Refine search for CPUs and Memory

VIA Nano vs Intel Atom

Author Edward Chester
Published 14th Aug 2008
VIA Nano vs Intel Atom
Discuss this article  4 comments    Email this to a friend  Email this to a friend TrustedReviews NewslettersTrustedReviews Newsletters

Based on the largely positive reaction there has been to the recent deluge of netbooks and nettops that use Intel's low cost and low power Atom CPU, it would be fair to assume Intel has these markets all sewn up. However, while Intel certainly has the PR budget and manufacturing capacity to spread the word and flood the market with these devices, it doesn't necessarily have the best low cost, low power CPU. At least that's what VIA would like us to believe.

Announced around the same time as Intel's Atom, VIA's new Nano CPU is widely reported to be faster than Atom yet draw only slightly more power (dependent on clock speed). Indeed VIA has been claiming Nano can even run Crysis and playback Blu-ray video.

On top of this VIA also has its OpenBook Mini-Note reference design, which is essentially exactly the same as the netbooks we've come to know and love but with a Nano CPU inside. So, it would seem there's set to be quite a battle over the next few months to see which is the superior low power, low cost platform.

With this in mind, we've been pestering VIA for quite a while to let us have a play with Nano and a couple of weeks ago it came good, sort of. Rather than the shiny OpenBook mini-notebook we were expecting, VIA actually provided us with a mini-ITX desktop platform.

So, a little disheartened we went away and collected up a similar Intel Atom based mini-ITX motherboard, courtesy our chums over at bit-tech, and set about seeing just what these budget CPUs are capable of.

Now, we understand that for notebooks and other mobile devices, ergonomics and battery life can be rather more significant than CPU performance, at least up to a certain point. But unfortunately, those are obviously both things we can't test directly here. However, what we can do is see how much power these desktop platforms draw during our testing and extrapolate a performance/power ratio for the two CPUs, which should give us some idea of potential battery life.

Also, in our reviews of the various netbooks we've seen so far, we haven't gone into much detail about performance, so we thought this would be a good opportunity to see just what you can and can't do on netbooks.

So, without further ado, lets get stuck into some testing.



Register to receive the latest Reviews and News Headlines directly to your Inbox every day, and enter our regular competitions. More Info.

Your Name

Email Address

Latest 4 of 4 Comments

Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.

Comment pimlicosound said on 15th August 2008

The video playback tests hardly seemed fair, since they were using different graphics chipsets, which make up a large part of the performance in this area. Also, I believe VIA wer... more

Comment Kebab said on 15th August 2008

How are they not fair? The Atom and Nano are limited to their specific chipsets and this is a *platform test* not a CPU. If you want to find a PCI card to do video offloading - goo... more

Comment Ed said on 15th August 2008

Essentially, as the article says, we've been pushing VIA for some Nano products for a while and what they came up with was a desktop board. Now you can argue the semantics of ... more

Comment Mr Real said on 7th November 2008

VIA Nano vs Intel ATOM. I've been reading those reviews for months now. And not without reason. I am ready to buy. I have been ready. But I decided to give VIA a chance and w... more

See all 4 comments on this article.

Add Comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.