Click Here to Register for TheWrap.com Screening Series
Complete Awards Season Coverage

'2012's Roland Emmerich: Grilled

"Yes, maybe we’re headed for extinction ... it is kind of scary."

EMAIL
PRINT

Related

 

Keywords

Slideshow

You can usually set your calendar by Roland Emmerich and one of his huge summer disaster spectacles, such “The Day After Tomorrow” or “Independence Day.”

But this year something’s off with his timing – appropriately enough, it turns out, as his latest mega-disaster, “2012,” is based on doomsday interpretations of the Mayan calendar and its apparent prediction that a cataclysm of epic proportions awaits the earth in 2012.

Obviously this sort of thing can’t be handled by governments and scientists. It takes a filmmaker of huge ambition and with enormous visual flair to be able to do it justice and warn the masses – not that there’s anything we could do if it turns out to be true. 

Enter Emmerich, who marshaled a cast of thousands, including stars John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Thandie Newton, Danny Glover and Woody Harrelson, and enough visual effects to employ thousands more.

Here, in an exclusive interview with TheWrap, the German-born director, screenwriter and producer explains why he loves destroying the world.

Q: What sort of film did you set out to make?

A: Our basic idea was to do a big spectacle but we also tried to counter that with an interesting discussion about the ethical side of things, and I feel this is something people can relate to today. There’s a lot of doom and gloom, and the philosophical and political elements add to the disaster and spectacle element.

Q: Was this the biggest film you’ve done so far?

A: It was a little bit like a culmination of all the other films I’ve done, and because I’ve done some similar things before, it wasn’t actually as big for us as people think. We were very well prepared and the production went quite smoothly. I wasn’t pulling my hair out (laughs). It was actually quite an enjoyable experience.

Q: How big was the budget and how hard was it getting financing?

A: It was around $200 million, which is huge, but it wasn’t a problem as people know there’s a big global market for films like this.

Q: You write, direct and produce. What part of the process do you like most?

A: The most exciting part for me is always the writing and coming up with these wild ideas, but I also love shooting and working with actors. The most tedious part for me is all the visual effects. You have to be very patient. And we had over 1300.

Q: Audiences don’t usually associate John Cusack with this type of film, so how did you get him?

A: (Laughs) I know, but he was really into it so we were really happy to get him. I was thinking about who could play his character in the writing process, and when you look at that age group, there just aren’t that many actors who could pull this off. And he always looks for the reality of a scene, which is great when you have some sort of fantastic story like this.

 
1 | 2
Next

Comments

Very interesting film.
______________________
www.movabletype.org

"Yes, maybe we’re headed for extinction ... it is kind of scary."

Roland. Hoping and praying that it happens sooner rather than later so the rest of us can continue on without you and your cohorts.

Liberal-- we outsourced our movie to Canada because taxes in the U.S. are too high:

"Q: You shot this in Vancouver. Was it the tax breaks?

A: Right, that’s why. It’s why people don’t shoot big movies in America anymore."

He's probably already working on the sequel: 2012.2

NEW COMMENT

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <i> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Comments

Very interesting film.
______________________
www.movabletype.org

"Yes, maybe we’re headed for extinction ... it is kind of scary."

Roland. Hoping and praying that it happens sooner rather than later so the rest of us can continue on without you and your cohorts.

Liberal-- we outsourced our movie to Canada because taxes in the U.S. are too high:

"Q: You shot this in Vancouver. Was it the tax breaks?

A: Right, that’s why. It’s why people don’t shoot big movies in America anymore."

He's probably already working on the sequel: 2012.2

NEW COMMENT

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <i> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options