Daniel Finkelstein
Win a trip to South Africa to watch The British & Irish Lions
Comment Central: Finkelstein and Riddell on expenses
"It's good. But it wouldn't work in the House.” I heard that often in the years I worked on William Hague's speeches. In fact, it became an office joke. There were lines of argument, gibes and phrases that were good, but would fail in the odd atmosphere of the House of Commons.
Behind this office joke lay a truth we all understood. Parliament is odd. It is, both literally and metaphorically, a law unto itself. So the little quirks and anachronisms were endless. The extent to which the institution stood on its dignity was amazing. And the traditions and practices were bewildering.
I vividly recall an evening when Tory MPs all went off to secret drinks parties so that they could return and embarrass the Government in a symbolic vote when it had sent its own MPs home. This ambush - just like the occasions when Labour MPs were forced to stay up all night just to tire them out - produced great joy among the organisers. But it left those on the outside baffled. What was the point of this game? What had been achieved?
Talk to individual MPs and there was a good chance they would share the astonishment of an outsider. But they also felt powerless to do much about it. Or they thought it was better to play the match than to start arguing with the ref about the rules. So a sort of resigned acceptance set in. Things can't change. Things won't change. Oh, what the hell, things don't need to change.
The expenses disaster arose at least to some extent from this feeling. Everyone knew that the rules had become baroque and that what had started as an allowance had become untaxed salary. But everyone just went along, claimed along. They clung to the authority of the Fees Office, and kept to themselves their view that the Fees Office and other House bodies were weak and useless. They kept going until... fiasco.
Surely now they will finally get it. Won't they? Unless Parliament changes, then year after year it will be hit by scandal and the public will react with anger. Addressing how the legislature works, how politics works, is no longer a boring process issue. The feeling against politics, the desire for a new kind of politics, is the mood of the moment. Understanding it and coping with it is the big intellectual challenge of the age.
The natural next step in this story will be to follow the money. Outside earnings will be scrutinised. We'll hear more about funding political parties. Politicians will work this out for themselves pretty quickly. And try and stay one step ahead of the disaster. But they may not appreciate that there are plenty of disasters out there waiting to happen that have nothing to do with money, but with the way that Parliament works.
Here are a few:
Debategate. When I turned up to a debate at Durham University a few years ago, I was told that it was to be “parliamentary style”. This turned out to mean that the MP on the other side (the Chief Whip Nick Brown, as it happens) shouted at me throughout my entire speech. This is parliamentary style?
When the House of Commons is about half full or more, MPs simply bellow and heckle each other, making intelligent debate impossible. Having watched a debate, I asked an MP friend why the Tory frontbencher had delivered such an impassioned, raucous speech. And my friend replied that while the TV mikes picked it up nice and clearly, other MPs could only hear a speech above the noise if the speaker shouted.
And the things MPs shout are not very nice, either. Sexist, rude, slanderous, irrelevant, childish. How long can it be before someone sits there, writes it all down and puts it on their blog? How long before first one MP, then another, is caught saying something inappropriate? The apologies, the disclipinary action. You can see it all, can't you?
When David Cameron was first elected Tory leader he promised to end “Punch and Judy politics”. He rounded on Labour's Chief Whip for heckling. It was a thrilling moment. But he has since concluded that he couldn't persist with this grown-up approach. “It's good. But it doesn't work in the House.” He has given up too easily. He should announce that he will be civilised in debate and that his MPs will follow suit.
Whipgate. I used to have a little game. Rather unfair, but still fun. Dinners with MPs of all parties are frequently interrupted by the division bell - that is, the alert for a Commons vote. And as they left I would ask: “What are you voting on?” On a very large proportion of occasions, the MPs didn't have much of a clue.
How long before someone mounts a proper survey of parliamentarians on their way to a vote? The moment that the slavish following of the whip becomes an issue, so will all the practices associated with it.
What will people think of votes on major topics when the chamber is almost completely empty for the debate? What about the absence of MPs at the theatre when a controversy is being settled in Parliament? What about the way MPs just vote the line?
These practices make sense to many MPs. But so did the additional cost allowance. So, act now? Or wait until it's too late?
Lawgate. The only way of avoiding a whipping scandal is to have less legislation. A smaller legislative programme. And this is necessary anyway.
MPs have long been aware that they are passing too many laws to be able to scrutinise them properly. They even passed a special Act to allow existing laws to be changed without having to go back before Parliament at all.
The public is not aware of this. Most think laws still have to go through Parliament, however rigid whipping might be. How long before these arrangements to make laws by shortcut become a scandal?
And these are just a start. Party candidate selection, debates taking place on documents only one side has read, important debates attended by fewer than ten MPs, and on and on.
Politicians have a choice. They can get ahead of all this, or let it get ahead of them. There is a big political prize for the leader who understands that the expenses row is about something bigger. There is a big political prize for the leader who stops answering with logical defences of current practices, and instead leads and shapes public opinion.
There is an obvious place to start. The House of Commons needs a new Speaker to lead it into a new age of reform. Michael Martin is not up to the job. When asked about him yesterday, David Cameron responded that it was convention for a party leader not to criticise the Speaker. Well, I think we've heard enough about convention for the time being, thank you very much.
Daniel Finkelstein is a weekly columnist and Chief Leader Writer of The Times. His blog, Comment Central, is a personal round up of the best political opinion on the web. Before joining the paper in 2001, he was adviser to both Prime Minister John Major and Conservative leader William Hague
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
Great deals on new cars
2005
39,950
£POA
Car Insurance
£150 k
Mark Spiers and Associates
UK
Attractive salary
Waitrose
London,South East & Southern England
from £70k upwards plus benefits, flexible
PhonepayPlus
South London
Six Figure
NSAP
West Midlands
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
World Cup Investment Opp - 2 bed gated apartment
Aspirational Homes from an Inspirational Company
With Golden Caribbean
For just £619pp
Experience Thailand from £1,580pp
with Cleveland Collection
S/c accomm in beautiful mainland Greece.
Great offers for May and June
Great travel insurance deals online
.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Lawgate? What about delegated legislationgate? European legislationgate? Enabling legislationgate? Lack of scrutinygate?
There should be a higher quorum for a debate in the House and only those that have attended the debate should be able to vote.
John Hall, Kaarina, Finland
Polite message to Peter Donson. I understand your frustration but not voting is apathy; it leaves the country to chance and holds the door open for this parliament of cheats. We all have to vote to get this government of corrupt socialism out.
Daniel Finkelstein - excellent analysis
Justin Kelsey, Sevenoaks, UK
Daniel Finkelstein is right. The MPs still do not seem to know why politics are held in such low esteem. The expenses scandal is pretty trivial compared to major issues such as the lack of independent thinking, long term vision and personal courage. Party machines are too powerful, voters powerless.
Richard Skipp, Bristol,
Nobody real gives a monkey's about these childish games. Pople should care about the 3,200 new laws enacted in the last 10 years, the intrusion into private life, the simple lack of understanding of the priorities in the lives of NORMAL people. Labour in 10 years has lost touch with ordinary folk.
Bill, Newhaven,
Do not vote. To do so would only be to endorse Parliament as it exists now and the party political system that drives it. One of the 2 major parties will still be returned, but if the turnout is derisory, say 30%, then change may be peacefully achieved.
Peter Donson, Southwell,Notts, UK
I didn't realise these MPs cost us so much. I don't mind them earning £1 million if they are absolutely great with their job. Unfortunately, they aren't - they have no vision, no belief, no responsibility. All they have is greed. If I was the boss, I'd probably pay them min wage with such performanc
Ben, Manchester,
The Country works best when Parliament is on holiday, which says a great deal about the 650 odd MPs. They are just voting fodder for the Parties. We need fewer MPs (400) and all archaic procedures reviewed. No law should be passed without proper consultation. The Speaker has to go, he is hopeless.
Martin Bellamy, cirencester, England
Regretably the recent MP's expense claims scandal has demonstrated the extent of human greed, in that they seem to care only for themselves instead of the people they represent.
Derek, St. Genis des Fontaines, France
Wasn't the "defences of current practices" argument exactly the one Thatcher faced when breaking the power of the unions? So what we see here are the MP as trade unionists and shop stewards indulged in Spanish practices? Where is Mrs T when she's needed?
Ken, France, France
The world's shoddy parliamentarians will not change until the voters do and stop electing them. The problem is that we are offered a choice between shoddy and and shoddy by the parties. The party system is a large part of the problem.
Chris, Ashford, Middx, England
Brian W - I suspect you are refering to the emering issue of "Gategate". I knew it would come up sooner or later.
Jon, London, UK
Sure, the heckling is childish and the atmosphere irreverent. But that is part of some intangible quality that many other legislatures lack, something that ultimately makes Parliament more human, and which punctures any institutional pomposity and pretension. Better than a "democratic mausoleum".
Johan, london,
An excellent article. We need to restore a sense that MP's represent their constituents not just the party whip and that they take inteligent informed and principled decisions. Then we need to give them real work, much of which has been hived off to Quango's or Brussles
Whigview, Harrogate,
Good points here: procedures and institutional culture matter.
We also need journalists who won't let the news be managed, whether by Damian McBride or by David Cameron's theatricals: "I was completely shocked to find my colleagues had behaved badly, I had no warning. I've fixed it immediately".
Ben, London,
we have the technology to do without the parliament. we can create a parliament in every household. if we can watch movies on internet if we can read papers and exchange ideas then why not vote????
we can as a nation all decide whats good and whats bad and vote for or against it.
makes perfect sense
ebbi britt, valencia, spain
excellent article.
you better start plugging away at some of these issues now please Dan! A real opportunity may present itself to radically improve this country.
jh, London,
By our own inertia and apathy we get the politicians we deserve.
The general public's preference for reading about soap operas and celebrity scanda rather than real life issues will ensure that this episode will be forgotten in a few weeks.
MaxC, London,
OBI states that: "any attempts to fix those other problems will have to wait until after the next scandal." That islike waiting for tomorrow - and tomorrow never comes, for when it does it is today. When the next scandal comes, it becomes the current scandal and people are too busy ducking for cover
Ian Ker, Mt Lawley, Australia
Lawgate. We are all deemed to know the law and can be prosecuted for breaking it. At least the lawmakers should know the details of laws they have passed. At the end of each session, MPs should take an examination on the laws they have passed. If the MPs don't pass the laws should be suspended.
David Hughes, Manama, Bahrain
If you consider Parliament as a legislation factory, most of its goods would be returned by the customers as "defective" "not as ordered" or "surplus to requirements". Would it help to smarten the old place up a bit? It's so gloomy, awkward and depressing it must be hard to work well there.
Frank Upton, Solihull,
There really is only one solution vote independent and destroy the established parties.
Garry, Sheffield,
Valid points, but only fiddling in the margins. A Parliamentary system that was fit for the 18th century is hardly likely to be the best possible solution for the internet age. Let's adopt the best parts of Switzerland's intelligent democracy, reduce MP numbers, and beef up the Boundaries Comm, too.
Steve, Porthcawl,
When oh when are you and the rest of the media going to stop adding the stupid suffix 'gate' to every scandal. Lets kill it NOW. On politics the sooner the whip system is made illegal , the sooner we will get MPs voting for what they believe, rather than what they are told to do.
Brian Wildey, Fleurance, France
the effect on younger generations will be deep seated and linger for years and that example is "greed is good, until you are found out". This is the true legacey left by all politicians as they will ALL be tarred by the same brush.
Ken Clarkson, fareham,
You, sir, the writer, are party to this mess. You, who have the power of the pen, have spent too much time dining MP's and too little time critiquing the institution. Politicians will not reform their club. The media and the outsiders must bell the cat.
bill grimmett, beatrice, canada
The world's shoddy parliamentarians will not change until the voters do and stop electing them. Don't hold your breath, chaps.
Bob Hall, New York, USA
No morals, no honour, no truth & a desire to suppress the release of information highlighting their appalling behaviour.
I am troubled for the future of this country when we, the people, are set such a shockingly bad example by parliamentarians.
isobel, ashford, uk
you have missed out the scandal (waiting to happen) of appointments by MPs of close family members and friends to publicly funded jobs as secretaries and researchers, assistants etc.
Crest, St Peter Port,
Good article, however it's about time that journalists did their job and started real, intense and deep investigating of all politics.
Papers assume that we only want to read about celebrities.
Guido Fawkes and this expenses scandal proves otherwise.
Tell the people everything and let them decide!
Jonathan, Cheshire,
Move them out of Westminster, somewhere more central. Put them into modern surroundings, give us access by camera and sound 24/7, publish all relevant data such as expenses and attendance and individual vote results. Get rid of the cosy club and archane nonsense this is the 21st century.
mike gee, bournemouth, uk
The most troublesome aspect of all this, is that they thought they could get away with it and how they fought tooth and nail to conceal it. This must say something about the kind of people queuing up for ride on the gravy train. Shame it's hit the buffers Heh! Now they'll have to get a proper job.
Tom Stack, Derby, England
Looks like the peasants are revoltin' Daniel and about time too. I reckon we need another Cromwell. "You sat here too long for any good you may have done,, let's be rtid of you in the name of God go!" As true today as when he said it in 1623. But then I saw a poster, saying there probably is no God.
Tom Stack, Derby, England
Once again, Daniel shows that he has far more political acumen than David Aaronovitch or Matthew Parris, indeed more than the House of Commons, even though he probably knows that is scant praise. Keep it coming, Daniel.
David Diprose, Saundersfoot, Wales
The government have long used 'enabling bills' which are included in legislation. These allow extra regulations to be tacked on the end of any existing law at a later date without further discussion.
c.wood, camberley, UK
I long wondered why the Government failed to act on the property -bubble to protect the public. Ministers were, in fact using the public's money to become tax exempt property speculators, hence their collusion in Brown's boom & bust. This is the charge the Government should answer..
John Barkham, Burton upon Trent, UK
British taxpayers will have to work until they are 70. I would like MPs to defer their own gold-plated pensions until then, too.
Kate, Oxford,
Mr Finkelstein doesn't mention that British parliament is very nearly irrelevant. Most legislation comes through, -on the nod, from Europe on the un-democratic statutory instruments system. That's the elephant in the room. Also interesting is Cameron's reaction to Lord Tebbit's comments.
n peckett, marlow, bucks
As far as I know, Hermann Göring never actually murdered anyone with his bare hands, and he was acting fully within the rules established by the governing body. Applying the standards du jour, has history been too harsh on him?
David Masu, Zürich, Switzerland
In ancient Greece they coined Democracy where every free man had a vote on every issue. Impractical, no doubt - which led to 'Political Party' politics. But the Greeks didn't have an Internet.
The very concept of Political Representation is made obsolete by the Net. Why now do I even need an MP?
BaiDaLong, Brisbane, Australia
I agree with David Shute, of Minchinhampton, - If all expenses had been published, the fiasco we are experiencing would never have happened - but the nature of the beast is not honesty - otherwise they all would have got a proper job
elliott, Kefalonia, Greece
Of course they get it. Just not in a good way.
So long as the behavioural psychologists tell them that negative campaigning works, and so long as each party believes that it can manage a revelation so that it damages them less than their opponents, it will all continue. It's ammunition for them.
Ian Kemmish, Biggleswade, UK
This has got to be the most sensible article i have read from Mr Finkelstein.
He has pointed out the myriad problems with the current practices of the UK parliament.
I have a feeling that any attempts to fix those other problems will have to wait until after the next scandal.
OBI , London, UK
If, as is being claimed, 90% of MPs have not exploited the expenses system - then let this 90% proudly publish their full (and presumably 100% justified) expense claims - since they, apparently, have nothing to hide.
Attention - Please watch out for low flying pigs!
david shute, minchinhampton, Gloucestershire
Once party discipline became paramount, time/delay was the only weapon left to MPs - not only, but especially the Opposition. Much of the behaviour of the House can only be understood in this context. However modernising the Commons has emasculated this device and the behaviour looks odd.
John Barnes, Etchingham, UK
"They even passed a special Act to allow existing laws to be changed without having to go back before Parliament at all."
You're right i didn't know about that. No wonder its been kept quite thats outrageous. I hope the Times investigates further.
Anthony Lester, Birmingham,
The MP spending issue still has other legs. Given what has happened, who now would say MPs can be trusted to chose their own staff and pay them in secret. And I suspect there are many MPs with plenty to hide here - how long I wonder before a newspaper exposes what has gone on in this area.
Anne Murphy, London,