Sotomayor Quits Belizean Grove

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Sotomayor Quits Belizean Grove stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MARK SHERMAN | June 19, 2009 09:40 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor meets with Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, June 17, 2009. (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg)

WASHINGTON — Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor resigned Friday from an elite all-women's club after Republicans questioned her participation in it. Sotomayor said she resigned from the Belizean Grove to prevent the issue from becoming a distraction in her confirmation hearings.

In a letter to Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the federal appeals court judge said she is convinced that the club does not practice "invidious discrimination" and that her membership in it did not violate judicial ethics.

But she said she didn't want questions about it to "distract anyone from my qualifications and record."

Federal judges are bound by a code that says they shouldn't join any organization that discriminates by race, sex, religion or nationality.

The Belizean Grove bills itself as women's answer to the 130-year-old all-male Bohemian Club in California. The club owns a 2,500-acre camping area in northern California called the Grove. Chief Justice Earl Warren belonged to the Bohemian Club beginning in the 1940s, before he joined the court and long before the federal judiciary adopted a code of conduct.

"The Belizean Grove is a constellation of influential women who are key decision makers in the profit, non-profit and social sectors; who build long term mutually beneficial relationships in order to both take charge of their own destinies and help others to do the same," the group says on its Web site. There are about 115 members, the club says.

Earlier in the week, Sotomayor defended her participation in the group, telling senators that it involves men in some of its events and that she was unaware of any man who had tried to become a member.

Sotomayor's backers noted that the court's only current woman, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, belongs to the membership-only International Women's Forum. So did former Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who defended her involvement in all-women groups during her Senate confirmation hearings in 1981.

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy faced similar questions over his longtime membership in the all-male Olympic Club in San Francisco. Kennedy resigned his membership in October 1987, as he was under consideration for the high court.

Sotomayor also told the senators that the search of documents from her time as a director of a Puerto Rican advocacy group is complete.

Republicans had complained that Sotomayor initially omitted from the records she sent the Senate Judiciary Committee a report she signed urging the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund (now known as LatinoJustice PRLDEF) to oppose reinstitution of the death penalty in New York in the early 1980s.

The report, which has since been provided, said, "Capital punishment is associated with evident racism in our society." It noted that African-Americans at the time made up 47 percent of death row inmates, but only 11 percent of the U.S. population.

WASHINGTON — Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor resigned Friday from an elite all-women's club after Republicans questioned her participation in it. Sotomayor said she resigned from the Beliz...
WASHINGTON — Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor resigned Friday from an elite all-women's club after Republicans questioned her participation in it. Sotomayor said she resigned from the Beliz...
Filed by Nick Sabloff
 
Comments
511
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo
Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (16 pages total)

Oh I see, a women's club is not allowed? So... the uglicans are gonna make her P standing up?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:18 AM on 06/22/2009
photo

On Thursday Limbaugh mentions her membership in the women's club.

On Friday she resigns her membership.

Anyone think Democrats don't listen to Limbaugh?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 AM on 06/22/2009
photo

Both Bushes are members of the Bohemian Grove club...go figure.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:31 AM on 06/22/2009
photo

Right....

And everyone on the left thinks this is bad for the country to have top people involved in organizations such as this, right?

So....let's walk the walk.

Don't defend her belonging to a group like this....ATTACK them for belonging to groups like this.

Then, we can TRY to get rid of them...

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:58 AM on 06/22/2009

I do not like Sotomayor. The more I hear about her, the less I like her. Obama should find another nominee. I am disappointed with his current choice.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 AM on 06/22/2009

Being "asked questions" about something does not mean "forced to quit" or "under attack".

Maybe all justices should just be confirmed without any questions at all. Just skip right to the voting.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 06/21/2009

Typical Republican hypocrisy. Everyone should do some research on the Bohemian Grove, especially the interesting article in Vanity Fair a couple months ago. For these same hypocrites to make an issue of Sotomayor's involvement in an exclusive club is just breathtaking. Since "all's fair in love and war" we should shine some very bright lights on the Bohemian Grove club. If Sotomayor has to relinquish her membership, so should a bunch of high level elected and appointed Republicans.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 06/21/2009
photo

If Sotomayor has to relinquish her membership, so should a bunch of high level elected and appointed Republicans.

EXACTLY.

Don't say this is bad, so....we get to do it TOO.

Say...

This is bad. No one should do it.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 AM on 06/22/2009
photo

I think it's a damn shame that she felt it necessary to resign from this club. I don't think I've ever heard of any male candidate for SCOTUS that was forced to resign his membership in any of the "old boys" clubs they belonged to. The Repugs are treating this highly qualified woman as though she were a paroled convict. It's contemptible!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:33 PM on 06/21/2009
photo

Same treatment Bush's noms. got. Why doesn't anyone have a problem with the fact that she is a devout Catholic and very likely pro-life. I thought the Dems were anti Christian and anti pro-life when it comes to the Super court. They sure made it an issue with Bush's noms. They made it THE issue.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 06/21/2009
photo

Wow, I just watched Booknotes on CSpan Booktv yesterday a rerun of a 2001 interveiw with Jon Johnson who wrote a book about this very subject called:"Them Adventures with Extremist." He was talking about this Bohemian Grove and how all white men belong to it, powerful white men, who meet for 3 weeks have have strange ceremonies like a fraternity.

They were called extremist because it is all powerful white men who basically are or were in all the positions of power exclusive club, including Cheney, Kissinger, Bush et al.. Do they have to quit too?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 PM on 06/21/2009
photo

Correction: The author is Jon Ronson, "Them: Adventures with Extremist," that talks about Bohemian Grove and other such exclusive organizations.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 06/21/2009
photo

Nobody made her quit. If anybody did it was probrobly the club so as to keep all the media dogs from exposing what goes on inside. VERY , very private. One thing it shows though, she has no problem smoozing with the other elitists.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 PM on 06/21/2009
photo

Unbelievable. So, are we going to demand that every senator resign from, oh, let's see, the Freemasons, Skull & Bones, Knights of Columbus, and the plethora of other groups out there that these MEN belong to that don't allow women? No? Gee, what a shocker -- and what a double standard. It makes my head want to explode when I see how petty our politics have become.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 AM on 06/21/2009
photo

Amen!

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:16 AM on 06/22/2009

To the best of my knowledge, there's no code prohibiting senators from belonging to such clubs, whereas, as the article says, "Federal judges are bound by a code that says they shouldn't join any organization that discriminates by race, sex, religion or nationality."

The question is, just how binding is the code?

Ginsberg and O'Connor both belonged to the same all-female organization during the their time on the court, and as the article tells us, O'Connor defended her membership in women's groups during her hearings and was confirmed nonetheless. On the other hand, Kennedy felt compelled to resign his membership to an all-male club when he was under consideration for the high court.

If there's a double standard at work in the court's code, it seems to favor women--I'm not sure if Kennedy could have survived his hearings if he defiantly defended his right to belong to a men's club the way O'Connor defended her membership in women's groups.

Generally, I think the Justices of either sex should be barred by law, not "code," from belonging to any group dedicated to furthering the cause of any special interest, no matter how worthy we might think that cause to be.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 AM on 06/22/2009

And this is the republicans' new big issue with her?! I guess they moved on from the one sentence she said at a law school about people subconsciously factoring things into their decisions based upon their experiences. Shoot me a break.

The republicans should just save everyone - and I mean everyone - time and trouble. After having their backroom meeting to develop the day's talking points, instead of then distributing the script to the republicans in congress and Fox to re[eat ad nauseam, they should just have one announcement on Fox each day and read the script. The show could be called something like the "What is Wrong About Everything the Dems Did Today." And they could end it each day with the statement "We have a better plan for all Americans that supports our troops, embryos and real Americans, but we can't disclose the details yet."

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 AM on 06/21/2009

Let the inquiries begin, gentlemen. All of you Sotomayor deniers need to fess up and list all of the organizations you have ever belonged to, including the strange "cults" that Bush, etc. belonged to in college. All of the organizations, OK? Including any country clubs or old boys clubs that were "shy" about inviting minorities, etc. etc. You know what I mean? Tit for tat.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 AM on 06/21/2009
photo

Lame. Just like Letterman apologizing.

Why do those who do nothing wrong apologize and why do those who should apologize do nothing?

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 AM on 06/21/2009

I don't have a problem with her belonging to a woman's club.

But Letterman's joke was inappropriate. I am glad he apologized.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 06/21/2009

what is inappropriate is a woman using a mentally challenged infant as a campaign speech prop, and forcing her daughter - the unwed mother - to go on an abstinence speaking tour in order to help the mother's political ambitions. that's inappropriate.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 AM on 06/21/2009
photo

It was wrong for Letterman to say that Sarah Palin's 14 year old would get pregnant....I'm sure she will be at least 15 or 15 1/2 before she gets pregnant, and will be 16 when she actually has the kid....Tron Ididarod Palin.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 AM on 06/21/2009

Liberals made all these incredibly stupid, politically correct rules.

That said, I wish the Republicans would stop acting liberals. All the bitching and whining over pc crap that is of none importance.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 PM on 06/20/2009

Yeah, they should be able to speak at all white clubs with signs outside barring blacks, like Reagan did while he was president. If people actually thought your prehistoric attitudes were still acceptible, you wouldh have WON last November.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 06/21/2009
photo

lolll...I find this to be amusing - sort of.

Sotomayor being in the Belizean Grove poses - posed, rather - far less of a threat to our people and democracy than did the fact that so many in that last Administration belonged to PNAC.

Sad.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 06/20/2009
photo

I make the following statement as a diehard progressive Democrat.

This liberal attitude that ____ is ok for everyone but white men is hypocritical and damaging to the greater causes.

If it's ok for ____, then it's ok for white men. If it's ok for white men, then it's ok for _______.

If you disagree with that, then you don't believe in equality.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:41 PM on 06/20/2009
photo

You are what is known as an apologist for an indefensible position.

There was nothing on earth wrong with this judge belonging to that group. It was not the KKK.

Very telling, and disturbing development. She now appears to be just another careerist who will do whatever it takes to get to the next level.

Do not be surprised if her decisions disappoint many of you.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 06/20/2009
photo

Turn it around, bro.

I can defend my position all day long. Everyone is equal and the rules should apply equally. I don't think people should divide themselves by demographics.

Your position looks like the border of West Virginia.

You say it was it is ok for her to belong to a group that restricts membership to a certain race, gender or class BECAUSE of how wrong it was for others to belong to a group that restricts membership to a certain race, gender or class.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 AM on 06/21/2009

I'm with you.

When I was growing up in the 70's, I was taught that the way the rules were in the past was unfair. I was taught that from then on, race shouldn't be a factor. It was unfair someone to have an advantage because of skin color.

Believing in that made me a liberal in the 70's. Today, I am called a bigot for believing that.

    Reply    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 AM on 06/21/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (16 pages total)

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect