SIOE Stop Islamisation Of Europe

Racism is the lowest form of human stupidity, but Islamophobia is the height of common sense

The new totalitarianism – Internazislam

Posted by Sitemaster on November 1, 2009



SIOE is probably the most hard-line anti-Islam group in the world.

Recent correspondence and conversations have necessitated further explanation of our reasons for being so uncompromising. 

SIOE is against totalitarianism, such as communism, Nazism, international socialism (internazism) and obviously, Islam

Islam is the nastiest form of totalitarianism. It is internazism or communism with a dodgy deity, a theocratic despotism 

Totalitarian systems attempt to attain total control, total world domination and invariably resort to violence to achieve their aim. 

Nazis did not betray socialism; they betrayed nationalism. Having taken over Germany, they immediately invaded other countries in their quest to fulfil the true socialist philosophy of expansionism.  Nazis (or more correctly, internazis) sought to build the Third Reich, the third empire, just as Muslims seek the Caliphate and just as communists seek the “workers’ world utopia” 

Totalitarian systems are not just some kind of ethereal ideology; they require people to make them work, in other words members. 

Nazism needs Nazis, communism needs communists, internazism requires international socialists and Islam needs Muslims

Totalitarian systems are not necessarily racist, although Nazism undoubtedly was.  Communism, internazism and Islam are irrefutably totalitarian, expansionist regimes, just like Nazism, but they do not have a racial context 

Islam comprises many races and Muslims kill non-Muslims of all races. Race is not an issue either for Muslims or anti-Islamists 

Not all Germans were Nazis – all Nazis were/are Nazis 

Not all Russians, East Europeans and Chinese etc were communists. All communists were/are communists 

Not all Arabs, Pakistanis, Indonesians etc are Muslims.  All Muslims are Muslims

Not all Nazis were Gestapo, SS or concentration camp guards.  All Nazis were Nazis 

Not all communists were Politburo or KGB.  All communists were communists 

Not all Muslims are Al-Qaeda or Taliban.  All Muslims are Muslims

There are no moderate totalitarianists, whether they be Nazis, internazis, communists or Muslims

The goal of totalitarianists is world domination and Islam is the worst totalitarian system.  Nazis and communists had favoured statuses and received benefits that were denied to non-members.  Islam bestows favoured status to Muslims, declaring Muslims (the Umma) to be a higher class of human to the Kuffar (people sensible and rational enough not to be Muslims)

Uniquely, Islam has the death penalty for those who leave Islam.  Not even the Nazis, internazis and communists have such a draconian punishment for deserting the party, although they all kill dissenters and opponents.  Naturally, Muslims kill opponents, dissenters and even mild critics who make movies

Totalitarian systems permit everything necessary to achieve their goal of world domination, murder, violence, lying, stealing, hacking websites, absolutely anything.  However, only Islam actually has this (i.e. absolutely anything) written into its manifesto

Nazis oppressed and murdered minority communities and those they considered inferior.  When forming the majority and in power Muslims behave like Nazis, so must be called Nazis.    This can be seen all over the world in Muslim countries. Similarly, Communists in power behave like Nazis, so must be called Nazis.  At least internazists are honest when they call themselves “international socialists” but then spoil it by calling those who oppose them “Nazis” and hurling stones at them (like Muslims).  Nazis, internazis, communists and Muslims are all Nazis in their deeds and must be considered as Nazis.  

Muslims have a philosophy of taqiyya (lying) and kitman (withholding the truth) to further the cause of Islam.  SIOE has been criticised for pointing out that Muslims declaring themselves to be moderate cannot be trusted because of taqiyya and kitman.  Well, it was Muslims who invented taqiyya and kitman, not SIOE, just as it was they who invented Islam.  So, Islam, taqiyya and kitman are problems for Muslims to solve, not for the Kuffar.  So SIOE doesn’t venture to proffer advice to Muslims on how best to solve the unsolvable.  SIOE considers it best for Muslims to leave Islam, and get a life, instead of trying to dominate everybody else’s and driving the dividing, regressive wedge of Islam into prosperous, productive Western democracies

28 Responses to “The new totalitarianism – Internazislam”

  1. DP111 said

    Islam poses a far greater threat to Western civilisation then Fascism, communism, Nazism or any combination of the the three. These three, though totalitarian, are to some degree rational in their purpose. Islam OTH, a 7th century blood thirsty desert cult, is motivated by world domination. Its texts are immutable and are not amenable change or rational analysis.

    Fascism, though bad, would not be totally alien to our culture, as in many matters, it would not infringe on many aspects of Western civilisation, that it itself takes for granted. Islam OTH would be totally alien. It would reduce women to objects of men’s pleasure by law. Islam would be against all forms of music, and any literature that did not give prime importance to the Koran. Islam is so alien to Western civilisation that it can be regarded as virtually out of this planet as far as we are concerned.

    I understand the need to use Fascism and equate it to Islam for illustrative purposes, but one must bear in mind that Islam poses a civilisational threat far greater in magnitude then Fascism in both its immediacy at the moment, and its virulence. If Islam ever came into dominance in the West, there will be no turning back. It is for this reason, that measures that would be deemed unacceptable in dealing with totalitarian threats such Communism or Fascism, must be considered as options against Islam.

  2. Sexy Infidel said

    News Blackout !
    I may be getting slightly off the totalitarian subject here (or am I ?), but neither C4 evening news or any of the BBC radio 4 news carried any coverage of the EDL & Casuals United demos in Leeds and London yesterday, despite the fact that there was UAF inspired violence at Leeds, and according to the Casuals utd site, an attack on them by the neo nazi Combat 18 group.
    Usually this sort of thing would be covered, so I’m guessing the powers that be have D-noticed it and told the media not to report under the guise of preserving a phoney sense of community cohesion, can any journalists advise us of what has gone on ?
    Also, as regards the C18 attack, this group has in the past been heavily infiltrated, and thus possibly manipulated, by the state – so again, I smell a rat. Look sharp !

  3. Stephen Gash said

    Totalitarianism is a mindset that’s weds an individual to a doctrine and a regime, that actually destroys individuality.

    Communism and Nazism have been virtually eradicated in name, certainly Nazism, which is a term of abuse, like fascism.

    The West was willing to defend itself against communism with a nuclear war. However, our “liberal left” ruling elite, seem willing to capitualte to Islam.

    The fact is, this amalgamation of totalitarian regimes is taking place. Male leaders are by and large mysogenistic and do not want women in positions of power. They wish to install sharia law as it is the best way to control people – fear under sharia.

    They mistakenly believe they can control the mosques. They cannot.

    The totalitarian mindset remains, except this time pragmatism has found a way to achieve the goal of total power.

  4. anonymous said


    by Emanuel A. Winston, Middle East Analyst & Commentator

    It is time for Leftists who wish to abandon the Land of Israel to Muslim Arab Palestinians and the Muslim/Arab nations who will soon thereafter take the surrendered Jewish Land away from the Arab Muslim Palestinians. Keep in mind that Palestinians are a despised low and endangered people, insofar as the larger Arab and Muslim nations, namely, Egypt, Iran, Syria, Kuwait, Libya, Lebanon consider them and keep them contained in the slums of permanent refugee camps instead of absorbing them and using their talents to build their societies. The Palestinians have proved to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the Gulf Oil States that they are accomplished Terrorists – trained, from childhood, to hate and kill Jews.

    By the way, in 1970 there were 100,000 Muslims in Europe; today in 2009 there are 52,000,000 (that’s 52 Million!!) Muslims in Europe.(1) How many will there be in 2050? When will they reach the “critical mass” to take over and rule their host countries?

    The Leftist Jews, as enablers, must accept a new and demeaning life-style, living under the rules and laws as dictated by the Muslim Mullahs and Ayatollahs. First the Leftist Jews must learn their subservient place under the Muslim rules of Dhimmitude….a low second (or third) class person with no human rights. That’s assuming they are left alive to serve their Muslim masters.

    In the past, (for 1878 years) Jews lived in the Land of Israel and then (for 1300 years) when they were a minority in Arab Muslim lands, they were treated as low people according to Koranic law. By Muslim law they had to step off the sidewalk into the street (usually also a running sewer) when they saw a Muslim coming. Jews were required to wear a distinctive piece of clothing or head-dress. As another method of contempt, Jews were not allowed to carry a knife or a sword for self defense. Weapons were reserved only for “manly” Muslims, therefore, according to the Koran, Jews (and Christians) had to pay a special tax, a “Jizra”, to “be protected” by the Muslims. When the tax was paid, they were traditionally slapped in the face to be reminded of their low status. Christians had to plead with the Mullahs to obtain a key to enter their church (especially the Church of the Holy Sepulcher) and that too came with a slap. Jews and Christians also could not defend themselves in court against a Muslim. Their homes and synagogues could not be higher than a Muslim’s. If a Jewish boy’s father died before the boy was 13, the boy was taken and raised as a Muslim. Prevailing claims by the Muslim Mullahs are that all children are born Muslim and then “spoiled” by Jews and Christians into the “wrong faith”. Therefore, the Muslims could again gain dominance, all children who have been weaned from their mother’s milk would be transferred to Muslim Madrassahs to complete their education (brain-washing) as devout Muslims. (2)

    President Barack Hussein Obama was educated in his early impressionable years and was raised as a Muslim. No doubt, he retains the teachings of his father and the Mullahs.

    Many more Islamic laws were engraved in Muslim stone to subjugate the Jews and the Christians who lived in Muslim Arab lands. That’s why they’re called “Dhimmis”.

    Here again the Leftist Jews are well practiced in lying in Leftist -dominated Courts – against other Jews so they are already acclimated to appeasing Arab Muslims and assuming a kneeling position before Muslims.

    Naturally, Leftist Jews – not being prideful of their religion – would accept the Islamic doctrine of subservience created in the 7th Century, that no synagogue may be built that exceeds the height of any Muslim Mosque, demonstrating Jewish acceptance of the their debased and lowly status.

    In the first year of Muslim conquest (G-d forbid), Leftist Jews would have to give up their wives to Muslim men for rape and subservience. Jewish children would be taken to be raised in the “true faith” of Islam. The Jewish men would be either slaughtered or put into forced labor, following the example set by Mohammed when he broke the 10 year Hudabiya Treaty in 2 years with the Jewish Koreish tribe who once offered him protection from his pursuers.

    The Leftist Jewish leaders of today, like the “Judenrat” of Adolph Hitler’s time would expect better treatment given their betrayal of their own Jews and the Jewish nation to the Palestinian Muslims and the Arab nations. But, the “Judenrat”, after assisting the Nazis were themselves shipped to the Death Camps – with their families.

    Instead, leaders like Ariel Sharon, Ehud Olmert, Ehud Barak, ‘et al’, I suspect they would be judged by a Muslim Court; judged guilty and hung or had their heads chopped off by the Mullahs’ executioners. Then as a final gesture of humiliation for lost 7 wars they waged against the despised Jews, the bodies of Israeli leaders (Prime Minister, Defense Minister, Supreme Court Judges) who worked on behalf of the New – Second State of Palestine, would likely be buried in the cesspools of Gaza. This would be an extreme gesture of contempt for their perfidious betrayal of their own people. There the Muslims could relieve themselves on Israel’s Leftist leaders as their gestures of appreciation for their betrayal and subversion of their own nation and their own people.

    Regrettably, real Jews will also suffer for the betrayal and cowardice of their leaders. Their names will go down in history – not only as traitors but, what remains of their bodies will not be allowed to be buried in sacred soil of Israel. Those that will use their privileged status as Prime Ministers, Defense Ministers, Judges, Peace Now advocates, J Street double-talkers, will try to escape and gain entry to other nations.

    But, as during WW2, the nations of the world will close their borders and Jews will not be allowed entry. Of course, some will sneak through and try to hide themselves as did the Nazi war criminals who found refuge in South America through the “rat-lines” of the Church and the Red Cross. (3)

    However thereafter, they will (or should) be hunted down by real Jews for betraying the Jewish people and the crimes that were committed because of them. Not one should escape Justice, no matter how long it takes. No Nuremberg Tribunals but, if found guilty, they deserve summary Justice and execution. Those Jewish collaborators would do well to hide themselves – lest they share in the vengeance of retribution.

    • Sitemaster said

      It is not only Jews making political decisions who would do well to hide themselves, it is also the rest of the dhimmies who are capitulating or indeeed, conniving, to install Islam and sharia. However, there is no doubt the Umma seek full vengeance on the Jews.

  5. anonymous said

    Egypt: Christians hide in homes after Muslims distribute leaflets saying “burn, vandalize and clean the country of these evil immoral infidels”

  6. stop sucking our money said

    Has Anyone Read the Copenhagen Agreement?

    We can only hope that world leaders will do nothing more than enjoy a pleasant bicycle ride around the charming streets of Copenhagen come December. For if they actually manage to wring out an agreement based on the current draft text of the Copenhagen climate-change treaty, the world is in for some nasty surprises. Draft text, you say? If you haven’t heard about it, that’s because none of our otherwise talkative political leaders have bothered to tell us what the drafters have already cobbled together for leaders to consider. And neither have the media.

    Enter Lord Christopher Monckton. The former adviser to Margaret Thatcher gave an address at Bethel University in St. Paul, Minnesota, earlier this month that made quite a splash. For the first time, the public heard about the 181 pages, dated Sept. 15, that comprise the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—a rough draft of what could be signed come December.

    So far there have been more than a million hits on the YouTube post of his address. It deserves millions more because Lord Monckton warns that the aim of the Copenhagen draft treaty is to set up a transnational “government” on a scale the world has never before seen.

    The “scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention” that starts on page 18 contains the provision for a “government.” The aim is to give a new as yet unnamed U.N. body the power to directly intervene in the financial, economic, tax and environmental affairs of all the nations that sign the Copenhagen treaty.

    The reason for the power grab is clear enough: Clause after complicated clause of the draft treaty requires developed countries to pay an “adaptation debt” to developing countries to supposedly support climate change mitigation. Clause 33 on page 39 says that “by 2020 the scale of financial flows to support adaptation in developing countries must be [at least $67 billion] or [in the range of $70 billion to $140 billion per year].”

    And how will developed countries be slugged to provide for this financial flow to the developing world? The draft text sets out various alternatives, including option seven on page 135, which provides for “a [global] levy of 2 per cent on international financial market [monetary] transactions to Annex I Parties.” Annex 1 countries are industrialized countries, which include among others the U.S., Australia, Britain and Canada.

    To be sure, countries that sign international treaties always cede powers to a U.N. body responsible for implementing treaty obligations. But the difference is that this treaty appears to have been subject to unusual attempts to conceal its convoluted contents. And apart from the difficulty of trying to decipher the U.N. verbiage, there are plenty of draft clauses described as “alternatives” and “options” that should raise the ire of free and democratic countries concerned about preserving their sovereignty.

    Lord Monckton himself only became aware of the extraordinary powers to be vested in this new world government when a friend found an obscure U.N. Web site and searched through several layers of hyperlinks before discovering a document that isn’t even called the draft “treaty.” Instead, it’s labelled a “Note by the Secretariat.”

    Interviewed by broadcaster Alan Jones on Sydney radio Monday, Lord Monckton said “this is the first time I’ve ever seen any transnational treaty referring to a new body to be set up under that treaty as a ‘government.’ But it’s the powers that are going to be given to this entirely unelected government that are so frightening.” He added: “The sheer ambition of this new world government is enormous right from the start—that’s even before it starts accreting powers to itself in the way that these entities inevitably always do.”

    Critics have admonished Lord Monckton for his colorful language. He has certainly been vigorous. In his exposé of the draft Copenhagen treaty in St. Paul, he warned Americans that “in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy and your prosperity away forever.” Yet his critics fail to deal with the substance of what he says.

    Ask yourself this question: Given that our political leaders spend hundreds of hours talking about climate change and the need for a global consensus in Copenhagen, why have none of them talked openly about the details of this draft climate-change treaty? After all, the final treaty will bind signatories for years to come. What exactly are they hiding? Thanks to Lord Monckton we now know something of their plans.

    Janos Pasztor, director of the Secretary-General’s Climate Change Support Team, told reporters in New York Monday that with the U.S. Congress yet to pass a climate-change bill, a global climate-change treaty is now an unlikely outcome in Copenhagen. Let’s hope he is right. And thank you, America.

  7. Infidela said

    All religion is totalitarianism, but ISLAM IS THE WORST.

  8. sioe supporter said

    ‘Lord of Rings’ producer may make Prophet Mohammad film


    American Barrie Osborne says $150-million English-language movie will ‘educate people about true meaning of Islam.’ Prophet will not be depicted in film, in accordance with Islamic rules.,7340,L-3798741,00.html

  9. stop sucking our money said

    American Barrie Osborne says $150-million English-language movie will ‘educate people about true meaning of Islam.’


  10. islam is a cult said

    Muslim wife tries to slit husband’s throat for not being devout enough

  11. anonymous said

  12. anonymous said

  13. anonymous said

  14. Anglo Saxon said

    The Evil 3 are coming together to form an unholly trinity, Anyone ever read nostradamus and the Iran war, it mentions in there Nazisim, Comunisim and Islam will join forces, it looks like he could be right

  15. Anglo Saxon said

    Nick Griffin was racially abused by a Muslim man who made threatening ‘gun gestures’ towards him, a court heard today.

    Mr Griffin was giving evidence in the trial of 23-year-old Tauriq Khalid, from Burnley, who is accused of shouting ‘white b*****ds’ towards Griffin and other BNP members who were demonstrating in the Lancashire town.

    As the far-Right leader gave media interviews outside Burnley police station last November, Khalid drove past and made the comment, returning shortly afterwards to make the gun gesture, Preston Crown Court was told.

    The defendant denies one charge of using racially abusive threatening behaviour against Griffin.

    But he admits he stopped his silver Vauxhall Astra at the scene but says he shouted, ‘Nick Griffin, you f*****g w****r’ and the hand gesture was a V-sign.

    Ian Metcalfe, prosecuting, told the jury of seven men and five women that the incident took place as several BNP members, including Griffin, staged a peaceful demonstration outside Burnley police station against the arrest earlier that day of four party colleagues.

    Read more:

    • DP111 said

      It is extremely insensitive and bad mannered of the BNP to demonstrate in Burnley, or for that matter in any town or city in Britain. Don’t they know that Britain is Islamic by default, and it is bad manners to insult your host.

      • Stephen Gash said

        Except it doesn’t demonstrate. It just ponces off others’ efforts while criticising their efforts.

  16. is islam a religion? BULLSHIT! said

    “US Mosques & islamic Centers serving as paramilitary training centers for jihad”

  17. sioe supporter said

    MICKEY MOUSE , tom & jerry FACING FATWA !!! Death to Mickey Mouse!

    Mickey Mouse is a soldier of satan and must die, says a Muslim cleric.

    Tom and Jerry have also incurred the wrath of Sheikh Muhammad Munajid who fears they are corrupting Islamic youth.

    The Saudi Arabian cleric also recently denounced the Beijing Games as the “bikini Olympics” because of the female athletes’ skimpy costumes which, he said, made Satan happy.

    His fatwa – an Islamic ruling which can carry a death sentence – against the cartoon characters was made in a religious affairs programme on an Arab television network.

    Asked about Islam’s teaching on mice, Mr Munajid, a former diplomat at the Saudi embassy in Washington, said that both household mice – and their cartoon counterparts – have to be killed.

    According to a translation by the Middle East Media Research Institute, he said: “The mouse is one of Satan’s soldiers and is steered by him. If a mouse falls into a pot of food – if the food is solid, you should chuck out the mouse and the food touching it, and if it is liquid – you should chuck out the whole thing, because the mouse is impure.
    “According to Islamic law, the mouse is a repulsive, corrupting creature. How do you think children view mice today – after Tom and Jerry?
    “Even creatures that are repulsive by nature, by logic and according to Islamic law, have become wonderful and are loved by children. Even mice. Mickey Mouse has become an awesome character, even though according to Islamic law, Mickey Mouse should be killed in all cases.”

    But this may be easier said than done. Mickey has survived countless attempts on his life since he first appeared in the cartoon Steamboat Willie in 1928 while Jerry has been fending off Tom’s murderous attacks since 1940.

  18. is islam a religion? BULLSHIT! said

    Muslim centers in the USA

  19. is islam a religion? BULLSHIT! said

    The number os mosques in France:

  20. is islam a religion? BULLSHIT! said

    The number os mosques im the USA

  21. is islam a religion? BULLSHIT! said

    The number of mosques founded

  22. is islam a religion? BULLSHIT! said

  23. is islam a religion? BULLSHIT! said

    mosques in European countries

  24. hrydjuverk said

    Gentlemen, here is a short message from Brigitte Gabriel on all the peace and love going on in the mosques in the USA to day.

    Brigitte Gabriel Part 4

    She had a close encounter with the religion of peace and love in South Lebanon around 1975.

    Enjoy her story.


  25. GO TO HELL ISLAM! said


    2012: Politically Correct Apocalypse

    Statue of Christ the Redeemer Crumbles

    The Kabaa Remains Intact

    In Roland Emmerich’s latest film, you will see the destruction of St. Peter’s Cathedral, the Vatican, Notre Dame, and Westminster Abby.

    You’ll also see the collapse of the White House, the Capitol, Big Ben, and the House of Representatives.

    But 2012,the new film which purports the show the end of world, does not contain any scenes of Saudis being swallowed up by desert storms or Dubai being sucked into a sea of oil.

    Yes, all the great structures of Western civiliation and Christianity will be swept away but the monuments of Islam will remain.

    The filmmakers ADMIT THEY WERE AFRAID to depict the destruction of Mecca and the Kaaba for FEAR OF ISLAMIC RETALIATION.

    Emmerich, who is well known for decimating famed landmarks in his The Day After Tomorrow and Independence Day, said that that he had no qualms about destruction of the Christ the Redeemer statue in Rio de Janeiro because he is “against organised religion.”


    The 53-year-old Emmerich admitted that the original screenplay called for a sequence in which the Kaaba disintegrates to dust but realized that such a scene COULD RESULT IN THE END OF HIS PROFESSIONAL CAREER, IF NOT HIS DEMISE.

    He told Sci-Fi Wire: “Well, I wanted to do that, I have to admit. But my co-writer Harald said I will not have a FATWA on my head because of a movie. And he was right. We have to all in the Western world think about this.

    You can actually let Christian symbols fall apart, but if you would do this with [an] Arab symbol, you would have a fatwa, and that sounds a little bit like what the state of this world is.

    “So it’s just something which I kind of didn’t [think] was [an] important element, anyway, in the film, so I kind of left it out.”

    2012 is scheduled to open in theaters on November 13.»


Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>