VIA Nano Outperforms Intel Atom in Actual Industry Performance Benchmarking tests

Previously we mentioned about VIA’s Nano (codenamed Isaiah) processor that may outperform Intel famous Atom processor and threaten its market position in certain segments based on pre silicon benchmarking data, now there seems to be a clearer picture that can prove the Nano as a solid winner in terms of actual performance benchmarking test being performed and released by some independent third parties. PC Perspective and HotHardware have been putting much effort to setup a standard test comparing BOXD945GCLF platform (with Intel Atom) against VIA Nano reference platform.



One thing to point out here, it may not be apple to apple comparison since VIA Nano is clocking at 1.8GHz, which is around 12.5 percent faster than Intel Atom at only 1.6GHz. Even taking this into consideration, VIA Nano still outperforms Intel Atom in most of the CPU benchmarking tests include those industrial standard 3DMark06 and PCMark06 that stress mostly on CPU and memory access. Based on actual figures, VIA Nano can perform at least 25 percent faster than Intel Atom in overall test results. No doubt, VIA Nano’s Out-of-Order execution has able to handle multiple complicated executions better as compared to Intel Atom’s In-Order execution even with Hyper-threading feature enabled.

Besides actual silicon performance, VIA’s platform is claimed to be an open platform that allows developers to explore and put in as much features as possible, as opposed to Intel conservative strategy with limited access to its X86 low level architecture. Furthermore, Nano processor is pin to pin compatible to C7 processor that makes it drop in replaceable as a quick successor for existing VIA’s C7 flavored board vendors.

Nevertheless, Intel Atom still stands a great advantage in terms of low power consumption and ultra small form factor. Thanks to its 45-nanometer process technology that able to fabricate much thermal efficient silicon at a much smaller foot print. So, depending on what the targeted market segment is, Intel Atom is still suitable for some small size battery operated devices such as MID (Mobile Internet Device), while VIA’s Nano can be used to handle more CPU intensive applications especially for those needed to be in UMPC (Ultra Mobile PC) or even Nettop for daily usage.

4 Responses to “VIA Nano Outperforms Intel Atom in Actual Industry Performance Benchmarking tests”

  1. Top Crown Unveils the World’s First 3G Netbook Based on VIA Nano and VX855 » My Digital Life
    March 21st, 2009 17:10
    4

    [...] Top Crown’s 3G Netbook is believed to be able to outperform Intel Atom N270 netbook based on actual industry benchmarking test since the VIA Nano is using Out-of-Order execution as similar to Intel’s Core Duo architecture. [...]

  2. VIA Nano Enhanced with SSE4 to Compete Against Intel Atom » My Digital Life
    January 6th, 2009 00:20
    3

    [...] performance and feature sets, it is claimed to be able to outperform Intel Atom based on initial performance benchmarking data. The major advantage of this new dual core processor as compared to Intel Atom is in terms of its [...]

  3. VIA’s Trinity Platform Powered by Nano Processor with Discrete GPU Targeted for High Graphics Performance » My Digital Life
    December 19th, 2008 23:56
    2

    [...] out to the market for quite a while and was believed to outperform Intel Atom processor based on performance benchmarking tests. However, it doesn’t seems to be able to capture much market share from what being originally [...]

  4. Arbor Technology Unveils Gladius G0710 Intel Atom based Ruggedized Tablet PC » My Digital Life
    August 7th, 2008 00:06
    1

    [...] its Atom Z-series family processors back to April timeframe. Despite the negative news about actual performance as compared to VIA Nano, there are more and more good news about the end products powered by this small form factor [...]

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to comments feature has been disabled. To receive notification of latest comments posted, subscribe to My Digital Life Comments RSS feed or register to receive new comments in daily email digest.

New Articles

Incoming Search Terms for the Article

via c7 vs atom - atom performance comparison - atom 270 vs 280 - intel atom 270 vs 280 - atom performance - Atom 330 vs 280 - atom 270 280 - c7 vs atom - via c7 vs atom 270 - via c7-m vs atom n270 - via nano ulv vs atom - atom 270 vs atom 280 test - atom n270 teste info - atom processor performance comparison - Via C7-D vs Atom 270 - atom power consumption 270 330 - atom 330 vs c7 - via nano vs atom 270 - intel atom prformance compare test - ulv vs atom - via nano 1.6 vs atom 330 - via c7 intel atom - intel nano atom za - performance via nano atom 270 - atom benchmarking - compare atom performance - via c7-m vs. n270 - via nano 3000 vs atom 330 - atom n270 vs c7 performance - atom 330 performance chart - intel atom speed chart - atom 330 vs 270 - nano eden c7 atom - via nano ion - via C7M vs atom N270 - atom 280 c7 - C7-M vs atom 2009 - atom 270 eller 280 via nano - n270 vs 330 - via c7 vs atom 330 - atom n330 via c7 - atom 330 performance comparison 2009 - intel nano 330 verses C7 - porovnavaci test windows 7 home premium a pofesional - via nano test - VIA C7 EDEN atom speed - VIA C7®-M ULV Processor Technology Vs N270 - intel atom or C7? - processor speed via c7m atom n270 - VIA C7-M Nano atom -