ACLU Blog of Rights - Official Blog of the ACLU National Office


Join Us At:

September 24th, 2009 Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg!RedditDeliciousFacebook

Fighting for Free Speech at the G20 in Pittsburgh

After the ACLU of Pennsylvania successfully sued last week to force the city of Pittsburgh to allow several groups to hold demonstrations around the G20 Summit, it seemed that free speech would prevail in the Steel City.

Unfortunately, this has not proven to be the case. Following the court ruling, the Pittsburgh police department has engaged in a pattern of harassment of G20 demonstrators, singling out the Seeds of Peace Collective, one of several groups providing food support to the protestors.

The police have repeatedly tried to intimidate members of the collective, citing them with minor traffic violations, illegally searching their bus, towing their legally parked bus, detaining and charging members walking home with loitering, repeatedly demanding identification, and pressuring private property owners to rescind their permission for the collective to park its bus.

Despite evidence of systematic harassment, a federal judge refused to grant a temporary injunction to stop the harassment in a second lawsuit.

The ACLU-PA is collecting reports of violations of protestors’ rights at the G20 and publishing them on our Web site. Anyone witnessing a violation is encouraged to call the ACLU G20 hotline at (412) 562-5015.

The ACLU-PA and the National Lawyers Guild have dispatched over 150 legal observers to monitor law enforcement’s treatment of the protestors throughout the week.

More information about the ACLU and the G20 is available here.

Check out The New York Times blog post about the G20 protests, which includes a video featuring an interview with ACLU-PA Legal Director Vic Walczak.

Google Bookmarks Technorati StumbleUpon Digg!RedditDeliciousFacebook

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

7 Responses to “Fighting for Free Speech at the G20 in Pittsburgh”

  1. freepittsburghperson Says:

    I was offended by the Pittsburgh police. On the WPXI Pittsburgh website, there is a video of an officer pushing a woman on a bike for no reason. Then, I don’t blame her, she got mad and tossed her bike in the air. So they arrested her and the TV station labels the video “Woman Throws Bike” I can clearly NOT see why she had to be provoked and what danger she posed. What the video didn’t show, and which I saw on their live TV broadcast at 11:30 pm last night, was another officer going after their TV crew trying to intimidate them, shame on the Pittsburgh police. I hope others saw that other bit of footage.

  2. shockednewyorker Says:

    Having seen Guiliani NYPD just spirit a person off 42nd Street in unmarked van, I am greatly disturbed by YOUTUBE video showing camouflaged military men whisking away a demonstrator at the G20. If the video is true, it needs investigation.

  3. JFK Says:

    “Today we need a nation of minute men; citizens who are not only prepared to take up arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as a basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom. The cause of liberty, the cause of American, cannot succeed with any lesser effort.”
    - President John F. Kennedy, January 29, 1961


    DR ROBERT HASTY: I cannot accept the use of the “NOISE CANNON” against demonstrators by the Pittsburgh City Police Dept. This is not an irritant! This instrument causes permanent hearing loss. It uses decible levels of 165-185db. In my own research, permanent hearing loss begins at the 85db level. Is causing permanent disabilitylegal in this country?

  5. Max Says:

    I was at the protests at Arsenal Park, and then in Oakland when the Police started harassing students.

    They’re nothing but pigs.

    Something had better be done about this. This disgusts me that this happened in my city and my country.

  6. Maggie Says:

    I watch these protesters on TV (regular TV) and it seemed to me they were more trouble being aggresive and throwing things. They acutally have people that feed them? Who pays for that. Sounds pretty organized to me. We have all seen this before at many G20 meetings and the WTO meetings. Seems to me that they are worse than the Tea Party people.

    Free Speach my foot. They went there looking for trouble. Covering their faces, too too organized. Sounds to me that the ACLU only helps the roudy people not the peaceful people. Do you know what organization pays the bills for these kinds of demonstrations? I would like to know.

  7. Tom Says:

    Texas trans corridor …….why can’t the American leaders who signed off on this Texas trans corridor deal be arrested under the National Security Act of 1947 and / or the Patriot Act ?

Enter this code:

© ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
This is the Web site of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation.
Learn more about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU.

User Agreement | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Site Map