Johann Hari: Mayor Boris is a disaster on the two big issues of our day
He is making policy to insulate the very people who caused this crisis
Wednesday, 8 April 2009
Cripes and golly gosh: it's nearly a year since the outer ring of Londoners booted out Ken Livingstone and installed mop-topped Boris Johnson in the glittering glass testicle of City Hall. Liberal-lefties like me predicted BoJo – with his record of calling black children "piccanninies" and cheering when Bush refused to sign up to Kyoto – would be a disaster. But as far as the media coverage goes, it's been a quiet 12 months. So is Boris a better mayor than we thought? The answer needs to be absorbed across the country, because Boris's London is the test lab for David Cameron's "progressive conservatism" – a hint of what's waiting for us all after the next election.
Let's start with the positive. There have been two unexpected and excellent moves from the Mayor. He knows that most of Britain's half-a-million illegal immigrants have washed up in London, where they live in constant fear, can't approach the police, and face grinding, binding poverty. It's to his credit that he has called for an earned amnesty that will allow these people – who skivvy for us, and keep London's wheels turning – to come out of the shadows and live here legally.
He also changed the policy of the Greater London Authority so all its employees and contractors now have to pay their staff the "London Living Wage" of £7.45 an hour. This is the amount you need to earn so you don't fall below the poverty line – and it's made a hefty difference to thousands of people. And there's more: I think Boris's verbal acrobatics are to his credit. He doesn't talk in pre-processed politicsese but in a real, vivid language that doesn't send voters into a coma. The skills that made him an excellent comic novelist and poet make him a good – if odd – communicator.
Yet on the two great challenges of our time that threaten the future of London – the credit crunch and the climate crunch – Boris's policies have been shocking. As a commentator and MP, Boris was one of the most enthusiastic defenders of the deregulation of financial services, saying it would bring "an era of amazing prosperity". Once the model he cheered on began to collapse all around us, he lashed out – at the people who had been proved right.
He declared this winter that the British people should stop "whingeing" and succumbing to "neo-socialist claptrap". He then, astonishingly, became the only British politician I know of to continue to defend the "the sub-prime sector", saying: "These products allowed millions of Americans to own their own homes." When I read this quote to Paul Krugman, this year's Nobel Prize-winning economist, he said: "Wow. This is economically illiterate. The increase in home ownership by sub-prime mortgages has all been wiped out by repossessions. We're back where we were, only with all the terrible problems you see all around you, and massive debts for the people who took them out."
This isn't just a verbal outburst from Boris. He is making policy – and lobbying the Government hard – to insulate the very people who caused this crisis, and to rebuild their collapsed model. He says the Government's pathetically minor and overdue new regulations on the City are "a vindictive attack on one of the most successful industries in this country". He objects to even the pitifully low increase on the very richest people's taxes by just 5 per cent, claiming it is "not economically sensible". He is fighting to retain the system where Alan Sugar pays a lower proportion of his income in taxes than his secretary.
On the climate crisis, he is worse still. Until he ran for mayor, Boris opposed every single move to prevent the destabilisation of the climate, saying George Bush's trashing of Kyoto was "good for the world". But, like David Cameron, on the road to elected office he claimed to have a Damascene conversion and pledged "a greener, cleaner London". We need one, since this city is highly vulnerable to rising sea levels. Since millions of us live on flood plains, after Hurricane Katrina the London Assembly investigated our flood defences – and found many are "appalling."
But Boris in power has been true to his core beliefs. He has done everything he can to encourage car use, and binned Ken Livingstone's carbon-reduction plans. He has halved the size of the environment team, scrapped the expansion of the Congestion Charge to west London, postponed indefinitely the expansion of the city's "Low Emission Zones", and cancelled Ken's plans to charge ultra-polluting SUVs an extra £25 a day. Despite constantly inviting photographers to snap him on his bike, he has hacked £27m out of the budget for building cycle lanes, wrecking proposals for 300 new ones.
The political symbolism is exposed as a sham by the political reality. Other than planting a few trees, his environmental policy has been "totally appalling", according to Darren Johnson, the excellent Green member of the London Assembly.
And Boris is formulating all these policies as a part-time Mayor of London. He apparently can't live on a mere £130,000 a year, a wage that puts him in the top 0.5 per cent of British people, and 0.0001 per cent of human beings. So he makes two-thirds of his income not from the electorate but from the Barclay brothers, the mysterious right-wing billionaires who live as tax exiles on their own private island. They pay him for a weekly column in The Daily Telegraph. But doesn't London – especially at this time – deserve a full-time Mayor, accountable to us?
Boris has made other decisions that suggest darker policy decisions to come. He has appointed as his director of policy a journalist called Anthony Browne, who has claimed "there is little British left" about London, and that "Britain will be a foreign land" soon. He has raged against "the growing social fragmentation of Britain under the weight of Third World colonisation," blaming immigrants for spreading deadly diseases. His writings recycle preposterous urban myths as fact, like the claim that councils were banning black bin bags as "racist".
Browne has enthusiastically posted on a far-right US website V-Dare, named after Virginia Dare, the first English child born in the New World. The site is dedicated to exploring "whether the United States can survive as a nation-state" in the face of "mass immigration and affirmative action". The British National Party's member of the London Assembly, Richard Barnbrook, said of Browne's appointment: "I cannot help but think that this is at least a step in the right direction." Browne is now the main hand guiding Boris's policy-making.
What does all this suggest about how David Cameron would govern Britain? Like Boris, Cameron claims to be "a new kind of Conservative", committed to environmentalism and "a more moral capitalism". Like Boris, he claims to have undergone a Damascene conversion: until 2005, he was a standard right-wing backbencher who cheer-led deregulation, and whose only statement on green issues was to mock wind farms as "giant bird blenders".
The evidence from London suggests that, given power, he will make a few concessions to modernity on the margins – and regress to rampant right-wingery on the core issues. As George Osborne said cheerfully in 2002: "We have a lot to learn from George Bush's compassionate conservatism."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Next Article In Johann Hari
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
I don't mind hearing this allegation from people who don't know the facts and imagine he really did say it, but I think in your case it is an entirely deliberate lie. Apart from the morality of such a deception, it makes me wonder why you have to lie - is there nothing he really said that makes him look as bad as you would like us to think he is?
I hope you will apologize for this slur on Hari's article.
Do not exaggerate for dramatic purposes; it makes you look untrustworthy, for good reason. Where else in this article have you made up a fact because it looks good?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vao5ShoI
That's exactly what the problem is.
As for racism, I don't know Boris so I have no idea if he is racist or not. However, even as a left-wing liberal, I am find it increasingly ridiculous that nobody can talk about social fragmentation and the impact of immigration on communities without being labelled a racist.
There is already very little time to cross, and now that the times have been even further reduced I have seen more people willing to risk their lives and run across on red.
BY his actions, Boris has made it even more dangerous for pedestrians to cross the road.
Bush refused to sign up to Kyoto. We all know about this and we still live with this. Has anything happens on the carbon control? No. Has he signed to date or has anyone told the new president signed this? This comes out of the goodwill to all human.
So is Boris a better mayor than we thought? Did he not talk of some London ministers and he claimed some cash for traveling by cab or bus?
He is making policy ? and lobbying the Government hard ? to insulate the very people who caused this crisis, and to rebuild their collapsed model. Can he?
He has done everything he can to encourage car use, and binned Ken Livingstone's carbon-reduction plans.
He apparently can't live on a mere �130,000 a year. Is that not enough for the politicians who receive less then the Hall workers?
"We have a lot to learn from George Bush's compassionate conservatism." Are we learning? Sure. We are.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
It follows surely that the UK deserves a full-time PM (ie one who is not distracted by being a constituency MP).
Ditto all other Ministers.
So it looks like it's to be a US-style separation of the legislative and executive branches. (Or is it all Ministers in the Lords?)
Please do not respond to the extreme racist comments.
Freeze them all out and tell your friends to do the same.
BUT POWER NEEDS TO BE CURB FROM CLEVER FOOLS.
He then implies that illegal immigrants somehow arrive on our shores by means of ocean currents. I think we all know how many other countries in which they prefer not to endure "blinding poverty" before they chose our variety.
They do not "skivvy" for me, they are exploited by businessmen, who usually claim they are essential. Well if your business plan relies on black market labour you don't have a business plan. Will Hari also put some flesh on the skeletal claim that "they keep London's wheels turning". We have no idea who these people are, how has he arrived at this conclusion? We already give council flats to perfectly legal immigrants such as Albanian war criminals so why not have an amnesty for people traffickers while we're at it, they might have a database of their previous clients, who as soon as they enjoy full status will then promptly lose their sweat-shop jobs because they've become too expensive to employ and if Hari is correct London will grind to a halt.
In an odd way i understand what he means about the subprime market. What's happening now is absolutly no provision is being made to allow the poor to aquire their own home. The left are once again happy to keep poor people trapped in a world they can identify them and the conservative view is one of producing mechanisms to enable them to escape. Johnson often sees what are actually remarkably left of centre visions but he reaches for an articulation which renders them right of centre.
The trick with Boris is to treat him as a special needs child. Latch on to his good intention (the ethic or ideal he is trying but failing to articulate ) BUT then work with him to steer the idea into genuinely new political proposals and mechanisms for upholding the idea. Keep your eye on the ideal. If he is indeed only being politcally devisive (as in the issue about which bouroughs in London are actually building new homes ) then you have to catch him out and explain it to him , yes that's right, explain to a politician why he's being corrupt.
Unfortunatley what happens alot is he reflexes into a conservative reactionary banality before he has finished his sentence and the opponent camp cry cheat as they spot him dodging and leap frogging back into old school conservative formation. If the opposition want to 'use' Boris, then they have to ween him out of his sixth form debating society attitudes and that means they have to be sussed about what they WANT too.
There seems to be a tradition here of anti intellectualism which feeds the great majority with the weapons of mass destruction in order to be part of the crowd whose greatest mind boggling success it to read the Star or the Sun.
I agree that the people who have caused this economic disaster must be thrown into the bin and recycled and just maybe Brown's electric car will become the boring future, which they seem to think will give them the credentials to be voted back into power.How about a 500 BHP electric car which could then run over the fat cats who have helped to destroy our society - Boris wake up!
Not one iota.
And neither should the British. But then, why should I expect anything better from the Brits? They spent 8 years saying how stupid the Americans were to elect Bush. I'll be laughing all the way to Heathrow when David Cameron gets the keys to 10 Downing Street, courtesy of the great and greedy British public.
1. Only independents being allowed to run for parliamentry positions, executives offices being voted for by those independent MP's..
2. A restriction of two years on all executive offices, no consecutive terms.
3. An abolition of major political parties.
4. A programme to get those out of work (those who have never
contributed tax payment (ever) or have been unemployed for 3 years +, into public enhancement jobs.(jobs normally done by foreigners).for a wage, this contributing tax
I have other ideas, but I may be in danger of being a radical reformer!!