Films

12° London Hi 18°C / Lo 11°C

Oscar-winning director: why I'm leaving Scientology

Haggis fires parting shot at 'hate-filled and bigoted' church

By Guy Adams in Los Angeles

Paul Haggis has angrily pulled out of the Church of Scientology

GETTY

Paul Haggis has angrily pulled out of the Church of Scientology

Paul Haggis, the Oscar-winning film-maker, has resigned from the Church of Scientology in an explosive letter that damns what he calls the organisation's "hate-filled" and "bigoted" opposition to gay marriage.

Haggis, who wrote Crash, Million Dollar Baby, and the last two James Bond films also registered his anger at the church's alleged "disconnection" policy, complaining that it encouraged his wife to live estranged from her parents.

His letter was sent to Scientology's official spokesman, Tommy Davis, in August. But it leaked to the Hollywood press this weekend, bringing further tricky publicity to the already-embattled organisation.

Mr Haggis, who had been a member for 35 years announced that he cannot "in good conscience" remain with "an organisation where gay bashing [is] tolerated" and which has "allowed [its] name to be allied with the worst elements of the Christian right".

The letter claimed that Scientologists in San Diego helped fund last year's campaign for Proposition 8, the ballot measure which outlawed same-sex unions in California.

It told how Mr Haggis, who also wrote the recent Terminator movie, became deeply concerned at the move, and persuaded Mr Davis to draw up a press release denouncing opposition to gay marriage. That release was never made public.

"You promised action. Ten months passed. No action," said Mr Haggis. "The church's refusal to denounce the actions of these bigots, hypocrites and homophobes is cowardly. I can think of no other word. Silence is consent, Tommy. I refuse to consent."

Although spokesmen have publicly denied that Scientology has a policy of "disconnecting" members who break rules, Mr Haggis further claimed that the parents of his wife, the actress Deborah Rennard, fell victim to that very practice.

"My wife was ordered to disconnect from her parents because of something absolutely trivial they supposedly did 25 years ago when they resigned from the church," he wrote. "It caused her terrible personal pain... For a year-and-a-half, [she] didn't speak to her parents and they had limited access to their grandchild. It was a terrible time."

The loss of Mr Haggis will be keenly felt by an organisation that deeply covets celebrity members from within the film community such as Tom Cruise and John Travolta.

Mr Davis yesterday confirmed to The Independent that the resignation letter, published on the blog of Hollywood Reporter columnist Roger Friedman, was genuine. However he said its contents were based on several false assumptions.

Although the Church of Scientology had been identified as a supporter of Proposition 8 on an internet site, it actually has no policy with regard to gay marriage, he said.

"We support civil rights for everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation, creed or race. As an organisation, we have members of every race, colour and sexual orientation. In fact we have many, many gay members."

With regard to "disconnection" Mr Davis re-iterated that the Church has no policy on the matter. However members are within their rights to privately refuse to communicate with friends or family members who insult their religious beliefs.

Either way, the affair comes at an awkward time for Scientology's public image. John Travolta and his wife, the actress Kelly Preston, were recently forced to deny reports that they were quitting the Church – founded by science fiction writer L Ron Hubbard – over its beliefs regarding psychology.

The couple's teenage son, Jett, collapsed and died earlier this year. His death was linked to severe autism he had suffered his entire life. However Scientologists take a sceptical view with regard to the existence of autism.

Last week, the Church was also placed in an embarrassing position by the British journalist Martin Bashir, who made a documentary about it for ABC's Nightline programme.

During that show, Mr Davis stormed out of an interview with Mr Bashir when asked if, as has been widely reported, Scientology teaches that Earth was first populated by an intergalactic emperor called Xenu, who buried his people in volcanoes 75 million years ago.

Haggis's letter: 'You promised action'

As you know, for 10 months now I have been writing to ask you to make a public statement denouncing the actions of the Church of Scientology of San Diego... The church's refusal to denounce the actions of these bigots, hypocrites and homophobes is cowardly. I can think of no other word. Silence is consent, Tommy. I refuse to consent...

I am now painfully aware that you might see this as an attack and just as easily use things I have confessed over the years to smear my name. Well, luckily I have never held myself up to be anyone's role model.

The great majority of Scientologists I know are good people who are genuinely interested in improving conditions on this planet and helping others. I have to believe that if they knew what I now know, they too would be horrified. But I know how easy it was for me to defend our organisation and dismiss our critics, without ever truly looking at what was being said; I did it for 35 years. And so, after writing this letter, I am fully aware that some of my friends may choose to no longer associate with me, or in some cases work with me. I will always take their calls, as I always took yours. However, I have finally come to the conclusion that I can no longer be a part of this group.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

One by one....
[info]timspooner wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 02:49 am (UTC)
By singular action, some people will come to their senses. Unfortunately, for every one that sees the nonsense for what it is, several more will step forward to join the club.....
An expensive faith
[info]xoixoi1 wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 05:24 am (UTC)
I am a former member of this "religion". After "donating" more than forty thousand pounds on courses and being told to disconnect from my father, who they accused of being a suppresive person, I finally left scientology. Low level scientologists are not told about the Xenu story or the murdered space alien ghosts that inhabit us as they are not yet indoctrinated (brainwashed) enough to believe it. It costs up to a quarter of a million pounds in fixed donations to reach the upper levels of this organisation. I know of no religion that requires money in exchange for salvation. I understand now why this cult does not have charitable status in this country. I concur with Mr Haggis' accounts.
Re: An expensive faith
[info]doug_piranha wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 08:41 am (UTC)
you are 100% right
But sadly, many weak minded individuals - who do NOT have money to "get out "
of one celebruty fantasy or another - drugs, religion, booze - have their lives destroyed.
Re: An expensive faith
[info]corporeal_v001 wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 12:51 pm (UTC)

Is it a religion or a pyramid business?
Re: An expensive faith - [info]reasonaboveall - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 01:32 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: An expensive faith - [info]corporeal_v001 - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 02:12 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: An expensive faith - [info]tomstreamer - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 04:42 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: An expensive faith - [info]corporeal_v001 - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 04:52 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: An expensive faith - [info]reasonaboveall - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 07:40 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: An expensive faith - [info]corporeal_v001 - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 08:00 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: An expensive faith - [info]reasonaboveall - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 08:22 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: An expensive faith - [info]tomstreamer - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 04:37 pm (UTC) Expand
WHO CARES?
[info]georgesign wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 07:40 am (UTC)
Anybody that is stupid enough to believe in any form of organised religion is obviously weak-minded even if they are a "Oscar-winning film maker". Why is it when people become "famous" we always have to hear about their thoughts on all manner of subjects not connected with their business. It's like reading about the local plumber's thoughts on reincarnation. Who cares?
Re: WHO CARES?
[info]hotporridge wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 11:14 am (UTC)
Well, i wouldn't mind hearing about the 'local plumbers thoughts on reincarnation' - I'm sure it would be just as interesting as anybody else's. Also, I like hearing people talk about their views on subjects whether or not it's related to how they make their money. Why be so black and white about things?

The problem, for me, arises when celebrities use their status to sell personal beliefs to the general public, using the popularity of a fictional character to gain gravitas. That, in a word, is lame. This director was a member for 35 YEARS and only now, sees the bad stuff, you gotta ask yourself, what is really going on?

Anyway, Scientology reminds me a little of the Freemasons - little men in little groups, all watching each other's backs, secret handshakes, singing hymns and making up all sorts of nonsense.
Re: WHO CARES?
[info]hotporridge wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 11:18 am (UTC)
Well, I wouldn't mind hearing about the 'local plumbers thoughts on reincarnation' - I'm sure it would be just as interesting as anybody else's. Also, I like hearing people talk about their views on subjects whether or not it's related to how they make their money. Why be so black and white about things?

The problem, for me, arises when celebrities use their status to sell personal beliefs to the general public, using the popularity of a fictional character to gain gravitas. That, in a word, is lame. This director was a member for 35 YEARS and only now, sees the bad stuff, you gotta ask yourself, what is really going on?

Anyway, Scientology reminds me a little of the Freemasons - little men in little groups, all watching each other's backs, secret handshakes, singing hymns and making up all sorts of nonsense.
Leavinbg Scientology
[info]artgenie wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 07:43 am (UTC)
A man who quit this 'church' of Scientology, in California, found a snake in his mailbox. Other attempts were made on his life. They do not take kindly to members who quit. So Mr Haggis, watch out and keep your eyes open from now on.
Paul Haggis
[info]exportskip wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 08:18 am (UTC)
Well done, Mr Haggis. My hope is that more and more people will have the opportunity to see this organisation for what it is: a money making machine. If the cogs in the wheel fail to bring in the money, they are abused and punished. If they speak out, they are punished and removed from their families and friends.

Yes, xoixoi1, it is ridiculous and scary that people spend a fortune and submit themselves to years of brainwashing before being told scientology's Ultimate Truth about their extra-terrestrial 'origins'. No wonder Tommy Davis walked out of Martin Bashir's interview when asked about this. You can't have people finding their Ultimate Truth for free, or before they're sufficiently psychologically pliant to actually believe it. Most people wouldn't realise that scientologists aren't allowed to use the internet. I wonder why?

Re: Paul Haggis
[info]drg40 wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 09:13 am (UTC)
"will have the opportunity to see this organisation for what it is: a money making machine"

Well, I quite like the irony of a bloke dripping with gold telling us that he believes in a religion which has as one of it's central tenets "Give all thou hath to the poor and follow me".

The Franciscans thought that was a nonsense in the 15th Century, but greed has its own idealogy.

Truth is that all you need is a grey haired old man standing in front of a stained glass window on telly, telling the world that he will ensure a route to the afterlife if you shell out, and the shills pay, oh my do they pay. And it's like diets for women, the weirder you can make the rules the more they love it. That's why the meeja men adore freako religious programs if they can get away with it; the money flows like water.

" I know of no religion that requires money in exchange for salvation." I suggest you might look at Vatican 2, prior to that date the RC church was distinctly odd in exactly the way you suggest - but the reason for that commendable sea change in belief/ideology systems is a story in itself, one with which the archaic US cults have yet to catch up.
[info]doug_piranha wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 08:37 am (UTC)
Oscar winner ? So what ?
Left after 35 years ? OH he must have been toturaged to walk out so soon !!!
What scientology only just become anti gay - anti family ties ?

Just shows winning an oscar and writing crap movie scripts does not = intellignece.

What really is disgusitng is celebrities like this have the money and freedom to indulge
their fantasies - and can bale out at any time.
But what of the impressionable people who swallow all this crap - because "an ocar winning director "
is member.

Just like all the other celebrities that have now sobered up, got off the smack, settlled down
with their families. Meanwhile many ordinary peoples' lives have been shattered by following these celebrity fantasies - and they don't have the money, power or support system to salvage their lives.
How are you so sure ...
[info]ydef wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 08:59 am (UTC)
that celebrities that stay in this 'church' are not being extorted or highly leveraged in some way to maintain their membership?
Re: How are you so sure ... - [info]doug_piranha - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 07:12 pm (UTC) Expand
Flaky People
[info]brinksman wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 09:01 am (UTC)
Why did it take Haggis so long to realise he was camped with a bunch of extreme and very flaky people?
Still, better late than never...
The truth at the
[info]andrea_2 wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 09:14 am (UTC)
centre of the Scientology religion reads like the plot of a third rate Science Fiction novel. Hardly surprising given the job of the founder of this cult.

Anyone believing in Scientology needs serious help.

Re: The truth at the
[info]andrea_2 wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 09:19 am (UTC)
Just remembered what my son told me re: Scientologists. He has to walk past one of their 'churches' on his way to work. For work he has to dress very smartly, suit, tie, very etc. When he's dressed smartly for work, the acolytes who hang around outside the church try and engage him in conversation and want to give him their literature. But when out of work, he dresses in old scruffy jeans and T-shirts, and they have never stopped him when he looks like he hasn't got any money.
So let me get this right. People who partake in, and..
[info]workerholic_joe wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 09:40 am (UTC)
..practice heterosexuality (which is still the norm) under a democratic process are both hate filled and bigoted? Well, that's just charming. Thank you so much for bestowing such a terrible, soul-staining label upon the very people whose lifestyle choice (straight) brought you into this world in the first place.

Heterophobic hypocrites.
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and..
[info]almightymat wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 10:27 am (UTC)

No, Collin, you funny little hate-filled man, you...did you actually read the article, or just fly of the handle when you saw that it was also about 'the gays'?

"Hate filled" because they actively funded Proposition 8, the ballot measure which outlawed same-sex unions in California

"Hypocritical" because the leadership of the organisation did this while having "many, many gay members" and publically claiming to have no policy on gay marriage, rather believeing in equal civil rights for all...

Do you need anything else in the article explained? I'm guessing that you can take care of wiping the bile that you vented at the word 'gay' off the screen yourself...X
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]almightymat - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 11:32 am (UTC) Expand
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]almightymat - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 12:21 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]almightymat - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 01:31 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]almightymat - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 02:37 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]almightymat - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 02:54 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]almightymat - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 04:58 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]almightymat - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 05:09 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]almightymat - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 06:57 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]goatbucket - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 02:57 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]tomstreamer - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 04:49 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]almightymat - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 05:14 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]goatbucket - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 06:09 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: So let me get this right. People who partake in, and.. - [info]goatbucket - Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 07:26 pm (UTC) Expand
Buried in a Volcano
[info]juliandbsmith wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 11:20 am (UTC)

It sounds as if there are many more people lining up to be buried in a vulcano. And Tony Blair had the audacity to suggest legal protection for "religious beliefs" against commentaters and comedians.

Nice one Tony, think what the Lizard lovers, crystal healing merchants and other assorted weird tribes would have made of that.

Beware of American influences, remember they perfected the art of expensive litigation and invented "Snake Oil".
Don't call it a church
[info]robdav wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 12:31 pm (UTC)
They're no sort of church at all - don't make them sound legitimate.
Nutters
[info]door_stop wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 03:27 pm (UTC)
Anyone thinking of joining this 'loony toons' outfit, should first get a copy and read, Russell Miller's excellent, 'Bare-Faced Messiah', published in 1987, which is an expose of L. Ron Hubbard and his stupid cult. The book is a hoot and will tell a reader all he/she could want to know, about this absurd and vicious organisation.
Judgement
[info]martynw wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 04:15 pm (UTC)
One has to question Mr Haggis' judgement both now and in the past to have been a member of this cult in the first place.
[info]andre_t wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 05:27 pm (UTC)
Christianofachists
[info]goatbucket wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 06:03 pm (UTC)
Something of an insult to genuine Christians (what few there are of them left, that is).

Fake-Christianfascists is what you're thinking of, surely.
Roll over Miscavage
[info]typhoon1 wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 08:46 pm (UTC)
It's funny.
The first thing that springs to my mind when anyone asks about the benefits of the Internet is that it allowed ordinary folk to lace a pair of 20 hole Dr Martens and collectively kick the Cult of $cientology in the backside.

My only hope is that Miscavage will stay at the helm and continue to run the show further into the ground.

Oh, if the gossip is correct, there's an almost certainty that he'll get round to reading this board at somepoint.
Hi Dave, just to be clear: In the event of a car accident, I choose Paramedics over Cruise, K?
Why does this cult attract so many actors?
[info]chrisclarkgold wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 11:01 pm (UTC)
Rubbished so often, so many public detractors, employing all manner of assisted disconnection coaches to help people escape, yet actors who are often reasonable thinking people (with some exceptions) seem somehow drawn like moths to a burning candle.

It is not even the usual triumph of hope over reality that less well off followers of other US cults (sorry religions) seem to get caught up in either.

Most viewed

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date