The Big Picture

Patrick Goldstein on the collision of entertainment, media and pop culture

« Previous Post | The Big Picture Home | Next Post »

Hugh Jackman: Oscar's hosting gig gets a face-lift

December 12, 2008 | 12:59 pm

I'm beginning to think that Larry Mark and Bill Condon, the producers of this year's Academy Awards telecast, actually have a few tricks up their sleeves. More important, I think they're determined to take the woebegone Oscar telecast in a fresh new direction. That's the clear message of today's selection of Hugh Jackman as the host of February's broadcast. By opting for Jackman, a classy movie and theater star instead of a big-mouth comic, Mark and Condon are signaling that they're trying to turn the Oscars into a party instead of the usual three-hour-plus cobwebby self-congratulatory snooze-athon.

143016ca1121ethugh2f9d The first thing Mark said when I got him on the phone this morning told me all I needed to hear. "In keeping with the thinking that the event needs to be more like a party," he said, "we're trying to make it very much like a party." Mark believes Jackman has the perfect party-host persona. "The Oscars are a celebration of movies, so who better to host than a movie star," Mark said. "Hugh can not only hold the screen, but he can hold the stage too, which is no small feat these days. He's done major theater work, from 'Oklahoma!' to 'Sunset Boulevard,' and he's not only hosted the Tony Awards, he actually won an Emmy for hosting them."

Mark laughed. "That's not to suggest that the Tonys were an audition, but in a way they were. The fact that he was brilliant doing the Tonys certainly spoke well for his abilities."

As it turns out, before Mark had seriously thought about casting a host, he saw Jackman perform at a benefit show for the Motion Picture and Television Fund (a show that Mark produced with "Milk" producer Dan Jinks). "Hugh was a hoot," he recalled. "He did a duet with Kristin Chenoweth on 'Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better,' completely off the cuff, with all sorts of improvised humor, and well, he was great. So when his name come up recently, we all thought, 'Wow, remember that night he did "Anything" and how he killed.' ''

Mark also became convinced that Jackman had a special star quality after Mark saw him in "Australia."  "Our whole idea for the show is that we want you to feel like you're not at a late-night TV show, but at a nightclub, where the host is saying, 'Welcome to the party--let's have a good time.' We're going for the contemporary feel that you'd have at the Cocoanut Grove or the Stork Club, where everyone is encouraged to have a good time. If this were the old days, we'd be asking Cary Grant or Clark Gable to be the host. I think Hugh has a lot of those same qualities. He's one of the few actors who has a real sense of occasion, who can say, 'Let's have a ball.' "

So he's looking for someone who looks good in a tux? "Exactly," said Mark. "Not just that Hugh would look good in a tux, but that he looks comfortable in a tux." Would Jackman be doing a musical number himself? Mark hedged: "Let's just say that with Hugh, there'd be a good reason to do it. It's certainly extremely appealing. He's definitely not going to be doing a 10-minute comedy monologue."

So how much does the Oscar host really matter? Can Jackman actually reverse the show's steady ratings decline? "I think the host matters on that night," Mark said. "I don't believe, in general, that people tune in to see the host. They tune in to see the Oscars. If the host gets to excel, that's an extra. So really a big part of our assignment is to get people to watch the show itself. It's not all on the host's shoulders. He's really there to set the tone and make everyone feel comfortable."

Doesn't that mean that the burden to turn the show around is, well, on the producer's shoulders? Mark laughed again, this time more nervously. "I shudder to think, but I guess it is on us. But what really  makes me optimistic is that Hugh was absolutely enthusiastic about doing it. He wasn't one of these people who'd said, 'I'd never want to do the Oscars in a million years.' He was really excited about it. I think that's a good sign. If nothing else, we're going to try to have a good time and really make this an event."

My colleague Mary McNamara has her own view on this. Here's the link:

Hugh Jackman hosts the Oscars? Bring the smelling salts

Photo of Hugh Jackman by  Jay L. Clendenin / Los Angeles Times


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

Anyone but Ryan Seacrest!!!

Fantastic choice - I look forward to seeing the show in February!

I thought Jon Stewart was hosting. This is ridonkulous. Jon Stewart is hilarious. People don't watch the Oscars because there's a million other things to watch. At least Stewart is a comedian, and funny. He did a great job last year considering all the egos that need to be assuaged. Colbert would be better, but I think they're afraid they couldn't contain him, which would actually make the Oscars funny. You're telling me that they think Huge Jackass is gonna do a better job. I guess they're going after the Desperate Housefraus demo.

Finally a pick that fits the bill. I was wondering how long it would take the Oscar producers to find Hugh. He has all the skills and charm to really help the Oscar telecast build rating over the next few years. Heck I would have signed him to a long contract just to lock him in now!

Recalcitrant, Jon Stewart's show last year was the lowest-rated in Oscar history. Sober up.

B.

FINALLY!

After years of constant recycling Billy Crystal and Whoopi Goldberg, with an occasional appearance by Steve Martin and Jon Stewart, we now have someone ENTERTAINING up on stage.

Looking forward to seeing Jackman do his thing.

Great choice! comedians (excuse the pun) made the awards a joke. It became a silly b-class late-night slot filler. which had uncomfortable moments that were just embarrassing to watch and made me cringe and stop watching all together. A host needs to be a 'host' someone to lead and build an excitement for the evening, not to be a one-man show and the star of the evening.
Hugh has the humbleness and the talent to make the awards an evening of television gold!

CONGRATULATIONS to Hugh Jackman a true show business
pro to bring class to the Oscars. Comedians are great however the sexiest real man alive has my appointment. At least artists won't have to wait to be insulted by Comedians. Thank you Jack!

Fantastic! Finally someone who will bring class and style back to the show! Hugh is the perfect choice...he's proven his ability, hosting the Tonys.

I am delighted to hear things may be different. This is a LONG BORING SHOW. Let's get on with the polite "Thank You" only, get off the stage and on with the next person/category. Speaking for myself I can care less for all the unknown names mentioned in the "Thank You". I consider this boring and rude. So, I don't subject myself to this and wait until I find out in the news.

 


Advertisement


About the Bloggers




Archives