Newly declassified Defense Department documents describe a
pattern of “abusive” behavior by U.S. military interrogators that directly led
to the deaths of several suspected terrorists imprisoned at a detention center
in Afghanistan in December 2002.
The previously secret pages from the report were part of the
a wide-ranging report into detainee abuse known as the Church Report, named
after Vice Admiral Albert T. Church who conducted the investigation. That
report said there was “no policy that condoned or authorized either abuse or
torture.”
But the declassified Pentagon documents, coupled with a
report issued last December by the Senate Armed Services Committee, tell a
different story and lend credence to claims by civil libertarians and critics
of former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld that refusal to release a fully
classified version of the Church Report several years ago amounted to a
cover-up.
The two pages
from the report obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union and released
Wednesday state that the interrogation and deaths of detainees held at Bagram
Air base in Afghanistan was “clearly abusive, and clearly not in keeping with
any approved interrogation policy or guidance.”
According to the documents, on Dec. 4, 2002, a prisoner died
while in U.S. custody in Afghanistan. Six days later, another prisoner
died.
Both deaths, the documents say, “share some similarities.”
“In both cases, for example, [the prisoners] were handcuffed
to fixed objects above their heads in order to keep them awake,” the documents
say. “Additionally, interrogations in both incidents involved the use of
physical violence, including kicking, beating, and the use of ‘compliance blows’
which involved striking the [prisoners] legs with the [interrogators] knees. In
both cases, blunt force trauma to the legs was implicated in the deaths. In one
case, a pulmonary embolism developed as a consequence of the blunt force
trauma, and in the other case pre-existing coronary artery disease was
complicated by the blunt force trauma.”
“In both instances, the [detainee] deaths followed
interrogation sessions in which unauthorized techniques were allegedly
employed, but in both cases, these sessions were followed by further alleged
abusive behavior outside of the interrogation booth,” the declassified
documents say.
“None of these techniques have ever been approved in
Afghanistan,” according to two pages of the declassified Church report. “Of
these, three (marked with X) are alleged to have been employed during
interrogations. These techniques -- sleep deprivation, the use of scenarios
designed to convince the detainee that death or severely painful consequences
are imminent for him and/or his family, and beating -- are alleged to have been
used in the incidents leading to the two deaths at Bagram in December 2002,
which are described at greater length later in this report.”
Moreover, the declassified documents names a private
contractor, David Passaro, who conducted at least one interrogation that
allegedly led to the death of a prisoner.
In a news release, the ACLU said it also obtained reports
of five separate investigations into deaths that took place in Afghanistan and
Iraq – as well as Abu Ghraib abuses, which, although previously reported, marks
the first time the military investigations have been released in full.
Those documents which span thousands of pages include:
- Investigation of two
deaths at Bagram. Both detainees were determined to have been killed by
pulmonary embolism caused as a result of standing chained in place, sleep
depravation and dozens of beatings by guards and possibly interrogators.
(Also reveals the use of torture at Gitmo and American-Afghani prisons in
Kabul).
- Investigation into the
homicide or involuntary manslaughter of detainee Dilar Dababa by U.S.
forces in 2003 in Iraq.
- Investigation launched
after allegations that an Iraqi prisoner was subjected to torture and
abuse at “The Disco” (located in the Special Operations Force Compound in
Mosul Airfield, Mosul, Iraq). The abuse consisted of filling his jumpsuit
with ice, then hosing him down and making him stand for long periods of
time, sometimes in front of an air conditioner; forcing him to lay down
and drink water until he gagged, vomited or choked, having his head banged
against a hot steel plate while hooded and interrogated; being forced to
do leg lifts with bags of ice placed on his ankles, and being kicked when
he could not do more.
- Investigation of
allegations of torture and abuse that took place in 2003 at Abu Ghraib.
- Investigation that
established probable cause to believe that U.S. forces committed homicide
in 2003 when they participated in the binding of detainee Abed Mowhoush in
a sleeping bag during an interrogation, causing him to die of
asphyxiation.
A separate report issued by Army Maj. Gen. George R. Fay
several years ago said other prisoner abuses resulted from Rumsfeld’s verbal
and written authorization in December 2002 allowing interrogators to use
“stress positions, isolation for up to 30 days, removal of clothing and the use
of detainees’ phobias (such as the use of dogs).”
“From December 2002, interrogators in Afghanistan were
removing clothing, isolating people for long periods of time, using stress
positions, exploiting fear of dogs and implementing sleep and light
deprivation,” the Fay report said.
Rumsfeld’s approval of certain interrogation methods
outlined in a December 2002 action memorandum was criticized by Alberto Mora,
the former general counsel of the Navy.
“The interrogation techniques approved by the Secretary [of
Defense] should not have been authorized because some (but not all) of them,
whether applied singly or in combination, could produce effects reaching the
level of torture, a degree of mistreatment not otherwise proscribed by the memo
because it did not articulate any bright-line standard for prohibited detainee
treatment, a necessary element in any such document,” Mora wrote in a 14-page
letter to the Navy’s inspector general.
Additionally, a Dec. 20, 2005, Army Inspector General Report
relating to the capture and interrogation of suspected terrorist Mohammad
al-Qahtani included a sworn statement by Lt. Gen. Randall M. Schmidt. It said
Secretary Rumsfeld was “personally involved” in the interrogation of al-Qahtani
and spoke “weekly” with Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, the commander at Guantanamo,
about the status of the interrogations between late 2002 and early 2003.
Gitanjali S. Gutierrez, an attorney with the Center for
Constitutional Rights who represents al-Qahtani, said in a sworn declaration
that his client, imprisoned at Guantanamo, was subjected to months of torture
based on verbal and written authorizations from Rumsfeld.
“At Guantánamo, Mr. al-Qahtani was subjected to a regime of
aggressive interrogation techniques, known as the ‘First Special Interrogation
Plan,’ that were authorized by U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld,”
Gutierrez said.
“Those techniques were implemented under the supervision and
guidance of Secretary Rumsfeld and the commander of Guantánamo, Major General
Geoffrey Miller. These methods included, but were not limited to, 48 days of
severe sleep deprivation and 20-hour interrogations, forced nudity, sexual
humiliation, religious humiliation, physical force, prolonged stress positions
and prolonged sensory over-stimulation, and threats with military dogs.”
Gutierrez’s claims about the type of interrogation
al-Qahtani endured have since been borne out with the release of hundreds of
pages of internal Pentagon documents describing interrogation methods at
Guantanamo and at least two independent reports about prisoner abuse.
According to the Schlesinger report, orders signed by Bush
and Rumsfeld in 2002 and 2003 authorizing brutal interrogations “became policy”
at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib.
The documents released by the ACLU will likely fuel further
calls to investigate whether Bush administration officials committed crimes by
authorizing torture.
On Feb. 9, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy
joined those advocating a “truth and reconciliation commission” that would seek
facts, not jail time.
“We could develop and authorize a person or group of people
universally recognized as fair minded, and without axes to grind,” Leahy said
during a speech at Georgetown University’s Law Center on Monday. “Their
straightforward mission would be to find the truth” about controversies such as
torture of detainees and warrantless wiretaps.
“People would be invited to come forward and share their
knowledge and experiences, not for purposes of constructing criminal
indictments, but to assemble the facts. If needed, such a process could involve
subpoena powers, and even the authority to obtain immunity from prosecutions in
order to get to the whole truth,” the Vermont Democrat said.
Later that day, when asked whether he would support Leahy’s
plan, President Barack Obama declined comment, saying he was unfamiliar with
it. He then reiterated his ambiguous response from the campaign, that no one is
above the law but that he favored looking forward, not backward.
“What I have said is that my administration is going to
operate in a way that leaves no doubt that we do not torture, that we abide by
the Geneva Conventions and that we observe our traditions of rule of law and
due process as we are vigorously going after terrorists that can do us harm,”
Obama said at his first prime-time news conference as president.
“My view is also that nobody is above the law, and if there
are clear instances of wrongdoing than people should be prosecuted just like
any ordinary citizen. But generally speaking I am more interested in looking
forward than I am in looking backwards.”
Leahy is expected to introduce a bill soon that would create
his proposed truth commission. Last month, Leahy’s counterpart in the House,
Rep. John Conyers, sponsored similar legislation to create a blue-ribbon panel
of outside experts to probe the “broad range” of policies pursued by the Bush
administration “under claims of unreviewable war powers.”
Jason
Leopold is the author of “News Junkie,” a memoir. Visit
www.newsjunkiebook.com
for a preview. His new website is The
Public Record.