Some are suggesting a cosmic cleanup. Others say time, energy and funds are better spent on minimizing likelihood of future crashes ...Read the full article
This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?
- Post a comment
- Skip to the latest comment
-
Alban Leurk from Ottawax, Canada writes: Well about space debris the sensor of teh NSIDC satellite is damaged and has been sending faulty data for over one month... Alanp. Burke will surely retract his inflammatory comments based on that faulty data -underestimating the sea ice extent- or will he just blame it on big oil?
- Posted 19/02/09 at 10:53 AM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Akbar M from Regina, Canada writes: Even with millions of objects out there it's virtually empty. There are 6 billion humans on earth and that's just on the land part. Think of the area of the earth and you have an idea of how much space there is up there. Not that crazily careening objects at 50,000 km/hr isn't dangerous but there is a lot of space in space.
- Posted 19/02/09 at 12:51 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
aging oldtool from Canada writes: "There is a lot of space in space," offers Akbar. M of Regina.
Yes there is Akbar, but the junk we speak of in this aticle is confined to only a tiny part of space, which just happens to be where earthlings are currently locating satillites and sending space missions to.
What I'm reading from this article is the classic unwillingness of nations, largely those responsible for this garbage, to actually do anything about it.
The reality is these Pigs in Space nations will do nothing until they begin to lose human beings, just as we saw on earth before the dinosaurs relented and began putting seatbelt in their oh, so safe automobiles.
It isn't encouraging and I'll bet those promoting the much heralded space tourism idea are learning that life insurance premiums for such ventures are now out of this world.
Just as well, visiting a garbage dump without even a mangy black bear to watch is hardly memorable.- Posted 19/02/09 at 2:42 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Barry Freeman from Eagle Hill, Canada writes: Yes, "There is a lot of space in space," but like people on earth (the "6 billion humans on earth") who prefer to live in certain places, and dislike others (count the number of people per square Km in the Antarctic), countries prefer to put their junk in particular orbits.
Visualize the number of people who all try to get on the London Underground at rush hour. Add to that a vast number of tourists that don't know where they're going or how to use the system. Now visualize how many bump into each other.- Posted 19/02/09 at 3:10 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
K McIntyre from Oshawa, Canada writes: That picture looks a lot like a shot from the opening scene from Disney/Pixar's WALL-E.
- Posted 19/02/09 at 5:03 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Mean Machine from Bugtussle, Canada writes: Most of that stuff was crap before it left earth.
- Posted 19/02/09 at 7:57 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Brian Klappstein from GRANDE CACHE, Canada writes: Akbars right. Space is still empty. The so-called accidental collision was in fact not. The Russian are just trying some things out and it looks like their test was a success.
Regards, BRK- Posted 21/02/09 at 1:04 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Northern Parrothead from The Wild West, Canada writes: The Americans are developing a space-laser anyway - why not just let them use the junk for target practice from above? Even if it does not destroy the stuff, it may break it up or at least transfer the momentum of the photons into a downward push on the stuff - then it can burn up in the atmosphere.
- Posted 21/02/09 at 10:11 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Iain's Opinion from Canada writes: Space is huge, but useful flightpaths/orbits are limited. The junk is in these fp/o's, kinda like a highway through siberia. Not many ways to get there from here.
- Posted 22/02/09 at 9:55 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
harry carnie from Northern, B.C, Canada writes: Oh.....well as long as the Star Choice`s satellite
maintains our T.V....
I could live without the internet part. (broadband feed through the Star Choice satellite)
What concerns me is the HUGE mass of plastic crap
floating, in the ocean North West of Hawaii.
Space POLLUTION has very little chance of killing us..............POLLUTION HERE ON EARTH HAS.- Posted 23/02/09 at 2:05 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Li Chi Ho from Saskatoon, Canada writes: So 1-800-GOT-JUNK has an opportunity to open a space division. I'd invest in that!
- Posted 24/02/09 at 12:18 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
Join the Conversation, Leave a Comment
This conversation is semi-moderated What is moderation? | How do I report a comment?
You must be logged-in to submit a comment — login now!
Not registered with globeandmail.com? Register now. It is quick and free.
Alert us about this comment
Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.