Politics

Some not-so-random videos, news, and information

1) Noam Chomsky on Marijuana

2) Marijuana Arrests For Year 2008: 847,864 - “Police arrested 847,864 persons for marijuana violations in 2008, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s annual Uniform Crime Report, released today. The total marks a three percent decrease in marijuana arrests from 2007, when law enforcement arrested a record 872,721 Americans for cannabis-related violations.

“Marijuana arrests now comprised one-half (49.8 percent) of all drug arrests reported in the United States. Of those charged with marijuana violations, approximately 89 percent, 754,224 Americans were charged with possession only. The remaining 93,640 individuals were charged with “sale/manufacture,” a category that includes all cultivation offenses, even those where the marijuana was being grown for personal or medical use.

“Marijuana arrests were highest in the Midwest and southern regions of the United States, and lowest in the west. The 2008 marijuana arrest total is the second highest annual total ever reported.”

3) Charlie Sheen's Video Message to President Obama

4) 9/11: Our Truth, and Theirs: The "official" 9/11 narrative doesn't make sense - “In spite of all the billions spent on ‘anti-terrorism’ programs during the Clinton years, and the combined efforts of our intelligence community and those of our allies’, Mohammed Atta and his cohorts managed to evade detection until the day they emblazoned their vengeance across the sky and pulled off the biggest terrorist attack in US history. That, at least, is the official story. As to what the real story is – well, we’re not allowed to ask.

“President Obama’s ‘green czar,’ one Van Jones, was recently pressured into resigning. His crime? He had once signed a letter originating with one of the ‘9/11 Truth’ organizations calling for a new investigation of the terrorist attacks. No, he hadn’t declared that 9/11 was an ‘inside job,’ as some of the more flamboyant ‘truthers’ assert: indeed, he hadn’t challenged any one specific aspect of the official story. All he had asked for was a new investigation – and once this got out (thanks to Fox News nut-job Glenn Beck), he was shown the door.

“This is the way our society deals with uncomfortable questions about ‘official’ explanations for the inexplicable – by purging all dissenters, and even anybody who asks a question without necessarily having a ready-made answer. To the stake with them! Burn the heretics! Move along, nothing to see here – and don’t ask questions unless you want to completely marginalize yourself, lose your job, and be subjected to an intensive hate campaign.

“We are asked to believe that 19 men, armed with the most basic weapons, somehow managed to elude the biggest, most expensively-accoutered intelligence apparatus in the world — and the intelligence agencies of our allies, to boot. Utilizing nothing but box-cutters and the knowledge gleaned from a few weeks at flight school, these supermen somehow managed to steer those planes into two of the most visible potential terrorist targets in the US, one of which had been successfully targeted by terrorists before. They did this with no help from any foreign intelligence agency, no nation-state in on the plot, and they did it for less than $100,000. Really?

5) Robert Newman’s History of Oil

6a) Rocket attack destroys 20 Nato tankers at Chaman border - “A number of Nato oil tankers were destroyed in a rocket attack near Custom House and FC Office at Pak-Afghan Border near Chaman. According to Geo News, supplies including 1500 oil tankers which were to be transported for Nato forces came under a rocket attack near Chaman border, triggering a blaze. Twenty oil tankers were completely destroyed in the attack.” … and6b) '30 civilians killed' in Afghan NATO strike - “Nearly 100 people, including 30 civilians, were killed in a NATO air strike called in by German troops on two hijacked fuel tankers in northern Afghanistan this month, an Afghan government-appointed official said. The September 4 strike in northern Kunduz province has drawn domestic and international criticism, and has stirred intense debate in Germany over Berlin's strategy in Afghanistan, two weeks before an election.”

7) Afghanistan: the battle for water

8) Water projects' past failures are hurting Afghan farmers - “Poor placement and management of wells and dams over several years by nongovernmental organizations and military reconstruction teams throughout Khost province have drained water tables, drying out land cultivated by thousands of farmers in the mountains.

“As a result, some farmers who grow wheat, corn, rice or fruit didn’t grow enough crops to feed their families. They turned to earning money by logging and goat herding or other means, and bought food at markets.”

9) The United States Isn't a Country — It's a Corporation!

10) Sotomayor Issues Challenge to a Century of Corporate Law - “In her maiden Supreme Court appearance last week, Justice Sonia Sotomayor made a provocative comment that probed the foundations of corporate law.

“During arguments in a campaign-finance case, the court's majority conservatives seemed persuaded that corporations have broad First Amendment rights and that recent precedents upholding limits on corporate political spending should be overruled.

“But Justice Sotomayor suggested the majority might have it all wrong -- and that instead the court should reconsider the 19th century rulings that first afforded corporations the same rights flesh-and-blood people have.

“Judges ‘created corporations as persons, gave birth to corporations as persons,’ she said. ‘There could be an argument made that that was the court's error to start with...[imbuing] a creature of state law with human characteristics.’”

11) Somali Pirates?

12) How UK oil company Trafigura tried to cover up African pollution disaster - “The Guardian can reveal evidence today of a massive cover-up by the British oil trader Trafigura, in one of the worst pollution disasters in recent history.

“Internal emails show that Trafigura, which yesterday suddenly announced an offer to pay compensation to 31,000 west African victims, was fully aware that its waste dumped in Ivory Coast was so toxic that it was banned in Europe.

“Thousands of west Africans besieged local hospitals in 2006, and a number died, after the dumping of hundreds of tonnes of highly toxic oil waste around the country's capital, Abidjan. Official local autopsy reports on 12 alleged victims appeared to show fatal levels of the poisonous gas hydrogen sulphide, one of the waste's lethal byproducts.”





Posted in | | | | Submitted by chycho on Fri, 2009-09-18 16:12.
chycho's blog | login or register to post comments

A Taste of AFRICOM: Some history on Somalia to put the most recent attacks by the Obama administration into perspective

Update: Tit for Tat: "Suicide bombers hit Somalia peacekeeping base in Mogadishu; witness says 11 dead" - "The attack came two days after al-Shabab vowed revenge for a U.S. commando raid that killed al-Qaida operative Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan in Somalia." (Note: Al-Shabaab is allegedly linked to al-Qaida. There is no proof that they are connected.)

American commandos killed Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan, one of the most wanted Islamic militants in Africa, in a daylight raid in southern Somalia on 15 September 2009. This attack is a good "indication of the Obama administration’s willingness to use force against Al Qaeda’s growing influence in the region.”

“American officials on Monday provided few details but confirmed that Special Operations forces commandos, operating from a nearby American warship, participated in the helicopter raid… The helicopters, either with sniper bullets or air-to-surface missiles, quickly disabled the trucks, according to villagers in the area, and several of the Shabab fighters tried to fire back. Shabab leaders said that six foreign fighters, including Nabhan, were quickly killed, along with three Somali Shabab.

“‘We are very upset, very upset,’ said a Shabab official from the town of Merka, near where the raid happened. ‘This is a big loss for us.’ Ahmed Gaabow, a resident of the area, said that the helicopters then landed and retrieved the bodies, apparently for identification purposes.”

Some have been heralding this as a great achievement, while others, including myself, see no difference between what the Bush administration was doing and what the Obama administration is now doing, other then escalating the war by putting ground troops in Somalia, which this attack just did.

I wonder what the consequences would have been if some of the American soldiers involved with this operation were actually killed or captured when they got out of their helicopters - Black Hawk Down anyone?

The True Story Of Black Hawk Down

It’s also important to keep in mind that even though “many in the media touted Nabhan as a ‘top al-Qaeda leader,’ his affiliation with the group isn’t readily apparent, and the FBI’s wanted poster simply lists him as ‘wanted for questioning’ in connection with a 2002 attack on an Israeli-owned hotel in Mombasa, Kenya.”


source

So it appears that if you are wanted by the FBI for questioning, and may be armed and dangerous, the President of the United States will sign an Execute Order to have you assassinated.

Now that it should be becoming clear, even to the most hardened Obama supporters, that the agenda has not changed with the arrival of the new administration, let’s review some recent Somali history in an effort to help put things into perspective.


click to enlarge - source

In 2006 “the CIA propagated that Al-Qaeda had made its base in Somalia where three senior leaders were residing. CIA then encouraged Ethiopia to invade Somalia in support of weak TFG forces (Transitional Federal Government) against UIC fighters (Union of Islamic Courts) and promised to provide intelligence and air cover. Ethiopian troops backed by USA invaded Somalia on 28 December 2006. The UIC was quickly defeated in a sweeping offensive and the six-month peace period was shattered. It was believed that the UIC leadership fled into Kenya or to Yemen and the hard-line fighters cached their arms and melded back into their clans leaving the mostly untrained, new recruits to face the Ethiopian troops. Soon after the UIC rout, two US air strikes targeted alleged Al-Qaeda bases in southern Somalia on 13 January 2007 but only innocent civilians got killed.”

“‘My four-year-old boy was killed in the strike,’ Mohamed Mahmud Burale said. ‘The plane was firing at other areas in Ras Kamboni. We could see smoke from the area. We also heard 14 massive explosions.’

“The air strikes came 16 days after Ethiopian forces entered Somalia to back pro-government troops driving out an Islamist movement that had taken control of much of the country from the weak transitional administration.”


click to enlarge - source

The Islamist movement that US and Ethiopian forces were attacking were the same people that had been trying to prevent Somali pirates from seizing ships:

In 2008 “the Islamist fighters attacked the pirates in Hobyo, 450 kilometres (270 miles) north of the capital Mogadishu … just after they had released a Jordanian-flagged cargo ship seized nearly a week earlier. ‘Two Islamists and several pirates died in the fighting which lasted more than an hour,’ one of the elders, Abdinasir Diriye, told AFP by telephone. An Islamist leader said four pirates and two Islamists had been killed in the shoot-out, adding that they had also arrested several of the pirates… Local elders had said Islamist fighters had threatened to attack the pirates if they did not release the ship.”


click to enlarge - source

Due to the tribal organization of Somalia and the lack of a central government, combined with Somalia's location at the Horn of Africa, conditions were ripe for the growth of piracy in the early 1990s. Since the collapse of the state, boats illegally fishing in Somali waters were a common sight. Pirates at first were interested in securing the waters before businessmen and militias became involved. Acts of piracy temporarily subsided following the rise of the Islamic Courts Union in 2006. However, pirate activity began to increase after Ethiopia invaded Somalia in December 2006.”

So regarding Somali pirates, what we should keep in mind is that Islamists tried to stop piracy until the US bombed them in support of Ethiopia’s invasion in 2006, and that Somalia Piracy Began in Response to Illegal Fishing and Toxic Dumping by Western Ships off the Somali Coast.

It’s important to point out that “the radical Islamists in Somalia never had much following until the Somali people became aware that an outside power was supporting the corrupt and thuggish military chieftains. The popularity of the Islamist movement then surged, allowing the Islamists to take over much of the country. In sum, where no problem with radical Islamists previously existed, the U.S. government helped create one.”

For the Somali people, the Ethiopian invasion of December 2006 could not have started at a worse time. Defeating the Union of Islamic Courts and propping up the Transitional Federal Government was Ethiopia's immediate rationale for invading Somalia. The larger goal was to forge a partnership between Washington and Addis Ababa in order to execute the ‘war on terror.’”

“To keep the invasion and Africa's worst humanitarian catastrophe going, heavy and modern weapons, including airplanes were used. One was a United States Air Force AC-130 gunship that attacked and killed Somali villagers and countless livestock in the hunt for three foreign men suspected for the 1998 bombing of American embassies in Africa, who yet remain at large.”


source

The shear madness of firing artillery from navy destroyers and gunships to try and kill two or three people in a town occupied by thousands of civilians, is only surpassed by the indifference displayed by the US military, the US media, and the US citizenry as to the number of innocent civilians being killed and displaced. How many civilians did the United States kill in these bombardments?

In January 2007 more than 100 people were killed in US bombings in just one week, and in April, just three short months later, four days of fierce fighting between Ethiopian-backed government forces and Islamic insurgents killed 381 people.

It is beyond my understanding how killing nomads and displacing hundreds of thousands of civilians was going to make Somalia, Ethiopia or the United States any safer. Of course, according to many analysts, this US led war in Somalia was really just about oil and resources, not about Islamic extremists.


source

Although Africa has long been known to be rich in oil, extracting it hadn't seemed worth the effort and risk until recently. But with the price of Middle Eastern crude skyrocketing, and advancing technology making reserves easier to tap, the region has become the scene of a competition between major powers that recalls the 19th-century scramble for colonization. Already, the United States imports more of its oil from Africa than from Saudi Arabia, and China, too, looks to the continent for its energy security.”

Since it was formed two years ago, the US African Command (AFRICOM) has been very busy creating death and destruction in Africa in an attempt to obtain control of precious resources, which is why the war in Somalia is expanding to the rest of Africa.


Even though “Africa is united in rejecting US requests for a military headquarters” inside Africa, there are reports that “from oil rich northern Angola up to Nigeria, from the Gulf of Guinea to Morocco and Algeria, from the Horn of Africa down to Kenya and Uganda, and over the pipeline routes from Chad to Cameroon in the west, and from Sudan to the Red Sea in the east, US admirals and generals have been landing and taking off, meeting with local officials. They've conducted feasibility studies, concluded secret agreements, and spent billions from their secret budgets.” This is the future that awaits Africa with AFRICOM and the agenda to control the “oil, and the diamonds, and the uranium, and the coltan.”

If you find the idea that Africa can become bloodier than it is inaccessible, then consider this: Contrary to popular belief, the worst humanitarian crisis in Africa is not Darfur, it’s Somalia, and it all started in 2006, when the United States and Ethiopia started a war with Somalia, ending six months of the only peaceful period Somalis had known for years. The end result has been the same as all other wars that the United States has started this century. Not only is Somalia devastated but the war is spreading.


source

So while our Western Mainstream Media continues to feed us government sanctioned propaganda, we should remember why and how Somalia became a failed State, some of the reasons as to why Somali pirates became so active in the region, and what the real agenda is for Africa.


Note: A lot more discussion on AFRICOM will follow in the future.





Posted in | Submitted by chycho on Wed, 2009-09-16 13:57.
chycho's blog | 1 comment

BBC’s ‘Dangerous Knowledge’: The reason why the UK government apologized to Alan Turing

On 10 September 2009, the government of the United Kingdom apologized to Alan Turing, five decades after his death.

Turing was a mathematician, logician, cryptanalyst, computer scientist, and a World War II war hero who allegedly committed suicide “55 years ago after being sentenced to chemical castration for being gay.”

Turing is widely considered to be the father of modern computing, however, he is best known among the general populace for his “cryptanalysis work at Bletchly Park in the UK. He contributed several ideas that helped the British Government translate Enigma machine messages sent by German naval intelligence. His work with Tommy Flowers resulted in Colossus, the world’s first programmable electronic computer.”

“Bletchly Park projects probably shortened the war by several years, but Turing’s work remained secret until the 1970s. Although he was awarded the OBE for his services during the war, the UK Government ordered the destruction of all computing equipment and research notes.

“Turing was homosexual and lived at a time when it was illegal and considered to be a mental illness. In 1952, he was convicted of ‘gross indecency’ and sentenced to a choice of jail or chemical castration. He chose the latter and, two years later, died of cyanide poisoning. The coroner’s official verdict was suicide, but there is speculation regarding the possibility of assassination owing to Turing’s sexuality being perceived as a security risk.”

This is what the UK government did to one of TIME magazines’ 100 Most Important People of the 20th Century, so just imagine what they did to countless others who were convicted of the same “crime” (sic), and what they continue to do to countless more with their archaic and brutal laws, but I digress. This is about Alan Turing (1912-1954), a person who “will be among the very few for which the 20th century is remembered, long after most of the politicians, artists and celebrities have receded into confusion and oblivion.”

My first introduction to Turing was last year when I came across a BBC documentary entitled “Dangerous Knowledge”. It featured Alan Turing along with three other great visionaries from our civilization.

In the introduction the producer and presenter, David Malone states the following:

“…this is my homage to four great thinkers, who without most of us even having heard of them, have profoundly influenced the nature of our age, and who’s stories have, I think, an important message for us today.”

I really didn’t understand what David Malone meant until I watched segments of this work multiple times trying to understand connecting phrases, which presented brilliant thoughts on how we interact with the known and the unknown.

It presents some of the perspectives from those who are considered to have been the most literate among us in their abilities in communicating in the language of mathematics. This is an excellent documentary on our past and future, insanity, life, time, human nature, infinity, entropy, artificial intelligence, institutional stupidity, change, incompleteness, uncomputability, chaos, suicide, murder, love, human rights, secrete governments, god and God.

It is an extraordinary documentary, a good portion of which is dedicated to Turing. If you would like to know more about this amazing man then I highly recommend watching ‘Dangerous Knowledge’, which is embedded below. You will not regret it.





Posted in | | Submitted by chycho on Mon, 2009-09-14 18:53.
chycho's blog | login or register to post comments

What will make or break the United States of America is the truth about 911: Investigate the theories behind the conspiracies

What will make or break the United States of America is the truth about 911, not its monetary policy, its fiscal irresponsibility, its inability to liquidate bad assets, its lack of transparency, its corporate run mainstream media, or even its inadequate health care. The truth about what transpired on 11 September 2001 will decide the fate of the United States. Everything else is secondary.


The Truth and Lies of 911

On 911 the world changed. Not because the attacks on the United States were unique, since there have been many documented cases of false flag operations throughout history. The world changed because we forfeited the freedom of generations to come to obtain a delusional sense of security from an institution, an institution that has begun multiple wars of aggression on behalf of its citizens, incurring trillions of dollars of debt in the process.

This same institution was then allowed to investigate itself for its inability to protect its citizens from an attack that has been the catalyst for a tremendous amount of misery across the globe.

This investigation, which cost only a fraction of what some of the most insignificant government investigations have previously cost, resulted in a report that did not even conclusively link Osama Bin Laden to the terror attacks, let alone answer the questions posed by the families of its victims. So why was such an inadequate document as the 911 Commission Report ever produced?

The reason that corporations like the United States of America even bother to release “official” documents so full of holes that you could fly a plane through them, is because by doing so every branch of government must regurgitate this “official” story. This means that schools, which are meant to educate our children, are actually indoctrinating them into a corrupt system established for the proliferation of war. The 911 Commission was established, and its report published, to protect those in power and to maintain the status quo.

Giuliani pushing 9/11 re-education course for public schools


The truth about 911 is the big bad white elephant in the room, and it’s not going away any time soon.

The “official” story that the US government has been peddling has completely fallen apart, and the reality that there is something very wrong with the so-called “War on Terror” is beginning to destabilize the United States. Americans are beginning to accept the fact that there is a lot more to 911 than their government will admit, and they are looking for answers.


The following video is a great introduction to some of the questions regarding 911. It’s a collection of short mainstream media and independent film clips on the evolution of 911 skepticism. If you are new to this topic, it is a great place to begin your search for truth. If you are a veteran, it is a great summary of some of the main questions that many Americans have regarding what transpired on that day.

The Third Stage (21:23)

Investigate the Theories Behind the Conspiracies

One of the main problems with our civilization is that words have lost their meaning. In 2008, Chris Matthews had to explain to Kevin James what the word "appease" meant. Unfortunately for Mr. James, this didn’t occur in private but live on MSNBC’s Hardball.


In spoken languages, the tone of a word can be used to make inferences that may be completely unrelated to the meaning of the word. This is specially true when dealing with propaganda. When certain people or organizations want to dismiss an argument, they tend to phrase words in such a way that makes them appear illogical or treacherous if given credence.

One of these words is “conspiracy”, and when put together with the word “theory” it becomes the infamous phrase “Conspiracy Theory”. Lets take a look at the definition of these two words and try to figure out why they have been used to discredit not only people, but history, data, and facts.

The legal definition of conspiracy is “an agreement between two or more persons to commit an illegal or unlawful act, or to achieve a legal act but by illegal or unlawful means.” A theory is “a concept that is not yet verified but that if true would explain certain facts or phenomena.”

So a conspiracy theory is a conjecture that two or more people may have planned an unlawful act, and if certain facts are proven to be true, then the conspiracy theory becomes reality.

As we all know, throughout history our governments and politicians have done exactly what the above states. They have conspired to obtain power, to overthrow governments, to destroy their political rivals, and to make money. Politics is littered with conspiracies but the mainstream media treats this word with contempt. Have we forgotten Watergate, Tonkin, Iran-Contra, Basra, Pinochet, Mohammed Mosaddeq, Reichstag, Pearl Harbor, Oklahoma City, COINTELPRO, Northwoods, JFK, 911, and much more.

So in the phrase conspiracy theory, it is not the conspiracy that needs to be scrutinized, but the data on which the theory is based on. And this is where the problem lies. Neither the mainstream media nor those in power have any desire to investigate the theory behind the argument. If they did, many questions could arise from the investigation which in turn could be devastating for the status quo.

As Chris Matthews stated, many supporters of those in power “don’t know what (they) are talking about”, they are “people with blank slates in terms of history”. And as Mark Green pointed out, the only thing these people are interested in is “rhetoric and not reality.”

So next time the phrase “conspiracy theory” is used to discredit someone, just point out that the conspiracy is not in question, but rather the data being presented from the theory. And then ask them what part of the argument they disagree with. You’ll most likely find out that they know less about the theory behind the conspiracy, than Mr. James knows about appease or history.

Why the Truth of 911 Must be Revealed

911 is different from the assassination of JFK and the Oklahoma City bombing. Those events were blamed on internal patsies, 911 was not.

As a direct consequence of 911, three wars are now being fought while a third is being planned with “all options on the table,” directly implying the use of Nuclear Weapons .

If we are going to continue our campaign of spreading death and destruction to the rest of the world and ourselves, then we should at least understand why we are doing it and who is orchestrating it. By beginning a new investigation into the events of 911, and in the process bringing those who committed this horrendous crime to trial, we will be able to break this chain of ignorance which has promised to bring us and our children war without end.

Prof. Emanuel Pastreich on War Profiteering and the Military-Industrial Complex


Eisenhower warns us of the Military Industrial Complex






Posted in | Submitted by chycho on Thu, 2009-09-10 18:32.
chycho's blog | login or register to post comments

Syndicate content

Solutions



Politics for 2009

Economics for 2009

Health and Environment



Politics General

Search

 




The Art of ...




Canada

United States

Politics Pre-2009