions to clean up preventable damages from weather without conditions or limits is wasteful, shortsighted and hurts our country and its citizens.
Posted by uncommonsense | January 12, 2009
We lived on the beach in Florida for decades (back before tourism hit our island, when it was a fishing village and cheap family property). We moved 40 miles inland after 2004's awful season. Did our insurance drop? Not much. Because now we subsidize those who continue to live in the high-risk tourism areas (as our old neighborhood eventually evolved after a huge golf development was built there), even though the 100 year high-mark for flooding has never come close to our foundation level inland. Insurance in Florida is about greed, not actualization of risks. The wealthiest live on the beaches in general, and the poorer inland in farming areas, and the costs are not fairly distributed by risk. That is what Florida legislators should really take to task. We finally had to drop insurance on our home because the premiums were such a huge portion of the value of our home, with a $2500 minimum deductible available.
Posted by Former Amelia Island homeowner | January 11, 2009
In the long run, you are 100% right about the need to enforce building codes that make structures more resistant to hurricanes. The "Three Pigs" analogy is appropriate for the current situation we face in Florida. Hopefully your views will not be kept in private but shared with your audience and those in a position to enact regulations which madate the change. It is human nature for many to "put off" mitigation and saving for the inevitable rainy day.
Posted by Chip Merlin | January 11, 2009
Best thing that can happen to Florida is a huge hurricane that eliminates 80% of all new construction. A natural disaster, like a hurricane, is the best one can hope for in this state.
Posted by MannyMitigator | January 11, 2009
with all the money the fed,state put in to help people in these areas.we the people in not problems areas have to pay for them.Problems like this can be taken care of if you people make a person that want to live in these areas use POLYSTEEL forms to build there homes.Plus in the long road it save our forest also. Put the goverment money in the cost of this homes to help people out building there homes with POLYSTEEL homes. look at www.polysteel.com and problem is over.then they can get insurance for there home. I'm upset about my cost of ins. because i am paying for these people too. just think about the long term saving for all of us in USA. thanks greg
Posted by greg | January 11, 2009
Why are there so many houses in America built from timber? Don`t Americans have the same nursery rhymes as we do in Britain. You should read The Three Little Pigs. You will see that only the house made from bricks keeps the wolf out. It is a sad indictment of modern life that many people will do the thing that is cheapest because it get`s them the biggest, all the while knowing deep down that when disaster strikes they will be in more trouble than if they`d invested more wisely. The sensible ones who used their head and were more conservative in their plans will see out the crisis. Sadly though it is these poor individuals who were careful not to be greedy that end up bailing out the irresponsible ones through increased taxes needed to prop up failing banks, house builders, motor manufacturers and home owners. Tell me, where is the incentive for sensible and careful spending, even saving, when the government just jumps in and bails out all these failing businesses. It`s our taxes that are used to do it after all. I say, if you`re living in a wooden house in hurricane alley get your own insurance and make damn sure it covers you or you could actually build your house from something a little more durable than matchwood. Just spend a little less on your cars and other luxuries and don`t think all us sensible taxpayers are going to keep bailing you out.
Posted by Chipperman | January 11, 2009
i think there plan for added insurance coverage and the sooner the better. we were lucky enough to get moved to North Caroline in 1996, and moved to a small town just outside of CHERRY POINT Air Station. we didn't get hurricane Ins but we had to have flood Ins. To make a long story short ,we were in 6 different hurricanes plus 2 tornados .In our experience we were in need of this type of Ins.\ the odd thing was the folks all around town seemed to live in denile . I hope you all success.
Posted by curtis culver | January 10, 2009
Bravo Dr Lyons! Why can't such common sense come out of government agencies? On a much smaller scale I've decided to prepare my family for the next disaster that strikes by having a safe room built in my house that's designed to with stand tornado and hurricane force winds. " An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."
Posted by Jim La | January 10, 2009
Dr. Lyons: Being from Grand Chenier, Cameron Parish, Louisiana and having seen what Hurricanes Rita and Ike brought to Southwest, Louisiana, the Federal programs is big money for the people involved with the monies dispursed by the Federal Government. Employees probably receive more monies than victims of such disasters. No one can build a hurricane, tornado or earthquake proff home and proably not a flood-proof home if the water extends 15-28 feet with a storm surge. Let there be insurance for the ones that can financially meet building codes and elevation. Divert all monies sent to foreign countries that we bomb and then rebuild to victims across the U.S. that are unfortunate of all disasters and lets consider self-insurance programs that may grant tax credits to participants of such a program. Thanks. Teddy Broussard, Grand Chenier, La. 70643
Posted by Teddy Broussard | January 10, 2009

The Weather Channel Alerts

Get free weather alerts by e-mail
and on your mobile phone
  • Severe Weather
  • Extreme Heat
  • Rain
  • Pollen
  • Daily Forecasts, and more!

Get a phone call with severe weather voice alerts. Try Notify! free for a week.

WeatherREADY

Be prepared, make sure your family is ready to weather the storm.

The Weather Channel

Have a Tornado Question?

Have a Tornado Question?

Your question may be featured on Storm Session.

Weather Warrior

Weather Warrior

Send them to us and they might be used on air!

Titanic Disaster

Titanic Disaster

New season of When Weather Changed History Tonight at 9pm

 
Search the Web

Home | Site Map | Video Site Map | Customer Service | Feedback | About Us | Press Room | Careers | Advertise

Copyright © 1995-2009, The Weather Channel Interactive, Inc. weather.com® Licensed by TRUSTe | Parental TV Controls Terms of Service | Privacy Statement