CLICK HERE FOR ZOMBIE KILLING ACTION!
FANGORIA GRAPHIX

CLICK HERE FOR MORE!

CLICK HERE!

CLICK FOR MORE!

FANGORIA RADIO

FANGORIA GOREZONE

Click to Subscribe!

THE MONSTER TIMES
FRIDAY THE 13TH (Film Review)
Ghastly Reviews - Film
Written by Michael Gingold   
Thursday, February 12, 2009 01:05 PM
It has been said, and turns out to be true, that the new FRIDAY THE 13TH combines the storylines of the first four movies in the original Paramount series. That may sound like a lot of plot to cram into one feature, but in truth, it’s sort of a de facto way of saying that those films all had the same storyline, with small variations, each of which has indeed been worked into FRIDAY 2009’s scenario.

friday09rev

From the initial FRIDAY, there’s the briefly glimpsed backstory of the murderous Mrs. Voorhees, who lived by the machete and died just the same; from PART 2, there’s her grown son Jason established as a forest wild man with a sack over his head and a ramshackle home deep in the woods; from PART III, Jason has been given a more powerful physique and eventually acquires his trademark hockey mask; and from THE FINAL CHAPTER, the young victims-to-be are not camp counselors but vacationers, and the hero is a young man in search of his missing sister, an apparent victim of the marauding murderer.

The new film also holds hard and fast to the rules of the slasher-franchise game. The first group of young people we’re introduced to (including the aforementioned sister Whitney, played by Amanda Righetti) do all the things guaranteed to inspire Jason’s wrath: taking drugs (or at least they plan to once they find the marijuana crop they’re seeking), having sex and singing along really loud to Night Ranger. Mr. Voorhees dispatches these interlopers right quick, and six weeks later, Whitney’s brother Clay (SUPERNATURAL’s Jared Padalecki) shows up in the area with a backpack full of missing-person flyers but gets no help from the squirrely locals. Meanwhile, a group of college buddies arrive for a stay at the waterside house of Trent (Travis Van Winkle), the designated jerk who nonetheless is the boyfriend of the designated nice girl (Danielle Panabaker). This gang also soon begins doing all the things guaranteed to inspire Jason’s wrath: taking drugs, having sex and topless waterskiing on Crystal Lake.

Indeed, it’s hard to call this FRIDAY THE 13TH a remake, because virtually nothing in it has been remade, which is to say rethought or reconceived. Without being a shot-for-shot replication, it nonetheless adds no new wrinkles to the old formula; as the Jason fan I saw the movie with quite accurately pointed out, you could slip this film in between PART III and FINAL CHAPTER, and it would fit perfectly. Those devotees who ask for nothing more than the spectacle of Jason bumping off a fresh assortment of dimwitted/horndog kids (with plenty of gore and boobage unfettered by the MPAA concerns that plagued the Paramount sequels) will probably find the new FRIDAY more than satisfactory, and are welcome to bump the rating below up by a skull or more.

But still, coming from the team (Platinum Dunes and director Marcus Nispel) who effectively and successfully revisited THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE several years back and kicked off the whole ’70s/’80s-remake trend in the first place, this FRIDAY is a disappointment. Surely they and scripters Damian Shannon and Mark Swift, who worked a few nifty variations on the mythology into their FREDDY VS. JASON screenplay, could have given the diehards what they want while delivering something more creative, imaginative and witty. (The closest they come to an in-reference is a cop called Bracke, after author Peter of CRYSTAL LAKE MEMORIES, though his name is mispronounced.) Instead, the film is resolutely unsurprising and predictable; if you don’t know how the movie’s going to end after a visit to one character’s barn, you’ve probably never seen a film like this before. And the young protagonists are ciphers or stereotypes, hardly engendering the sympathy required to feel any real terror at their plight.

Some slasherhounds say (and are already saying in this film’s defense) that caring about the characters and even being afraid for them is beside the point in a FRIDAY feature; the gory demises, watching Jason do his thing, is what it’s all about. To that end, newcomer to the role Derek Mears does do a fine job of conveying the required physical menace (fortunately, the filmmakers don’t seem to have taken seriously the claims of some of their number that Jason is really a tragic figure to be pitied as he callously slaughters everyone in sight). Though Mears moves faster than the slow-stalkin’ Voorhees of movies past, he’s not so active that he breaks continuity or dispels his power. The same cannot be said of Nispel and cinematographer Daniel C. Pearl’s camerawork, though, which too often favors shaky close-ups that make it hard to follow the action. And as far as the “creative killings” that became FRIDAY’s hallmark are concerned, this one peaks early, and the splatter, though graphic, doesn’t hit the heights of outrageousness that would really get crowds whooping and hollering.

Instead, Nispel and composer Steve Jablonsky try to goose the viewer by accompanying Jason’s appearances with aural blasts that aren’t nearly subtle enough to be called stingers, and instead suggest the musical equivalent of a train hitting a stalled car. This in-your-ear approach gets real old real fast, and one yearns for the comparative grace notes of Harry Manfredini’s compositions for the earlier FRIDAYs. Potentially most disappointing for the buffs in the audience is the fact that his signature “ki, ki, ki, ma, ma, ma” sound effect, which is as essential an element of these movies as Jason himself, is only employed very sparingly here. Perhaps Nispel and co. eschewed its use in an attempt to separate their FRIDAY from its forebears—but if they were trying to give this film its own identity, they didn’t try nearly hard enough. Watching the end result, there’s never a compelling sense of why they remade FRIDAY THE 13TH in the first place.

2skulls
 

26 Comments

  1. I am a big fan of the early F13 films. When I heard about this I was stoked to go see it! I at first thought, "Man, They are going threw these killings way to fast. But the movie didnt event start! Awesome movie! Brutal death scenes. It was fantastic. I do think it's time for some new horror movie icons though. My gen had it the best with the 70 s and 80's but the kids now dont have anything....JIGSAW? THE SCREAM GUY? Time for some new slashers guys. Bravo on a new look to F13... Loved it.
  2. The 1980 film is a classic. Expectations were running high (so were mine). But they were buried. Please, stop making remakes of films that are classics. It`s interesting that people (I don`t know the exact demographic that this shit was made for)like to see stupid fucks, running around, doing drugs and getting killed (even in no exciting ways). The screenwriters have fucked up this movie big time by creating "characters" we, the audience, don`t care and give a fuck about, if they are getting killed or not. The storyline was as thin as the charcaters. It`s strange, that Sean S. Cunningham was involved in this mess. But maybe he was more interested in making money, than caring for a franchise that he has created, because, by all means even the worst entries in the old Friday the 13th movies were a million times better then this fucking shit.
  3. JASON DOESN'T RUN!!! The killings were boring and what's with the prisoner? Kill her ass and get it over with. Enough said.
  4. What the Hell? Remake or not it wasn't good. As others stated Jason doesn't take prisoners. The death scenes sucked. Whatever happened to folding people in half? And the JASON DOESN'T RUN!! That is what makes him , him. And the tunnels under the camp showing how he gets place to place was horroble. Go back to the TRUE Jason. Bring Hodder back.
  5. They RUINED Jason! This was a terrible remake. Since when does Jason take a prisoner? Since when does weed grow in Crystal Lake? It just made me cringe!
  6. LAME - and a huge disappointment after all the hype. Is Jason killing these people to protect his weed farm? You smoke Jason's stash and he's going to kill you! There's so much bad dialogue and plot elements that stretch credibility (and for a Friday film that's saying something). Maybe Jason sells his weed to pay the electric bill to power the huge spotlights around the broken down camp? He obviously has had some commando training since he now sets traps, is an expert marksman with the bow and arrow and has tunneled out a whole underground cave system underneath the Voorhees place. And what's with the fake-looking flesh bulge on the right side of Jason's neck? This ranks right down at the bottom of the Friday franchise, right next to Jason Takes Manhattan. I think I even like Part 5 better than this. Back to the drawing board guys - time for another REBOOT.
  7. A fun, funny, gory film. Agood time...and for the record, they always said this wasn't a remake, so stop treating it like it is....Just a updated version of a formula we like!
  8. i hated this movie because what was great about Friday the 13th was that they were all B-movies with over the top kills and amazing gore (with the exception of part 8) this was totally unnecessary to re-make this movie why does Michael Bay have to make these movies "hip" and "stylish"????? that's not what these movies were about it was about incredibly inventive ways to murder teens to make you hoop and holler during the movie. this movie had none of this the kills weren't even over the top and since when does Jason keep victims as prisoners?????? all i can say is Hollywood knows that horror movies are the most profitable genre in the movie business and instead of coming up with something original they just re-hash the classics the one good thing is that 20 years from now we'll still be talking about the original Friday series and these re-makes will just be a thing of the past and forgotten
  9. Thought it was a pretty good sequal, just not a remake. Take out the part where he gets the hockey mask and you've just got another movie you can sandwich in with the originals. The kills could have been more creative, but all in all it was a good flick. There were a ton of background references to the older movies in almost ever set. Although I didn't get the whole kidnapping thing either, I'm pretty sure that Jason thought the girl looked like his mom, just like in two when the blond chick puts on the sweater. Hence the whole thing where he stops whenever she calls his name and doesn't hurt her. Unfortunately this isn't the 1980s anymore and that 'campy' feeling hasn't been in the franchise since the end of that decade, so just enjoy another Jason killing spree for all its worth!
  10. *SPOILERS AHEAD* Since when does Marijuana grow in Camp Crystal Lake? Since when are one dimensional characters that use bong's to get stoned and laugh at every little thing make for a good horror movie? What girl water ski's topless? I understand sex if part of a horror movie but i didn't think Explicit sex made it from scene to scene. Anyways I guess I'd rate it 1 and a half stars out of 5 stars.
  11. Reviewer hits it right on the mark. I thought even the first 20 minute part wasn't all that great, but it was better than the rest of the movie. The malarkey of 'we wanted to pay homage to some of the original stuff' is just that: malarkey. Jason does plenty of stuff out of character, some good, some bad. His apparent boost in intelligence is mostly good, but *SPOILER* his hanging onto victims, nope.
  12. Just got back from seeing Friday the 13th. It was not good!! Stop trying to remake movies, add to the originals, sorry guys, your never going to top them. And Kane Hodder is the best Jason so stop trying to replace him. Im sorry i wasted my money on that.
  13. I saw this last night. Mixed thoughts, it was okay. Some of the shaky camera work and quick editing cuts make it hard to tell what’s going on rather, instead of the hip style the director was going for. I don’t want to write spoilers, but there were a couple of very -un-Jason-like things Jason….. Also I don’t even understand why the called this a remake. If they just kept a hockey mask on him the whole movie and called it Friday the 13th part XI, everything would have worked fine. Maybe it’s just a trend in Hollywood that they think remakes sell better than sequels. And they’re probably right. Kids who never saw the originals see remakes. And the truth is all us old school fans who hate remakes, go see the remakes anyway. The only remake I skipped seeing was Halloween, but everyone I know saw it.
  14. New F13th SUCKS If u ARE a F13 fan, instead, go buy the documentary, HIS NAME WAS JASON: 30 yrs of F13...Great retrospective DVD with interviews w/ cast members from ALL the F13 movies(including even Betsy Palmer!) U want an original F13 idea? On the DVD, Jason's "surviving" ladies suggest a film where the ladies who survived Crystal Lake form a "club" & go after Jason. NOW THATS a MOVIE I wanna See!
  15. i've gotta say, i loved this movie. it has everything i love to see in a slasher movie: lots of good looking young people getting naked and butchered with a decent amount of comic relief. i really dug it.. cant wait for another sequel!
  16. No reviews I've read are mentioning the most glaring mistep this movie makes: SINCE WHEN DOES JASON KIDNAP?!?!?!?!?!?!?! Let alone keep them alive for a month. And he appearently kept her fed, bathed her, and did her laundry too! The kills were mostly fun though. 2 skulls seems about right. What's with this reviewer praising the TCM remake though? Now that was garbage.
  17. The reviewer is wrong, in my humble opinion. The films shaky camera work and the sound engineering, as well as the color pallet and a few other surprises that wait below, are contemporary tools the filmmakers have used to update the look and feel of the film. Look, if someone's gripe is that they didn't hear enough "ki ki ki, ma ma ma" they should gather a team and some money and make a shot for shot remake a la Psycho. That's not what this is. I saw the original when I was ten. I saw the redux, today, with 16 teenagers for whom the film is targeting -- and it worked really well for them. For me, it's fun to look at the aforementioned barn (or wheel chair) and know what it's referencing, but those are perks for a fan and a sign that the makers care for the subject matter. What matters is the feel of the film and from what I saw through the eyes of others, it worked really well. Also, I got sucked into, too. And fyi, it could never be wedged into 3 and 4.
  18. I am super excited about seeing this tonight. I find it funny though, that people complain about remakes, yet when a movie comes out that they think is a remake, but it's not, they complain that it's not a remake. Do people want remakes or not? I don't mind that it's not going to be a direct remake of the first, that would be had to follow. To pack parts 1-4 into a movie, as a restart is a good thing, if that mean we get more Jason!!!
  19. This reads very similar to the review I posted on my Midwest Horror Club Myspace Blog Wednesday after I attended an advanced screening on Tuesday. In fact some of the observations are almost completely the same. I guess after watching this movie it would be hard to come to any other opinion unless you were trying way too hard to like this movie despite it's flaws. http://www.myspace.com/midwesthorrorclub Rp
  20. your right this film is great the thing they think it should be is better than the original but lets face its not going to be because we have came to love the original and its a diffrent crew with a diffrent view to bring horror and the seires back to life 31/2 out of 5 halloween was also weird but uniqe and my fav i cant wait for nightmare on elm street and h2 anyway stop the fuss at least take a deeper look at these remakes
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Add Comment