Italy Willing To Open Tehran Embassy To Protesters

Posted by Alex On June - 21st - 2009

Italy is willing to open its embassy in Tehran to wounded protesters in coordination with other European nations, the Italian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Monday.

Quick Guide To Twittering The Iran Revolution

Posted by Alex On June - 21st - 2009

A how to guide to twittering about the Iranian election crisis.

Iran-50 Cities Had More Votes Than Voters

Posted by Alex On June - 22nd - 2009

In 50 Iranian cities the number of votes cast in this month presidential election exceeded the number of eligible voters, the state's election watchdog admitted today. The surprising admission by the Guardian Council was, however, designed to undermine the claims of the defeated candidates that the vote was rigged.

Iran-Faces Of The Basij

Posted by Alex On June - 20th - 2009

Images of the Iranian Basij

Next Stop - Civil Disobedience

Posted by Jaime On June - 19th - 2009

On Tuesday, Savage Love columnist and podcaster Dan Savage wrote an interesting article addressing how queer Americans should approach the Obama administration's repugnant avoidance of campaign-trail promises.

Public Gay Book Burning

Posted by Alex On June - 17th - 2009

A Christian group called the CCLU is trying to have a gay book publicly burned.

List of Journalist and Politicians Detained in Iran

Posted by Alex On June - 21st - 2009

An unconfirmed list of the reporters, bloggers and politicians being detained in Iran.

Focus On The Family Lies

Posted by Alex On June - 18th - 2009

Truth Wins Out Catches Focus On The Family In A Lie

(Unconfirmed)

Graphic Content

Via CitizenTube

“Yet another very disturbing video that depicts a chaotic scene that ends with a man - who has just been shot in the head - bleeding to death on the street. People crowd around him snapping photos and taking videos. Please use discretion before viewing as some of the images may be upsetting.”

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

This is some of the clearest video I’ve seen:

 

| | edit post

Iran-More Footage Of Violence

Posted by Alex On 1:24 AM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

Via The Huffington Post

3:15 PM ET -- What a difference a video makes. This 10-minute video just arrived in my inbox from (the very helpful) reader Jenny. It appears to be video from yesterday's events. And as you can see -- warning, there is footage of protesters beaten and anxious moments when people are trapped in between cars -- there was serious unrest yesterday.

After a day when many news outlets shifted away from their focus on Iran because of the scarcity of new footage, it demonstrates just how vital these citizen-created videos are in establishing a real sense of what's happening on the ground.

 

| | edit post


The Reverend Bastard Fred Phelp's nasty group of screaming righteousness, otherwise known as the Westboro Baptist Church, was in Seattle recently. This is the same group that picketed the trial of Matthew Shepard's killers, as well as the funerals of Heath Ledger, 9/11 victims, and service-men and -women killed in Iraq. (Apparently the worst thing to do on this earth is to be gay or support gay rights, therefore we deserved 9/11 and the killing of our soldiers in Iraq).

I was very disappointed to learn about this after the fact. I had visions of what kind of public display I could provide that might shock them into leaving: pledging my soul to Satan, full-frontal nudity, or full-on lesbian sex in public. I was very encouraged by how easy this could be accomplished, since apparently all it takes to turn their stomach is a bunch of fully-clothed frat boys dancing to Diana Ross' "I'm Coming Out". Alas, it was not to be.

However, I did stumble upon something interesting while looking into their picketing schedule: an auto-biographical speech by one of the Bastard's sons, Nate Phelps. It is really fascinating reading, full of childhood abuse and corresponding adult searching for healing and change. As much as Freddy (Krueger?) Phelps is a monster, his son Nate Phelps should be seen as a role-model.

With my schooling in psychology, however, I find the background information on Freaky Freddy eerily fascinating. For all of us who already knew he was a sociopath, there is a whole lot more evil to the man than just what he shows to the public. Personally, he seems Bi-Polar with manic leanings. I once thought he was just a sociopath, with no empathy for others. Reading about his treatment of his wife and children, I'm pretty sure he's a psychopath. In fact, has anyone done any digging in this man's back yard? It wouldn't surprise me at all if this guy has hidden a few dead bodies in his lifetime. There is so much hate in this man, it's a wonder that he hasn't publicly executed homosexuals, casually murdered competitors for leadership, and/or secretly molested and then killed young boys.

The man is a walking time-bomb, and so far all we've done is try to ignore him or over-shout him. Where are the criminal investigations? I seriously think it's just a matter of time before he explodes, if he hasn't secretly done so already.

I found this disgusting video on the Bilerico Project website earlier today. It is just scary that these ads were so common. It does make you think of how far we’ve come and how brave the gay community was. The ad warns boys about “homosexuals”. The film compares homosexuality to having small pox. It ends with the lines:

“One never knows when the homosexual is about. He may appear normal, and it may be too late when you discover he is mentally ill.”

Video Of Michael Jackson's Body Being Flown By L.A. Sheriff Helicopter And Transferred To L.A. Coroner's Office - 06/25/09

 

Iran-Video From Baharestan Square

Posted by Alex On 10:41 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

The is one of only a few videos that came out of Iran of the Baharestan Square protest yesterday (June 24th, 2009):

 

| | edit post

perez-hiltonAs The Gay Atheist reported earlier, in a recent statement from blogger Perez Hilton, Hilton said that if his lawsuit against the Black Eyed Peas manager was successful, he planned on donating the money to the Matthew Sheppard Foundation. The Matthew Sheppard Foundation has refused the money saying:

"We do not know the details of the lawsuit, whether it has been filed, the nature of his claims or the likely outcome," a statement from Judy Shepard reads. "But because the lawsuit presumably involves the physical attack prompted by Mr. Hilton's admitted use of an anti-gay slur, the Foundation will be unable to accept any funds obtained in such a manner."

RIP MICHAEL JACKSON

Posted by Alex On 9:33 PM 0 comments

Dedicated to the man himself…

 

Michael_jackson_bad_cd_cover_1987_cddaVia TMZ

We've just learned Michael Jackson has died. He was 50.
Michael suffered a cardiac arrest earlier this afternoon at his Holmby Hills home and paramedics were unable to revive him. We're told when paramedics arrived Jackson had no pulse and they never got a pulse back.
A source tells us Jackson was dead when paramedics arrived.
Once at the hospital, the staff tried to get him to breathe but they had no luck.
We're told one of the staff members at Jackson's home called 911.
LaToya ran in the hospital sobbing, after Jackson was pronounced dead.
Michael is survived by three children: Michael Joseph Jackson, Jr., Paris Michael Katherine Jackson and Prince "Blanket" Michael Jackson II.
Story developing...

Live CBS Stream:

Live video chat by Ustream

****************************************************************************

Photos Via TMZ

Update: Here is a photo of Michael Jackson’s mother Katherine Jackson arriving at the hospital:

ScreenHunter_02 Jun. 25 19.48Update: Here is a photo of Michael Jackson’s sister La Toya Jackson racing to her brothers side in tears. Unfortunately MJ was already dead. 

ScreenHunter_03 Jun. 25 19.55 Photo Via ET Online

Update: Here is a photo showing Jackson being taken into the hospital.

ScreenHunter_04 Jun. 25 20.06

michael-jackson1Via TMZ

We've just learned Michael Jackson was taken by ambulance to a hospital in Los Angeles ... and we're told it was cardiac arrest and that paramedics administered CPR in the ambulance.
He was picked up at his home around 20 minutes ago -- we're told his mother is on the way to visit him.
UPDATE: The 911 call came in at 12:21PM at his Holmby Hills home in L.A.
UPDATE: A Jackson family member tells TMZ Michael is in"really bad shape" and the brothers are headed to UCLA.

Update: Photo of Jackson arriving at the hospital, via TMZ.

ScreenHunter_01 Jun. 25 18.25

CNN Interviews Pastor Patricia McKinney Of Connecticut's Manifested Glory Ministries Church That Performs "Gay Exorcisms" - 06/25/09:

 

 

What a crock of shit!

Iran-Saberi: Iran can’t go back

Posted by Alex On 5:00 PM 0 comments

Program note: Freed U.S. journalist, Roxana Saberi, discusses her time in prison and the current Iranian situation with Anderson Cooper. For the full interview tune in tonight,  AC360° at 10 p.m. ET

| | edit post

Actress Farrah Fawcett Dies At 62

Posted by Alex On 4:50 PM 0 comments

Iran-Another Man Shot

Posted by Alex On 4:42 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

Graphic Content

The following video shows a man shot in the arm:

 

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

“This video, uploaded today, appears to show Neda, the young Iranian woman whose death on Saturday has received much media attention, walking with her teacher before she was shot (:18). The clip of Neda is followed by footage of police on motorcycles. Approximately 43 seconds into the video, you can hear what sounds like a gunshot.”

 

| | edit post

Michael Savage, the anti-gay radio host who once said autistic children should just be slapped, recently did an interview with CNN. Here Media Matters points out the lies he told:

 

A church in Connecticut posted on their website what looks like an exorcism designed to cure a 16 year old boy of his homosexuality: The boy is seen having a seizure and vomiting.

 

 

This is child abuse!

Perez Hilton Apologies Again

Posted by Alex On 3:06 PM 0 comments

1a976757-f9da-4ee0-8c58-2090a3dc4006Gossip Blogger Perez Hilton once again took to his blog, to apologize again. Perez makes clear though that he is not apologizing to GLADD. Here is his statement:

"People make mistakes. I have made many in my life, but this past week I have made more than I can count on one hand.

I am sorry. And I mean it. No one is forcing me to write this. I am not feeling pressured to say this. I am speaking out because I realize that the last few days have been more hurtful to me - and many others - than the repeated blows I suffered to my head in Toronto this past weekend.

I have been filled with incredible sadness and regret.

I am sorry that any good work I have done for promoting equality may be tainted by me reclaiming a hurtful word - that's been personally used against me and the gay community - to hurt someone that was verbally attacking me. It was stupid.

Apologizing for me is not easy. Writing this was not easy. Life is not easy. But everything happens for a reason and I will take away a lot of valuable lessons from this experience.

Violence is never the answer. Never.

Victims should not be mocked.

The "F" word will never be uttered from my lips again. Just as others use the "N" word to insult and hurt - or as part of their everyday speech - I challenge them to remove it from their vocabulary as well.

Hindsight is always 20/20, they say. I should have been the bigger man and walked away from an unfortunate situation. Instead, I chose - in a very misguided way - to stand up for myself and only made things worse by how I - under pressure, anger and extreme emotion - handled the situation.

I am sorry.

I am NOT apologizing to GLAAD. I could care less about them, my former employers.

I am apologizing to the gay community, to anyone who was hurt by my choice of words, and to all the people who have ever emailed me to thank me for all that I have done to fight for gay rights over the last few years.

I have reached out to Isaiah Washington, someone I incorrectly labeled a homophobe in the past, despite his own public statements that he was not.

I will be donating any money collected from my lawsuit against Polo Molina, road manager for the Black Eyed Peas, to the Matthew Shepard Foundation.

And I will continue to speak out for equality and support the great work done by LGBT organizations, such as LAMBDA Legal and HRC.

Sincerely,

Perez"

Gorgeous Hunk Eddie Cibrian will be joining the CSI: Miami cast this September. According to People, Cibrian will play a reoccurring role on the show staring as a Los Angeles police officer who moves to Miami. I see that my one time love with the CSI franchise will almost definitely now be reborn. To celebrate this wonderful announcement, I’ve included a few hot pictures of Cibrian. Enjoy! I sure am.

eddie_cibrian13Eddiecaps00wp y1p7FFSuwTBTXYR8GbhO0zm4O7wbGxNBVdreddie-cibrian-wife.0.0.0x0.445x542 eddie_cibrian_01 eddie-cibrian-xeg083 eddie-cibrian-ugly-betty-01

(Disturbing Audio)

The following interview took place today (June 24th, 2009) on CNN. It’s very disturbing. The Iranian woman begs for help from the outside world and says the people are being massacred in the streets. The guy from CNN is even at a lack of words when she starts begging for help. She says the security forces were pushing people of bridges and beating them to death. She compared them to Hitler and says they have started using axes to kill people.

 

| | edit post

the-j-bros-the-jonas-brothers-758475_1024_768Nick Jonas, stopped by the White House wearing a white oxford shirt with no tie and a gray blazer. He met with President Obama and other children with diabetes. After his trip to the White House, Nick headed to the office of Senator Frank Lautenberg. Nick and the Senator talked about music while having pictures taken.

Nick has type 1 diabetes, which he publicly announced in 2007.

Iran-Police Clash With Protesters

Posted by Alex On 9:48 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

This video was shot yesterday in Iran according to the description provided with it:

 

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

Graphic Content

I am unsure of when or where in Iran this video was filmed, but the video description says the man who is injured was shot by the Basij.

 

| | edit post

CNN did a piece on two women who escaped from Iran. One received a broken ankle & thumb during a protest:

| | edit post

jon-and-kateThey are grainy, but Access Hollywood has a copy of Jon & Kate Gosselin’s divorce papers. You can take a look HERE

No words needed other than, Hot!

28816305-28816306-large__opt1

I still think I prefer the first cover they did though. What do you think?

Iran-Protesters Attack The Basij

Posted by Alex On 6:07 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

Via CitizenTube

This is incredible footage of Iranians attacking and beating members of the Basij. Police motorcycles have been lit on fire, and the streets are filled with people running around and yelling loudly. At a few points in the video, it looks as though a number of citizens are trying to protect the fallen Basij officers from being further injured by their fellow protesters.


There's no indication of when this video was shot, but it looks to have been taken from an Iranian news organization called the Fars News Agency.

| | edit post

will_i_am_001_062108Via ET Online

Gossip blogger Perez Hilton is suing the man he claims assaulted him.

Following an argument with will.i.am of the Black Eyed PeasSunday night at a Toronto nightclub, Perez alleges that Peas manager Liborio "Polo" Molina punched him repeatedly outside the club. Molina was arrested in Toronto on Monday after he allegedly punched Perez.

The suit is seeking unspecified damages.

 

Update: The lawsuit Perez Hilton filed against Black Eyed Peas manager Polo Molina claims Hilton suffered emotional distress and battery. Hilton claims he is defending his right to free speech and seeking in the lawsuit $25, 000.

 

north_korea_missile

SEOUL, South Korea – North Korea accused Washington of seeking to "provoke a second Korean War" as the regime prepared to hold maritime military exercises off the eastern coast. U.S. and regional authorities were watching closely for signs that North Korea might fire short- or mid-range missiles during the June 25 to July 10 timeframe cited in a no-sail ban for military drills sent to Japan's Coast Guard.

North Korea had warned previously it would fire a long-range missile as a response to U.N. Security Council condemnation of an April rocket launch seen as a cover for its ballistic missile technology.

An underground nuclear test last month drew more Security Council action: a resolution seeking to clamp down on North Korea's trading of banned arms and weapons-related material by requiring U.N. member states to request inspections of ships carrying suspected cargo.

In a first test of the new resolution, a North Korean ship suspected of transporting illicit weapons was sailing off China's coast with a U.S. destroyer close behind.

The Kang Nam, which left the North Korean port of Nampo a week ago, is believed bound for Myanmar, South Korean and U.S. officials said.

Myanmar state television downplayed the reports of a possible weapons shipment Wednesday evening, saying another North Korean vessel was expected to pick up a load of rice but that the government had no information about the Kang Nam.

A senior U.S. defense official said Wednesday that the ship had already cleared the Taiwan Strait.

He said he didn't know how much range the Kang Nam has — that is, whether or when it may need to stop in some port to refuel — but that the Kang Nam has in the past stopped in Hong Kong's port.

Another U.S. defense official said he tended to doubt reports that the Kang Nam was carrying nuclear-related equipment, saying the information officials have received seems to indicate the cargo is conventional munitions.

The U.S. officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were discussing intelligence.

Officials said last week that they believed the ship was carrying smaller arms, though they didn't elaborate.

The U.S. and its allies have not decided whether to contact and request inspection of the ship, Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said Wednesday.

"That's a decision that will have to be made at some point, and not necessarily just by us or this government," he said at a news conference. "I think we will likely take (the decision) collectively with our allies and partners."

He said he didn't believe a decision would come soon.

North Korea has said it would consider interception of its ships a declaration of war, and on Wednesday accused the U.S. of seeking to start another Korean War.

"If the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will ... wipe out the aggressors on the globe once and for all," a dispatch from the official Korean Central News Agency said.

The warning came on the eve of the 59th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War. The brutal fighting ended after three years in a truce in 1953, not a peace treaty, leaving the peninsula divided and in a state of war. The U.S. has 28,500 troops in South Korea to protect against an outbreak of hostilities.

On Wednesday, the top U.S. commander in South Korea, Gen. Walter Sharp, praised soldiers from U.S.-led U.N. forces who died fighting the "tyranny" of communist North Korea decades ago.

"A North Korean victory in the Korean War would have brought the nightmare of tyranny to this great land, thrusting the citizens of the Republic of Korea into a darkness that their northern counterparts have yet to emerge from," he said a commemoration ceremony Wednesday, referring to South Korea by its official name, the Republic of Korea.

Reports about possible missile launches from the North highlighted the state of tension on the Korean peninsula.

A senior South Korean government official said the no-sail ban is believed connected to North Korean plans to fire short- or mid-range missiles. He spoke on condition of anonymity, citing department policy.

Yonhap reported that the North may fire a Scud missile with a range of up to 310 miles (500 kilometers) or a short-range ground-to-ship missile with a range of 100 miles (160 kilometers) during the no-sail period.

U.S. defense and counterproliferation officials in Washington said they also expected the North to launch short- to medium-range missiles. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence.

South Korea will expedite the introduction of high-tech unmanned aerial surveillance systems and "bunker-buster" bombs in response to North Korea's provocations, the Chosun Ilbo newspaper said, citing lawmakers.

Meanwhile, a flurry of diplomatic efforts were under way to try getting North Korea to return to disarmament talks.

Russia's top nuclear envoy, Alexei Borodavkin, said after meeting with his South Korean counterpart that Moscow is open to other formats for discussion since Pyongyang has pulled out of formal six-nation negotiations.

In Beijing, top U.S. and Chinese defense officials also discussed North Korea. U.S. Defense Undersecretary Michele Flournoy was heading next to Tokyo and Seoul for talks.

South Korea has proposed high-level "consultations" to discuss North Korea with the U.S., Russia, China andJapan.

___

Associated Press writers Jae-soon Chang in Seoul, and Pauline Jelinek, Pamela Hess and Lolita Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.

Sanford Family2 After disappearing for seven days, South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford, admitted that he had gone to Argentina to visit a woman he was having an affair with. Sanford said he would resign as head of the Republicans Governor’s Association.

Via The Huffington Post

"I've let down a lot of people, that's the bottom line," the 49-year-old governor said at a news conference where he choked up as he ruminated with remarkable frankness on God's law, moral absolutes and following one's heart. His family did not attend.

The woman, who lives in Argentina, has been a "dear, dear friend" for about eight years but, Sanford said, the relationship didn't become romantic until a little over a year ago. He's seen her three times since then, and his wife found out about it five months ago.

He told reporters he spent "the last five days of my life crying in Argentina" and the affair is now over. Sanford, a rumored 2012 presidential candidate, refused to say whether he'll leave office.

"What I did was wrong. Period," he said.

 

So, this makes the second Republican to admit to having an affair in the past few days, Sanford following Senator John Ensign.

Sanford has a long list of “strange” activities.

Iran-Boy Shot By Sniper

Posted by Alex On 4:32 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

Graphic Content

 

This video was labelled today (June 24th, 2009):

 

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

Graphic Content

 

I’m unsure of when this film was recorded but it was uploaded to YouTube today (June 24th, 2009). It shows Iranians gravely injured from fights with the Basij.

 

| | edit post


The Live Stream From The NY Senate Should Start At 3PM EST.

gayscalifflagPermission has been given to supporters of same-sex marriage in California to begin collecting signatures to put a new vote back on the ballot in 2010 to legalize same-sex marriage. If passed the vote would nullify Proposition 8. 

Via CVBT

The okay has been given to supporters of an initiative to legalize gay marriage in California to gather signatures to put the measure before voters in 2010.

If approved, the amendment to the California Constitution would nullify Proposition 8, which outlawed gay marriage.

Supporters, lead by the Sacramento group “Yes on Equality,” say the amendment would make it clear that it is not intended to modify or change the curriculum in any school or to mandate or require clergy of any church or religious institution to perform a service or duty inconsistent with his or her faith.

The proponent for this measure, listed as Charles Lowe with a phone number linked to Yes on Equality, must collect valid signatures from 694,354 registered voters -- the number equal to 8 percent of the total votes cast for governor in the 2006 election -- in order to qualify it for the ballot. The proponent has until Nov. 19 to circulate petitions for this measure.

david_paterson_at_podiumWhile the New York senate is in chaos with a split of votes between the Democrats and Republicans being 31-31, Governor David Paterson has called another “extraordinary” session and is placing the gay marriage bill right at the top for today (June 24th, 2009).

New York’s Empire State Pride Agenda released the following statement:

"This weekend marks the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall Inn demonstration in New York City, a pivotal event in the LGBT rights movement. Tomorrow, the New York State Senate has the opportunity to show that we have indeed made progress over the last four decades. Governor Paterson has put the marriage bill on the agenda for tomorrow’s extraordinary session. Senators will now have before them a bill (S.4401) authorizing same-sex couples to marry in New York State. The New York State Senate now has the chance to do what the Assembly has done twice, and what a majority of New Yorkers support and that is to vote to allow same-sex couples access to marriage and the 1324 rights and protections that come with a New York State civil marriage license. As we have seen from the growing level of support on this issue, this is not a partisan matter. It is a matter of equal treatment under the law. We urge the New York State Senate to vote on and pass this crucially important human rights bill tomorrow. LGBT New Yorkers expect and deserve such a vote. New York State, with a proud progressive tradition, should not continue a situation in which some of its citizens are deprived of their rights. When more than a million LGBT people and their friends and families gather in New York City this weekend to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the birth of the modern LGBT rights movement, we hope that there will be another pivotal event—marriage equality—for them to celebrate."

 

You can watch the Live NY Senate here at 3PM EDT.

 

A new poll conducted by Quinnipiac University also shows that a majority of New Yorkers now support same-sex marriage, 51% of them compared to 41% who are against, leaving 8% still undecided.

Transformers 2 Parody

Posted by Alex On 1:05 AM 0 comments

Ok, I just published a post about the new Transformers movie and right after I found this Twitter oriented parody online, enjoy!

 

Since the new Transformers movie comes out in theatres tomorrow and I loved the first one, here is the trailer for the new movie:

 

A New Statement From Perez Hilton

Posted by Alex On 11:47 PM 2 comments

perez-hilton2

Perez Hilton has released another statement on his blog concerning the altercation between himself and the Black Eyed Peas Manager. I don’t really know if it’s an apology for using anti-gay slurs, but he does mention it.

"Words can hurt. I know that very well, from both sides of the fence. The other night in Toronto, after feeling physically threatened by a verbally abusive Will.I.Am of the Black Eyed Peas, I chose the most hurtful word I know to hurl at him. I was in an out-of-the ordinary situaton and used a word that I would not utter under normal circumstances. My intention - however misguided it may have been - was to stand up for myself and tell this belligerent man that I had enough of his badgering and was not going to continue to let him berate and intimidate me. I wanted to hurt him with the word I chose, not anyone else. Unfortunately, the one who got hurt was me and, subsequently, a lot of other people. I wish none of it had happened. I can't take it back. I did what I thought was best at the moment to stand up for myself in a non-violent yet still assertive way. Clearly, I am not homophobic. Also, I am not nor have I ever claimed to be a spokesperson for the gay community. I am just speaking for myself, a gay man. One who is labeled "flamboyant" in the media. An American that is not granted equal rights under the law. I will continue to speak out for equality and I will continue to say things that upset both gay people and straight people. Who I am as a person and what I do for a living are two separate things. I've come to terms with all my incongruities and am proud of who I am and what I do. In closing, words can hurt. But words should not provoke someone to violence. Stripped away from the mask of Perez Hilton, I have been extremely bothered by the public reaction to my assault. Violence should never be condoned with such statements as "It's Karma" or "I don't believe in violence but….". In fact, several television and radio shows over the past couple of days echoed the sentiment "He had it coming". Would they have said the same thing if I was a woman? Would I have "deserved it" if I had been stabbed? Or shot? Or killed? I was attacked from behind without warning and repeatedly punched in the head in a cold, disgusting and unnecessarily violent manner by Polo Molina, the road manager for the Black Eyed Peas, who I did not even speak with that evening. I did not share any words with him and his assault on me was completely unprovoked. I feel like everything happens for a reason and I leave this traumatic experience as a person with more compassion. Specifically, there was an instance last year when actor Jesse Metcalfe was attacked outside of a Hollywood nightclub by a fellow entertainer. I did not condone the violence, but I did make light of that situation. I regret that. Sincerely. There are many ways to deal with disagreements, both good and bad, but violence is never the answer. Never. I now know that first-hand. It should not be condoned, promoted or accepted. No one "deserves" to be the victim of violence. No one "has it coming." NO ONE. And victims should not be ridiculed. I look forward to marching for equality in Washington, D.C. this October. And I look forward to standing up for my rights in a Toronto courtroom shortly, as I fully intend to seek every lawful remedy against the man that attacked me."

- Perez Hilton
June 23, 2009
Los Angeles, California

I wonder, how much more will we hear about this? The thing is, I’m sure Perez’s blog is getting a lot of hits. I’ve even been on the site several times today. Perez also claimed he is going to seek legal actions against the bands manager, so I’m sure we will be hearing more about that.

You can see Perez’s original video statement here, or watch a condensed comedy version from the Huffington post here.

The Richard Dawkins Foundation has produced a video called “The Baloney Detection Kit” that tells you how to know if the information your getting is any good or not & since I haven't posted much lately about atheist topics here you are:

“With a sea of information coming at us from all directions, how do we sift out the misinformation and bogus claims, and get to the truth? Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine lays out a "Baloney Detection Kit," ten questions we should ask when encountering a claim.”

More Causalities In Iran

Posted by Alex On 9:53 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

Graphic Content

I don’t know when this video was filmed, but it shows more graphic violence in Iran.

 

| | edit post

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow talks with Charlie Rose about what it was like coming out at age 17. She says it’s always better to be out, then to hide who you are.

 

Our most hated bitch, Ann Coulter, was on Fox News with Bill O’Reilly when she said that she didn’t think of Dr. George Tiller’s Death as a murder, but more of a late late term abortion. Coulter continued with more disgusting remarks after that. She even had O’Reilly disagreeing with her. You can watch the video bellow:

June-23-2009

I have finally been able to get footage of President Obama’s comments about the election fallout happening in Iran, during his press conference earlier today. He has definitely stepped up and taken a harder and more forward stance towards the Iranian government.  The White House is also offering the video with Persian subtitles apparently thinking some Iranians may be watching.

 

| | edit post

Jon & Kate Production Halted

Posted by Alex On 5:57 PM 0 comments

The TLC series Jon & Kate Plus 8, which follows the life of Jon and Kate Gosselin and their 8 children will be put on hold. This after last nights announcement by the couple that they are getting a divorce. This Mondays episode of the reality show will feature a clip show, with some new footage, but the planned new episode will not air until August 3rd, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Us Magazine says that TLC has not had enough footage to produce more episodes because of the couples marriage turmoil. They even say that episodes shot this season were usually finished last minute and often on the day of airing. jon_and_kate_plus8 I think this “time off” could give the reality family some private and needed time away from the cameras. Unfortunately I doubt the paparazzi will give them a break. I’m doubtful of the reports I have heard that Jon and Kate are still working on their marriage, but I do wish this family all the best.

 

Also in case you missed the announcement of the divorce, Jon & Kate gave last night, here it is:

 

I think this is a new promotional ad for the National March on Washington, October 10-11th, 2009:

 

perezhilton2_20090408_seoulbeats1Perez Hilton after receiving a demand from the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation to apologise for using anti-gay slurs, has responded, but not as you may think, or maybe you could expect it from him?

"I am saddened GLAAD chose to victimize me further by criticizing me for how I non-violently dealt with a very scary situation that, unfortunately, turned violent," Hilton said in a statement. "While I doubt I will get an apology from GLAAD, nor do I expect one, I would just hope people know how difficult it is to intellectualize a situation and think rationally when a thug disguised as a musician is screaming at your face and intimidating you. I am just very fortunate and grateful that nothing more serious happened to me."

Ali-Karimi-during-Irans-W-001 Via guardian.co.uk

According to the pro-government newspaper Iran, four players – Ali Karimi, 31, Mehdi Mahdavikia, 32, Hosein Ka'abi, 24 and Vahid Hashemian, 32 – have been "retired" from the sport after their gesture in last Wednesday's match against South Korea in Seoul.

They were among six players who took to the field wearing wristbands in the colour of the defeated opposition candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi, which has been adopted by demonstrators who believe the 12 June election was stolen.

Most of the players obeyed instructions to remove the armwear at half-time, but Mahdavikia wore his green captain's armband for the entire match. The four are also said to have been banned from giving media interviews.

The fate of the other two players who wore the wristbands is unknown. None of the team members were given back their passports upon returning to Tehran after the match, which ended in a 1-1 draw – a result that ended Iran's hopes of qualifying for next year's tournament.

Karimi is one of Iranian football's best-known stars, having played for the German club Bayern Munich. Ka'abi played for Leicester City for several months during the 2007/8 season. Hashemian and Mahdavikia play for the German teams Bochum and Eintracht Frankfurt.

The gesture acutely embarrassed Iranian officials. The team's chief administrative officer, Mansour Pourhiedari, initially claimed the wristbands had been intended as a religious tribute to a revered Shia figure in the hope that it would deliver a victory on the pitch.

Iran's hardline media have since linked the protest to the arrest on Saturday of Mohsen Safayi Farahani, who headed the country's football governing body under the former reformist president, Mohammad Khatami. He is one of several dozen opposition politicians, intellectuals and journalists to have been detained.

Hezbollah, a pro-Ahmadinejad website, accused Farahani, a member of the pro-reform Islamic participation front, of bribing the players to wear the symbols. Farahani was one of several prominent figures accused by Ahmadinejad of corruption during the recent election campaign.

Ahmadinejad, a known football fan, has taken a close interest in the sport's affairs. In 2006 Iran was banned from international competition by the world governing body Fifa after claims of improper interference by his government. The ban was later lifted.

This year the national team coach Ali Daei was sacked, reportedly on Ahmadinejad's orders, after a 2-1 home defeat by Saudi Arabia.

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

According to this video, which was supposed to have been shot today (June 23, 2009) in Tehran, shows Tehran is more like a boot camp now, with security forces stationed all through the city:

 

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

If this video was truly shot today, it shows the continued violence in Iran:

 

| | edit post

Via Drink The Glitter

The Picture shows someone who for sure looks like Perez getting hit and on the left is Lady Gaga:

DrinkTheGlitterPEREZ

Vampires have long held a place in our hearts as sexy men of the night, but now Vampire Con, an annual convention in California, is reaching out to the gay community with a new add featuring two gay vampires:

 

The Iranian government is saying that it will create a special court for captured protesters. This special court will make examples of captured protesters, such as possible embarrassment, torture, and possible execution.

 

This is on top of the new “bullet fee”, which charges an average of $3000 to the families of dead protesters to get their loved one’s body back. Most Iranians cannot afford this. This is obviously all an attempt to humiliate and frighten the Iranian people.

| | edit post

To further the conversation around the debate about Perez Hilton’s fight with Will.i.Am, here is another point of view:

 

Despite recent successes for gay rights, I've been in quite funk since the Obama administration likened us to incestuous child molesters. There's also a lot going on with Iran and North Korea, so my brain has been a bit preoccupied with doom and gloom. Who knew that a commercial could wake me up again?

This weekend I saw a new Orbitz commercial, during which a man in a golf shirt with an interesting logo is viewable for many seconds. The logo was comprised of a blue square with two yellow bars inside, like a big equal symbol (=). I waited until the commercial was over - had to make sure there wasn't anything else noteworthy about the commercial - and then hopped on line for confirmation. Here's what I found:

Orbitz Commercial Features Human Rights Campaign Logo

Apparently I did miss something else noteworthy: the rainbow flag towel on one of the golf bags in the distance.

Way to go Orbitz. It's nice to know we still have supporters out there.

According to the Huffington Post the Iranian government is forcing families of murdered Iranian protesters to pay the equivalent of $3000 dollars to pay for the bullets used before the government will turn over the victims body. 

The Wall Street Journal also covered this sad story. Read their article bellow, it’s horrific:

The family, clad in black, stood at the curb of the road sobbing. A middle-aged mother slapped her cheeks, letting out piercing wails. The father, a frail man who worked as a doorman at a clinic in central Tehran, wept quietly with his head bowed.

Minutes before, an ambulance had arrived from Tehran's morgue carrying the body of their only son, 19-year-old Kaveh Alipour.

On Saturday, amid the most violent clashes between security forces and protesters, Mr. Alipour was shot in the head as he stood at an intersection in downtown Tehran. He was returning from acting class and a week shy of becoming a groom, his family said.

The details of his death remain unclear. He had been alone. Neighbors and relatives think that he got trapped in the crossfire. He wasn't politically active and hadn't taken part in the turmoil that has rocked Iran for over a week, they said.

"He was a very polite, shy young man," said Mohamad, a neighbor who has known him since childhood.

When Mr. Alipour didn't return home that night, his parents began to worry. All day, they had heard gunshots ringing in the distance. His father, Yousef, first called his fiancée and friends. No one had heard from him.

At the crack of dawn, his father began searching at police stations, then hospitals and then the morgue.

Upon learning of his son's death, the elder Mr. Alipour was told the family had to pay an equivalent of $3,000 as a "bullet fee"—a fee for the bullet used by security forces—before taking the body back, relatives said.

Mr. Alipour told officials that his entire possessions wouldn't amount to $3,000, arguing they should waive the fee because he is a veteran of the Iran-Iraq war. According to relatives, morgue officials finally agreed, but demanded that the family do no funeral or burial in Tehran. Kaveh Alipour's body was quietly transported to the city of Rasht, where there is family.

Everyone in the neighborhood knows the Alipour family. In addition to their slain son, they have two daughters. Shopkeepers and businesses pasted a photocopied picture of Mr. Alipour on their walls and windows. In the picture, the young man is shown wearing a dark suit with gray stripes. His black hair is combed neatly to a side and he has a half-smile.

"He was so full of life. He had so many dreams," said Arsalan, a taxi driver who has known the family for 10 years. "What did he die for?"

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

 

This video was supposedly filmed on June 22nd, 2009. It provides a drive by view of a street in Southern Tehran.

| | edit post

(unconfirmed)

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

This video was taken according to the description given with it on June 20th, 2009 of protesters burning down a Basij and Parliamentary head quarters:

 

| | edit post

ScreenHunter_06 Jun. 22 23.53 The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLADD) has released a statement about the confrontation that took place between internet blogger Chris Crocker Perez Hilton and Black Eyed Peas member Will.i.Am and Perez’s use of the word “faggot”. The statement reads:

New York, NY, June 22, 2009 – The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) today issued the following statement in response to a video posted by celebrity blogger Perez Hilton, in which he made the following remarks about a confrontation with will.i.am of the Black Eyed Peas and members of the band’s entourage.

"And that is when I made the split-second decision - that I was gonna say what I thought was the worst possible thing that thug [will.i.am] would ever want to hear. As I was standing my ground - without being violent or physical which I would never do - I told him - and you know what? I don't need to respect you and you're a f**. You're gay and stop being such a f***ot."

"These are vulgar anti-gay slurs that feed a climate of hatred and intolerance toward our community," said Rashad Robinson, Senior Director of Media Programs at GLAAD. “For someone in our own community to use it to attack another person by saying that it is, quote, ‘The worst possible thing that thug would ever want to hear,’ is incredibly dangerous. It legitimizes use of a slur that is often linked to violence against our community. And it sends a message that it is OK to attempt to dehumanize people by exploiting anti-gay attitudes.”

“We have reached out to Hilton and asked him to apologize for promoting this anti-gay slur, and we would ask media outlets to avoid repetition of the slur in their coverage of this story.”

Reuters is reporting that Toronto police have charged Liborio Molina, the manager of the Black Eyed Peas, with assault.

“While not all the facts in this case are known, the violence that appears to have been committed against Perez Hilton is unacceptable and ought to be condemned in the strongest possible terms,” said Robinson.

Perez Hilton Vs. Will.i.Am-Fight

Posted by Alex On 11:32 PM 0 comments

1a976757-f9da-4ee0-8c58-2090a3dc4006

Last night’s Much Music Video Awards were great, but the real action was after the award show. Internet blogger Chris Crocker Perez Hilton got in a fight with Black Eyed Peas member, Will.i.Am.

 

Via Huffington Post

Hilton, whose real name is Mario Lavandeira, complained about the incident on the microblogging site Twitter. He tweeted at 4 a.m.: "I am bleeding. Please, I need to file a police report. No joke."

Hilton, who is openly gay, said in interview with The Associated Press that he called will.i.am a "faggot," a gay slur, inside the club after the musician told the blogger not to write about his band on his Web site.

"He was like 'You need to respect me.' He was in my face. He was obviously trying to intimidate me and scare me," Hilton said. "I was like 'I don't need to respect you. I don't respect you and I did say this, and I knew that it would be the worst thing I could possibly say to him because he was acting the way he was. I said 'You know what, I don't respect you and you're gay and stop being such a faggot.'"

Will.i.am said in a video posting on dipdive.com that he came to Hilton with respect and was called a "faggot."

Hilton, who was at the club with Lady Gaga, said he then left the club and was punched from behind. The pop stars and the blogger were among celebrities in Toronto for the MuchMusic Video Awards on Sunday night.

A spokeswoman for the Black Eyed Peas declined comment.

 

Both Will.i.Am and Perez posted video responses after the incident, but as usual Perez Hilton.com does not allow video embedding. You can view Perez’s response here, and watch Will.i.Am’s response bellow:

 

 

As far as my personal response: I use to wonder why people hated Perez so much. But I believe now I understand. Calling someone a faggot, Perez, is just a fucked up thing to do. You said you knew it would get him upset, what the hell? It is offensive to our community for you to go around using the “faggot” word. How do you expect others to not use the word if we do? I don’t think you should have been attacked, but your response video comes of a little bit Chris Crockerish and just plain bitchy.

 

Update: Will.i.Am has released a new video where he says he did not attack Perez. You can see it HERE.

Jon And Kate Getting A Divorce?

Posted by Alex On 10:16 PM 0 comments

Update: It’s official, Jon & Kate just announced they are getting a divorce! To try to help the kids through this hard time, the parents are going to rotate who lives in the house. What that means is that Kate who is taking majority custody will be in the house most of the time with the children, and she will leave when Jon has the kids. The TLC show will continue, but most likely Jon will not be shown very often.

 

According to People Magazine, the TLC reality television couple, Jon and Kate Gosselin have filed for divorce. The couple has been married for 10 years and have 8 children together. In past weeks the couples relationship has clearly been strained. Tonight's episode of “Jon and Kate Plus 8” is supposed to be a special update with the couple giving some form of announcement.

(Unconfirmed)

 

| | edit post

Iran-Video Of A Vehicle On Fire

Posted by Alex On 9:10 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

 

| | edit post

Who Are We Anyway?

Posted by E.D. On 7:59 PM 1 comments
Hello there. My name is Erik. I'm planning on being a regular blogger here, but kind of want to introduce myself.

I'm in my early 20s. I enjoy life and love friends and family. If I want something, I go after it. If I'm passionate about something, I'll strive for it until it is achieved. I'm gay, and kind of am seeing someone right now. I love being outdoors, and water fascinates me to no end. I'm funny sometimes, but mostly I'm very talkative. I love learning about people. People watching is one of my favourite sports, and I play it way too often. As much as I talk, I listen to others. I love listening to what my friends have to say, or even what a stranger on the street has to say.

But back to the gay thing. What does being gay mean? The word "gay" is defined by society as someone who is solely attracted to the same sex... but I am attracted to some females too. True, I am attracted to many more guys than I am attracted to girls, but that doesn't deny the fact that my attraction is for both sexes. Do I choose the label "gay" because I ignore the fact that there is some attraction to females, or do I choose the label "gay" to because I choose to associate myself with the term and it's connotation?

Who are we anyway? These labels that we put on ourselves in attempt to describe who we are both help and hinder us. People make judgements on the labels we use to describe us, and assume certain things until they get to know us better. By telling people I'm gay, they get the assumption that I'm not attracted to any females. On the flip side However, if I were to tell people I was bisexual, I would be more accepted by my fellow males, and girls would view it differently when I "hit-on" them, and everyone would think that I was attracted to anything that was human.

There are no good terms to describe those people who are in between totally gay and totally straight. Technically, anyone in between the two terms is considered bisexual, and some theories state that most all of the nation falls somewhere between there. If there are so many people who are technically "bisexual" but associate themselves with straight or gay, why aren't there other terms out there to use? I would love for people to be able to say "I'm slightly crooked" or "I'm sorta sexual" or something like that.

To me, knowing yourself to the point where you have figured out where on the spectrum you are is much better than the label associated with that place. I have straight friends I know who are much more bisexual than they let on to people, but are so concerned about what society would think about them if they used the term "bisexual." I also know a whole lot of gay guys who do admire the female body and have attractions to some females as well, but deny that fact because they are "gay"

The point that I'm trying to make is that sometimes we are too wrapped up in labelling ourselves something. We worry about the words we want to call ourselves and forget about the central issue: figuring out who we really are. I spent so much time in High School trying to uphold the label I was placing on myself. As a person, we should be ourselves and figure out who we are first. The labels will never fit exactly, but neither do T-shirts. We just need to take our time, look at the scenery, and chill. Eventually, the words will come to us.

(Unconfirmed)

Graphic Content

 

| | edit post

Apparently the Iranian government considers voting statistics confidential information, but…

 

Via Press TV

According to Sharifi-Rad, the Ministry had, however, decided to publish the results "box by box," to resolve ambiguities about the disputed election in which incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won a landslide victory, ILNA reported.
His comments came after the country's highest electoral authority, the Guardian Council, said, "Votes collected in 50 cities surpass the number of people eligible to cast ballots in those areas.”
A spokesman for the Council, however, said that the additional votes did not change the outcome of the election, as they were not enough to reverse the reelection of President Ahmadinejad.
The extra votes amount to roughly three million ballots.

 

Wouldn’t it at this point just make more sense to have a total revote, a new election monitored by independent and international groups. Considering if the Iranian government lied once, what else are they still hiding?

| | edit post

13634786-67452e1ed4fcd8519b5c36e4b389b7ab.4a3fcbdc-scaled

| | edit post

Via Times Online

In 50 Iranian cities the number of votes cast in this month presidential election exceeded the number of eligible voters, the state's election watchdog admitted today.

The surprising admission by the Guardian Council was, however, designed to undermine the claims of the defeated candidates that the vote was rigged.

Mir Hossein Mousavi, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's main rival in the hotly-disputed election, and the other two losing candidates have claimed that the vote exceeded eligible voters in as many as 170 districts.

Abbasali Kadkhodai, a spokesman for the council of senior clerics, told the state television channel IRIB: "Our investigation shows that the number of districts they announced is not correct. Based on our preliminary report, 50 districts face this issue."


Mr Kadkhodaei also argued that voter turnouts of more than 100 per cent were not unusual because Iranians can cast their ballots where they want. Although it is summer in Iran and some of the cities in question are in desert areas, he suggested some voters might have gone to them on holiday.

He also made clear that Mr Ahmadinejad's victory would not be affected even if the results in the 50 disputed districts were reversed as they account for three million votes and the official results show Mr Ahmadinejad won by a margin of 11 million.

Mr Mousavi and the other two candidates, Mehdi Karoubi and Mohsen Rezai, have all complained to the Guardian Council of electoral fraud and have reported 646 alleged irregularities.

The council has agreed to investigate those complaints but it is chaired by a close ally of Mr Ahmadinejad's and dominated by conservatives. The defeated candidates do not consider it impartial - especially after Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader, made clear in a speech on Friday that Mr Ahmadienjad's victory would stand.

Mr Mousavi and Mr Karoubi are demanding a fresh election. They refused an invitation to appear before the council to present their complaints on Saturday and Mr Mousavi has rejected its offer to recount a random ten per cent of the votes.

The regime also announced today that 457 people were arrested during Saturday's running battles on the streets of Tehran. It said they had "caused insecurity, disrupted public order and clashed with police".

At least 13 civilians died in those confrontations between pro-Mousavi demonstrators and the security forces. The prosecutor general's office in Tehran claimed that it was "unknown vandals", not the police, who opened fire on civilians.

The protests have prompted unprecedented traffic on the micro-blogging website Twitter.com and on other social networking sites, including Facebook and YouTube, as details of planned demonstrations are shared around.

Many of today's postings were focused on Neda Soltani, the 26-year-old woman allegedly shot by a Basiji militiaman on Saturday evening who has become a posthumous poster girl for the protests after her death was captured on video. YouTube users posted picture galleries and even a song in tribute to her today.

| | edit post

Via Reuters

Iran's hardline Revolutionary Guards threatened Monday to crush protests, after opposition leader Mirhossein Mousavi urged supporters to stage more demonstrations over the disputed June 12 election.
| | edit post

Via Reuters

Italy is willing to open its embassy in Tehran to wounded protesters in coordination with other European nations, the Italian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Monday.

The move follows a Swedish initiative to look into whether European Union nations can put together a plan to take in and provide aid to demonstrators at their embassies in Iran, the ministry said.

"The Italian embassy will be able to accept requests, despite the fact that the proper place for the care of the injured remains the hospital," Maurizio Massari, a spokesman for the foreign ministry, told reporters.

Italy, which has called on Tehran to avoid further bloodshed and seek a peaceful solution to the protests, has already instructed its embassy in Iran to assist wounded protesters but has not yet received requests for help, the ministry said.

| | edit post

Iran-Women Standing Up To Police

Posted by Alex On 2:07 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

I have received this picture through Twitter of Iranian women standing up against the police:

 

13623162

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

This was supposed to have happened today:

 

| | edit post

Via Cara Ellison

1. Do not publish names of Iranians on Twitter. They are being arrested and killed. They are publishing Tweets to the peril of their very lives. Respect that.

2. NYT is publishing the names of Iranians. They are always on the wrong side.

3. Here is a quick guide to fake Iranian twitters.

4. If you are a Westerner, please change your time zone to Tehran (+3:30 GMT) to confuse the censors. Also, change your city to Tehran.

5. If you are an Iranian, change your time zone to -5:00 GMT with the city “Houston” or “Chicago” or “Dallas” or -6:00 GMT with the city “New York”.

6. DO NOT publish proxy IPs on the internet, especially using the #iranelection hashtag. If you are creating new proxies for the Iranian bloggers, DM them to @stopAhmadi or @iran09 and they will distributed them discretely to bloggers in Iran.

7. Security forces are now setting up twitter accounts to spread disinformation by posing as Iranian protesters. Be aware.

8. Do not set up DDOS attacks. It just slows traffic. This is an information war. Keep the channels open as much as possible; the government of Iran is closing so much, we don’t need to contribute to that.

9. Change your icon to green. There are several websites that have green icons already; just grab one. It shows the Iranians that we are on their side.

10. RT generously.

11. This is a terrific primer on the current Iranian political situation.

12. Google map satellites will put protesters in danger, do not show where they are hiding!

| | edit post

Iran-San Francisco Rally

Posted by Alex On 12:16 AM 0 comments

Supporters of the protesters in Iran held their own rally of support in San Francisco.

13559426-3091a7cbdb4e31180ec4819c3dd238e4.4a3ef6c2-full

| | edit post






11:32-Here is Gaga. Supposed to be big!

11:30-Shows Back. I’m looking at another live blogging app. Lol, all the girls screaming at the Jo Bros.

11:25, Who Hoo…Taylor Laughtener….no idea how to spell that. I have a love-hate relationship with Nickel back and I love Lady Gaga.

11:22-Maybe I’m out of the loop, but I have no idea who these guys are!

11:20-Ok the Jo Bro’s Kinda Sucked!

OK, to take some time from the Iran Crisis, I’m going to write about the MMVA’s. I’ll Be live Blogging my Opinions!

| | edit post

There are highly unconfirmed reports coming from Twitter that the Iranian government may be planning on reverting to rolling blackouts of the electrical grids in an attempt at shutting off power and thus outside communications with the world. 

| | edit post

Iranian Student Killed

Posted by Alex On 9:57 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

Graphic Content

I once again hesitated to publish this, but at this point I just want to get the images and video out of the atrocities in Iran:

 

| | edit post

Via The Washington Times

Two European companies — a major contractor to the U.S. government and a top cell-phone equipment maker — last year installed an electronic surveillance system for Iran that human rights advocates and intelligence experts say can help Iran target dissidents.

Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN), a joint venture between the Finnish cell-phone giant Nokia and German powerhouse Siemens, delivered what is known as a monitoring center to Irantelecom, Iran's state-owned telephone company.

A spokesman for NSN said the servers were sold for "lawful intercept functionality," a technical term used by the cell-phone industry to refer to law enforcement's ability to tap phones, read e-mails and surveil electronic data on communications networks.

In Iran, a country that frequently jails dissidents and where regime opponents rely heavily on Web-based communication with the outside world, a monitoring center that can archive these intercepts could provide a valuable tool to intensify repression.

Lily Mazaheri, a human rights and immigration lawyer who represents high-profile Iranian dissidents, said she had suspected that the government had increased its capability to monitor its perceived enemies.

 

Read the rest of the article here.

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

 

Via Tehran Bureau

Politicians

Dr. Mohsen Aminzadeh: Member of the Student Followers of Imam’s Line (SFIL), the leftist group of the students who took over the United State Embassy in Tehran on November 4, 1979; Deputy Foreign Minister in the Khatami administration; member of the Central Committee of the Islamic Revolution Mojahedin Organization (IRMO), one of the two leading reformist parties; founding member of the reformist Islamic Iran Participation Front (IIPF), Iran’s largest political party; director of the Mousavi campaign.

Dr. Saeed Hajjarian: Member of SFIL; leading reformist strategist; advisor to Mohammad Khatami during his presidency; editor-in-chief of Sobh-e Emrooz (This Morning), a leading reformist newspaper shut down by the hard-liners; member of the Central Committee of the IIPF; deputy Minister of Intelligence in the 1980s; member of the SFILM; handicapped by an assassination attempt on his life in March 2000.

Behzad Nabavi: Leading reformist strategist, a founder, and member of the Central Committee of IRMO; Deputy Speaker of the 6th Majles (parliament); chief negotiator with the United States that led to the release of the American hostages in 1981; Minister in the first Mousavi Cabinet in the 1980s; jailed for years by the Shah.

Mohammad Tavassoli: Tehran’s first mayor after the 1979 Revolution; member of the Central Committee and political director of the Freedom Movement of Iran (FMI), a reformist/centrist political party founded in 1961 by Mahdi Bazargan, the first prime minister after the 1979 Revolution; jailed for years by the Shah.

Mostafa Tajzadeh: Deupty Interior Minister in the first Khatami administration who supervised the elections for the first city councils and the 6th Majles, a process praised for its even-handedness and transparency; member of the Central Committees of both IIPF and IRMO; outspoken critic of the hard-liners.

Dr. Abdollah Ramazanzadeh: Deputy Secretary-General of the IIPF; Government spokesman during the second Khatami administration; Governor-General of the Kurdistan province; deputy Interior Minister for planning, and for political affairs.

Mohammad Ali Abtahi: Chief of Staff, and then Vice President to Mr. Khatami for parliamentary affairs; a principal advisor to Mahdi Karroubi (the second reformist candidate) in the 2009 presidential election; popular reformist cleric who writes for his own website/blog, www.webnevesht.com ; a leading member of the Association of the Combatant Clerics, the reformist leftist clerical organization that supports Mr. Mousavi.

Dr. Ebrahimi Yazdi: Secretary-General of the FMI; Foreign Minister in the Bazargan government after the 1979 Revolution; leading aid to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini during the Revolution (he was arrested while hospitalized for a medical condition; it is said that he may have been released).

Dr. Mohsen Mirdamadi: Secretary-General of the IIPF; chairman of the 6th Majles’ Committee on National Security; one of the three principal leaders of SFIL who took over the US Embassy in 1979.

Mohammad Atrianfar: Deputy Interior Minister in the first Khatami administration; member of the Central Committee of the Executives of Reconstruction Party (ERP), a reformist party; editor-in-chief of the popular daily Hamshahri (owned by Tehran’s city council) during the second Khatami administration; manager ofShargh, a popular daily reformist newspaper shut down by the hardliners.

Mohsen Safaei Farahani: Member of the Central Committee of the IIPF; former head of Iran’s Soccer Federation, deputy Minister of Economy in the Khatami administration.

Hedayatollah Aghaaei: Member of the Central Committee of the ERP.

Davood Soleimani: Deputy Minister of Culture and Islamic Guidance for Domestic Press in the first Khatami administration; Tehran deputy in the 6th Majles; member of the Central Committee of the IIPF.

Dr. Ali Tajer Niya: Mashhad’s [a large city in northeastern Iran] deputy to the 6th Majles; member of the campaign team of Mr. Mousavi; member of the IIPF.

Jahanbakhsh Khanjani: Spokesman for the Interior Ministry during the Khatami administrations; member of the ERP.

Saeed Leylaaz: Economic advisor to the Khatami administration; journalist; strong critic of President Ahmadinejad’s economic policies.

Abdolfattah Soltani: Prominent attorney and member of the Center for the Defense of Human Rights (founded by Shirin Ebadi, Iran’s Nobel Laureate for Peace); attorney for several jailed human rights advocates; attorney for the mother of Dr. Zahra Kazemi, the photojournalist that was murdered in an Iranian jail; imprisoned for his human rights activities.

Shahab Tabatabaei: Director of the youth committee of the Mousavi campaign.

Mohammad Reza Jalaei Pour: Director and spokesman of the nation-wide movement, Pouyesh, that supports Mr. Mousavi; son of the well-known university professor and reformist journalist Dr. Hamid Reza Jalaei Pour.

Abdollah Momeni: former Secretary-General of the Office for Consolidation of Unity (known in Iran as Tahkim Vahdat, the largest nation-wide university student organization), and the Organization of University Graduates of Islamic Iran (known in Iran as Advaar-e Tahkim); a prominent political activist.

Rajabali Mazrouei: Member of the Central Committee of the IIPF; Isfahan’s deputy to the 6th Majles; journalist, and director of the Association of Iranian Journalists

 

Journalists and Bloggers

Mahsa Amrabadi: reporter for the E’temaad-e Melli (National Trust) daily, the mouthpiece of the National Trust Party of Mr. Mahdi Karroubi, the reformist candidate.

Karim Arghandehpour: journalist writing for reformist newspapers Salaam and Vaghaa-ye Ettefaaghiyeh,both of which were shut down by the hard-liners. He also has a blog, www.futurama.ir

Khalil Mir Ashrafi: A television producer and journalist

Behzad Basho: Cartoonist

Kayvan Samimi Behbahani: Managing editor of Naameh (Letter), a monthly publication, close ties to the Nationalist-Religious Coalition (NRC)

Somayyeh Tohidloo: a blogger at http://smto.ir ; political activist; sociologist; supporter of Mr. Mousavi

Abdolreza Tajik: political activist, economist, and close to the FMI and the NRC

Dr. Ahmad Zeydabadi: distinguished journalist writing for www.roozonline.com and print media in Iran; Secretary-General of the Organization of University Graduates of Islamic Iran (Advaar-e Tahkim); a supporter of Mr. Karroubi; close to the RNC.

Mojtaba Pourmohsen: editor of Gilaan-e Emrooz (Today’s Gilaan; Gilaan is a province in northern Iran, bu the Caspian Sea); contributor to Radio Zamaneh (a Persian radio in Holland).

Hamideh Mahhozi: a journalist active in southern Iran

Amanollah Shojaei: a blogger living in Bushehr, in southern Iran

Hossein Shokouhi: reporter and journalist writing for Payaam-e Jonoob (the Message of the South), in southern Iran.

Mashallah Haydarzadeh: Another journalist active in southern Iran

Ruhollah Shahsavar: A journalist working in Mashhad (in northeaster Iran)

Mohammad Ghoochani: prominent reformist journalist, editor of many reformist newspapers shut down by the hardliners (e.g., Shargh [East]; Hammihan [Compatriot], and the weekly, Shahrvand Emrooz [Today’s Citizen]); editor of E’temaad Melli; son-in-law of Mr. Emad Baghi, the prominent journalist and human rights advocate.

Jila Baniyaghoob: prominent female journalist, working previously for many reformist newspapers; editor of the website Kannon-e Zanaan-e Irani (Center for Iranian Women); writing at http://irwomen.net

Bahman Ahmadi Amooee: journalist and husband of Jila Baniyaghoob

Eisa Sahar Khiz: an outspoken journalist who has been a critic of the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei; contributor to www.roozonline.com director in charge of the domestic press during the first two years of Mr. Khatami’s presidency, during which the Iranian press flourished.

These courageous men and women have done nothing other than defending the human and political rights of their Iranian compatriots. They deserve the support of all those who care about human dignity and freedom.

| | edit post

Iran Cracks Down On Journalist

Posted by Alex On 9:29 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

Via Reporters Without Borders

The Islamic Republic of Iran now ranks alongside China as the world’s biggest prison for journalists. The crackdown has been intensified yet again following Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s endorsement of the result of the 12 June presidential election and the opposition’s decision to call another demonstration on 20 June.

Iran now has a total of 33 journalists and cyber-dissidents in its jails, while journalists who could not be located at their homes have been summoned by telephone by Tehran prosecutor general Said Mortazavi.

| | edit post

ObamaWave On Sunday President Obama urged the international community to support the demonstrators in Iran. He said:

"We respect Iran’s sovereignty, but we also are witnessing peaceful demonstrations, people expressing themselves, and I stand for that universal principle that people should have a voice in their own lives and their own destiny," Obama said in an interview with an English-language newspaper in Pakistan.
"And I hope that the international community recognizes that we need to stand behind peaceful protests and be opposed to violence or repression."

 

Republicans have been criticizing the President all week for not saying or doing enough. The Obama administration has been cautious not to get overly involved in the Iranian election fallout to avoid claims that the US was responsible for the protests.

A British academics analysis has apparently claimed that in some Iranian areas more votes were received, than there were eligible voters. In other provinces the turn out was close to 100% according to the official election results.    

Article from Times Online:

Claims that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s re-election was rigged have been bolstered by an analysis of the official results by British academics In the conservative provinces of Mazandaran and Yazd, the number of votes cast exceeded the number of eligible voters, the survey by researchers from the University of St Andrews and Chatham House, the London think-tank, found.

• Four more provinces recorded turnouts close to 100 per cent.

• To achieve the official results in 10 of the 30 provinces, the ultra-conservative President must have carried all the new voters who did not cast ballots in 2005, all the votes that went to his centrist rival Ali Akbar Hasemi Rafsanjani and up to 44 per cent of the votes that went to reformist candidates.

• Those provinces include ones dominated by ethnic minorities who seldom if ever vote conservative. “The numbers from Ilam, Lorestan and Hormozgan almost defy belief,” said Thomas Rintoul, one of the researchers.


• Lorestan is home to Medhi Karoubi, the most liberal of the four candidates, who won 440,247 votes (55 per cent) there in 2005. Official figures suggest he won only 44,036 (4.6 per cent) this time.

• “The analysis shows that the scale of the swing to Ahmadinejad would have had to have been extraordinary to achieve the stated result,” said Ali Ansari, Professor of Iranian Studies at St Andrews.

• The figures also challenge the notion that Mr Ahmadinejad’s victory was due to the massive participation of a previously silent conservative majority and that he was particularly popular in rural areas.

| | edit post

Iran-Video Of City Bus Burning

Posted by Alex On 6:58 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

 

| | edit post

Iran-Another Man Down

Posted by Alex On 6:55 PM 0 comments

Via Citizen Tube

(Unconfirmed)

Graphic Content Warning

More video footage just posted within the last few hours from Tehran, supposedly taken sometime on Sunday. This video shows a chaotic scene with loud gunshots in the background and a man who has just been shot. Protesters are shouting, just about everyone is documenting the scene with cameras and cell phones, and it doesn't seem as if the violence is letting up.

 

| | edit post

Iran-Protesters Push Back Basij

Posted by Alex On 6:45 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

 

| | edit post

Iran-Basij Chase Protesters

Posted by Alex On 6:42 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

June 21st, 2009:

| | edit post

Iran-Police Run From Protesters

Posted by Alex On 6:31 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

 

| | edit post

People unite in 30 cities worldwide to support the people of Iran as they fight for freedom, as they protest oppression, terror, and the brutal atrocities of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

 

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

 

The Basij Arrest two Men, the filmer is cursing them under his breath quietly. June 21, 2009:

 

| | edit post

1718692.binVia The National Press

A Canadian journalist working in Iran was arrested without charge on Sunday and has not been heard from since.

Maziar Bahari, 42, a correspondent for Newsweek magazine, has been reporting on Iran for the past decade from his base in Tehran, where he was born.

His most recent article for Newsweek, published in the aftermath of Iran's disputed presidential election, examined opposition supporters' concerns that groups loyal to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad were staging violent incidents at their rallies to undermine support for their movement.

"Newsweek strongly condemns this unwarranted detention, and calls upon the Iranian government to release him immediately," the magazine said in a statement.

Bahari, who holds dual citizenship in Iran and Canada, is also a prominent documentary filmmaker. He graduated with a degree in communications from Montreal's Concordia University and has since made a handful of films that provide trenchant glimpses inside contemporary Iranian culture.

Since 1998, Bahari has been Newsweek's Iran correspondent. Over the years, his work for a U.S. magazine resulted in repeated brushes with Iranian authorities.

In a 2007 dispatch for the British political magazine New Statesman, Bahari pointedly described his encounters with Iranian intelligence agents, who often go by the pseudonym Mr. Mohammadi and prefer to hold their interrogations over tea at hotels.

"These days Mr. Mohammadi's main concern is that the American fifth column, disguised as civil rights activists, scholars and journalists, is destabilizing the Islamic Republic," Bahari wrote.

"There are so many social and economic problems in Iran, that if someone wanted to exploit them to create dissent it wouldn't be difficult to do so. But most activists I know inside Iran ... resent the American government much more than their own. In the meantime, the Iranian government tries to find foreign perpetrators and domestic accomplices instead of solving the root causes of dissent, such as mismanagement of the country's economy, poverty, internal migration and drug addiction."

The Paris-based media advocacy group Reporters Without Borders said Sunday that 23 Iranian journalists have been arrested since the disputed June 12 election.

Even before that, Iran had routinely jailed popular bloggers, notably Hossein Derakhshan, an Iranian-Canadian who was arrested last November and charged with spying for Israel.

| | edit post

Partying Like It's 1979

Posted by Jaime Ravenet On 5:59 PM 0 comments
The protests in Iran can now be called a revolution.


When they began, they were a call for justice, from the people to those who really hold power, such as Grand Ayatollah Khameini. The protests were a petition for his supreme judgement to mandate another election. They were asking for a legal, legitimate action, one which would occur from inside the Iranian political structure.


He failed his people.


Instead, he supported the conservative Ahmadinajad (big surprise there, being that if the election really was rigged, Khameini had to have signed off on it). He could have listened to the people in the streets. He could have heard the voice of the citizens of Iran. Instead, as often happens when someone is in power, he sought to further his own agenda.


My guess is that Iranians were tired of the rhetoric and the struggles, tired of being cut off from the world, maligned by the words of their version of George W. Bush. The protests have changed dramatically over these 10 days or so. They started peaceably, with hundreds of thousands of citizens walking in silence that astounded the world with their poise and solemnity. People quoted Ghandi and Martin Luther King, Jr., and tied green ribbons around their wrists. Then they were declared illegal, and the government responded to them with violence. When Khameini ignored the protests, the people realized their fight had to go straight up to the top. When the police started to arrest and kill, the call changed. Mousavi is no longer in charge of the "Sea of Green" (He's been incredibly silent for the past day in fact. I think he realizes what is happening). The rhetoric of the protestors has changed too. Gone are the calls for peaceful resistance. Instead, Twitter is populated with recipes for home-made napalm and increasingly violent videos are surfacing on YouTube.


For almost 10 days, the citizens of Iran have taken to the streets. If this was just about an election, they would have gone home by now. The reform that these protesters seek doesn't stop at Mousavi vs. Ahmadinejad. If it did, they wouldn't be calling for the death of their supreme governmental leader, or posting close-up pictures of Basij and asking everyone to identify them and their home addresses, saying "we know you and we will kill you".


As the temperature rises in Iran, something has become clear: This has become bigger than the elections. It is about absolute disenfranchisement and theocracy. It can only end with blood, that of the Mullahs or that of the citizens that fight against their tyranny. I, for one, support the citizens.

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

 

13493225

| | edit post

Via Al Jazeera

Mir Hossein Mousavi, the politician at the centre of Iran's opposition movement, has encouraged his followers to continue their protests over the presidential election.
In a statement on his website on Sunday, Mousavi said that people had the right to protest against "lies and fraud", but urged them to show restraint as they take to the streets.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the conservative incumbent president, was declared the winner of the June 12 election with a landslide victory, but Mousavi and another reformist candidate have complained that it was rigged.

Mousavi's statement appeared on the website of his Kalameh newspaper as reports emerged of police attacking a vigil by about 100 people outside the offices of the United Nations in Tehran.
The capital had been largely calm until then after state television reported that at  least 13 people had been killed as police and pro-government militia clashed with protesters the previous day."I as one of the mourners invite my dear people to self-restraint. The nation belongs to you," Mousavi said.

"The revolution is your legacy. To protest against lies and fraud is your right. Be hopeful that you will get your right and do not allow others who want to provoke your anger ... to prevail."

| | edit post

Anonymous Help In Iran

Posted by Jaime Ravenet On 5:20 PM 0 comments
Taking down the homophobic, misogynist theocracy in Iran, 4chan-rooted "Anonymous" does it's part. Here's video.


For information on Anonymous in Iran, check out http://iran.whyweprotest.net

My only question for Anonymous: What more can we do? You crashed Scientology's gates. Can you face a totalitarian government as strongly?
| | edit post

 

Via The Washington Post

Iranian government media Sunday launched a campaign against Mir Hussein Mousavi and his supporters, calling the leader of the protests over Iran's disputed election a "criminal" and comparing demonstrators to members of a hated terrorist group.
| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

0042

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

 

 

 

According to the YouTube caption, she is supposed to be the woman next to the man in the blue shirt.

| | edit post

(Unconfirmed)

 

This is supposed to be of a protest in Iran that happened today:

 

| | edit post

Iran-Protest (June 21st, 2009)

Posted by Alex On 3:36 PM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

 

 

On the YouTube caption, the publisher of the video said 13 people were killed by the Basij.

| | edit post

Via CNN

As thousands of riot police and militia lined Tehran's streets Sunday, the public rift among Iranian leaders appeared to be widening.

The country's foreign minister disputed allegations of ballot irregularities in Iran's disputed presidential election, and the parliamentary speaker implied the nation's election authorities had sided with one candidate.

Amateur video showed large crowds marching down a major Tehran thoroughfare shouting, "Don't be afraid, we're together!" and "Death to dictator!" The person who shot the video said it was taken Sunday, but CNN could not immediately verify that the protest had taken place.

Eyewitnesses reported a protest also took place at Southern Tehran's Azad University, where final exams were postponed after about 200 students refused to take them.

Thousands of riot police and members of the Basij militia lined the streets of the city, according to eyewitnesses. Many shops were closed, and shopkeepers who were open said they planned to close early Sunday. However, no tanks were seen on the city's streets. Traffic was light.


Police have not been given permission to use firearms in confronting protesters, Tehran Police Chief Azizollah Rajabpour told Iran's semi-official Mehr news agency. Police have not used firearms on the public, he said.

Allegations to the contrary are false and "spread by those who want to muddy the waters," the agency reported.

Protesters dispute the results of the June 12 presidential elections.

News coverage in Iran has been limited by government restrictions on international journalists. On Sunday, the BBC said Iran had expelled Jon Leyne, the British network's permanent correspondent in Tehran. And Al-Arabiya, a Dubai-based Arab satellite network, said its Tehran bureau was ordered closed.

However, the protests appeared mostly peaceful, in stark contrast to Saturday's bloodshed. Hospital sources said 19 people were killed Saturday in clashes between protesters and police. Unconfirmed reports put the death toll as high as 150.

Government-funded Press TV confirmed 13 fatalities Saturday, saying the deaths resulted from police clashes with "terrorist groups" in Tehran. But the station did not say whether all the deaths took place Saturday or spanned the length of the weeklong protests.

Press TV also reported Sunday that five relatives of former President Ali Akhar Hashemi Rafsanjani were arrested for "alleged involvement in post-election incidents ... taking part in unauthorized protests in central Tehran ... they are accused of provoking riots."

All but Faezeh Rafsanjani, the former president's daughter, were later released, Press TV said. The woman's brother said she was arrested while taking part in a protest.

| | edit post

Via Eldercato’s Blog

The Liberal press office just now released a statement from Michael Ignatieff on the situation in Iran.

“We mourn each life lost as a result of the Government of Iran’s unjust actions, and share the anguish and outrage of Canadians of Iranian origin at the suppression of peaceful protest and the apparent denial of fully free and fair elections. Canada should join other countries in keeping our embassy open for the humanitarian needs of the people of Iran.
This from
“The Iranian government cannot hide the truth from their own citizens or from the rest of the world.  By answering the call for open and transparent elections with a violent disregard for the rights of its citizens, the Iranian government has further alienated itself from the international community. The Liberal Party of Canada strongly affirms the rights of Iranians and people everywhere to freely express themselves and associate with others, without threat to their life or liberty.  We call on the Iranian government to cease the violence and continue to call for open and transparent elections.”

| | edit post

Via Eldercato’s Blog

The Canadian Embassy Emergency Hotline in Ottawa says that they will not take in Iranian citizens and that they never take in foreign nationals unless in ‘extreme’ situations (seemed to imply on an individual basis). The spokewoman said that they will be accepting Canadian citizens (obviously, they are the Canadian Embassy).

While this may be subject to change it still confirms CTV reports that currently Canada will not be open to injured Iranians.

It should also be noted that when I cited reports of other embassies taking in injured people she said that there were no official reports of any foreign embassies taking injured Iranians. From what we have heard from many eye witnesses today there has been asylum given to the wounded, if but temporary, by many nation’s embassies.

This comes amid many  Canadian citizens petitioning Prime Minster Harper to open the embassy in Tehran to injured Iranians. Information about that petition, as well as a link to the petition itself can be found here:http://bit.ly/17SMf0

| | edit post

A Woman Named Voice

Posted by Alex On 2:50 AM 0 comments

 

I read this Twitter post and needed to post it:

 

RT @shizuyo In land where women lost their voice it's apt that a woman named Voice should become a symbol that topples the regime.
| | edit post

12596600

| | edit post

Iran-More Protest Video

Posted by Alex On 2:01 AM 0 comments

A crowd in Iran runs from what looks like tear gas:

 

| | edit post

Iran-Citizens Fighting Back

Posted by Alex On 1:39 AM 0 comments

Via Citizen Tube

This video shows a clear view of a major city street in Tehran, which is filled with civilians who initially flee as riot police on motorcycles approach, but then reassemble and begin throwing objects at the police in protest:

 

| | edit post

Iran-Faces Of The Basij

Posted by Alex On 1:27 AM 1 comments

Via Demotix

 

| | edit post

Iran-Canadian Embassy Closed

Posted by Alex On 1:13 AM 0 comments

Amid allegations that the Canadian Embassy in Iran was not allowing endangered Iranians in to seek protection, the Canadian government verified that in fact the embassy was closed. The government says they have been closing their embassies early to allow their workers to safely get home. A dispute is know going on in the Canadian government about keeping the Embassy open.

 

Via CTV

Numerous posts on Twitter's Iranian election page say that dozens of people have been severely beaten and that foreign embassies in Tehran are taking in the wounded.

There were allegations on the web Saturday that the Canadian embassy was denying entry to injured people seeking sanctuary, but the Department of Foreign Affairs said those allegations were false.

"The Embassy was closed Saturday and there were no Canadians at the Embassy when the protests began. Reports that we were providing shelter to Iranian demonstrators are false," foreign affairs and international trade spokesperson Simone MacAndrew said in a statement to CTV.ca. 

"Canada's Embassy is located in the centre of recent demonstrations. Due to the tense security in Tehran this week, the Embassy has been closing early so that staff can return home safely before the public and democratic demonstrations begin."

Foreign Affairs called the violent crackdown by authorities "wholly unacceptable."

Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff issued a statement late Saturday night saying, "Canada should join other countries in keeping our embassy open for the humanitarian needs of the people of Iran."

Foreign Affairs says that Canadian embassies do not normally offer asylum to individuals abroad but will provide temporary safe haven if there is an immediate threat or injury.

| | edit post

The Video is hard to see, but the audio speaks a thousand words. You can hear what sounds like gun fire and people screaming while their homes are being broken into:

 

| | edit post

Basij Head Quarters Attacked

Posted by Alex On 12:44 AM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

Natural gas lines of a Basij head quarter was set on fire after the Basij locked themselves inside, at 0:05 you can see the whole building exploded. According to reports at least 5 Basij were killed. You can see fire in different parts of the city:

 

| | edit post

Basij Attack Apartment Complex

Posted by Alex On 12:09 AM 0 comments

(Unconfirmed)

 

| | edit post

The following video appears to show a helicopter spraying something on a crowd bellow, reaffirming what people on Twitter have been saying:

 

 

A still image shows something looking like a mist or liquid behind the helicopter:

13285387-c10ea938cb796e6967d49880112bb7fc.4a3da0a0-scaled

| | edit post

Report of Tanks False

Posted by Alex On 10:41 PM 0 comments

The earlier report of tanks in Tehran are now being reported to be false. Speculation is that the Iranian government may have started this rumour to scare protesters.

 

It is current, early morning, 6:10 AM in Iran.

| | edit post

Via Eldercato’s Blog

An embassy may be closed due to blocking by Basij and police.

Australian – BLOCKED (Unconfirmed)

Austrian- BLOCKED

Belgian- BLOCKED

British- BLOCKED (Unconfirmed)

China- closed and guarded too

Danish- BLOCKED

Dutch- BLOCKED OFF (CONFIRMED reports indicate that pro Government forces threw stones and tried to put it on fire)

Finnish- BLOCKED (Unconfirmed

French- (embassy refused to speak, probably closed)

German- BLOCKED

Irish- BLOCKED

Italian-

Mexican- (phone answering machine)

Norwegian-

Portugese- (phone answering machine)

Polish-

Russia- closed and guarded

Spain- (Phone Problem)

| | edit post

Via Eldercato’s Blog

The following are embassies that are accepting Iranian injured. A link to Maps is at the bottom of page!

-Australian Embassy : No. 13, 23rd Street, Khalid Islambuli Ave – Telephone+98 21 8872 4456

-Austrian embassy – Bahonarstr., Moghaddasistr., Zamanistr., Mirvali 11, Teheran

-Belgian Embassy No.3,Babak Alley, Shabdiz St.,Elahieh – 155-157 Shahid Fayyazi Avenue (Fereshteh)
16778 Teheran

-British Embassy – 198, Ferdowsi Avenue Tehran 11316-91144

-Danish Embassy – Dr. Shariati Ave,Elahiyeh Ave Dashti Str. 10

-Dutch Embassy – Sonbol Street # 7  Farmanieh  Tehran, 1953623253

-Finnish Embassy-  Qeytariyeh in Haddadian 2, Mirzapour St. (prev. Soheil St.), Dr. Shariati Ave., Tehran

French Embassy - 85 avenue Neauphle-le-Château, Téhéran
Tel. (00 98 21) 64 09 4000
Fax. (00 98 21) 64 09 40 92/93

-German Embassy: Avenue Ferdowsi 320-324 -

-Irish Embassy – North Kamranieh Avenue Bonbast Nahid Street, No. 8 19369  (98 21)-22 80 38 35

-Italian Embassy – 81, Neauphle Le Chateau Ave.

-Mexican Embassy - África Ave., Golfam St. No. 12,19156-74741 Teherán, Irán

-Norway: No. 201 Dr. Lavasani St. (Ex. Farmanieh St.) Corner of Sonbol St. Tehran, Iran – (0098 21) 22 29 13 33

-Polish Embassy: Ambasada Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w Teheranie
No. 1/3, Pirouz St., Africa Expressway,
Tehran, Iran, PO Box 11155-3489
tel: +98 (21) 8878 7262 do 64
fax: +98 (21) 8878 8774
Sekcja Konsularna – fax: +98 (21) 8887 2627

-Portugese Embassy No.30, Nezami St., Abbas Pour St., Valy-e-Asr

-Embassy of the Republic of Slovenia Tehran No 30, Narenjestan 8th Alley Pasdaran Avenue

-Swiss Embassy – Elahieh Ave. Sharifimanesh  Yasaman Street No. 2  P.O. Box 19395-4683  19649 Tehran – 98 (0)21 22 00 83 33

Please comment if you know of more.

I have sent CNN and CBS this list and talked to each representative myself. This should be posted on their site soon, but this will be continually updated.

More will be updated if it is confirmed they start taking injured.

http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&msa=0&msid=108089191184151933961.00046ccb4946d8e0073dd&z=12

| | edit post

Via Huffington Post

7:42 PM ET -- Rights group: Injured demonstrators arrested at hospitals. "Numerous Iranians beaten and injured by security forces as they tried to stage peaceful demonstrations have been arrested and detained when they sought medical treatment in hospitals," the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran reported today.

"The arrest of citizens seeking care for wounds suffered at the hands of security forces when they attempted to exercise rights guaranteed under their own constitution and international law is deplorable," said Hadi Ghaemi, spokesperson for the Campaign. "It can only be taken as a sign of profound disrespect by the state for the well-being of its own people."

Additionally, the Campaign said it had "learned that communications out of Tehran's Evin prison have been cut off. Evin prison is where many of Iran's long-term political prisoners and a number of intellectuals, opposition politicians, human rights activists and journalists detained over the past several days are incarcerated.”

| | edit post

Via Iranian Revolutionary

ObamaFlagAlexWong

The Iranian government must understand that the world is watching. We mourn each and every innocent life that is lost. We call on the Iranian government to stop all violent and unjust actions against its own people. The universal rights to assembly and free speech must be respected, and the United States stands with all who seek to exercise those rights.

As I said in Cairo, suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away. The Iranian people will ultimately judge the actions of their own government. If the Iranian government seeks the respect of the international community, it must respect the dignity of its own people and govern through consent, not coercion.

Martin Luther King once said – “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.” I believe that. The international community believes that. And right now, we are bearing witness to the Iranian peoples’ belief in that truth, and we will continue to bear witness.

| | edit post

Graphic Content

************************************************************************

 

| | edit post

iran_peace_11x8.5 A website has been launched offering free “support the people of Iran” logos and graphics. You can visit the website here.

| | edit post

Iran-Video Showing Election Fraud

Posted by Alex On 9:23 PM 0 comments

This is not confirmed and we are not sure where or when it was filmed:

 

| | edit post

The Structure Of Power In Iran

Posted by Alex On 8:52 PM 0 comments

ScreenHunter_04 Jun. 20 20.49

CNN has a great section explaining the power structure in the Iranian government, view it here.

| | edit post

Not sure of the date:

 

| | edit post

Iran: Wounded Man

Posted by Alex On 8:24 PM 0 comments

Graphic Content

 

*******************************************************************

 

| | edit post

Photo Of Man Beaten In Iran

Posted by Alex On 8:13 PM 0 comments

Via Huffington Post

A contributor to the photojournalistic site Demotix was beaten in Iran for taking Photos. Many people are now claiming that they were beaten for carrying a camera or a phone: 

92422

| | edit post

At least 19 Dead In Tehran

Posted by Alex On 7:32 PM 0 comments

Via CNN

ScreenHunter_03 Jun. 20 19.23

The unrest left 19 people dead, hospital sources said. Unconfirmed reports put the death toll as high as 150 on the seventh day of post-election demonstrations.

Police were using tear gas, clubs and water cannon as they tried to disperse the demonstrators.

A stream of videos posted on social networking Web sites appeared to show demonstrators who had been shot.

One video showed a woman trying to protect a man being beaten and kicked by protesters. A motorcycle lies on its side nearby, and another is in flames.

The protests were held in open defiance of warnings issued Friday by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and the Islamic Republic Security Council. They had said protest organizers -- specifically Moussavi -- would be held accountable if the protests led to bloodshed.

The message on Moussavi's page on Facebook urged Moussavi's supporters to "protest" and "not go to work." The social networking Web site has proved to be a key source of information in a country whose government has banned international journalists from newsgathering.

The authenticity of the information could not immediately be established, but its posting coincided with growing unrest by demonstrators, who say President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's election victory was rigged.


Witnesses in Tehran told CNN one crowd was chanting "Death to Khamenei!" and "I will kill whoever killed my brother!" -- a chant that dates to Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution that brought Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini to power.

In a story posted Saturday on the Web site of the government-run Press TV, Iran's deputy police commander said 400 police personnel had been wounded since the opposition rallies began last weekend.

Meanwhile, the head of Tehran's Emergency Center, Reza Dehqanpour, said more than 50 ambulances had been reserved to help the wounded.

Demonstrators gathered in major cities in France, the United States and Germany to condemn Iran's crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in Tehran.

In Washington, President Obama urged the Iranian government to stop the violence against its own citizens.

"The Iranian government must understand that the world is watching," Obama said in a written statement. "We call on the Iranian government to stop all violent and unjust actions against its own people."

Obama received intelligence briefings throughout the day and discussed the situation with senior advisers, an administration official told CNN.

On Saturday night, the Iranian state-run news agency IRINN said an attacker had been killed earlier in the day outside Tehran at the entrance to the Khomeini's mausoleum. The agency said the man "carrying the bomb" was killed, and there were no other casualties.

Press TV had said earlier that three people, including the bomber, died at the shrine to Khomeini, the father of the Islamic Revolution that swept the shah of Iran from power in 1979. Khomeini is regarded as the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

In a related development, a witness reported a fire near the French Embassy, apparently caused by debris that had been set ablaze nearby. The location is near the intersection of Vali Asr Avenue and Noufle Chateau, named for where Khomeini lived when he was in exile in Paris, France.

With international journalists restricted from covering events in the capital, Iranians were using cell phones and social networking sites to get news out. CNN was told that many protesters removed the SIM card, or memory chip, from their cell phones to prevent the government from tracing their calls.


Witnesses reported that cell phone service was cut off in the area after 5:30 p.m.

Saturday's protests began later than had been predicted. Rallies that were to have begun about 4 p.m. (7:30 a.m. ET) did not materialize.

Many who said they planned to attend the rallies wrote early Saturday to one another on the social networking site Twitter. Some wondered whether there would be violence at the protests.

"Let the Qu'ran shield you. It's a mortal sin to kill anyone holding the Qu'ran. BRING your Qu'ran to protest!!!" one person wrote on Twitter.

Meanwhile, the Iranian government said Saturday it is ready to randomly recount up to 10 percent of "ballot boxes." The government agency that oversees elections, the Guardian Council, said it had received more than 600 complaints of irregularities from the three candidates.

| | edit post

Iranian Woman Shot To Death

Posted by Alex On 7:17 PM 0 comments

Warning: Extremely Graphic Content!

 

**************************************************************************

 

(Unconfirmed)

 

A woman protesting the Iranian election was shot to death today by a group known to support the current Iranian President, called the Basij:

 

 

Update: Unconfirmed reports are saying the female shooting victim was named Neda, meaning “voice” or “call” in Farsi.

| | edit post

Sex With Ducks

Posted by Sarah On 2:24 PM 0 comments
This is about a month old, but I love it so I'm sharing it. Pat Robertson, on the 700 Club, started talking about the hate crimes bill that he is clearly very ignorant on. Actual text of the hate crimes bill can be found HERE. (It did pass, in case you were unaware.)

The bill certifies that if someone is attacked "because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person" it is considered a hate crime. Mr. Robertson, in his infinite wisdom, had the courtesy to say, "You got somebody who's really weird, and his sexual orientation is he likes to have sex with ducks. Is he protected under hate crimes? Is he protected if he likes to have sex with little boys?" Wow, very astute, Mr. Robertson. Well, as a televangelist, I would just like to know when you started telling people to violently attack someone else for any reason. Because that's what a hate crime is as defined in the bill: "willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person." Even if someone is a bad person, should citizens of this country go out an attack them, or should we let the law take care of them? Hate crimes are worse than regular assaults because they are motivated by some generally uncontrollable factor (I say generally uncontrollable because religion is a choice). You can see Mr. Robertson making a fool of himself here:



Now, as we all know, sex with ducks will be made legal as soon as gay marriage is, so these two women (Garfunkel and Oates) made a video celebrating that.

A woman who shared only 24 songs is being fined almost 2 million dollars for doing so. If she loses the court case she could end up paying about 80, 000 dollars for each song.

 

 

Something to think of before you use Lime Wire again?

“Fuck You” Hits Europe

Posted by Alex On 8:42 PM 0 comments

Lilly Allen is releasing her hit song, “Fuck You” as her new single in Europe. We all know with a new single, you need a music video. So here it finally is, Lilly Allen’s official video for “Fuck You”:

 

Maine’s Own Proposition 8?

Posted by Alex On 8:33 PM 0 comments

It could be a long difficult fight in Maine to defend marriage equality. Opponents of Maine marriage equality have hired “Schubert Flint Public Affairs”, the team that was behind the campaign that got Proposition 8 passed in California.

 

The Associated Press Says: “Schubert Flint Public Affairs will provide guidance to the campaign to repeal Maine's gay marriage law, just as it did during the Proposition 8 campaign in California.”

The AP also reports that Maine Freedom to Marry has hired Jesse Connolly who has in the past fought for gay rights in the state. Connolly says he and his team are preparing for a high profile and high cost battle.

Maine will start marrying same-sex couples in September, unless opponents can collect 55, 087 signatures before then. If the opponents can collect the needed signatures by the required date, the enactment of the new law will be put on hold. The Roman catholic dioceses has allowed signatures to be gathered at churches in an attempt to get the needed numbers. 

I just hope my birth state stands up and votes for Marriage equality. I know the people of New England are better than this.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs was asked about including same-sex civil unions in the 2010 census:

CNN Reports On Iran's Supreme Leaders Speech & Reactions:

 

| | edit post

Next Stop - Civil Disobedience

Posted by Jaime Ravenet On 11:17 AM 1 comments
On Tuesday, Savage Love columnist and podcaster Dan Savage wrote an interesting article addressing how queer Americans should approach the Obama administration's repugnant avoidance of campaign-trail promises. The line-up for this discussion is intense: Cleeve Jones (former second hand to Harvey Milk), President Obama, ex-pat politico extraordinaire Andrew Sullivan, and of course, you and me.

Here's the situation: Jones is promoting a "million gay march" on DC, to take place in October. I fully support this action. Marching on the steps of the Capital will certainly make our presence more visible, and Jones has been keen to mine the fervor of the post-Prop 8 gay community, and he has the background to make a real move (haven't you seen Milk yet?). We have been complacent for too long. In my lifetime, I've never seen our community so active as it has been since November. Jones' timing is pretty spot-on. But the question is, to what end? Marching itself never seems to really get the point across, and often times even gigantic protests are too easily ridiculed and belittled by our political opponents, who have taken the wind out of the sails of such hippie generation actions. So, what do we do?

This is the question I've been pondering lately, because frankly being gay in America means being a second-class citizen.

Savage hit the nail on the head. We really do have to do more than just march if we want to be taken seriously. We have to have an act of civil disobedience that will rip a hole in the fabric of the discourse to date. Savage's suggestion is that one gay couple a day go to the White House and ask to speak to the President about DOMA. When they are refused, they sit down and get arrested. And then the next day another couple does it. And the next, and so on for a year. "Drip drip drip," Savage says, insinuating that a steady series of small acts of friction can have a real effect on policy, wearing away the will of our leaders to ignore the civil rights of a minority for reasons of politicking.

If we demand equality under the law, we must be willing to act to secure that in the face of such politicking. Without action, we are nothing but pawns in the greater political game, tantalizing grapes of ending DADT and evicting DOMA set out in front of us when our votes are needed. Savage points out that this small rebellion puts the fight into human scale. All it requires is that one couple a day go make a small protest.

My suggestion? Don't limit this action to gay couples. I have two main reasons for this. The non-conjugationalist argument against DOMA-esque policy was the only argument that won out over conservative state constitution amendments in 2004*. This is because it is the only argument that points out a very important fact: DOMA will not affect gay couples alone, but would ironically be the self-same radical redefinition of "family" that conservatives love to throw around to justify their homophobic agenda. All families are hurt by DOMAs, on the state and federal level. Furthermore, and because of this, building a coalition of many different kinds of families will only strengthen our argument and broaden our base. When straight people realize that DOMA means no visiting rights for grandmothers who raise grandchildren, and no passing of property from one sibling to another after death, what was once a minority issue becomes a majority issue.

Civil disobedience is the best exercise of our power as citizens that we have. If you're fed up with being a second-class citizen, as I am, you have a responsibility to yourself, to your community, to your country as a whole, to do something about it. Come to the march in October! And if you're visiting our nation's capital, as so many do during the summer, while you're taking in the Smithsonian and strolling around the Mall, why don't you stop by the White House and ask the President why you can't get married, and why he's breaking his promises to you? I know I will.

*Google: Arizona DOMA 2004

EDIT: Sullivan enters the picture because that is how I found out about Savage's blog. Apparently, he is also a fan of the idea.
| | edit post

Carrie Prejean is threatening to sue the Miss California USA pageant. Prejean’s lawyer fired off a letter to Keith Lewis’ lawyer. The letter claims Lewis defamed Prejean by making her sound uncooperative and impossible to work with.

The letter also said Lewis was trying to use Carrie to push a gay agenda. Prejean’s lawyer claims Lewis and the pageant had no right to releases the details of Prejean’s boob job. 

Prejean’s lawyer says Prejean has suffered "severe emotional distress." The letter demands Lewis clear Prejean’s name or a lawsuit will be filed.

 

…But what the hell? The Miss California Organization wasn’t the only one who said she was impossible to work with. If anyone remembers, right after she was fired as Miss California, Carrie was fired by another company for not showing up to her scheduled events. Plus she also dropped out of the Special Olympics. When will this bimbo bigot go away?

TWO is an organization devoted to exposing the lies the anti-gay groups so often use to try to prove their points. I received the following Email from Wayne Besen and Truth Wins Out (TWO):

Truth Wins Out has done it again.
We have publicly exposed Focus on the Family for twisting legitimate research in their quest to portray gays as sick and sinful. Last week, Focus on the Familypublished
a noxious article that said gay people were the result of childhood sexual abuse.

Truth

TWO's news director, Mike Airhart, contacted the authors of the book Focus cited, and the scientists were not amused. At our request, they provided us with a letter that claimed Focus on the Family "distorted" their work.

Here is the text of the letter:

"We want to respond to a recent Focus on the Family characterization of scientific findings reported in our book, Unequal Opportunity: Health Disparities Affecting Gay and Bisexual Men in the United States (Oxford University Press) that misrepresented findings in the book to suggest that childhood sexual abuse causes male homosexuality. The Focus on the Family description of the findings reported in Unequal Opportunity is inaccurate and, in our opinion, a distortion of the scientific literature.
Most basically, the Focus on the Family characterization of the literature on childhood sexual abuse among gay men represents a misunderstanding of scientific approaches to distinguishing between correlation and causation.
The book chapter in question reports that gay men are more likely to report childhood sexual abuse by men than are heterosexual men. This correlation does not mean that the reported abuse caused the adult sexual orientation. If that were the case, then the fact that some heterosexual men report sexual abuse by women means that sexual abuse by women "causes" heterosexuality in men. It is also worth noting that the argument that childhood sexual abuse causes homosexuality in gay men is undermined by the fact that the vast majority of gay men are not sexually abused as children.
One potential partial explanation for this correlation, and one that makes the most sense when you consider people of all orientations, is that some youth, particularly post-pubertal youth (who still cannot legally consent to sexual activity) have sexual experiences with males or females, depending on their pre-existing orientation.
Let's be very clear that this does not mean that these experiences are appropriate or healthy. However, it also does not mean that these experiences caused the sexual orientation of the youth. The development of a person's sexual orientation is a complex and multifaceted process. The research into these processes has barely begun, and the development of sexuality is very difficult to study. Mischaracterizations of the scientific literature on the development of sexual orientation is not helpful to science.
Rather than mischaracterize these findings, we would like to point out the harm to health that can be caused by childhood sexual abuse among boys and girls of all sexual orientations. Childhood sexual abuse occurs to far too many young Americans and a large and growing literature supports that this abuse can cause lifelong damage to the physical and mental health and well-being of men and women of all sexual orientations. We suggest that Focus on the Family and other concerned organizations focus on how to work to ensure that all of our children remain safe from unwanted sexual experiences - whether heterosexual or homosexual.
That said, we want to state clearly that the published research does not support the claim that the development of a homosexual orientation is caused by childhood sexual abuse. Furthermore, adult homosexual orientation is no longer considered a pathology or a maladjustment. We urge those who are interested in trying to better understand some of these complex issues from a scientific perspective to read the discussions in our book, as well as the scientific literature on childhood sexual abuse, and not rely on second-hand interpretations."
Ron Stall
Ron Valdiserri

More anti-gay lies can be seen at www.RespectMyResearch.org. If you like our unique efforts to expose anti-gay attempts to twist science, please consider a tax-deductible contribution. We can't bust myths and challenge distortions without your generosity. Together, we can hold anti-gay organizations accountable and educate the public on the truth about GLBT people.

You can visit the Truth Wins Out website, here.

PBS Bans Religious Programming

Posted by Alex On 12:56 AM 2 comments

Via Politics.com

 

The Public Broadcasting Service agreed yesterday to ban its member stations from airing new religious TV programs, but permitted the handful of stations that already carry "sectarian" shows to continue doing so.


The vote by PBS's board was a compromise from a proposed ban on all religious programming. Such a ban would have forced a few stations around the country to give up their PBS affiliation if they continued to broadcast church services.

 

A Christian group called the Christian Civil Liberties Union is trying to have a gay book publicly burned and banned in the city of Milwaukee. The book is a young adult’s book called Baby Be-Bop, written by Francesca Lia Block. The book tells the story of a gay teen who is struggling with his sexuality and is attacked by a homophobic gang.

The group requested permission to burn the book publicly from the West Bend Community Memorial Library. They also demanded $120, 000 in damages. Apparently seeing the book on display is causing damage. They are also calling for the resignation of the cities mayor, Kristine Deiss.

The group says the book is explicitly vulgar, racial and anti-Christian. The four plaintiffs, who are all elderly, claim they received emotional damage from the book. The say the reason is that the book contains the word “nigger” and derogatory sexual and political epithets. They claim the book incites violence and can “put one’s life in possible jeopardy, adults and children alike.”

The plaintiffs want a grand jury to declare the book obscene and to decide if making it available could be a hate crime.

What bull shit Christians!

Quoting the Bigots- Gay=Sin

Posted by Alex On 11:00 PM 1 comments

 

Via The Dog Father Blog

I found this video while web surfing and found it very profound:

Video by Matthew Brown
Music by Sigur Ros

Bill O’Reilly Takes on Youtube

Posted by Alex On 10:41 PM 1 comments

Fox New’s Bill O’Reilly talks about a new conservative group’s study that hits at Youtube for having inappropriate content. I’d love to hear your opinions:

O’Reilly talks about how the video sharing site has no way to verify a persons real age. But why pick on just Youtube? How many porn sites are out there. I’ll admit, when I was under age, I was able to access porn. What type of protection does a “Don’t enter unless your 18” button do to prevent children from viewing porn. I would just click it anyway. Has no one heard of XTube? All you have to do for that site is create a fraudulent account, and lie about your age. News Flash O’Reilly…almost all sites are the same. I would agree I don’t think six year olds should be looking at porn either, but the sky isn’t falling. Those good old fashioned nude magazines were/are just as bad. All it takes is a kid to find one of those. A little porn won’t stop the world from turning.  

| | edit post

President Obama Signs Order Extending {Some} Benefits to Same-Sex Federal Employees:

 

On Youtube’s blog, Citizentube, Youtube posted a video telling viewers how to circumvent an internet proxy, such as the one the Iranian government is using to control internet usage in the country and to block certain sites. They have also relaxed their terms of use to allow Iranians to get their videos out.

| | edit post

Obama’s Plan for Gay Rights

Posted by Alex On 7:46 PM 0 comments

A new website spells out what President Obama’s plan is for helping the gay community:

Obama’s Plan For Gay Rights!

Civil Disobedience: A Proposal

Posted by Alex On 7:37 PM 0 comments

Via Dan Savage

The following post in directly copied from Dan Savage and the Stranger Blog, just to get the idea out:

Longtime gay activist Cleve Jones is leading the charge for the "National Equality March," a gay march on Washington called for October 11 of this year. Many folks are opposed—there's not enough time to organize a march, Congress isn't in session that week, marches don't accomplish much, a march eats up resources and energy—and Queerty has a good point/counterpoint interview/argument with Cleve. I'm officially agnostic: if people want to march, they can march.

But I have suggestion for an ongoing, smaller-scale action that would have a larger impact than a one-off "march" through an empty city. My idea would need fewer than a 1000 people to succeed—730 to be exact—and it wouldn't be over in a day. It would go on, day-in, day-out, every day, for a year. Hell, it could go on indefinitely. It involves civil disobedience and the 730 volunteers would have to be willing to get arrested. People who are unable to participate could make donations to help cover the expenses—legal expenses and travel expenses—of those who can.

Here's the idea: one gay or lesbian couple—a couple currently denied their rights under DOMA—shows up at the entrance to the White House grounds. A different couple every day. They ask to speak to the president about DOMA. They're refused. They sit down. They refuse to leave. They're arrested, carried away by the police. Couples would be recruited from all over the country, demonstrating that gay marriage isn't just an issue in liberal California or godless New England, and the media in each couple's home city and state would be notified in advance of their arrest. The occasional famous couple—Rosie and Kelli? Ellen and Portia?—would participate to pull in celeb media. But most of the couples who come to D.C. to get arrested would be average folks. The couples would need support, legal and logistical, and we would need someone to organize media outreach and maintain a website. The website would include a photo and profile of each couple that comes to D.C. to get arrested, collect all the press, and be used to recruit couples willing to travel to D.C. and get arrested.

The action would be small scale—it would be human scale—and it would go on and on and on. It would demonstrate better than another gay march just how seriously we take this issue: we take it seriously that we're willing to travel to D.C. and get arrested. It wouldn't be a one-day event that the White House could ignore or bluff its way through with some lame statement about its "commitment" to ending DOMA. The couples would keep coming. Every day an arrest. Drip, drip, drip. Members of the White House press corps would see couples getting arrested every day on their way to work. Gibbs would be forced to address DOMA on a near-daily basis. The president would be asked about the issue again and again.

My boyfriend—who doesn't do demonstrations (or interviews or photos or anything public)—is so upset about the DOMA brief that he's willing to go to D.C. and get arrested. So am I. We can't be the only couple that feels this way.

It’s a little late, but…

American Idol's Adam Lambert Talks About 'Coming Out' On ABC's 20/20:

To show my support for the people of Iran in this hard time. I am changing the side color of the blog to green. Lets promote free and fair elections.

After gym doctors confirmed the injuries were career-ending, Johnson's trainers said there was no reason to keep her alive.

A British pup had a narrow flush with disaster after his 4-year-old master decided to give him a bath in the toilet. Daniel Blair was quoted as telling Britain's Daily Mirror tabloid that he tried to clean the muddy 1-week-old cocker spaniel because he was muddy, and he flushed him down the drain.

New National Equality March Video

Posted by Alex On 1:55 PM 0 comments

 

 

There’s been plenty of talk about Obama not standing up for gay rights, let’s take a look at what he has said:

 

| | edit post

Imagine dropping your quarters into a vending machine and having a raccoon face pop out instead of your drink. That's what happened to some residents at an apartment complex in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

 

| | edit post

Via Towler Road

I know, two similar posts in one week. But also two hot posts, lol.

6a00d8341c730253ef01157115e546970b-800wi

| | edit post

Update: Obama is supposed to address Iranian crisis at approximately 5PM Eastern Time.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Warning: The Follow Pictures are Graphic

Via The Huffington Post

A militia opened up gunfire on a rally in today in Iran. The following pictures have been released by the Associated Press. I hesitated to post these pictures, but decided to let the audience see what's going on. Once again, they are graphic.

********************************************************************************************

 

610x

610x (1)

…and this picture which is unconfirmed, coming in from Twitter.

APTOPIX Mideast Iran Election

| | edit post

Joe Solomonese, the head of the Human Rights Campaign sent a letter to President Obama concerning the Obama administration brief to the Department of Justice about the Defence of Marriage Act.  Solomonese stated to Obama that LGBT families were equal to his own. The original and entire letter:

June 15, 2009

President Barack H. Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

I have had the privilege of meeting you on several occasions, when visiting the White House in my capacity as president of the Human Rights Campaign, a civil rights organization representing millions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people across this country. You have welcomed me to the White House to express my community’s views on health care, employment discrimination, hate violence, the need for diversity on the bench, and other pressing issues. Last week, when your administration filed a brief defending the constitutionality of the so-called “Defense of Marriage Act,” I realized that although I and other LGBT leaders have introduced ourselves to you as policy makers, we clearly have not been heard, and seen, as what we also are: human beings whose lives, loves, and families are equal to yours. I know this because this brief would not have seen the light of day if someone in your administration who truly recognized our humanity and equality had weighed in with you.

So on behalf of my organization and millions of LGBT people who are smarting in the aftermath of reading that brief, allow me to reintroduce us. You might have heard of Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon. They waited 55 years for the state of California to recognize their legal right to marry. When the California Supreme Court at last recognized that right, the octogenarians became the first couple to marry. Del died after the couple had been legally married for only two months. And about two months later, their fellow Californians voted for Proposition 8.

Across this country, same-sex couples are living the same lives that Phyllis and Del so powerfully represent, and the same lives as you and your wife and daughters. In over 99% of U.S. counties, we are raising children and trying to save for their educations; we are committing to each other emotionally and financially. We are paying taxes, serving on the PTA, struggling to balance work and family, struggling to pass our values on to our children—through church, extended family, and community. Knowing us for who we are—people and families whose needs and contributions are no different from anyone else’s—destroys the arguments set forth in the government’s brief in Smelt. As you read the rest of what I have to say, please judge the brief’s arguments with this standard: would this argument hold water if you acknowledge that Del and Phyllis have contributed as much to their community as their straight neighbors, and that their family is as worthy of respect as your own?

Reading the brief, one is told again and again that same-sex couples are so unlike different-sex couples that unequal treatment makes sense. But the government doesn’t say what makes us different, or unequal, only that our marriages are “new.” The fact that same-sex couples were denied equal rights until recently does not justify denying them now.

For example, the brief seems to adopt the well-worn argument that excluding same-sex couples from basic protections is somehow good for other married people:

Because all 50 States recognize hetero-sexual marriage, it was reasonable and rational for Congress to maintain its longstanding policy of fostering this traditional and universally- recognized form of marriage.

The government does not state why denying us basic protections promotes anyone else’s marriage, nor why, while our heterosexual neighbors’ marriages should be promoted, our own must be discouraged. In other words, the brief does not even attempt to explain how DOMA is related to any interest, but rather accepts that it is constitutional to attempt to legislate our families out of existence.

The brief characterizes DOMA as “neutral:”

[DOMA amounts to] a cautious policy of federal neutrality towards a new form of marriage.

DOMA is not “neutral” to a federal employee serving in your administration who is denied equal compensation because she cannot cover her same-sex spouse in her health plan. When a woman must choose between her job and caring for her spouse because they are not covered by the FMLA, DOMA is not “neutral.” DOMA is not a “neutral” policy to the thousands of bi-national same-sex couples who have to choose between family and country because they are considered strangers under our immigration laws. It is not a “neutral” policy toward the minor child of a same-sex couple, who is denied thousands of dollars of surviving mother’s or father’s benefits because his parents are not “spouses” under Social Security law.

Exclusion is not neutrality.

Next, the brief indicates that denying gay people our equal rights saves money:

It is therefore permitted to maintain the unique privileges [the government] has afforded to [different-sex marriages] without immediately extending the same privileges, and scarce government resources, to new forms of marriage that States have only recently begun to recognize.

The government goes on to say that DOMA reasonably protects other taxpayers from having to subsidize families like ours. The following excerpt explains:

DOMA maintains federal policies that have long sought to promote the traditional and uniformly-recognized form of marriage, recognizes the right of each State to expand the traditional definition if it so chooses, but declines to obligate federal taxpayers in other States to subsidize a form of marriage that their own states do not recognize.

These arguments completely disregard the fact that LGBT citizens pay taxes ourselves. We contribute into Social Security equally and receive the same statement in the mail every year. But for us, several of the benefits listed in the statement are irrelevant—our spouses and children will never benefit from them. The parent who asserts that her payments into Social Security should ensure her child’s financial future should she die is not seeking a subsidy. The gay White House employee who works as hard as the person in the next office is not seeking a “subsidy” for his partner’s federal health benefits. He is earning the same compensation without receiving it. And the person who cannot even afford to insure her family because the federal government would treat her partner’s benefits as taxable income—she is not seeking a subsidy.

The government again ignores our experiences when it argues that DOMA § 2 does not impair same-sex couples’ right to move freely about our country as other families can:

DOMA does not affect “the right of a citizen of one State to enter and to leave another state, the right to be treated as a welcome visitor rather than an unfriendly alien when temporarily present in the second State.”

This example shows the fallacy of that argument: a same-sex couple and their child drives cross- country for a vacation. On the way, they are in a terrible car accident. One partner is rushed into the ICU while the other, and their child, begs to be let in to see her, presenting the signed power of attorney that they carry wherever they go. They are told that only “family” may enter, and the woman dies alone while her spouse waits outside. This family was not “welcome.”

As a matter of constitutional law, some of this brief does not even make sense:

DOMA does not discriminate against homosexuals in the provision of federal benefits…. Section 3 of DOMA does not distinguish among persons of different sexual orientations, but rather it limits federal benefits to those who have entered into the traditional form of marriage.

In other words, DOMA does not discriminate against gay people, but rather only provides federal benefits to heterosexuals.

I cannot overstate the pain that we feel as human beings and as families when we read an argument, presented in federal court, implying that our own marriages have no more constitutional standing than incestuous ones:

And the courts have widely held that certain marriages, performed elsewhere need not be given effect, because they conflicted with the public policy of the forum. See e.g., Catalano v. Catalano, 170 A.2d 726, 728-29 (Conn. 1961) (marriage of uncle to niece, though valid in Italy under its laws, was not valid in Connecticut because it contravened public policy of th[at] state.”

As an American, a civil rights advocate, and a human being, I hold this administration to a higher standard than this brief. In the course of your campaign, I became convinced—and I still want to believe—that you do, too. I have seen your administration aspire and achieve. Protecting women from employment discrimination. Insuring millions of children. Enabling stem cell research to go forward. These are powerful achievements. And they serve as evidence to me that this brief should not be good enough for you. The question is, Mr. President—do you believe that it’s good enough for us?

If we are your equals, if you recognize that our families live the same, love the same, and contribute as much as yours, then the answer must be no.

We call on you to put your principles into action and send legislation repealing DOMA to Congress.

Sincerely, Joe Solmonese

| | edit post

Via The Huffington Post

The pictures coming in today from the protests in Iran in support of defeated reformist candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi show hundreds of thousands of supporters. The crowds are unbelievable: 

ScreenHunter_02 Jun. 15 14.54

ScreenHunter_03 Jun. 15 14.55

Mousavi was present at today’s protests.

 

ScreenHunter_04 Jun. 15 14.56

ScreenHunter_05 Jun. 15 14.56

ScreenHunter_06 Jun. 15 14.57

| | edit post

I’m posting this on behalf of Guest Blogger, Rob Harris.

for gayatheist_01_bw

******************************************************************************************

*This entry is written with reference to English and UK establishments and practices. They are not the same throughout the entire world.

How often have you heard the phrase, “Marriage is between ONE man and ONE woman”? How about, “God created Adam & Eve, not Adam & Steve”? I’ll wager it’s more than a few times. And how many times have you felt real anger at having to respond to these rather asinine statements?

At the crux of your discussions is the word ‘marriage’. You aren’t arguing over how the ceremony is performed, how many people get invited to the wedding, or how many of your partner’s family like salmon canapés; you are talking solely about the act of binding two people together in a legal contract for the rest of their lives, or until the contract is no longer required. Religious zealots have a problem with this, but we’ll come to that later. For now, it’s important that we define the word ‘marriage’.

My dictionary says:

marriage |ˈmarij|

noun

  • The formal union of a man and a woman, typically recognised by law, by which they become husband and wife.
  • A similar long-term relationship between partners of the same sex.

Let’s look at that definition; it states that marriage is ‘typically recognised by law’. This is the act of the state granting a ‘marriage certificate’ to the two people involved. This is not a religious ceremony. If you are a Christian, a Hindu, a Jew, a Muslim, or a person of any other religious belief or non-belief you are required to get a marriage certificate before the state will recognise that you are married, and subsequently grant you the rights and privileges of being a married person in the eyes of the law.

Churches, mosques, synagogues etc. do not, and indeed can not, grant two people those rights and privileges, as they do not control the state and have no ability to set law.

What this means, essentially, is that the ceremony you perform is a religious one, but the actual legal recognition of your marriage is granted by the state. You can perform a ceremony in a church, but until you have the marriage certificate you are not legally married. Indeed, many marriage certificates are granted hours or days to either side of the religious ceremony.

You do not actually have to perform a religious ceremony, which is borne out by the many non-religious people who get married every year. You merely need to visit a Registry Office and undertake the appropriate procedure.

So, what does this mean for your Christian zealot friends? Well, it means that their hold on the term ‘marriage’ is tangible at best. If the Christian Church ‘owned’ marriage, Jews and Muslims would have to get permission from the local Christian church before they could be married. Clearly, this does not happen; the Registry Office is a secular institution that grants marriage certificates to any and all people of any religion or non-religion.

Thus, it is not the duty of Christianity solely to say who can and cannot be married. It is up to the state.

This now brings us onto the question of how the state grants marriage certificates. A recent example is that of Proposition 8 in California, USA. This changed the California Constitution to add a new section (7.5) to Article I, which reads: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." (Source: Wikipedia).

By effectively redefining ‘marriage’ to specifically exclude anything but heterosexuals means that the state is discriminating against non-heterosexuals. However, since this was a democratic decision the result must stand until it can be changed through the democratic process again. [What sickens me, personally, about this is that the majority have been able to remove the rights of a minority based on some very flimsy beliefs and ideas of how “gay marriage will destroy families”, to quote one person interviewed on a local news channel.]

The state is now not able to grant marriage certificates to non-heterosexuals. Note that this was a democratic process and not a religious decision (though the proponents of Prop 8 were clearly religiously-motivated). Thus, religion has nothing to do with granting marriage certificates.

It is also useful to note that this wording effectively bans polygamy, so any Muslim men out there with aspirations of having up to four wives - as allowed by Islamic law - are right out of luck.

A further point to be made here is that there have been many news stories about churches refusing to hold same-sex ceremonies in their buildings. They are absolutely entitled to this  - after all, those buildings are theirs - unless they are maintained through public money. In this case, the decision to hold such a ceremony is largely up to the individuals in charge of that building as they are using funds from the public, some of whom are not heterosexual but have an equal claim on the use of the buildings.

Given that religion is impotent of the ability to legally define who can and cannot be married, and it is clearly up to the state to make such decisions, religion is relegated to the ceremonies performed for that religion. If your religion requires that you be married in a church, then you perform a marriage ceremony in a church. If it does not, you do not get married in a church. This is simple, but religion wishes to grab both sides of the situation and assume the right to grant legal status to whomever it chooses.

Some of the more banal reasons that religious zealots wax lyrical about include the ridiculous canard that same-sex marriage will destroy the family unit. It is interesting to note that such zealots do not actually define how this would happen.

  • Would homosexual married couples go around converting heterosexuals to homosexuality?
  • Would they petition government to stop heterosexuals from marrying?
  • Would they make outrageous demands that favour themselves over heterosexuals?

No, clearly not. And, as far as I am aware, same-sex couples want equal rights, not extra rights. So, why would the joining of two people in love who want to commit themselves to each other be such a problem for marriage? Remember, marriage is not a religious affair; it is a legal status.

A favourite retort of mine comes when a religious zealot states that homosexuality is unnatural. I take great pleasure in pointing out that nylon is unnatural, as are hospitals, cars, air conditioning and money. Oh, and In-vitro Fertilisation (IVF), which allows infertile couples to have children. Books are also unnatural, so that Bible of theirs is skating on very thin ice...

Another asinine reason they like to churn out is that if we grant marriage rights to same-sex couples, what’s to stop us from marrying animals or allowing paedophiles to marry children? With the former, I am unaware of any animal other than human beings who can give their informed consent, let alone sign their name on a marriage certificate. The latter needs no real explanation of its absurdity other than to point out that paedophilia is a recognised mental illness, and such a coupling would undoubtedly harm the child, as indeed it does given the number of claims against the Catholic Church for compensation for having been molested by their priest. We don’t allow people diagnosed with recognised mental illnesses to fly commercial planes, do we?

On the issue of raising children in a homosexual marriage, where is the evidence that the children are adversely affected by it? Nowhere; but the religious folk will have you believe these kids are scarred for life. There may be some bullying at school when the question of mother and father arises, but this is short-lived. Any child who suffers bullying at the hands of other children is not at fault - the other children are. For these people to not recognise this, astounds me.

And yes, I know that a homosexual couple cannot bear children, but neither can infertile heterosexual couples. Is the sole reason for not allowing two people to marry simply a question of their potential to procreate? Clearly not, or we would ban infertile couples from marrying, and have no need for IVF.

A child brought up to understand that homosexuality is just as natural as heterosexuality (though less common) would surely be more accepting? If you’re brought up to believe that homosexuality is ‘wrong’ (in some god’s eyes) then you’ll have these bigoted views for the rest of your life. Being moulded from a young age into hating ~2-6% of the world’s population simply because of something they do in the privacy of their bedrooms is just plain stupid. If that affects their entire world view so much, I would suggest they have worse problems to deal with.

Religious zealots speak many words but say very little. They are mute on the actual reasons why they are against allowing two people in love to marry. They fail to back up their points with real facts.

They rely on a 2,000-year old book and someone who claims they have a seat right next to ‘God’ to give them guidance. Funny how they aren’t demanding slaves, as allowed in their book. And when did a Christian man last stone to death his new bride on her father’s doorstep because she wasn’t a virgin? They pick and choose the bits that they want to follow, and ignore the bits that they do not. It is a shame that they are so vehemently against progressing humankind and accepting the natural vista of human sexuality.

What a world we wish to live in, and what a world we are forced to live in. Religious people profess love, but they are so much better at stifling it.

By Rob Harris, 12th June 2009.

Not a fan of the fanatical flier

Posted by Patrick On 9:48 PM 0 comments

Out of curiosity I read the flier jammed in my front door by the ever persistent Jehovah's Witness minion doing penance by littering my neighborhood with propaganda printed on 0% post consumer waste with lead ink. The flier (impersonal invitation), which I've saved as proof of the idiocy, asks "How can you survive the end of the world?" as if the Witnesses have been chosen to know just when that will be and how to survive it.

Here's the deal with that... uh, if it really is the end of the world... will there really be any reason to survive it? Secondly, if you're organization is going to try to use fear to bait me to join this silly discourse which will undoubtedly be more strongly focused on where I can donate money than to explain how to survive the end of the world I'll skip it.

The ever tacky colored drawing of scores of people walking up a hill out of a lightening storm to the brightly lit hilltop doesn't comfort me any. Instead it points out that my fashion sense is far too advanced to be welcomed into the Jehovah's Witness "protection".

Ironic since the flier aims to alarm the recipient that in smaller text reads, "You are warmly invited to come and listen to the answer." Again, nothing warm and fuzzy about how a religion will make the end of the world more tolerable. Why would I intentionally suffer through the end of the world with people who have been invited to learn, among other things, that they must (and I quote from said flier):
  • Stay Awake as Christians (sleep deprivation is a known torture technique - special)
  • Know That the End is Near (whatever the fuck that means)
  • Imitate Jesus' Example of Watchfulness (proven to be quite effective)
  • Keep in Expectation, Watching for Jehovah's Day (is that anything like St. Patrick's Day?)
Adding further insult to injury, there is a free offer for a book titled "What does the Bible Really Teach". Can't find that one at Barnes & Noble stores or online at least not anywhere near the education section. Maybe listed under religious fanatics? The question I have is about how The Bible is able to teach anything? It is a historical work of fiction, reflecting possible explanations for unexplainable events - a collection of stories.

So, after much thought, I must admit that despite the alluring art and scary words, I'm going to have to skip this year's "Keep on the Watch" festival of fatuousness. I'm guessing that if the end really is near, well, I undoubtedly won't really be in any position to do anything about it. Additionally, and this applies to any/all religions: I don't respond to threats of impending doom, solicitation, begging, and injudiciousness. Please, stop with the annoying fliers in the mail or in my doorjamb. Don't come to my door with your religion ringing my bell. If (and that's a big IF) I'm ever at the point where I'm ready for an organized religion, well I'll simply come to you. Oh, and it will most definitely NOT be Jehovah's Witness "protection".




Update: You can read Joan Walsh’s take on the O’Reilly attack: HERE

******************************************************************************************

As usual ass hole Bill O’Reilly reverts to simply shouting over his quest:

Police enters a person's house an beat him to the death in his own yard, then leave.

That's the democracy that government of Iran is talking about !

 

Plus some pictures from people right in Iran:

  

| | edit post

Via TMZ

Soccer Stud Cristiano Ronaldo was spotted all oiled up while lying pool side. Enjoy!

ScreenHunter_01 Jun. 14 16.12

| | edit post

North Korea Warns of Nuclear War

Posted by Alex On 1:48 PM 1 comments

North Korea's communist regime is warning of a nuclear war on the Korean peninsula while vowing to step up its atomic bomb-making program in defiance of new U.N. sanctions.

 

Update:

********************************************************************************************

 

image5080130

New Iranian President Ahmadinejad claimed victory today while holding a press conference. Further reports are coming out of Iran that over a hundred reformist have been arrested and cell phone/text messaging has been jammed. Protest and riots are still going on. Several websites including Facebook are down, leaving the Iranian people pretty much without communication. All this further leads to speculation about the so called “election”.

ScreenHunter_01 Jun. 14 09.32

A key theme appeared when Ahmadinejad took questions from Western reporters. He dodged many of their questions. When asked by a CNN reporter if he would guarantee the safety of former Presidential opposing candidate, Mir Hossein Moussavi, Ahmadinejad avoided the questions. He said something about traffic violations and a sports stadium. Apparently saying Moussavi had been arrested for traffic violations, but that may have been symbolic for another meaning. Here is one statement he said during the conference:

"Some people are sentimental and become excited," he added. "As I said, I compared it to a soccer match. Their team has not won in the match."

"In the end, I don't think we'll have any serious challenges," he said. "Sentiments are high and sometimes they do some stuff on the streets, but in the end we had 40 million people participating and what is happening on the streets is like a football match."

At one point he also said Iran was the most stable country in the world. Later when asked about women’s rights, Ahmadinejad once again attempted to dodge around the question but ended up talking about blood money. According to the Iranian President, when it comes to blood money, the money when one spouse passes away, men are actually discriminated against. 

ScreenHunter_02 Jun. 14 09.32 Moussavi has not been heard from since the election, when he claimed the election had not been fair. A pro-Ahmadinejad rally is being held later today.

*Photos Via CNN and their affiliates.

Ask Not

Posted by Alex On 1:47 AM 2 comments

A new film being shown on PBS called Ask Not highlights Don’t Ask Don’t Tell and it’s impact on soldiers, both gay and straight. Under DADT, 12, 000 qualified men and women have been discharged from the Armed Forces simply for being gay. This is what PBS says about Ask Not:

As wars rage in the Middle East, the U.S. military is eager for more recruits—unless you happen to be openly gay. ASK NOT explores the tangled political battles that led to the infamous "don't ask, don't tell" policy and reveals the personal stories of gay Americans who serve in combat under a veil of secrecy.

The film premiers on PBS this Tuesday, June 16th.

| | edit post

 

ScreenHunter_03 Jun. 13 23.51 

A New York gay couple are in the Us Magazine Dream Wedding Contest Finals. The Couple consists of Jeffrey Denke, 37 and his fiancé Matthew Ossenfort, 31. When asked why they should be picked, the couple said:

You should pick US because we are living in a new world: a world of change and understanding. A place where we learn how to be better people every day and try to be progressive and not to judge one another on any race, beliefs or orientation. I am hoping that Us Weekly and the people at WeddingChannel.com are open minded and ready to take on the progressive way of thinking and select us because we deserve to win -- and only happen to be a gay couple who are very happy and very much in love.

You can vote for the couple at the Us Magazine website:  Here.

StandWithCarrie.com

Posted by Alex On 10:17 PM 0 comments

StandwCarrie 

The National Organization for Marriage has launched a new website called Stand With Carrie. The website only has one paragraph and a petition. This is what the website says:

Carrie Prejean could have had it all, at the price of sacrificing her values. She chose to speak the truth. She chose to Stand Up for Marriage. Now she is paying the price. It's time for us to Stand with Carrie. Sign up now to let Carrie know you stand with her. And check back soon for more details on how you can help Carrie stand for truth.

Despite what many in the LGBT community expected, the National March on Washington scheduled for October 10-11 is a go. The permits have been approved. The plan is to gather an to march. They also have a website.

There is only one demand being asked for: Equal protection in all matters governed by civil law in all 50 states. The site list the following:

“Our philosophy: As members of every race, class, faith, and community, we see the struggle for LGBT equality as part of a larger movement for peace and social justice.”

“Our strategy: Decentralized organizing for this march in every one of the 435 Congressional districts will build a network to continue organizing beyond October.”

Contact

Posted by Alex On 1:38 PM 0 comments
 
To Contact Us about anything including Tips: Write to:
Contact/Tips





I Just Can't Care Anymore

Posted by mysie On 5:04 AM 0 comments
Election Night 2008 was one of the happiest days of my life. In the Seattle Westin's Ballroom, people were jammed wall to wall, crying and laughing together. I heard a gay man on his cellphone telling someone "This is it. This is the beginning. Everything is going to change. I know it!"

No more of this bullshit about throwing out our civil rights in the name of homeland security. No more tortues at Gitmo. No more worries about Roe v. Wade being overturned. Equal rights for GLBT - the right to marry, the right to serve, the right to inherit, the right to attend a dying spouse in the hospital.

I was so elated, I didn't really bother to check the news for months - everything was awesome, what could go wrong?

I finally started taking notice when the waffling about closing Gitmo started. Keeping our troops in Iraq instead of getting them home right away wasn't enough? How much of Bush's old policies were going to be kept going by the new administration?

No repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell". Backtracking even. WTF? Bringing in Sotomayer without nailing down in public her stance on Roe v. Wade.

Earlier this week I posted about my frustration with Obama, including a quote from CNN (William Jelani Cobb):
(CNN) -- Last week Gov. John Lynch signed a bill making New Hampshire the sixth state to legalize same-sex marriage.

It was a paradoxical moment. The new law is a reminder that same-sex marriage is the civil rights issue of our era and just how far the movement for marriage equality has come. It also highlighted the unexpected and remarkable silence from the White House on this issue.


That last sentence should have been a warning. The White House broke it's silence Thursday night:

Obama defends DOMA in federal court. Says banning gay marriage is good for the federal budget. Invokes incest and marrying children.

I suddenly have no words. I cried. I screamed. I swore I would never vote again. I did not think it was possible for a politician to whip us up into such a hopeful frenzy, only to take it all back with one letter to the Supreme Court.

Somewhere, a positive spin theory was posited by a commentor on a blog that I can't remember now - I was desperately looking for any news anywhere that Obama had released a retraction, apology, anything - I just looked at too many different sites to find it again. I gave it 6 hours for Obama to realize all the hell he had just raised, and let us in on his sneaky plan that was really to our benefit afterall.

Instead, I found this:

Obama DOJ lies to Politico in defending hate brief against gays

This about sums it up:

"You see, this is the problem with what Obama did to our community last night. He can talk all he wants about helping us get our civil rights (well, in fact, notice the Justice spokesman said nothing about Obama actually helping us get DOMA repealed), but the Obama administration's own word will now be used against us, and against him, if he ever deigns to actually fulfill even one promise to our community."


Obama, your halo finally hit the ground. Do whatever you want with it, I just can't allow myself to care anymore.

For those of you who do still care, here is the actual text of the brief.

What Atheism Is

Posted by Sarah On 6:47 PM 2 comments
In an earlier post, I mentioned a note that someone had posted that really affected me. I finally found it and will now post it for you all to enjoy. :)

"The following definition of Atheism was given to the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Murray v. Curlett, 374 U.S. 203, 83 S. Ct. 1560, 10 L.Ed.2d (MD, 1963), to remove reverential Bible reading and oral unison recitation of the Lord's Prayer in the public schools.

“Your petitioners are Atheists and they define their beliefs as follows. An Atheist loves his fellow man instead of god. An Atheist believes that heaven is something for which we should work now – here on earth for all men together to enjoy.

An Atheist believes that he can get no help through prayer but that he must find in himself the inner conviction, and strength to meet life, to grapple with it, to subdue it and enjoy it.

An Atheist believes that only in a knowledge of himself and a knowledge of his fellow man can he find the understanding that will help to a life of fulfillment.

He seeks to know himself and his fellow man rather than to know a god. An Atheist believes that a hospital should be built instead of a church. An Atheist believes that a deed must be done instead of a prayer said. An Atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death. He wants disease conquered, poverty vanquished, war eliminated. He wants man to understand and love man.

He wants an ethical way of life. He believes that we cannot rely on a god or channel action into prayer nor hope for an end of troubles in a hereafter.

He believes that we are our brother's keepers; and are keepers of our own lives; that we are responsible persons and the job is here and the time is now.

Don’t tell me who to love!

Posted by Alex On 10:49 PM 0 comments

In the famous words of one of my heroes, Harvey Milk, “You’ve got to give them hope”:

The Cove: dolphin slaughter

Posted by mysie On 8:12 PM 0 comments
About two weeks ago I attended the SIFF screening of a documentary called "The Cove". When I walked into the theater, all I could remember about why it had made my list of SIFF movies to watch was the fact that it was about dolphins, and the picture representing the movie in the guide was very pretty. FYI, don't bring your kids to this movie - it's decidedly not pretty. I've spent the last two weeks digesting the information and wondering what to do with it. The least I can do is write about it, be one small voice to reach out to the general population that has no idea what's going on in Taiji, Japan.

The movie isn't pretty, but it is filmed beautifully by world-renowned photographer Louie Psihoyos. For a first time moviemaker, he had a lot to work with, a daunting task to narrow the footage down into a cohesive story that could be made into a film.

That story begins in Japan with the meeting of Louie Psihoyos and Richard O'Barry, former dolphin trainer on the set of the TV show "Flipper". O'Barry immediately whisks Psyhoyos to Taiji, all the while relaying information about the local conspiracy to keep him from his observations in order to keep their town's dolphin trade a secret. He comes of as a bit of a looney, but we see that O'Barry has not been exagerating. They are followed by multiple police cars, accosted by fisherman who scream and block their camera view, and met with officials demanding to know their intentions and insisting they stay out of the national park where "The Cove" is located on public land. That's all on their first day. Later, they visit the Cove when the public is allowed to watch the auctioning off of dolphins to trainers at aquariums and dolphinariums around the world. No one there seems to question what will happen to the dolphins that are not selected for sale.

The movie goes on from here to tell you quite a bit about Richard O'Barry and his history with dolphins. Mainly his remorse for helping put them in the spotlight for entertainment, as well as his efforts to save dolphins and whales kept in confinement - through legal and illegal measures. New team members are then introduced, as a team is assembled of various professionals who can help them get dolphin footage clandestinely.

Cameras disguised as rocks, camouflaged behind foliage, and hidden in the cove are set-up at night, the action filmed on with heat-sensing video equipment. We've gone from looney conspiracy theory, to collecting skilled professionals, to the thrilling night escapades of dedicated documentarians. Everything is so exciting, and kind of fun, you've kind of forgotten why all of this cloak and dagger stuff is going on.

The tone changes immediately when the audience is shown two minutes of unimaginably cruel dolphin slaughter. Over 80 hours of footage, collected over the course of year, sneaking equipment in and out every night to avoid notice. All edited down to what was the worst two minutes of my life. I will spare you the most horrific details that haunt me still. I will say that the dolphins are terrified, even jumping out of the water onto the rocks to escape the violence. They are killed with no real efficiency or thought to alleviate their suffering - the dolphins die slowly by bleeding to death from multiple wounds. The fisherman laugh, sparing not even the babies or pregnant dolphins, with divers going underwater with knives to make sure no dolphin has been missed. Out of the 23,000 dolphins and whales killed annually by Japanese whalers and fishermen, 2500 dolphins are killed this way annually, over the course of six months.

After that horrible scene, the movie is no longer funny or entertaining at all. They keep adding on horrors for you to digest. The dolphin meat is loaded with extremely high levels of mercury and sold to consumers without warning. The dolphin meat is often mislabeled as other whale meat or seafood. Street interviews with the citizens of Tokyo reveal the general public does not support eating or killing dolphins, and they have no idea this is going on in Taiji. Japanese officials swear that the dolphins are killed humanely, dispute the levels of toxic lead in the meat, and consider serving that meat to school children - the Japanese school lunch program is mandatory, the children are not allowed not to eat it. The Japanese government has told these fisherman that dolphins are pests needing to be culled, because they are responsible for the depletion of fishstock. The International Whaling Commission has banned O'Barry for life for trying to talk about the slaughter in Taiji. When O'Barry walks in on an IWC meeting with a video screen strapped to his chest showing the slaughter footage for all to see instead of trying to talk to them, he is thrown out - to the amusement of the IWC's Vice President, a Japanese delegate accused of vote-buying to have the whaling moratorium lifted.

I have never been so horrified in all my life, except maybe when learning about the Holocaust. Shouldn't something be done? Why isn't anyone else talking about this? How can the Japanese government hide these facts from their citizens?

As an American, I'm not really sure what to do. Change can only come within Japan to stop this hunt. So the least I can do is talk about it so that others hear my voice. And I will never, ever again visit Sea World or any other aquarium that keeps captive dolphins - the industry keeps the Taiji fisherman in the dolphin business.

If you are inspired to action, you can visit these websites for more information:

Official The Cove movie site
TakePart.com
Save Japan's Dolphins
The Oceanic Preservation Society
Earth Island

You know what Bill O’Reilly….just go fuck off somewhere:

Rockstar Vs. Internet

Posted by Alex On 4:45 PM 1 comments

rockstar_energy_drinks_250ml_and_473ml 

I never drink Rockstar energy drinks because of the “alleged” affiliate ship with the ass hole Michael Savage. The rightwing homophobic bigot. Not to mention it taste like shit. Well in April, Bilerico reported on the connections between Savage and the drink company, of which Savage’s own son is head. Apparently however someone way up in the Rockstar empire, is ashamed of Daddy Savage. They have started firing off lawsuits in all directions across the web, towards Facebook users and bloggers alike, like a holocaust of free thought.

Possibly the most prominent lawsuit threat was towards the LGBT blog, The Bilerico Project. Rockstar may have gone to far and someone is standing up to the big bully. Rockstar is threatening to sue Bilerico because of the claim that the company is affiliated with Michael Savage. Here are the two sentence Rockstar is threatening the lawsuit over:

“It [Rockstar Energy Drink] was co-founded by conservative radio host Michael Savage.”

“Michael Savage is reaping profits from the selling of Rockstar Energy Drink.”

Rockstar claims that Savage only advised his son in the beginning and that Savage does not receive profits from the company.

My response is, even if and I doubt it, Michael Savage is not affiliated with Rockstar, his son, Russell Weiner, is still a homophobic prick. We should still boycott the damn company and I will never drink it’s products. At a concert, Weiner, called his father the leader and said:

"Who's heterosexual and proud? [...] If you're not, hopefully you will be soon!"

Weiner believes in most of his father beliefs and is a member in most of the same groups.

You can read the original Bilerico article here, and the update Bilerico has posted here.

Scary Fox E-mailers

Posted by Alex On 4:05 PM 0 comments

Fox’s Shep Smith talks about how he himself sees an uprising in rightwing extremism through the E-mails he receives:

Updated Von Brunn Photo Released

Posted by Alex On 2:07 PM 0 comments

A newer photo of James Von Brunn, the holocaust memorial shooter has been released:

art.james.von.brunn.mug 

We have also learnt that before officer Stephen Tyrone Johns was shoot, he had opened the door to allow Von Brunn to enter, thinking he was helping an elderly gentleman.

Could Aqua be coming back?

Posted by Alex On 1:43 PM 0 comments

The old 90’s band Aqua has released a new song called Back to the 80’s. It’s actually pretty good:

DHS: Is it to late?

Posted by Alex On 1:07 PM 0 comments

The Department of Homeland Security warned us that rightwing extremist were a growing threat in the current political and economic conditions. What did the right-wingers do about the DHS report, like I wrote yesterday, they freaked out:

This morning Keith Lewis, the Miss California executive spoke along with the New Miss California, Tami Farrell to the CBS Early Show. Lewis spoke of how Prejean failed and refused to appear for many of her scheduled events, more than he could think of off the top of his head. Lewis also mentioned how the only way he is in contact with Prejean is from his lawyer to her lawyer. Prejean’s lawyer also happens to be a National Organization for Marriage lawyer.

Prejean Clueless

Posted by Alex On 11:20 PM 0 comments

Update: The Gay Atheist has been able to retrieve a copy of the official Press Release which ended Prejean’s horrific Miss California reign. You can read it: Here

 

***

 

Via Good as You

When the news broke about Carrie Prejean being stripped of her Miss California crown, Billy Bush phoned up the clueless ex-beauty queen. She claimed she had not heard about being stripped of her crown until the radio show host called her.

She then accused the Pageant organizers of holding a grudge about her response to Perez Hilton’s  question about same sex marriage. She claimed she had not broken any of her contract and had appeared for every event she was scheduled to be at. Now we are clearly seeing the tantrums Carrie is capable of. You can listen to her radio interview bellow.






 

Also on a note of bigoted morons we cannot forget The National Organization for Marriage. They have released a statement concerning Prejean losing her crown:

Princeton, NJ) - Today, the National Organization for Marriage (NOM) issued the following statement in response to the firing Miss California USA Carrie Prejean:

"Hollywood hates Carrie. First they abuse her, then they try to get her to recant, then they threw mud, and now they are doing what they wanted to do from day one: Get rid of Carrie.

This cover story about a contract dispute doesn’t pass the smell test. Americans aren’t fooled that easily. God knows, and we know, the truth about Carrie: She’s a young woman of great beauty who chose truth over the glittering tiara that Hollywood offers," said Brian Brown, Executive Director for NOM. "Of course they will try to punish her, but we know she will be fine in the end, because her values are in the right place."

"Hollywood will dance its tribal war dance over her body--the hatred generated against her has been extraordinary--but Carrie will be free to define her own mission and message from now on. Congratulations," stated Maggie Gallagher, President for NOM.

DHS –Rightwing Extremist Report

Posted by Alex On 11:04 PM 0 comments

The Gay Atheist has been able to find an original copy of the Department of Homeland Security's initial report about the uprising of rightwing extremist in the United States.

The Report can be read in PDF format: Here

DHS Report

Posted by Alex On 7:28 PM 0 comments

DHS14_1

By now, other blogs have probably come to the same conclusion, but the holocaust memorial museum shooting earlier today reminded me of something. Not long ago Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, issued a report suggesting in the next few months the United States could see an uprising in right wing extremist actions. Of course, almost immediately after Napolitano released the report, she retracted her words following a mad attack by the GOP and the religious right.

So, if my count is correct with today’s shooting, and Dr. Tillers murder last week, it brings us up to two domestic terrorist attacks as a result of extreme right wingers in as many weeks. My only remaining question is…who is next to die?

Holocaust Memorial Guard, Dead!

Posted by Alex On 5:05 PM 0 comments

CNN has just broke the news that a guard shot earlier today in a shooting at the National Holocaust Memorial in Washington has died. CNN is also saying that the Suspect is an 88 year old man named James Von Brunn, a white supremacist and a racist.

Update: The Officer who was killed, has been identified: Stephen Tyrone Johns:

It has to be noted, that the suspect, who has been identified as a white supremacist, shot and killed a black guard. The suspect, Von Brunn is currently in the hospital receiving medial attention. He denies that the holocaust ever happened and has said that the diary of Ann Frank is a hoax. Von Brunn wrote and self published a book called “Kill the Best Gentiles” and said Jews were compulsive liars who knew the holocaust was a lie. He said that lying is in their genes.

Update: An unconfirmed picture of the Holocaust Memorial shooter, James Von Brunn has been leaked. I repeat, this picture has not been confirmed:

James_von_Brunn

Via NY Times: Trump Fires Prejean

Posted by Patrick On 4:44 PM 0 comments
via nytimes: Donald Trump Fires Miss California http://bit.ly/9SCXh

Prejean Being Fired

Posted by Alex On 4:33 PM 0 comments

According to Fox News Carrie Prejean is being stripped of her Miss California crown. K2 productions sites continuous contract violations as the reason Prejean is being fired. Executive direction of K2 productions Keith Lewis said:

"This was a business decision, based solely on contract violations."

"After our press conference in New York we had hoped we would be able to forge a better working relationship. However, since that time it has become abundantly clear that Carrie has no desire to fulfill her obligations under our contract and work together.”

According to Fox News it was Donald Trump himself who gave the ok to fire her. Trump said:

"I told Carrie she needed to get back to work and honor her contract with the Miss California Organization and I gave her the opportunity to do so. Unfortunately it just doesn’t look like it is going to happen and I offered Keith my full support in making this decision."

Miss California runner up, Tami Farrell will now take the Miss California crown. Fox is now reporting that Miss Prejean will now have time to write the book she’s wanted to write. A book I will never read.

MSNBC’s Contessa Brewer got in an argument with documentary film maker, John Ziegler about Sarah Palin. Ziegler, an avid Palin supporter resorted to repeatedly attacking MSNBC at one time calling them Barack Obama’s network, until Brewer ended the interview and asked for Ziegler’s mic to be cut. Watch the exchange here:

Gay Families, Not Families

Posted by Alex On 1:48 PM 0 comments

lava_water_slides2

A lesbian couple and their 3 children showed up to the Lava Hot Springs Swim Park located in Idaho looking to have a fun family day together, but they soon found out they were not welcome there. The couple and their children were denied the parks special family admission rate.

indoor_swimming_pool 

The executive director for the hot springs said:

“the state doesn't recognize gay or lesbian marriage and defines a family as one male, one female and children.”

In fact however the Idaho state code says nothing about what defines a family. You can contact the park here.

Update: A quick visit to the park’s website shows a link in the top left corner stating the “Family Pass Policy.”

Dear Obama: Your Halo is Slipping

Posted by mysie On 12:52 PM 1 comments
Commentary: Obama absent on gay rights

This morning CNN.com posted an article written by guest commentator William Jelani Cobb.
(CNN) -- Last week Gov. John Lynch signed a bill making New Hampshire the sixth state to legalize same-sex marriage.

It was a paradoxical moment. The new law is a reminder that same-sex marriage is the civil rights issue of our era and just how far the movement for marriage equality has come. It also highlighted the unexpected and remarkable silence from the White House on this issue.

I've noticed a marked increase in dissatisfaction with Obama coming from gay rights activists. So far, Mr. Cobb's commentary is the most eloquent, complete with parallels to John F. Kennedy Jr. that may surprise the average reader. It seems that neither Obama or JFK are/were the Saints they presented Americans with during their elections.

Obama, trying not to get into a "culture war", seems to be doing just the opposite by following in the footsteps of Bill Clinton, who charmed his way into the White House on a wave of miraculous promises that turned out to be empty. Now Barak Obama seems to be avoiding gay rights as he tries to keep to "middle ground" that will please the most Americans. Has he forgotten the overwhelming support he had that swept him into office? Plus, he's the first Democratic president to be backed by a Democratic Congress in... ages! Obama should be taking charge and unafraid, not cow-towing to the middle.

Even middle America was critical of the Bail Outs. Now Obama is risking pissing off the left by ignoring the recent gay marriage wins and losses, pussy-footing around his promise to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell", and refusing to use support of Roe v. Wade as a litmus test for choosing his Supreme Court nominees.

I will be the first in line to adjust Obama's saintly halo back into its rightful place, but only after he un-tarnishes the thing first.

Tiller Clinic Closer: Update

Posted by Alex On 11:44 PM 0 comments

Rachel Maddow Interviews the President of the National Women’s Health Foundation, Susan Hill, about the sad loss of Dr. George Tiller.

 

| | edit post

Tiller's Clinic Closing

Posted by Alex On 9:17 PM 0 comments

It is a sad day in the United States. After the murder of Doctor George Tiller, the late term abortionist, his clinic will be shut down. Anti-Abortion supporters will most likely see this as a bitter sweat victory. For years they focused on shutting Doctor Tiller down. There head campaigns focused predominantly on him.

Tiller’s murder acted like a grenade reigniting the abortion debate and thrusting it back into the main stream over night. President of the Centre for Reproductive Rights, Nancy Northup released the following statement:

"Part of what is a tragedy about this is that violence has achieved its objective."

The closure of the clinic now leaves the Kansas area without an abortion provider. I wonder now what the price is on other abortion providers heads? How many more abortion clinics will be targeted now that these domestic terrorist know there actions work? For that matter, what will be next? What will the women who need abortions do now?

Even now, Tiller’s alleged killer is defending his kill and showing no remorse. To the right wing, if you support this type of terrorism, what’s next? Before you know, it could be you whose head is on the chopping block!

O’Reilly Hits Back @ CNN

Posted by Alex On 7:17 PM 0 comments

Via Huffington Post

Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly hit back at CNN, saying yes he was wrong, the station did cover the Military Recruiter shootings, but not enough. Watch O’Reilly try to sell us shit:

(CNN Conversation starts at about 2:35)




Fred Phelps Dance Mix

Posted by Alex On 6:51 PM 0 comments
Take the Phelps...


Apes Giggle Like Humans-Update

Posted by Alex On 5:03 PM 0 comments


Via The Stranger Slog

ESPN on June 14th will be airing a program telling the story of two wrestlers who made a porn movie of themselves masturbating for a site the is mostly for gay men. The men simply say they did nothing wrong.










The funny thing is, I mentioned to my Dad just yesterday how homo-erotic wrestling really was. Besides that first guy is really hot and reminds me of a guy I went to school with.

Homosexuality-Male Figure Abuse

Posted by Alex On 3:11 PM 0 comments

Parents writes in to ask Pat Robertson about what they should do with their homosexual son, and of course Pat Robertson must state he without certain knows homosexuals are not born that way. He knows A "Coach" Or "Guidance Counselor" Or "Other Male Figure" "Made" Many Homosexual.

Pat Robertson knows nothing about being gay and he can go fuck himself!

Maddow- A fierce Advocate?

Posted by Alex On 2:20 PM 0 comments

Rachel Maddow Takes On Obama Over Gay Rights Lack Of Progress:

| | edit post

Sex With Ducks Interview

Posted by Alex On 12:47 PM 0 comments

CNN talks to the creators of the Sex With Ducks Video:

…and here is the original:


Cheney's Permafrost Heart Melting?

Posted by Jaime Ravenet On 12:08 AM 1 comments
Further Evidence of Global Warming?



So apparently former VP-in-perpetual-hiding Dick Cheney had a meds vacation last week, because a heretofore unknown substance (truth?) seemed to spill from his lips almost by accident. He acknowledged that 1) he supports gay marriage, and 2) Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11. Leaving, for the purposes of decorum, the 9/11 one aside, the quotes were:

"I think, you know, freedom means freedom for everyone," Cheney said in a speech at the National Press Club. "I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish, any kind of arrangement they wish."

and then:

"And I think that's the way it ought to be handled today, that is, on a state-by-state basis. Different states will make different decisions. But I don't have any problem with that. I think people ought to get a shot at that,"

Well done, Dick! Err, sort of. You see, there's something strange going on here, and I can't quite wrap my head around it. It starts at "freedom means freedom for everyone," which is, in classic Bush administration style, grandiose-cum-propaganda. He probably means something akin to the idea that "freedom" (pardon the glittering generality) is something applied equally by the law to all citizens (Cheney has never really offered any evidence to suggest he thinks that human rights extend beyond American citizens, but it's a fair enough starting point). But he follows this with a stereotypical conservative call for the rights of states to recognize such a freedom.

And therein is the problem: if freedom means freedom for everyone, then how the hell can this be parsed in terms of state's rights? Maybe he is suggesting that the Constitution of the United States is insufficient to enforce this freedom. If that's so, then it would be reasonable to assume that Cheney is actually stating his own opinion about how the law *should* be, but noting dutifully that his will must defer to the Constitutionally guaranteed right of states to be self-governing. But...if that's the case, then he is relying on the supremacy of the Constitution, and now we've gone right round like a record!

Another possibility is that "freedom for everyone" includes freedom for those who don't support "freedom" to marry, divided up by the states. But if that's what he means, the "freedom for everyone" has dissipated from something everyone has a right to, to something some people in some places have, but others don't, and that's just fine by Dick. Squirrely, no? What we have here is an uncharacteristic moral relativism on the part of a characteristically morally unambiguous politician. Remember, this is a man who helped carved the world into the "no grey areas" stark contrast of "those who stand with us" and "those who oppose us." The problem here is that this reasoning easily go to support the kind of moral relativism abhorred by his beloved Partei, and was weaponized and perveted and lobbed like clumps of mud to attack those who didn't agree with their preemptive war strategy as some kind of support of the Taliban and al Qaeda.

In the end, there is no good way to justify this position. Either this "freedom" is a right of all (citizens, in this case), or it isn't. If it is, then there is no state's rights issue in the question of gay marriage rights. If it is not, then what Cheney said was meaningless baiting by the neo-cons to shore up support among the younger citizens of the country, who overwhelmingly favor acknowledging the legal right of gay couples to marry. So, dear reader, don't get your hopes up that the mean ol' Cheney grew a heart and brought presents to Whoville. Thanks but no thanks, Dick. Here's some advice: do us all a favor and say what you mean. At least Rush is honest. And while you're at it licking your wounds, make sure to get out of the way, because either or, you know your party is on the losing end of this fight.

(P.S. Yes, this does make him "The Dick Who Stole Marriage")

1st Gay Pride

Posted by Alex On 11:42 PM 0 comments

I am not totally sure if I will be going this year, but this summer could be my first gay pride ever. Like many of you already know, I live in small town Canada, which unfortunately means little gay pride, well none really. Of course, I am proud of who I am, but there is something liberating about attending a gay pride event. Unfortunately, the drive time to the nearest city means I would only be able to attend the pride parade, not the entire week of events I would like to. Either way, if I get to go this year, I hope to have one of the best times of my life so far. The Pride Festival in Saint John is still pretty small, but the fact that there is even a festival in New Brunswick, Canada amazes me. I think a nice pride event would be the charge I need for my run down batteries. The parade isn’t until near the end of August, but I think it’s a go, so unless something comes up, I’ll be there and I’ll take lots of pictures so you can come with me. 

Not Just "Passing" Anymore

Posted by mysie On 4:17 AM 2 comments
Hello fellow free thinkers, I'm Mysie. Alex sent out the call for gay atheists to help contribute to the site, and he seems to have rounded up quite an eclectic mix of folks. I have a feeling we're not all going to see eye-to-eye on everything, so I think it's going to be an interesting time as we each open ourselves up to our audience, as well as each other. So to my fellow contributors I say well met, and to our audience I send my hope that this is going to be as exciting for you as it will be for us.

As for myself... I currently live with a very special set of circumstances that allow me to "pass" for normal in many ways that I feel I'm truly not. I'm an atheist, bisexual, identify as a mixed-race Hawaiian/Caucasion American, have communist and socialist leanings, support legalizing drugs, and I'm clinically depressed with various other un-fabulous ailments. Thing is, I look "normal", boring, "mousey", and caucasian. When was the last time you were in line at the market behind a white 30-something clad all in Old Navy and you had the burning suspicion she was an atheist? Questioned her sexuality? Wondered about her drug use or mental health? Did I mention that I live just outside of Seattle? And now that Prop 8 passed in California and our Right-to-Die law is in place, Washington is the crazy-liberal state. So people here are less inclined to wonder if someone is "different", or care if they find out that you are.

This all makes me feel a little guilty because all of these "differences" are very important to me and yet I usually let people hold onto their preconceptions about me. I still crave social acceptance more than I wish I did. Take all of this together, and I've developed very definite opinions about almost everything and I'll talk to anyone who asks about it. But I don't usually go out of my way to shout it from the roof tops. Usually.

I'm hoping that blogging here will help me change that.

In closing, I'd like to ask: how many of you consider yourselves "true" atheists? I'm not going to throw out a definition and see if you meet my qualifications. I want to know how you define yourself, deep down inside. And while we're at it, how close are you to identifying publicly the same way you feel in your heart of hearts? I'm really curious, since I've only met two people who call themselves atheists without adding some sort of provision at the end of their declaration. As for me, I self-define as "atheist, but..." Maybe I'll write about this topic more in my next post. Until then, thanks for stopping by and reading what I have to say.

Forced Lifestyles?

Posted by Sarah On 10:06 PM 4 comments
Whenever the topic of homosexual marriage, or more specifically, homosexuality in general, comes up, I often hear the argument, "Hey, I don't care if they're gay, I just don't want it shoved in my face" or "I just don't want it forced on me." Um...excuse me, but when has homosexuality been "shoved" or "forced" on you? Last I checked, homosexuals were just asking for equal rights. Not special rights, equal rights. I feel that point needs to be reiterated because often people say call same sex marriage a "special" right, which it most certainly is not. Marriage is a right that everyone deserves, not a privilege that only certain people should be able to enjoy. Regardless...how often is gayness forced upon people? In fact, the only thing I've ever had forced on me is religion.

How many times have you walked down the street, only to be accosted by someone holding up a protest sign about pornography, an abortion clinic, Harry Potter, etc.? Or how often have you been sitting in the comfort of your own home, only to have a "missionary" come to your door (it used to only be Jehovah's Witnesses, but it appears that Mormons have moved into my area)? How many times have you been told to, "REPENT!" or to accept Jesus as your personal lord and savior? And how often have you heard Christians bemoaning the loss of their rights, since we don't want to have their god forced in secular schools?

It seems to me like religion is the only thing being forced around here. Which is funny, since religious beliefs and activities (or lack thereof) are a choice...when the sex you're attracted to isn't.

BabySafe Ball

Posted by Alex On 5:09 PM 0 comments

For a healthy laugh on this Sunday, here is a parody from the Onion News Network. It’s the BabySafe ball, for those times when you just need to shake your baby:

Gay Pride

Posted by Alex On 11:28 AM 0 comments

hfhhfhdhf 

I’m posting this on behalf of Quest Blogger: Jamie Ravenet, Washington DC  

***

Gay pride and gay marriage (and equal rights for gay people in general) are so closely related it's actually hard to tease them apart. I'll prove it to you. 
Why do gay people want to get married? Maybe they don't! Not all of us anyway. But the majority of us want the RIGHT to get married at least. And the right to have equal treatment for our families. What we are seeking when we say "equal rights" is equal treatment from the institution of the government. 
So why are we looking for that? The only answer can be that, at the very minimum, we don't feel that we have it already, and there is no good reason for this difference of treatment. Whether or not this is true is another debate (though I'm definitely in the camp that says we are not treated equally). 
Do you think the American government's policies toward gay people and straight people are equal? I'm gonna guess you don't, because you pointed out specifics about differences between the way straight couples and gay couples are treated at the legal level. Also, you went out of your way to go to another country, one which does not have discrimination at the institutional level like ours does, in order to demonstrate to your partner "that you are committed and dedicated to being him for the rest of your lives". Do you feel that you ought to have the right to have your own country acknowledge that? 
Gay pride is the every-day personal response to the shame that other would cast upon us. Gay marriage is the political outcome (which is only one kind of outcome among many) of gay pride. This doesn't make gay marriage a shallow political issue (and indeed, no one should be getting married just to prove a point!) This is how the personal becomes political. When your personal life is discounted, shunned, or otherwise slighted by the prevailing school of thought, acknowledging that a) the prevailing school of thought can be flat out wrong, and b) you have the same rights as heterosexual people to seek, maintain, and have recognized by your friends, family, and the government, that exact life, turns the personal political. Or, being gay ISN'T bad, it's just different, and that difference should be tolerated and possibly even celebrated! Do you think being gay makes you a bad person?
Are you out to your family? If you are, you must have felt the pressure of telling the truth about yourself to them. What drove that? Wasn't there even the slightest sense of wanting them to know that you want to be treated like anyone else would be?
Furthermore, gay pride isn't parades. and it isn't "lesbians shaking naked titties on floats while gay guys slather themselves up with lube...". Gay Pride isn't a weekend in June! It's what happened to allow us to HAVE the parade. It's fighting the power that tells us that we ARE bad people because we fall in love with others of the same gender. It is telling ourselves and others the truth about something that has been dramatically maligned to prove that gay people are everywhere and are being discriminated against. It's saying "hey, whatever these people do, I don't care because they are consenting adults, and it has nothing to do with me!" AND it is celebrating the fact that they have the RIGHT to do that. Which they do. Don't you agree? 
Also, what exactly is so scary about being associated with the people that fete themselves in the parades? 
It sounds to me like you have a little internalized homophobia going on yourself. Do straight people worry that they will be perceived differently because of Mardi Gras or strip bars? What about that show "The Girls Next Door?" I don't think so, or at least not in a larger picture way. The difference is that heterosexual people assume this is their right. Gay people have to learn it on their own.

The Listener is Hot!

Posted by Alex On 11:01 PM 0 comments

45540930

I caught the last half of a new show airing on Space Network here in Canada, called The Listener. I know it's been around for a while in the States, but when I saw the cute guy who plays the main character Toby, I had to blog about him. The actor’s name is Craig Olejnik and he has amazing eyes. I think I’m in love!

           tv_craig___                   craigolejnik

Anyway if I can concentrate long enough not to look at his pictures, the show is about a man who can read peoples thoughts. The man’s name is Toby Logan, a twenty something paramedic. Toby has been able to read minds since he was a child, but was usually able to block it out until he bumped into a man on the street and picked up his thoughts. The man had kidnapped a women who was missing. This is when Toby realises he can no longer waste his ability and that is where the show starts. I cannot stop staring at his eyes! Here is a show Promo:

I think the original airs on NBC in the US. I can’t publish this post without posting one last picture of my new biggest crush (except maybe for David Beckham), Craig Olejnik.

craig olejnik 2 2006

| | edit post

Home-Trailer

Posted by Alex On 4:50 PM 0 comments
This Morning I was planning to see Terminator Salvation, but choose instead to turn to Youtube and watch a free video being streamed from the site in High Definition. The film is called "Home." This is the description the producers provide:

"We are living in exceptional times. Scientists tell us that we have 10 years to change the way we live, avert the depletion of natural resources and the catastrophic evolution of the Earth's climate.

The stakes are high for us and our children. Everyone should take part in the effort, and HOME has been conceived to take a message of mobilization out to every human being.

For this purpose, HOME needs to be free. A patron, the PPR Group, made this possible. EuropaCorp, the distributor, also pledged not to make any profit because Home is a non-profit film.

HOME has been made for you : share it! And act for the planet."

I thought the film was extremely well made and recommend it to everyone. The film consists of many HD shots from every corner of the globe and spectacular stories come along with it.  



A little about me

Posted by Patrick On 4:18 PM 1 comments
I'm not convinced I'm atheist - unless suffering from struggles with organized religion vs spirituality is symptomatic of atheism.  I'm convinced that I am gay, in fact I've been know to openly admit it. 

That said, I am not without experience when it comes to organized religion.  I was born and raised Catholic, stumbling through a few sacraments along the way.   It was the catechism courses accompanying Confirmation that sent me questioning how Catholicism would enhance and enrich my life.   When my religion imposed on me what to believe in and what to oppose, my faith fizzled - homosexuality and abortion were issues I would never oppose.

I had not even come out of the closet by this point and I'm not physically able to have an abortion, but I was aware that belonging to any group willing to deprive me of the ability to form my own opinions and make my own decisions was simply not something that would ever support me or be supported by me. 

Much to my parent's dismay I stopped going to church at eighteen.  I am fortunate to have parents willing to let me choose my religion.  Looking back on it, choosing no religion was never an option.  I think my mom really wanted me to believe in something.   

So, as far as where I am today with the whole thing:
  • I'm convinced that the Bible is a literary work - which means "not to be taken literally"
  • I'm convinced that "Religions" exist - there are more than enough churches
  • I'm convinced that "Spirituality" is far more important
  • I'll make my own choice about Religion vs Spirituality vs Atheism all in due time
  • I'll never stop questioning everything
As for the whole gay thing, well I do my part to be the best gay I can be.  I speak up.  I stand up. I write it all down. 

Where Does Anti-Atheist Bias Come?

Posted by Sarah On 3:00 PM 1 comments
At least in America, most homosexuals and atheists have encountered some sort of bias or opposition from fundamentalists. Gays are usually slandered as child molesters (despite the fact that the vast majority of child molesters are heterosexual [Source: http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/HTML/facts_molestation.html]) and overly promiscuous, and atheists are usually portrayed as “fag-loving baby killers.” Now, granted, most atheists are usually okay with homosexuality, as they don’t have an archaic book telling them to hate someone based on who they sleep with, so that offense-sounding charge is usually accurate. As for the “baby killer” accusation, not all atheists are pro-choice. I know atheists who value all forms of life, and they oppose what they see as murder on all levels. This, of course, includes war, the death penalty, and abortion. That I can understand, it’s the acceptance of war and capital punishment while decrying abortion that befuddles me.

However, I digress. Why is there such a strong bias against gays and atheists? Let’s go back a few years to when I was attending Catholic school. I remember seeing a few Gay Pride parades on TV, and of course, rather than showing the entire parade, the highlights only include the men in spandex or assless leather chaps. My father reaffirmed this view of mine that gay people are all flamboyant and pushy about their “lifestyle choice” (his words, not mine). Now that I’m an adult, I’ve actually attended gay rallies, and there were no assless chaps present. Why, I’ve even befriended gay people, and not once have I seen them in spandex underwear. Who knew that gays would actually wear normal clothes, just like…*gasp* heterosexuals!? Clearly, the “all gays are flamboyant and wear assless chaps” argument is a weak one portrayed by a few images.

Now, again at Catholic school, I had some pretty mixed up views of atheists. What I’m going to say may sound like a joke, and you can laugh because it is funny, but I am in no way exaggerating. When I was younger, I fought my parents so they would send me to a Catholic high school. We couldn’t afford it, so to public school I went. I was absolutely terrified, because I was taught that if I brought a Bible into a public school, I would be ridiculed and beaten up by my peers, then expelled from the school (like I said, this is no exaggeration, I honestly believed this). If only I had known that 70% of this country is Christian, even people who attend public schools. Or, if only I had known that atheists are not terrible people. Since I was Catholic, I was very pro-life. I once asked someone older, wiser, and more knowledgeable in the ways of Catholicism than myself, “How can people be pro-choice? Don’t they realize it’s a baby?” The reply I received from this supposedly older and wiser person was… “They like killing babies because they don’t have God to guide their lives.” What?! I wish at the time I had known to be appalled at that answer, but unfortunately I was utterly convinced that no God meant no morals. Unfortunately, that wasn’t the only lie I received during my religious studies.

This anti-atheist bias followed me until I saw a note that someone I very much respected and admired posted a note about atheism online. I didn’t realize he was an atheist, or as he liked to say, a secular humanist (I had never heard the term “humanist” before, either). I wish I could find the note for reference, because it was quite poignant. In any case, it said something to the affect of, “Why are atheists bad? Is it because they don’t want one way of life forced on everyone?” except it was much more elegant than that. I remember it making the point about not having the government force prayer or Christmas on people, as—get this—not everyone is Christian. I believe it also said something about caring about people for the sake that they are human, too…not because they fear punishment from some supposedly omniscient being. The note (which I will try to find) really shook my beliefs to their core. Atheists…love people? Not because someone tells them to, but for no reason other than the fact that they’re sentient beings? Woah, man…woah. That was literally a defining moment in my life.

I have no evidence to support this assertion other than my own experience, but I feel the anti-atheist bias is propagated by religious leaders. If people knew they could lead a moral and fulfilling life without God, how many would leave their church? If the church keeps portraying “the enemy” (atheists, or anyone who disagrees with their belief) as terrible, moral-less people, they’ll secure their target population forever.

As atheists, we do need to stand up and prove that atheists are not the scum of the earth, and that one can lead a meaningful life without worrying about post-life judgment. We also need to fight all stereotypes, including those against Christians. Just because we’ve been stereotyped doesn’t make it right for us to do to others. I’ve now met many Christians who realize that atheists are decent people and who are not opposed to homosexuality. No matter whom they’re about, generalizations and biases should be ended.

I'm new at this; don't judge me.

Posted by Sarah On 11:46 PM 2 comments
Hi everyone. My name's Sarah, and I'm new at this, so don't hate me if I suck. I wish I had something witty or pithy to intro myself with, but I really don't. In fact, I'm kind of boring (actually, that's a lie, but if I tell you I'm exciting, you'll set higher standards for me. I don't mind low standards, that way I always reach them).

Well, I'll tell you a little bit about myself, as I've recently become the 1st girl in this "all boys club" (oh geez, now I sound like Sarah Palin...just wait until I start talking about her!). Anyway, I'm a 20 year old girl from Milwaukee, WI, I go to school in Pella, IA (yes, that's where they make the windows; no, I cannot get you a discount on said windows), and soon I'll be studying abroad in Johannesburg, South Africa for 5 months. It's for the International Human Rights Exchange, so I'm pretty excited about that. Hopefully I'll have time to contribute while I'm there.

Now, what qualifies me to write for the "Gay Atheist?" I'm a bisexual (or as I like to say, half gay) atheist. I was raised in a very religious neighborhood and attended Catholic school for 10 straight years, and attended non-denominational Bible studies every week for several years, so I'm pretty well-versed in the ways of Christianity and the Bible...which is probably why I'm an atheist. I feel the more that you know about the Bible, the less you believe it.

This is probably the point at which I should let you know that if you don't agree with me, you'll probably be offended by what I say. To that, I say: go cry about it. No, honestly. If you're going to get your panties in a bunch over something someone wrote on the internet, then you shouldn't be on the internet. I'll listen to you if you disagree with me (you can always leave comments or email me at Sarah@thegayatheist.com), and we can discuss/debate, but I'll probably still find you wrong. Just giving you warning ahead of time.

I was tempted to create this account under a pseudonym, as my family and many of the people around me don't really know that I'm an atheist or half gay (even though both are listed on my Facebook, and everyone knows Facebook = the real world). Some of my family would be okay with the atheism, shocked at the gayness, some of them would be okay with the gayness, and horrified by the atheism...I'm fairly certain none of them would be happy with me, though. Granted, I've always been the black sheep of my family, but due to the fact that I still live in my parents' house during school breaks, I'm trying my best not to completely ostracize myself from them, lest I be kicked out on my own, which I surely cannot afford at this juncture in my life.

It's very disappointing that I cannot come out to my family about either thing, as I consider those both to be very important aspects of my life, though not the only ones. Part of the reason why I don't want to come out to non-family is because I think to tell people that I'm bisexual would make me lose some of my credibility, so to say. Now clearly I'm not saying that gays or atheists are not credible people, but the stereotype out there is that gay people are all flamboyant parade marchers and atheists are evil baby killers. Granted, we all know that's not true, but stereotypes are very harmful. I guess I should stand up and claim both of these aspects of my life, as I am proud of them, and I can help to extinguish those stereotypes, at least in people I know. But, I have to admit, I'm very afraid.

What about you? Are you "out" about everything in your life? Have any advice for someone who's new at this?

Hope this wasn't terrible. Thanks for reading! :)

Rick Sanchez Rips Bill O'Reilly

Posted by Alex On 10:29 PM 2 comments
Not long ago, Fox's Bill O'Reilly commented about the Army Recruiter killing saying CNN gave it almost no coverage. Well today CNN's Rick Sanchez ripped on Bill O'Reilly and proved him to be a liar, that CNN did cover the story and they covered it a lot:


Kassem G on The Gays

Posted by Alex On 6:14 PM 0 comments
Comedian Kassem G talks to the Straights and the Gay on the streets of California:  


The Gay Atheist Contributors

Posted by Alex On 4:38 PM 0 comments
PICT0146

Name: Alex Cheney

Blog Founder-Contributor

Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Contact: alex@thegayatheist.com

 

1221081302

Name: Patrick Hurley

Contributor

Location: Longmont, Co

Contact: patrick@thegayatheist.com

 

Sarah Moglia

Name: Sarah Moglia

Contributor

Location:  Milwaukee, WI - Pella, IA - Johannesburg, South Africa

Contact: sarah@thegayatheist.com

 

Obama_mysie3

Name: Mysie Cairns

Contributor

Location: Seattle, WA

Contact: mysie@thegayatheist.com

amarilee

Name: Marilee Cornelius

Contributor

Location: Phoenix, AZ

Contact: marilee@thegayatheist.com

hfhhfhdhf

Name: Jaime Ravenet

Contributor

Location: Washington, DC

Contact: jaime@thegayatheist.com

n506963151_353463_9443

Name: Erik Michael Donner

Contributor

Location: Princeton, IL

Contact: erik@thegayatheist.com

 

For any blog related questions, please direct your messages to alex@thegayatheist.com.

Contributors Wanted

Posted by Alex On 3:29 PM 2 comments

Over the next few days I will be adding a few new contributors to "The Gay Atheist." This should provide you, the readers, with a better view point. I will also continue to keep posting on a regular basis. Every new contributor will be given an info page and an e-mail address where you can contact them.

I'm still looking for more contributors: So if your gay or and atheist contact me: alex@thegayatheist.com

Home Project

Posted by Alex On 1:04 AM 0 comments

This evening I was video searching on Youtube when I noticed a little globe in the left corner next to the Youtube logo, so I clicked on it. It brought me to a page called "Home Project." When I click the about me button, it says:

"HOME is an ode to the planet's beauty and its delicate harmony. Through the landscapes of 54 countries captured from above, Yann Arthus-Bertrand takes us on an unique journey all around the planet, to contemplate it and to understand it. But HOME is more than a documentary with a message, it is a magnificent movie in its own right. Every breathtaking shot shows the Earth - our Earth - as we have never seen it before. Every image shows the Earth's treasures we are destroying and all the wonders we can still preserve. "From the sky, there's less need for explanations". Our vision becomes more immediate, intuitive and emotional. HOME has an impact on anyone who sees it. It awakens in us the awareness that is needed to change the way we see the world. (HOME embraces the major ecological issues that confront us and shows how everything on our planet is interconnected.)"

So apparently the film "Home" is being offered free on Youtube in HD. It looks really good. So I plan on watching it soon, possible tomorrow and if so I will publish a review. Until then you can watch it HERE .

Is Jesse Metcalfe Hot? [YES]

Posted by Alex On 12:04 AM 4 comments



In the past few months I have lost the sex appeal I once had for Jesse Metcalfe. But he can still get my blood pumping:




Like I said, he was once so much more attractive. So here is a video mash up of some of the hot pics:





Now the pictures at the top, of him are the hottest. I remember a few years back when watching a episode of Desperate Housewives was on and there was a make out scene staring Jesse, I knew for sure, no doubt...I was gay. In the first picture, I just want to spend a night with him!

| | edit post

Don't Tell Me Who To Love!

Posted by Alex On 9:55 PM 0 comments


Apes Giggle Like Humans

Posted by Alex On 9:50 PM 1 comments
A new Study shows then when Apes are tickled they giggle like we do:


Project Pushback Contest

Posted by Alex On 4:49 PM 0 comments
A new contest is underway called Project Pushback. The contest invites contestants to make marriage equality videos and submit them. Here are a few of my favourite entries:

What If? from Project Pushback on Vimeo.



A Wish from Project Pushback on Vimeo.


NH-SSM Bill Results

Posted by Alex On 4:06 PM 0 comments
Update: Governor Lynch has signed the Same Sex marriage bill into law, now making New Hampshire the sixth state to allow gay marriage. Great Job New Hampshire!


The results are in from New Hampshire's House Vote on allowing same-sex marriage. They voted to allow same sex marriage, 198-176. The Bill still has to be signed by Governor Lynch, but he has already said he would support the revised bill. 

NH SSM Bill House Hearing-LIVE

Posted by Alex On 3:12 PM 0 comments

Via: @stop8dotorg ...

The New Hampshire House is debating the Same Sex Marriage Bill Right now. You can watch the live stream: HERE

Bo Bites Mic

Posted by Alex On 12:32 PM 0 comments
The First Families Dog, Bo, bit onto a reporters microphone. It really reminds me of my dog playing with his toys. 


NH Senate Passes SSM Bill

Posted by Alex On 12:20 PM 0 comments

The New Hampshire Senate passed the gay marriage bill today, 14-10. The new bill has the included wording of religious freedom. It now goes to the house where a vote is expected today. 

Tonight I will be watching ABC's Earth 2100, a graphic novel of what the world could be like in the year 2100. It comes from the point of view of a baby girl who is born tonight, and who in 91 years tells her story. The 2 hour television special shows tonight on ABC. Check your local listings. Here is the trailer: 

Earth 2100: The End of Civilization?

March On Washington Not Possible

Posted by Alex On 11:36 PM 4 comments

Via Joe My God ...

The planned National LGBT March on Washington schedualed to take place on the weekend of October 10-12 most likely will not be possible. This is because the National Mall, the area where the march would have had to happen, is already booked for 3 different events which are expected to bring in over 135,000 people. The national parks service said the area would not be available at that date. Organizations generally need a years advance notice to book the Mall. So it appears the March organizers will not be able to get a permit. 

Olbermann Blames Fox News

Posted by Alex On 10:54 PM 0 comments
MSNBC's Keith Olbermann called out Bill O'Reilly and Fox News for the death of Dr. George Tiller, the late term abortionist. O'Reilly often called the Doctor, "Tiller the Baby Killer." The suspect in Tiller's death allegedly posted a comment on an anti-abortion website where he used words that O'Reilly had used on his show. Keith Olbermann explained how Fox News is unwilling to take responsibility for the impact they have. He called not for a regular boycott of Fox News, but that if a person is in a store or business that has Fox News on, that that person ask the owner to turn the channel, or insist you will leave.


Weight Loss VLOG 2

Posted by Alex On 8:09 PM 0 comments
Start Weight: 275 lbs
Current Weight: 253 lbs
Goal Weight: 160 lbs



Poker Face - Parody (Outer Space)

Posted by Alex On 5:14 PM 0 comments
It's not the best video I've seen Venetian Princess make, in my opinion her video quality is kinda going down, but here is a funny parody of Lady Gaga's Poker Face called "Outer Space".


Dick Cheney Supports SSM, Sorta

Posted by Alex On 5:03 PM 2 comments
Dick Cheney was asked his opinion on Same Sex Marriage. He said he had no problem with it, but believed it should be left up to the states. 


Rep. Mayor Now Supports SSM

Posted by Alex On 3:53 PM 0 comments
Republican Mayor, Jerry Sanders, of San Diego explains how he used to believe in only Civil Unions, thinking they were equal to marriage. The mayor explains he changed his mind after getting to know LGBT people in his community, office and when his own daughter came out to him. He know realises Civil Unions are not equal. 


CNN: Still Married in California

Posted by Alex On 3:30 PM 0 comments
CNN interviews Juan Rivera and Eric Manriquez, an openly gay couple who married in Calif., on their marriages remaining valid in the state, as well as Milk screenwriter Dustin Lance Black, who discusses Prop. 8 and challenges facing LGBT youth.


Boyle Admitted To Mental Clinic

Posted by Alex On 12:09 AM 0 comments