« Vive La Resistance | Main | Buchananism Rebooted »

17 Dec 2007 12:16 pm

Ron Paul For The Republican Nomination

Ronpaulscottolsongetty

By now, readers will know who I favor in the Democratic race. Here's my most considered case. But what of the GOP? For me, it comes down to two men, Ron Paul and John McCain. That may sound strange, because in many ways they are polar opposites: the champion of the surge and the non-interventionist against the Iraq war; the occasional meddling boss of Washington and the live-and-let-live libertarian from Texas. But picking a candidate is always a mix of policy and character, of pragmatism and principle. And what these two mavericks share, to my mind, is a modicum of integrity. At one end of the character scale, you have the sickening sight of Mitt Romney, a hollow shell of cynicism and salesmanship, recrafted to appeal to a base he studied the way Bain consultants assess a company. Paul and McCain are at the other end. They have both said things to GOP audiences that they knew would offend. They have stuck with their positions despite unpopularity. They're not saints, but they believe what they say. Both have also taken a stand against the cancerous and deeply un-American torture and detention regime constructed by Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld. In my book, that counts.

I admire McCain in so many ways. He is the adult in the field, he is attuned to the issue of climate change in a way no other Republican is, he is a genuine war hero and a patriot, and he bravely and rightly opposed the disastrous occupation policies of the Bush administration in Iraq. The surge is no panacea for Iraq; but it has enabled the United States to lose the war without losing face. And that, in the end, is why I admire McCain but nonetheless have to favor Paul over McCain. Because on the critical issue of our time - the great question of the last six years - Paul has been proven right and McCain wrong. And I say that as someone who once passionately supported McCain's position on the war but who cannot pretend any longer that it makes sense.

Let's be clear: we have lost this war. We have lost because the initial, central goals of the invasion have all failed: we have not secured WMDS from terrorists because those WMDs did not exist. We have not stymied Islamist terror - at best we have finally stymied some of the terror we helped create. We have not constructed a democratic model for the Middle East - we have instead destroyed a totalitarian government and a phony country, only to create a permanently unstable, fractious, chaotic failed state, where the mere avoidance of genocide is a cause for celebration. We have, moreover, helped solder a new truth in the Arab mind: that democracy means chaos, anarchy, mass-murder, national disintegration and sectarian warfare. And we have also empowered the Iranian regime and made a wider Sunni-Shiite regional war more likely than it was in 2003. Apart from that, Mr Bush, how did you enjoy your presidency? 

McCain, for all his many virtues, still doesn't get this. Paul does.

Paul, moreover, supports the only rational response: a withdrawal, as speedily and prudently as possible. McCain, along with Lieberman, still seems to believe that expending even more billions of dollars to prop up and enable a fast-devolving, ethnically toxic, religiously nutty region is somehow in American interests. Given the enormous challenges of the terror war, the huge debt we are piling up, the exhaustion of the military, the moral and financial corruption that has its white-hot center in Mesopotamia, I do not believe that an endless military, economic and political commitment to Iraq makes sense. It only makes sense if we are determined to occupy the Middle East indefinitely to secure oil supplies. But the rational response to oil dependence is not to entrench it, but to try and move away from it. Institutionalizing a bank-breaking, morale-busting Middle East empire isn't the way to go.

But the deeper reason to support Ron Paul is a simple one. The great forgotten principles of the current Republican party are freedom and toleration. Paul's federalism, his deep suspicion of Washington power, his resistance to government spending, debt and inflation, his ability to grasp that not all human problems are soluble, least of all by government: these are principles that made me a conservative in the first place. No one in the current field articulates them as clearly and understands them as deeply as Paul. He is a man of faith who nonetheless sees a clear line between religion and politics. More than all this, he has somehow ignited a new movement of those who love freedom and want to rescue it from the do-gooding bromides of the left and the Christianist meddling of the right. The Paulites' enthusiasm for liberty, their unapologetic defense of core conservative principles, their awareness that in the new millennium, these principles of small government, self-reliance, cultural pluralism, and a humble foreign policy are more necessary than ever - no lover of liberty can stand by and not join them.

He's the real thing in a world of fakes and frauds. And in a primary campaign where the very future of conservatism is at stake, that cannot be ignored. In fact, it demands support.

Go Ron Paul!

(Photo: Scott Olson/Getty.)

Share This

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2224950/24282414

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Ron Paul For The Republican Nomination'

Andrew Sullivan Endorses Ron Paul!!!
Excerpt: At last! Sullivan: Ron Paul For the Republican Nomination. I was thinking of emailing him just this morning to try to press him on this. On a day when the rest of the conservative blogosphere has collectively decided to stick their heads in...
Weblog: The Crossed Pond
Tracked: Dec 17, 2007 12:26:21 PM

Ron Paul for President
Excerpt: I had been curious where Andrew Sullivan would come down on the Republican nominations he confirms it today : Ron Paul For the Republican Nomination. I remain hopeful Paul can win. Like Mr. Sullivan, I would be just as happy wit...
Weblog: danielholter.com
Tracked: Dec 17, 2007 1:23:10 PM

Andrew Sullivan Endorses RonPaul
Excerpt: But the deeper reason to support Ron Paul is a simple one. The great forgotten principles of the current Republican party are freedom and toleration. Pauls federalism, his deep suspicion of Washington power, his resistance to government spendin...
Weblog: JEFF PROCTOR
Tracked: Dec 17, 2007 3:25:36 PM

http://wonkette.com/politics/sullivan-caves-in/-334878.php
Excerpt: Andrew Sullivan has decided to play libertarian wingnut Sullivan today instead of Obama-loving faux liberal Sullivan and has endorsed Ron iz moneybomb Paul for the Republican nomination. So thats a nice ...
Weblog: Wonkette
Tracked: Dec 17, 2007 3:31:48 PM

The $6 Million Man
Excerpt: Ron Paul's presidential campaign raised more than six-million dollars yesterday, setting the single-day record for donations in American politics. Republican hacks have sought to ban him from presidential debates, blocked his supporters from participat...
Weblog: Flynn Files
Tracked: Dec 17, 2007 3:36:13 PM

Andrew Sullivan Endorses Ron Paul
Excerpt: Andrew Sullivan, who has been enthusiastically fair to the Ron Paul candidacy when others have unfairly skewered or enthusiastically ignored it, today announced his endorsement of Ron Paul. Sullivan's endorsement may or may not carry much sway, but if ...
Weblog: RedStateEclectic
Tracked: Dec 17, 2007 3:43:16 PM

What Will Ron Paul Do With All This Money?
Excerpt: In follow up to my earlier post on yesterdays fund raiser for Ron Paul, the question remains where Paul goes now that he has so much money at his disposal. While Im sure it will be helpful, I wonder if this latest influx of money is too l...
Weblog: Liberal Values
Tracked: Dec 17, 2007 4:02:47 PM

Ron Paul, the $6 Million (In One Day) Man
Excerpt: Ron Paul raised more than $6 million (exact numbers still being tallied) today during a money bomb his supporters created in honor of the anniversary of the Boston Tea Party. At midnight EST, Pauls real-time donations ticker read $...
Weblog: Libertarian Girl
Tracked: Dec 17, 2007 4:10:01 PM

Andrew Sullivan Endorses RonPaul
Excerpt: I promise to stop soon with the endorsement blogging, but this one I just had to make note of here. Popular columnist and blogger Andrew Sullivan has endorsed Congressman Ron Paul for the Republican nomination. His endorsement has a lot to do with oppo...
Weblog: The Political Inquirer
Tracked: Dec 18, 2007 1:07:38 AM

Personal Presidential Elimination Process: The Case Against Ron Paul
Excerpt: Ive been cataloging my quest to settle on a GOP Presidential candidate to support in 2008 (so far Ive stick with Fred Thompson mainly by default). I took on McCain, Romney, Huckabee, and Tancredo in this post. I went back to make the cas...
Weblog: Punditry
Tracked: Dec 18, 2007 12:42:09 PM

A Limerick on Andrew Sullivan
Excerpt: You cannot, when reading Sullivan, Help but allow your own head to spin; From a Tory for war, To a Ronulan bore, His bullshit is really not hard to pin: But the deeper reason to support Ron Paul is a...
Weblog: Snarksmith: new york. gossip. art. politics. pop culture. literature. etc.
Tracked: Dec 18, 2007 1:13:37 PM

Military expert: "we have lost this war" - but how
Excerpt: A recent posting by Andrew Sullivan drew a lot of attention from Ron Paul fans because he publicly endorses the candidate for President. I don't really care much about who he endorses, but his statements on the war are irresponsible:
Weblog: The Shield of Achilles
Tracked: Dec 18, 2007 3:11:46 PM

Sullivan Supports Ron Paul
Excerpt: Andrew Sullivan supports Ron Paul for the Republican presidential nomination. Thats a good thing. But he spends a considerable amount of time talking about how the war in Iraqhas been lost Perhaps, trying to convince himself. Let&#...
Weblog: The New American Citizen
Tracked: Dec 18, 2007 3:50:33 PM

The Problem with Andrew Sullivan
Excerpt: Today, I read two pieces by Andrew Sullivan, one linked by a reader, the other by OpinionJournals Political Diary. Buried beneath that bloggers bile were some insightful observations and even the makings of solid arguments. But, as I re...
Weblog: Gay Patriot
Tracked: Dec 18, 2007 7:54:37 PM

Worth Repeating #82
Excerpt: "Let's be clear: we have lost this war. We have lost because the initial, central goals of the invasion have all failed: we have not secured WMDS from terrorists because those WMDs did not exist. We have not stymied Islamist...
Weblog: Flynn Files
Tracked: Dec 18, 2007 11:54:46 PM

Choosing who to endorse
Excerpt: It's apparently endorsement season in the blogosphere. The hardworking staff here at danieldrezner.com is deep in debate about presidential endorsements. With this blog's powerful and deeply distrubed coterie of supporters, it's humbling to think that ...
Weblog: Daniel W. Drezner
Tracked: Dec 20, 2007 11:43:43 AM

A Tale of Two Anti-War Arguments
Excerpt: This site gets lots of visitors from the far left and the far right. Additionally, the libertarians visiting the site range from anarchistic to radical to pragmatic. There has been a recent increase in the number of Ron Paul supporters visiting here...
Weblog: Third Party Watch
Tracked: Dec 20, 2007 12:13:48 PM

Question time for John McCain
Excerpt: It's apparently endorsement season in the blogosphere. The hardworking staff here at danieldrezner.com is deep in debate about presidential endorsements. With this blog's powerful and deeply distrubed coterie of supporters, it's humbling to think that ...
Weblog: Daniel W. Drezner
Tracked: Dec 20, 2007 2:34:17 PM

Andrew Sullivan is an idiot
Excerpt: Andrew Sullivan, as usual, is seriously misinformed. He should read my book Both In One Trench: Saddam's Secret Terror Documents before he goes spouting off: Ron Paul For The Republican NominationLet's be clear: we have lost this war. We have
Weblog: Ray Robison: Pointing out the obvious to the oblivious
Tracked: Dec 20, 2007 10:23:27 PM

The $6 Million Man
Excerpt: Ron Paul's presidential campaign raised more than six-million dollars yesterday, setting the single-day record for donations in American politics. Republican hacks have sought to ban him from presidential debates, blocked his supporters from participat...
Weblog: Flynn Files
Tracked: Dec 31, 2007 3:46:41 PM

25 More Conservative Critics of the Iraq War
Excerpt: Conservatives do not speak with one voice on Iraq. Like the first installment of 25 Conservative Critics of the Iraq War, the second installment shows that some of the most admired conservative thinkers and doers have opposed and/or criticized the...
Weblog: Flynn Files
Tracked: Jun 11, 2008 9:24:05 PM