This, the first of two articles, explores the devotional
literature
and sermons of some of the lesser known figures of 17th century, as
well as the more well known writings of Lancelot Andrewes,
John Donne, and George Herbert. It shows the richness of the devotional
life of people in the Church of England during a formative period of
its history. The second article on other writings of cathedral clergy
will appear in the next issue of the journal.
The seventeenth century has long been recognized as a great
period--some would say the great period--for the composition of English
religious literature. One has only to mention such names as John Donne,
George Herbert, Lancelot Andrewes, John
Tillotson, Edward Stilling-fleet, and Thomas Ken to appreciate the high
quality and lasting merit of writings by Anglican clergy. The sheer
quantity of religious publication was extraordinary. In 1620, for
example, more than half of the titles listed in the Stationers'
Register were religious in character; in 1640, about 42 percent of the
titles listed in the Short Title Catalogue of English books could have
been classified as religious.[1]
One can only speculate about the reasons which lie behind this
flowering of religious literature. Obviously, the growth of literacy
and the great expansion of the publishing trade have something to do
with it. The religious controversies of the period were probably also
responsible for generating heightened interest. The exceptional
literary quality of the age of Shakespeare and Milton may have spilled
over into religious writing and may account in part for its uncommon
excellence. Whatever the reasons, the seventeenth century forms a
particularly interesting period for the study of religious writings,
and indeed of all writings published by Anglican clergy.
Since the quantity of published material is so great, some
limitation of scope is necessary, especially in a relatively brief
survey. One plan of attack is to consider the works of a specific group
of writers. The clergy who held positions in the cathedrals perhaps
form the most suitable gathering. Unlike the entire body of English
clerics, the cathedral population is precisely defined; although large
it is manageable. It is not, of course, representative of the entire
body of Anglican priests. The cathedral clergy--the deans and canons or
prebendaries--enjoyed a higher status than ordinary parish priests.
They were exceptionally well educated; virtually all had received
degrees from Oxford or Cambridge, and nearly half held doctorates. They
were also exceptionally well rewarded. The actual value of their
stipends had fallen somewhat in the years after 1540, since this was an
inflationary period in which the church's income failed to rise as
rapidly as prices, but they continued to enjoy much more comfortable
circumstances than the rectors, vicars, and curates of parishes. Free
from routine parochial responsibilities, the clergy who held cathedral
preferments formed an intellectual elite; their resources and relative
leisure made it possible for them to produce a large portion of the
writings which can be attributed to English churchmen during the
seventeenth century.
During these years, there were twenty-six cathedrals in
England and
Wales. Nine of the English cathedrals were cathedrals "of the old
foundation": they had long been served by a dean and chapter of secular
clergy, so they did not require constitutional change at the time of
the Reformation. York, Lincoln, Salisbury, St. Paul's, Wells, Exeter,
Hereford, Chichester, and Lichfield were establishments of this sort,
as were the four small Welsh cathedrals (St. David's, Bangor, St.
Asaph, and Llandaff). Eight cathedrals (Canterbury, Durham, Winchester,
Ely, Worcester, Norwich, Rochester, and Carlisle) had been served by
monks; these were refounded with secular chapters during the reign of
Henry VIII.
Henry VIII established five new cathedrals in order to break
up
over-large dioceses like Lincoln and to provide a continuing use for a
few great monastic churches which had not previously enjoyed cathedral
status. The new cathedrals (Gloucester, Peterborough, Chester, Bristol,
and Oxford), together with the former monastic cathedrals, are the
cathedrals "of the new foundation"; all of them received new statutes
during the sixteenth century.[2] The number of clergy serving
cathedrals of the new foundation was determined by their statutes.
Generally, there were a dean and six or eight canons, although
Canterbury had twelve and Carlisle a mere four. By contrast, the
cathedrals of the old foundation continued to name large numbers of
prebendaries, clergy who enjoyed the revenue from specific estates or
prebends and were, in the main, not resident at the cathedral itself.
Both Lincoln and Salisbury had more than fifty such prebendaries, and
all the old secular cathedrals in England could appoint more than
twenty men. In all, about four hundred clergy held cathedral positions
at any given time.
As part of a comprehensive history of cathedrals during the
century
of the English Civil War, I have developed computerized files of
biographical information for 2531 men who were members of cathedral
chapters between 1600 and 1700.[3] These have been analyzed to reveal
social background, educational qualifications, life span, mobility to
higher offices in the church, and involvement in the political
controversies of the age. In addition, they have been collated with the
Short-Title Catalogues of English Books printed during this period to
produce a list of works published by cathedral clergy.[4] The resulting
compilation is not quite complete. The Short-Title Catalogues do not
include works written in Latin or other foreign languages and published
abroad (they do contain such works if printed in England), and they are
limited to works now extant. That a number of publications have
vanished is evident from the fact that the catalogues frequently list a
fifth or sixth edition but not all of the four or five which preceded
it. In addition, there must have been a number of lost ephemera,
perhaps mainly such things as individual funeral sermons produced in
limited editions and not collected in libraries. Still, the
bibliography drawn from the Short-Title Catalogues can be regarded as
essentially accurate. While it may miss a few editions, it is not
likely to omit titles of any significance.[5]
In all, we know of 716 cathedral clergy who have left
published
writings. This is just over a third of the total number of men
associated with the cathedrals. These writers produced 4265 separate
works.[6] A further 2753 volumes represent later editions or
reprintings of these titles. The total number of identifiable items
attributed to seventeenth-century cathedral clergy is thus 7018.[7]
Comparison with the sixteenth century is revealing: only 197 of the
2849 clergy whom we studied for the earlier period (about 7 per cent)
were represented in the Short-Title Catalogue, and the tabulation of
entries produced only 830 separate titles and 512 reprints or new
editions.[8]
In examining the seventeenth-century writings, it is best to
begin
with a rough classification according to topic or genre. Such an
analysis is inevitably somewhat arbitrary and subjective; no doubt
other historians would have chosen a different set of headings or would
have placed some titles in different pigeonholes. In addition, it is
not always possible to determine the character of a work by its title
alone, and the sheer volume of publication makes it impossible to
examine every book. Nevertheless, I have thought it possible to
classify 3965 of the 4265 works, with results set out below.[9]
Subject of Published Writings
Popular tracts, devotional literature 1083
Sermons (individual or collected) 958
Political or controversial works 892
Theology 414
Miscellaneous, including language, rhetoric, and drama 221
History 98
Poetry (including funeral odes) 91
Mathematics, science, logic 81
Visitation articles, pastoral letters 67
Collected works 39
Geography 23
Comparison with the writings of the previous century is again
interesting.[10] Sermons loom large on both lists. Proportionally fewer
popular tracts or pieces of devotional literature were published under
the Tudors, but there was relatively more serious theology. More of the
sixteenth-century popular writings were catechisms, setting out the
beliefs of the reformed church. Numerous anti-Catholic tracts and a
handful of pro-Catholic apologies appeared in the sixteenth-century;
some of this controversial or polemical literature was later replaced
by works arguing Puritan or Arminian points of view. Writings about
politics (not necessarily religious in connotation) increase,
especially after 1660. History, poetry, and geography (travel or
cosmography) appear on both lists, pointing up the fact that some
clergy were scholars in fields other than religion. Cathedral clergy
were not involved in producing the cheapest pieces of popular piety,
the ballads, "chapbooks," and simple sermons which ran to a few pages
and sold for a few pennies.[11] Their writings were intended for
readers with higher intellectual aspirations and more ample financial
resources--the middle and upper segments of the publishers' market.
We begin our bibliographic journey with the devotional
literature
for which the Stuart period is so well known. Several works of modest
literary or theological merit were enormously popular, while others,
reprinted less frequently during the period itself, have become
classics of the spiritual life.[12]
The work most often reprinted was The Practice of Piety:
Directing a
Christian how to walke that he ma6' please God.[13] The author, Lewis
Bayly, is now largely forgotten and left no other writings. Born in
Wales, Bayly was educated at Oxford. He became treasurer of St. Paul's
cathedral in 1611, a prebendary of Lichfield in 1614, and bishop of
Bangor in 1616. Unlike most English bishops, he did not resign his
other preferments upon ascending to the episcopate; the Welsh sees were
poorer than the English ones, and their incumbents tended to retain
whatever other sources of income they had. Bayly was also involved in
politics. He served as chaplain to James I and his son, Prince Henry.
But his Puritan leanings and personal indiscretions brought him into
disfavor. In 1621, he was briefly imprisoned in the Fleet and probably
lost his post at St. Paul's at the same time. Five years later, a
speaker in the House of Commons accused him of simony, bribery,
extortion, licensing incestuous marriages, and "incontinence the most
palpable proved that ever I heard of"; the Puritan writer, John
Bastwick, snidely called him "my Lord Bangwhore."[14] One of Bayly's
sons became a chaplain to Charles I; another was subdean of Wells in
the 1630's and a royalist officer in the Civil War but was converted to
Catholicism while exiled in France and ended his days at Douai. Lewis
Bayly himself did not live to see the Civil War; he died in 1631.
The bibliographical history of The Practice of Piety is
confusing.
It was first published in 1612 and had run through at least fifty
printings by the 1750s. Not all of these survive, even in a single
copy, perhaps because they were literally worn out by their users. The
first edition has disappeared. We have editions 2-5,
7-9,11-15,17-21,23,25-28,30-33,36, and several called "the last
edition," but we lack extant copies of editions 6, 10, 16, 22, 24, 29,
34, and 35. Bibliographical difficulties have been compounded by the
repeated use of the same engraved title-page and by the reassignment of
the copyright to a succession of printers.[15] The Practice of Piety
was published in Scotland and the Netherlands as well as England and
was translated into French and Welsh. In all, the work may have sold
100,000 copies.[16]
The Practice of Piety is a long work. The first surviving
edition
runs to 1031 pages, and all later printings, even those in smaller
format, exceed 500 pages in length. Its miscellaneous contents include
prayers and meditations, lists of obstacles to piety, exhortations to
read the Bible, a confession of sin prior to receiving Communion,
"comfortable thoughts against despair," directions on making one's
will, and "the last speech of a godly man dying." Nowhere profound or
involved in theological subtleties, the work emphasizes
non-controversial Protestant (sometimes Puritan) beliefs; it does
display a sense of social criticism, favoring the poor and
industrious.[17]
Although it remained popular, the influence of Bayly's book
declined
somewhat after 1650 as more men and women began to read The Whole Duty
of Man, first published in 1658. Like The Practice of Piety, this work
poses bibliographical problems, but for different reasons: The Whole
Duty was published anonymously, and at least twenty-seven candidates
have been proposed as its author. Most of these can be disposed of
easily enough. The only serious contenders are John Fell (1625-1686)
and Richard Allestree (1620-1681); recent research clearly establishes
Allestree's authorship.[18] Allestree (or Allestrey) was a friend of
Bishop Fell's who fought for Charles I in the war and was rewarded at
the Restoration with a canon's position at Christ Church, Oxford, and
appointment as one of Charles II's chaplains. The son of a commoner
from Shropshire, Allestree was a learned man, the holder of an Oxford
doctorate, a serious theologian who could read Hebrew, Aramaic, Syriac,
and Chaldean and had traveled on the Continent, probably in France and
Italy, to escape persecution during the Interregnum in England. Unlike
Bayly, he was a high churchman, and he was a more active author, with
at least six other books (also issued anonymously) to his credit. They
have such titles as The Art of Patience, The Government of the Tongue,
and The Government of the Thoughts.) His complete works were published
in at least fourteen editions, and more than fifty of his sermons were
printed.[19]
The Whole Duty of Man was very popular during the Restoration
period. An edition of 1690 was identified as the twenty-eighth, but
there may have been more unnumbered reprintings. The book was
translated into Welsh, French, and even (in 1665) into an American
Indian dialect.[20] Like Bayly, Allestree avoids theological disputes
and concentrates on morality. The virtues stressed include honesty,
humility, obedience, submission, and patience. Allestree emphasizes the
necessity for servants to obey their masters and for all persons to
respect magistrates and the king.[21] The Whole Duty was the dominant
book of religious instruction throughout the eighteenth century; most
households possessed a copy of it, together with the Bible and the
Prayer Book. Samuel Johnson disliked it--his mother made him read it on
Sundays--but the American planter, William Byrd, said that it edified
him very much.[22] As late as 1778, a Cambridge undergraduate, Charles
Simeon, was converted after reading The Whole Duty ("the only religious
book that I had heard of," he wrote) and became a popular preacher,
especially among young students, who came to be called
"Simeonites."[23]
Although he produced no single work as popular as Bayly's or
Allestree's, the most prolific popular writer of the age was Joseph
Hall. A graduate of Emmanuel College, Cambridge, Hall was named bishop
of Exeter in 1627 and translated to Norwich in 1641, only to lose the
position in 1643 following the Puritan victory: he was expelled from
the bishop's palace in 1647 and died in 1656, too soon to witness the
Restoration. Many of his works were written while he was a student at
Cambridge (before 1611), archdeacon of York (1611-1627), or dean of
Worcester (1616-1627).
The scope of Hall's publications is exceptional. More than one
hundred separate titles were published.[24] These included pieces of
popular piety, for instance Heaven upon Earth, or of true peace, and
tranquillitie of mince (1606), The breathings of the devout soul
(1648), and The remedy of discontentment (1645); Contemplations upon
the principal! passages of the Holy Storie (8 vole., 1612-1626);
sermons (preached at court, to the House of Lords, at Paul's Cross, and
in hospitals); controversial apologies (against Cardinal Bellarmine,
1609, and Against the unjust challenges of the Brownists, 1610);
moderate Anglican defences of clerical marriage (1620) and episcopacy
(1640); poetry (The kings prophecie: or weeping joy, written on the
occasion of Queen Elizabeth's death and James I's accession in 1603);
satires (Virgidemarium, 1597-98, and Mundus alter et idem, 1605);
epistles (3 vols., 1608-1610); and social commentary (Quo vadis? A just
censure of travell as it is commonly undertaken by the gentlemen of our
nation, 1617). Hall's collected works appeared in 24 editions prior to
1799 and have been reprinted in several modern sets.[25]
Of these works the satires and meditations hold the greatest
interest. Both of the satires were products of Hall's youth, written
while he was at Cambridge. The Virgidemiarum (the Latin title means a
bundle or harvest of rods) was Hall's attempt to write social criticism
in satirical verse, imitating the style of Horace and Juvenal. The
first three books, subtitled Tooth-lesse Satyrs, were published in
1597; the more bitter Byting Satyres followed the next year. Hall's
protest is directed mainly against the enclosure movement, in which
many agricultural laborers lost their livelihood as landlords converted
their fields from crops to pasture for sheep. He also discerns and
criticizes a general decline in hospitality. Other targets of his pen
are poets, lawyers, doctors, academic life, gluttony, ostentatious
tombs, greed, and Roman Catholicism.[26] Mundus alter et idem was
evidently not intended for publication, and it was probably brought out
without Hall's consent. His name does not appear on the early editions,
which were in Latin, or on the English version (not a literal
translation) written by John Healey and published in 1609 as The
discovery of a new world, or a description of the South Indies. Hall's
authorship was nevertheless assumed early on, and Healey refers to the
author as "I. H." The work, a burlesque of Hakloyt's Voyages, is an
account of a journey to the Antipodes undertaken by "Mercurius
Britannicus" in the ship "Phantasia." The writer visits four
nations--Crapulia (gluttony), Viraginia (women), Moronia (folly), and
Lavernia (deceit), finding nothing but unrelieved depravity in all of
them. This is reminiscent of Thomas More's Utopia, but it is a reverse
image depicting evil rather than good.[27]
Hall's most influential work, the piece which most commends
itself
to modern readers, was The arte of divine meditation. Although a
staunch Protestant himself, greatly influenced by Calvin, Hall
nevertheless borrowed from Catholic tradition in setting out a system
for meditation. Loyola and Gerson lurk behind many of his pages. His
subtitle identifies the "two large patterns of meditation: the one of
eternal! life, as the end: the other of death, as the way" which he
would have his readers follow. For him, meditation "begins in the
understanding [but] endeth in the affection; It begins in the braine,
descends to the heart; Begins on Earth, ascends to Heaven; Not
suddenly, but by certaine staires and degrees, till we come to the
highest."[28] Following a prescribed route, it travels the road from
logic to mysticism.
A striking contrast to the pedestrian works of Bayly,
Allestree, and Hall is provided by the classic devotional writings of Lancelot
Andrewes,
John Donne, and George Herbert. Although these men are not always
thought of as cathedral clergy, all held appointments in one or more of
the English cathedrals.
Andrewes was a prebendary of St. Paul's in
London for
twenty years (1589-1609) and also served as penitentiary of the
cathedral.[29] "While he held this place," Sir John Harington wrote,
"his manner was, especially in Lent time to walk daily at certain hours
in one of the aisles of the church, that if any came to him for
spiritual advice and comfort (as some did, though not many) he might
impart it to them."[30] In 1601, he was named dean of
Westminster--strictly speaking the Abbey was not a cathedral, although
it had been for part of the sixteenth century and continued to function
like one--and, in 1605, he accepted appointment as a bishop, holding
the sees of Chichester, Ely, and Winchester in succession. (He had been
offered
Salisbury and Ely by Queen Elizabeth but had declined the
nomination
as a token of his opposition' to her custom of holding sees vacant in
order to collect their revenues herself.) His tomb is in Southwark
Cathedral.
Although most of his published works were sermons, Andrewes'
devotional writings are of greater lasting interest. The most important
of these are the Preces privatae or Private devotions.[31] It is
impossible to know when these were written. Most likely Andrewes
gathered them for his own use over a period of years; he is said to
have spent as much as five hours a day in prayer. They were not
published until 1675, nearly fifty years after his death. The printer,
Richard Drake, wrote of the "glorious deformity" of the original
manuscript, nearly worn out by Andrewes' pious hands
"and watered with his penitential tears."[32] The original version, in
Creek and Latin, ran through six further editions, while at least
twenty reprints of the English translation had appeared by 1903. A
classic of Anglican piety, the Preces invoke a liturgical style similar
to that of the Prayer Book itself. Dean Church's comment that Andrewes
succeeds in bringing the spirit of the Prayer Book "from the church to
the closet" is apt.[33]
Although John Donne is now remembered chiefly as a poet, he
was also
a masterful author of prose. His place as a devotional writer is firmly
established by the Devotions upon emergent occasions which he composed
during a serious illness and published in 1623, two years after
becoming dean of St. Paul's.[34] These emphasize spiritual sinfulness
and physical weakness, both of which can be conquered only through
divine grace. Devotion XVII includes what is perhaps Donne's best known
passage:
No man is an Iland, intire of it selfe; every man is a peece
of the
Continent, a part of the maine; . . . any mans death diminishes me,
because I am involved in Mankinde; And therefore never send to know for
whom the bell tolls; It tolls for thee.[35]
George Herbert's cathedral connections were less evident than Andrewes'
or Donne's. He did enjoy the revenue from a prebend's stall at Lincoln
for a decade (1626-36), but he did not reside there. Indeed, he was not
ordained priest until 1630--it was unusual but not impossible for a
layman or one only in deacon's orders to hold such a preferment. His
earlier life was spent mainly at Cambridge and his later days at
Bemerton, the village near Salisbury, where he served as rector for the
last six years of his life.
Although his well-deserved fame rests on his poetry, Herbert
did
leave an important prose work, published posthumously as A Priest to
the Temple, or The Countrey Parson. This is not a devotional work in
the usual sense but rather a set of precepts for fellow ministers; it
deals with learning, liturgy, and manner of living; with the decency of
church buildings, and with the fatherly care which a parish priest
should exercise over members of his flock. No doubt because it was
intended for a limited audience, it did not enjoy the popularity
achieved by some other works. Originally published in 1652, it was
reprinted twice (1671 and 1675) and was included in Herbert's
Remains.[36]
A few more of the most popular devotional writers may be
mentioned,
although their works are not of great lasting merit. John Scott's
examination of The Christian Life was published in several volumes and
parts; in all, it received at least 28 editions.[37] Scott was a
prebendary of St. Paul's from 1684 to 1695 and also held several
rectories in the City. John Preston, a prebendary of Lincoln from 1610
until his death in 1628, left a number of tracts, treatises, and
sermons, a few of which ran through eight or nine editions.[38] Some of
Preston's popular writings promote Puritan views, while others
concentrate on Christ's humanity and human longing for him. His
best-known works emphasize divine love: these include A heavenly
treatise of divine love and The soliloquy of a devout soul to Christ,
panting after the love of the Lord Jesus.[39]
John Cosin is best known as the Restoration bishop of Durham,
but he
was a prebendary of Durham as early as 1624 and was appointed dean of
Peterborough in 1640. His Collection of private devotions was first
published anonymously in 1627 and had been reprinted at least fourteen
times by the end of the century.[40] As its subtitle states, it
contains "the houres of prayer" as "in the practice of the ancient
church"; it is like a medieval breviary or Tudor primer. It may not
originally have been intended for publication but rather for the use of
a friend, who had a small edition of two hundred copies printed to
avoid the difficulty of making manuscript copies for his own
followers.[41] The work is remembered chiefly because its
Anglo-Catholic character aroused the ire of two intrepid Puritans,
William Prynne and Henry Burton. In A brief survoy and censure of Mr.
Cozens his couzening devotions, Prynne asserted that the book was
"altogether Popish, both in forme and matter"; Burton's Tryall of
private devotion likewise demonstrated that most of Cosin's sources
were Catholic. Both Prynne and Burton had their ears cropped in
punishment for their libels.[42]
If Cosin can be taken as a leader of the high church or
Arminian
party, John Owen has some claim to be regarded as the greatest scholar
and popular writer among those Puritans who were associated in some way
with the cathedrals. His name enters our list of cathedral clergy only
through a peculiar fluke. Owen was dean of Christ Church, Oxford,
during the Interregnum, and, as such, he presided over both the college
and the cathedral which lay within its grounds. All the other
cathedrals were closed, at least for official, Anglican worship, and
lost their dignitaries, during this period. Most of Owen's writings
date from the years after 1660, when he was deprived and forced into
dissent, but the 1650s did see the publication of popular tracts on
such topics as Of temptation, Of the death of Christ, and Of the divine
original. None of these works was reprinted, although The advantage of
the kingdom of Christ and Of the mortification of sinne both received
three editions before 1660.[43] They represent the opposite pole of
spirituality from the collected liturgical devotions of Cosin.
A rationale upon the Book of Common Prayer by Anthony Sparrow
seems
to have been more popular than any of Owen's works. Sparrow was a
fellow of Queen's College, Cambridge, ejected when he married in 1644,
and a parish priest in Suffolk, ejected when the Puritans won the Civil
War in 1647. Ironically, it was during the Interregnum, when public use
of the Prayer Book was proscribed, that Sparrow wrote his appreciation
of it. The first surviving edition is dated 1655; eight more had
followed by 1684.[44] After the Restoration, Sparrow became a
prebendary of Ely, provost of King's College, vice-chancellor of
Cambridge University, and later bishop of Exeter and Norwich
successively. His Rationale explains the liturgical origins of the
Prayer Book and suggests ways in which it may be made an effective
vehicle for supplication and devotion.[45] Another work frequently
reprinted, both during the Interregnum and after the Restoration, was A
practical catechisme by Henry Hammond, a chaplain to Charles I, who
held a prebend at Oxford before being ejected in 1648. At least twenty
editions of his book had been published by 1700.[46] Among the further
works in this genre, one may notice Milke for babes (1617) and Meate
for men (1622) by William Crashaw, a prebendary of York and father of
the better-known metaphysical poet, Richard Crashaw.[47] The earlier of
these tracts was subtitled "a north-country catechisme, made plaine to
the capacitie of the countrie people." The catechism set forth by
Thomas Marshall, dean of Gloucester in the 1680s, went through at least
eleven editions and was translated into Welsh.[48] Thomas Ken, the
famous nonjuring bishop, also published an exposition of the catechism;
his most popular prose work, despite its seemingly limited audience,
was a manual of prayers and litanies written for use at Winchester
College.[49]
The most active writers of the Restoration era included Simon
Patrick, Thomas Comber, Edward Reynolds, and Anthony Horneck. Patrick
was dean of Peterborough in the 1680s and later served as bishop of
Chichester and Ely. Often regarded as one of the chief instruments of
the revival of religious life in the Restoration church, he was a
founder of the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge and was also
active in the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel. His writings
ran to sixty-nine separate titles and eighty-eight reprintings.[50] In
fact, there must have been many more editions which have not survived:
we have, for instance, only six versions of A boolfor beginners, but
the last of these is called the fifteenth edition.[51] Some other
popular works were The hearts ease; The parable of the pilgrim; and The
Christian sacripee, a treatise on the communion. A number of Patrick's
sermons were published, as were some pieces of polemical theology,
scriptural commentary, and poetry.
A prebendary of York in the 1680s and dean of Durham in the
1690s,
Thomas Comber produced several studies of the Prayer Book, following in
Sparrow's footsteps. His largest work, A companion to the temple, was
designed to persuade dissenters to reunite with the state church.[52]
It goes through the Prayer Book nearly line by line; it has been
characterized, fairly enough, as laborious and deadly dull,[53] but it
did help foster appreciation of formal Anglican liturgy. Edward
Reynolds, briefly a prebendary of Worcester before becoming bishop of
Norwich in 1661, wrote meditations on comfort, healing, and Mary
Magdalens love to Christ as well as An explanation of the hundreth and
tenth psalme which was reprinted five times despite the fact that it
spent more than five hundred pages explicating a mere seven verses of
Scripture.[54]
Anthony Horneck is of interest because he was born in Germany
and
held degrees from Heidelberg as well as Oxford and Cambridge. A
prebendary of both Exeter and Wells, he offended some of his superiors
by advocating social reform. For a time, he produced a new devotional
tract each year. His works include The happy ascetic (1681), Gods
providence (1682), The pre of the altar (1683), Delight and judgment
(1684), The exercise of prayer (1685), The crucified Jesus (1686), and
The nature of true Christian righteousness (1689).[55]
It is a pity that Jeremy Taylor's classics Holy Living (1650)
and
Holy Dying (1651) cannot be included in this list, since Taylor never
held an English cathedral position. A friend of Archbishop Laud and a
royalist in the Civil War, Taylor might well have expected preferment
in England following the Restoration, but instead he was named Bishop
of Down in Ireland. As John Booty has written, Taylor speaks to us
"through the veils of time to remind a world gone mad that there is
hope, justice and forgiveness[56],
Sermons were in general intended for the same audience as
devotional
writings and were published in nearly as great quantity. Horton Davies
was clearly right when he wrote of a "passion for preaching' which
reached its highest peak during the 1640s and 1650s. He commented that
sermons were never read more avidly than in seventeenth-century
England.[57] "Every book-seller's stall groans under the burden of
sermons, sermons," wrote a contemporary observer in 1680.[58]
The sermons selected for publication were originally preached
in a
variety of locations. St. Paul's Cathedral and Paul's Cross provided
the most public forum, while the royal court (at Whitehall, Greenwich,
or Hampton Court) drew forth some fine preaching by John King, Robert
South, and John Preston as well as Lancelot Andrewes
and John Donne.[59] Sermons were delivered in Parliament, at the Inns
of Court (especially Lincoln's Inn), at the Spittal Cross (an outdoor
pulpit on the site of the former hospital), at Lambeth, and even to
investors in the Virginia Company.[60]
A number of the published sermons commemorated special events.
James
I's accession day (March 24) was observed in a sermon preached by John
King at Oxford in 1608.[61] King, who was dean of Christ Church, also
left sermons celebrating James I's recovery from illness (1619) and the
marriage of James's daughter, Elizabeth, to the Elector Palatine
(1613).[62] Thomas Sprat preached on Charles II's accession day in
1684.[63] Earlier, the Restoration of the monarchy in 1660 had been
celebrated in sermons given by John Hacket (probably in London) and
John Bramhall (in Dublin).[64]
Less happy events were also noted in pulpits. There were a
number of
funeral sermons.[65] The death in 1612 of James I's promising son,
Prince Henry, was widely lamented. Accepted Frewen and Edward Chetwynd
wrote laments while they were still students at Oxford; both achieved
prominence later.[66] Lionel Sharp probably preached his Oration
funebris at Salisbury, where he was archdeacon.[67] Daniel Price, who
was Henry's chaplain, was involved more deeply. He published two
sermons at the time of Henry's death, followed by a "first anniversary"
in 1613 and a "second" in 1614. Earlier he had preached at the youth's
investiture as Prince of Wales.[68] The funeral sermon for James I was
delivered by John Williams, then bishop of Lincoln, and was immediately
printed.[69] It bore the title Great Britains Salomon. A groane at the
funeral! of Charles I, following his execution in 1649, was published
by Henry King, bishop of Chichester.[70] Earlier, in 1621, while he was
a prebendary of St. Paul's, King had delivered an unusual sermon at
Paul's Cross to deny the "supposed apostacie" of his father, the bishop
of London, who had been accused of a deathbed conversion to Rome.[71]
Many surviving sermons were preached in time of plague and pestilence.
(Modern churchgoers may need to be reminded that the petition in the
Litany, "From plague, pestilence, and famine, Good Lord, deliver us,"
spoke to very real concerns in earlier centuries.) Their authors
included Lancelot Andrewes (1603), John
Sanford (1604), Joseph Hall (1625), Thomas Fuller (1626), Sampson Price
(also 1626), Oliver Whitby (1637), and John Featley (1665).[72]
Especially in the earlier decades of the century, the Gunpowder Plot
was regularly remembered. Andrewes preached ten sermons
for Guy Fawkes' Day; John King delivered similar orations at Oxford
(1607) and Whitehall (1608).[73] In 1641 (just before the outbreak of
the Civil War), William Sclater preached a Guy Fawkes sermon which
pictured Charles I defending established religion against novelty,
while, in 1659 (just before the restoration of the monarchy), Ralph
Brownrigg invoked the text from Daniel, "O King, live forever."[74]
Commemorative sermons were still being preached on November 5 in the
reign of Charles II. William Lloyd (who held positions at St. Paul's,
Salisbury, Lichfield, Bangor, St. Asaph, and Worcester) and Gregory
Hascard (an obscure prebendary of Salisbury) were among their
authors.[75]
The greatest of the Jacobean and Caroline preachers--perhaps
it is
not too strong to say the greatest Anglican preachers of all time--were
Lancelot Andrewes and John Donne. Andrewes
preached mainly at the court; all but four of his 96 published sermons
were delivered there. Many of Andrewes'
finest sermons celebrate the great events of the liturgical year. His
collected works include 18 sermons for Easter, 17 for Christmas, 15 for
Pentecost, 8 for Ash Wednesday, and 3 for Good Friday. The most famous
of Andrewes' homilies is the Nativity sermon on the Wise
Men, delivered in 1629, which formed the basis of T. S. Eliot's poem
"The Journey of the Magi." Andrewes' preaching was
characterized by verbal brilliance, sophistication, and wit. Some
critics have felt that its literary craftsmanship led to artificiality,
and James I is supposed to have complained that Andrewes
"did but play with his text, as a Jack-an-apes does, who takes up a
thing and tosses and playes with it, and then he takes up another, and
playes a little with it: here's a pretty thing, and there's a pretty
thing."[76] T. S. Eliot, on the other hand, greatly admired Andrewes
and accorded him "a place second to none in the history of the
formation of the English Church."[77]
John Donne's own spiritual struggles are reflected in his
sermons,
which display greater understanding of human psychology and speak more
directly to the condition of his listeners than do Andrewes'.
What is perhaps the most revealing of Donne's lines--"Batter my heart,
three-personed God"--comes from a poem rather than a sermon, but, when
preaching on the conversion of St. Paul, he included what might be
considered a description of Donne himself as well as the saint: "Poor
intricated soul! Riddling, perplexed, labyrinthical soul!" Only six of
Donne's sermons were published during his lifetime, but collections of
them were issued shortly after his death. LXXX sermons appeared in
1640, to be followed by Fifty sermons in 1649 and XXVI sermons ("the
third volume") in 1661.[78] Izaak Walton described Donne as preaching
"like an angel from a cloud," carrying listeners "to Heaven in holy
raptures."[79] Donne's style depends heavily on elaborate imagery,
analogy, metaphor, and paradox. His last sermon, about death, draws a
parallel between the alchemist transforming base metal to gold and
Christ transmuting Christian souls as they leave their bodies. Like Andrewes
and Richard Hooker, Donne helped establish the classic case for the
Anglican wa media.
These great sermons came from the firs,t forty years of the
century.
During the Civil War and Interregnum, preaching had greater political
significance; many sermons were delivered in Parliament and at army
gatherings. The "Fast Sermons" given in the House of Commons were
particularly important.[80] These, however, do not figure in our
account, since they were not delivered by cathedral clergy or, indeed,
by those in sympathy with the Anglican establishment. Only a little
Anglican preaching from this period survives. Ralph Brownrig, a
prebendary of Ely, Lichfield, and Durham and bishop of Exeter,
continued to preach after he was ejected from his positions in 1645.
More than one hundred of his sermons were collected and printed
following his death in 1659.[81] A number of the "choice sermons" by
Thomas Westfield, prebendary of St. Paul's and bishop of Bristol, were
also published some years after his death in 1644.[82]
Anglican sermons were again very popular during the
Restoration era
The homiletic style of the Restoration was quite different from that of
the pre-war years. Clarity, rationality, and relative brevity replaced
the sophisticated elegance and literary fireworks of Andrewes
and Donne, no doubt in part because of the influence of the scientific
revolution and the new Royal Society.
The best known preachers of the later seventeenth century were
Edward Stillingfleet, John Tillotson, and Thomas Tenison. Stillingfleet
became a canon of St. Paul's in 1667 and was dean from 1678 to 1689. He
spent the last decade of his life (1689-1699) as bishop of Worcester.
At least eighteen of his sermons were printed separately; four volumes
of collected sermons appeared between 1669 and 1700, and six volumes of
collected works were published posthumously in 1710.[83]
Stillingfleet's prodigious literary output also included religious
treatises and historical works. A Latitudinarian, Stillingfleet
remained on good terms with Nonconformists. He was friendly with Hobbes
but entered into controversy with Locke over the matter of the Trinity.
Tillotson followed Stillingfleet as dean of St. Paul's, where
he had
been a canon since 1675. Like Stillingfleet, he was a chaplain to
Charles II. After the Glorious Revolution, William and Mary named him
archbishop of Canterbury, a position he held until his death in 1694.
He is one of the few archbishops to have been regarded as an
outstanding preacher in his own time. Sermons account for almost all of
Tillotson's published work. Large numbers appeared during his lifetime,
both singly and in collections. Most have political implications. Some
suggest compromise with the Presbyterians, while others oppose Roman
doctrines, especially transubstantiation. The eighteenth-century,
Augustan rationality of Tillotson's outlook is perhaps best seen in his
most famous sermon, on the text "His commandments are not
grievous."[84] Tenison followed Tillotson at Canterbury. His sermon
preached at St. Martin's-in-the-Fields on Good Friday 1687 moved John
Evelyn greatly and, according to the diarist, "drew tears from many
eyes."[85]
During the 1690s, a number of strongly Protestant sermons were
preached by William Wake. A prebendary of Oxford from 1689 to 1701,
Wake was also chaplain to William and Mary and preacher of
Gray's
Inn; he was dean of Exeter early in the eighteenth century, then bishop
of Lincoln (1705-1715) and finally archbishop of Canterbury
(1716-1737). He first took his seat in the House of Lords on November
5, 1705, and seized the occasion to preach a Gunpowder Plot sermon to
the House, praising the realm's deliverance from the Catholicism of
James II as well as James I's deliverance from Guy Fawkes. Much of
Wake's writing, especially concerning the projected union with the
Jansenists, falls outside our period, but he can be included here as
continuing the tradition of Stillingfleet and Tillotson into the
eighteenth century.[86]
All in all, these popular devotional writings and sermons
speak to
the importance of religion in the lives of ordinary English men and
women during the seventeenth century and to the diversity of this
audience. The writers and publishers provided something for almost
everyone, naive or sophisticated, beginner or scholar, Puritan or
Arminian, excepting only those who could spend only a few pennies for a
few pages. Those who would understand the temper of the time--the
mentalite of the age--would do well to spend some time immersed in this
flood of printed words.
Not all the published works written by cathedral clergy fell
into
these categories. There was an outpouring of religious poetry as well
as a large quantity of controversial literature, and cathedral clergy
also produced works of theology, history, science, and grammar. Their
writing in these genres will form the basis of a companion study.
[1] Helen White, English Devotional Literature 1600-1040
(Madison:
University of Wisconsin Studies in Language and Literature, No. 29,
1931), p. 11; Edith L. Klotz, "A Subject Analysis of English Imprints
for Every Tenth Year from 1480 to 1640," Huntington Library Quarterly,
1(1938): 418.
[2] Westminster Abbey was also turned into a cathedral by
Henry
VIII, but it lost its cathedral status under Mary Tudor and became a
"royal peculiar" under Elizabeth.
[3] Their names have been obtained from Le Neve's Fasti
Ecclesia
Anglicanae (both the 1854 edition, 3 vole., ed. T. Duffus Hardy and the
revised version, not yet complete, edited for the Institute of
Historical Research by Joyce M. Horn) with additions from the
manuscript records in the archives of the several cathedrals. I am
grateful to my research assistant, Alice Keeler, for help in compiling
these biographical files.
[4] Short-Title Catalogue of English Books, 1475-1640,
compiled by
A.W. Pollard and C. R. Redgrave, 2nd ea., rev. by W.A. Jackson, F. S.
Ferguson, and Katharine F. Pantzer, 2 vols. (London: Bibliographical
Society, 1976, 1986); Short-Title Catalogue of English Books,
1641-1700, compiled by Donald Wing, 2nd ea., rev. Wing, Timothy J.
Crist, John J. Morrison, and Carolyn W. Nelson, 3 vol. (London:
Bibliographical Society, 1972, 1982, 1988). Numbering in STC 1475-1640
is in one continuous series, but STC 1641-1700 has a separate numerical
sequence for each letter of the alphabet.
[5] It should be noted that this list of publications includes
all
the works written by clergymen who held cathedral office at any time in
their lives. No attempt has been made to exclude items published before
an individual had received a cathedral appointment or after he had
relinquished his cathedral position, for instance when appointed a
bishop. Nor has it been thought desirable or possible to make
adjustments in the case of men who were ejected or sequestered from
their offices during the Interregnum, when Anglican service s were
suspended after the Royalists lost the Civil War.
[6] This figure includes items described as "Part II" or "Part
III" of larger works, When first published at different dates.
[7] These figures do not include new editions of works by
cathedral
clergy who died before 1603, nor do they count works or editions
printed after 1700. (Because there is no published Short-Title
Catalogue for the eighteenth century, it is difficult to control the
bibliography after 1700.) The actual volume of publications written by
men associated with cathedrals is thus somewhat larger than these
numbers suggest
[8] See my book The Reformation of Cathedrals: Cathedrals in
English
Society, 14851603 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988), pp.
241-242. When doing the research for the sixteenth century, I relied on
the original edition of A.W. Pollard's catalogue, published in 1946.
Use of the revised edition would increase the number of editions,
perhaps fairly substantially, but would not add very many additional
titles. Clergy whose careers lay in both the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries, are counted in both lists, as are the titles of their
writings, so that one cannot simply add the figures for the two
centuries to obtain a total for the period 1985-1700.
[9] The distinction between popular tracts and theology is
based on
the audience for whom the work appears to be intended; by "theology" I
refer to books written for other clerics or scholars.
[10] See Reformation of Cathedrals, p. 242, for a table of
Tudor publications by topic.
[11] For discussion of this sort of publication see Tessa
Watt,
Cheap Print and Popular Piety, 1550-1640 (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1991).
[12] For general studies of this literature, see White,
English
Devotional Literature, and Louis L. Martz, The Poetry of Meditation
(New Haven: Yale University Press, 1954). White deals only with prose
and deliberately excludes writers such as Lancelot Andrewes,
John Donne, and Jeremy Taylor whom she judged to be sufficiently well
known. There is also an interesting discussion of Restoration piety in
john Spurr, The Restoration Church of England, 1646-1689 (New Haven and
London Yale University Press, 1991), pp. 279-375.
[13] STC 1475-1640, 1601-1624.
[14] Christopher Hill, A Tinker and a Poor Man (New York:
Knopf,
1989), p. 163. See also J. E. Bailey, Bishop Lewis Bayly and his
Practice of Piety," Manchester Quarterly, 11 (1883), 204-216.
[15] See Harry Farr, "Philip Chetwind and the Allott
Copyrights," The Library, 4th ser., XV (1934), 135-160.
[16] In 1635, the Stationers' Company set 2000 copies as the
maximum
press run (it had earlier been 1500). It seems likely that such a
popular work would have been issed in as large a nun as possible. Cf.
H.S. Bennett, English Books & Readers 1603 to 1640 (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1970), p. 227.
[17] See Horton Davies, Worship and Theology in England From Andrewes
to Baxter and Fox, 1603-1690 (Princeton: Princeton University Press,
1975), pp. 112-114, C.J. Stranks, Anglican Devotion (London: SCM Press,
1961), pp. 36-63, and Hill, op. cit., p. 164.
[18] Paul Elmen, "Richard Allestree and The Whole Duty of
Man," The Library, 5th ser., VI (1951) 19-27.
[19] His writings are STC 1641-1700, A1081-1195.
[20] Cf. Davies, p. 112.
[21] Cf. Stranks, pp. 123-148 and A. Tindal Hart, The Man in
the Pew 1558-1660 (London: John Baker, 1966), p. 201.
[22] Stranks, pp. 125-26, 143.
[23] Laurence and Helen Fowler, eds., Cambridge Commemorated
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), p. 193.
[24] STC, 1475-1640, 12635-12719; STC, 1641-1700, H361-422.
[25] Ed. Josiah Pratt, 10 vols. (London: Williams and Smith,
1808);
ed. Peter Hall, l! vols. (Oxford: D.A. Talboys, 1837-1839); ed. Philip
Wynter, 10 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1863, reprinted New
York: AMS Press, 1969).
[26] For a modern edition see The Poems of Joseph Hall, ed.
Arnold
Davenport (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1969), pp. 1-100.
[27] There is further discussion of these work in Richard A.
McCabe,
Joseph Hall, A Study in Satire and Meditation (Oxford: Clarendon Press,
1982), and Leonard D. Tourney, Joseph Hall (Boston: Twayne, 1979).
[28] Works, ed. Wynter, I, 103. There is a newer edition of
The Art
of Divine Meditation and of Hall's Occasional Meditations (1633) in
Frank Livingston Huntley, Bishop Joseph Hall and Protestant Meditation
in Seventeenth-Century England (Binghamton, N.Y.: Center for Medieval
& Early Renaissance Studies, 1981), pp. 65-200.
[29] The most useful of the several books on Andrewes
are Paul A. Welsby, Lancelot Andrewes,
1555-1626 (London: S.P.C. K., 1K8), and Florence Higham, Lancelot
Andrewes (London: SCM Press, 1952). A recent study
views Andrewes as a link between Hooker and Laud: Peter
Lake, "Lancelot Andrewes
and John Buckeridge," in Linda Levy Peck, ea., The Mental World of the
Jacobean Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp.
113-133.
[30] Quoted in Welsby, p. 60.
[31] STC 1641-1700, A3149-50.
[32] Quoted m Welsby, p. 265. Shortly before his death, Andrewes
gave another manuscript to William Laud which is now in the library of
Pembroke College, Oxford.
[33] Richard Church, Mastere in English Theology, quoted in
Welsby,
p. 267. Welsby himself called it 'the most popular and widely used of
all Anglican devotional works" (p. 274). One of the translators of the
Preces was John Henry Newman; his version appeared as No. 78 of Tracts
for the Times. The best modern translation is that by F. E. Brightman
(1903,reprinted New York: Living Age Books, 1961).
[34] Donne's Catholic upbringing and the spiritual struggles
of his
earlier life are too well known to require elaboration here; of the
several modern biographies, the best are R.C. said' John Donne: A Life
(Oxford Oxford university Press, 1970) and Frank J. Warnke, John Donne
(Boston Twayne, 1987). see also Annabel Patterson, "John Donne,
Kingsman?, in Peck, Mental World, pp. 251-272.
[35] Devotions upon Emergent Occasions, ed. John sparrow
(Cambridge Cambridge university Press, 1923), p. 98.
[36] STC 1641-1700, H1508-1511. A Priest to the Temple is
included
in Louis L. Martz el., George Herbert and Henry Vaughan (Oxford Oxford
university Press, 1986), pp. 189-243.
[37] STC 1641-1700 S2043-2061A.
[38] STC 1475-1640, 20208-20282; STC 1641-1700, P3298-3308.
[39] Cf. Davies, pp. 76-77.
[40] STC 1475-1640, 5P15-5819; STC 1641-1700, C6350-6363.
[41] Cf. Stranks, pp. 66-69.
[42] Cf. Davies, 92-97. There is a modern edition of Cosin's
Devotions in the ' Library of Anglo-Catholic Theology": The Works of
John Cosin (5 vole., Oxford: J. H. Parker, 184355), 11, 83-331. 'The
Library of Anglo-Catholic Theology' played a significant role in
popularizing seventeenth-century writings; eighty-eight volumes of
works by Stuart divines were published in this series between 1841 and
1863.
[43] STC 1641-1700, 0711-825.
[44] STC 1641-1700, S4827-4834.
[45] Cf. Stranks, pp. 150-155.
[46] STC 1641-1700, H581-196. On catechisms, of which
three-quarters
of a million copies were in circulation in the early seventeenth
century, see lan Green, "'For children in yeeres and children in
understanding: the emergence of the English catechism under Elizabeth
and the early Stuarts," Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 37 (1986):
397-425.
[47] STC 1475-1640, 6019-22.
[48] STC 1641-1700, M800-807A.
[49] STC 1641-1700, K261, 266-275A. The catechism was
translated into Welsh (260B).
[50] STC 1641-1700 P737-868.
[51] STC 1641-17W P751 - 753A.
[52] STC 1641-17W, C542-5458.
[53] Davies, p. 117; Stranks, p. 156.
[54] STC 1475-1640, 20927-20938; STC 1641-1700, R1234-1302;
Cf. Bennett, pp. 99100.
[55] STC 1641-1700, H2815-2847.
[56] John E. Booty, "An Anglican Classic: Jeremy Taylor's Holy
Living and Holy Dying, Anglican Theological Review 73 (1991): 198-204.
[57] Davies. p. 133.
[58] Quoted in Spurr, pp. 229-230.
[59] Andrewes occasionally preached in Latin;
cf.
Concio Latine habita coram regia majestate, quinto Augusti 1606, in
aula Grenuici (STC 1475-1640, 586). On preaching at Paul's Cross see
Millar MacLure, The Paul's Cross Sermons, 1534-1642 (Toronto:
University of Toronto Press, 1958).
[60] Examples are: Parliament: John Owen, 1652; Lincoln's Inn:
Donne, 1623, and Preston, 1635; Lambeth: William Loe, 1645; Spittal: Andrewes,
1588; Virginia Company: Richard Crashaw, 1610, and Donne, 1622.
[61] STC 1475-1640 14987.
[62] STC 1475-1640 14983, 14989.
[63] STC 1641-1700, S5060.
[64] STC 1641-1700, H172, B4235.
[65] On this genre, see David d'Avray, "The Comparative Study
of
Memorial Preaching," Transaction, of the Royal Historical Society, 5th
ser., XL (1990), 25-42.
[66] STC 1475-1640, 19047, 5128.
[67] STC 1475-1640, 22375.
[68] STC 1475-1640 20290, 20294, 20299, 20300, 20304.
[69] STC 1475-1640 25723
[70] STC 1641-1700, K500.
[71] King came from a long line of clergy; he was descended
from a
nephew of Robert King, the last Abbot of Osney, who was named the first
Bishop of Oxford in 1542. For Kings life, see Margaret Crum, ed., The
Poems of Henry King (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965), pp. 1-27.
[72] STC 1475-1640, 610, 21739, 12713, 11467, 20332, 25371;
STC 1641-1700, F597A, F600A.
[73] STC 1475-1640, 624, 14985-14986. Andrewes'
other sermons are in his collected works but were not published
separately.
[74] David Cressy, Bonfires and Bells (London: Weidenfeld
& Nicholson, 1989), pp. 161, 169.
[75] STC 1641-1700, L2709, 2712-2713; H1113.
[76] From John Aubrey, Brief Lives, quoted in Trevor A. Owen, Lancelot
Andrewes (Boston: Twayne, 1981), p. 144.
[77] T. S. Eliot, Selected Essays (New York: Harcourt, Brace,
1932), p. 301. Eliot's essay on Andrewes accounts for
much of Andrewes' popularity in the twentieth century.
On Andrewes' sermons see Nicholas Lossky, Lancelot
Andrewes
the Preacher (1555-1626) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991) and Davies,
pp. 142-184. The 96 sermons were reprinted as vols. 1-5 of The Works of
Lancelot Andrewes, ed. J.P. Wilson
and James Bliss, 11 vols. (Oxford: J.H. Parker, 1841-1854, reprinted
New York: AMS Press, 1967).
[78] STC 1475-1640, 7038; STC 1641-1700, D1862, D1872. The
standard
modern edition is The Sermon' of John Donne ed. George R. Potter and
Evelyn M. Simpson, 10 vols. (Berkeley: University of California Press,
1953-62).
[79] Quoted in William R. Mueller, John Donne: Preacher
(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962), p. 209.
[80] The Fast Sermons to Parliament were reprinted in the
series "The English Revolution" (London: Cornmarket Press, 1970).
[81] STC 1641-1700 B5204-5214.
[82] STC 1641-1700, W1414A-1420.
[83] His works are STC 1641-1700, S5556-5679.
[84] Cf Davies, pp. 181-184; Norman Sykes, Church and State in
the
XVIII Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934), p. 262;
Louis G. Locke, Tillotson: A Study in Seventeenth-Century Literature
(Copenhagen: Rosenkilde and Bagger, 1954). Tillotson s Works were
edited by Thomas Birch, 10 vols. (London: Richard Priestly, 1820).
[85] John Evelyn, Diary, ed. E. S. de Beer (5 vole., Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1952), IV, 544-45.
[86] Twenty-two of Wake's sermons were published in a
two-volume
edition, 1737. His manuscript correspondence fills 31 volumes at Christ
Church. His career has been studied by Norman Sykes, William Wake, 2
vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957).
~~~~~~~~
By STANFORD LEHMBERG[*]
[*] Stanford Lehmberg is Professor of History at the
University of
Minnesota. His most recent book is The Reformation of Cathedrals:
Cathedrals in English Society, 1485-1603, published by Princeton
University Press in 1988.