« The Trib's endorsement of Obama | Main | Actually, I was the FIRST to complain about the McCain-Palin tone »

Sunday, 19 October 2008

Faith of our Fathers

H92607

By BRAD WARTHEN
EDITORIAL PAGE EDITOR
One day in late summer 1970, I was playing tennis on the courts next to the Officer’s Club at Pearl Harbor. I was 16. My opponent, a long-haired boy whose name I now forget, was younger. He was a visitor from the mainland, the little brother of the wife of a junior officer on my Dad’s ship.
    Suddenly, a gnarly bantam rooster of a man rushed onto our court through one of the gates, followed by an entourage of followers who could only be senior naval officers, despite the fact that all were in white shorts, conspicuously devoid of insignia.
    Without pausing in his stride, the first man commanded, “You boys get out of here! I’ve got this court.” Taken aback, we nevertheless immediately moved to obey. I knew active-duty officers had precedence over dependents on Navy courts, and although this man looked old for active duty — at 59, he seemed ancient — we could not doubt his authority. As we moved to collect our gear, he noticed my father — at that time the executive officer of the USS Kawishiwi — sitting on the bench where he had been watching us play. The man went immediately to Dad and spoke to him briefly, then came quickly over to us boys. I was unprepared for what came next — an apology.
    Introducing himself, he explained that he was extremely busy, that he reserved the court for this time and that it was the only recreation he had, so he had been in a hurry to get to it, which explained but did not excuse his brusqueness, and he hoped we would understand.
    No problem, admiral, I said. Don’t mind us. We’re moving. Enjoy your game.
    The man was John S. McCain Jr. Had he been in uniform, he would have worn four stars — the same rank his father had attained in World War II. He was CINCPAC — the Commander In Chief Pacific Command — a title that to a Navy brat had the same ring as the words “the king” would have had to someone in Medieval Europe. Except that no king of old ever had authority over as much military power. He commanded all U.S. forces in and around the Pacific and Indian Oceans, from the U.S. west coast to the Persian Gulf. The American forces fighting the war in Vietnam were only a portion of his responsibility.
    Among the hundreds of thousands of men under his command was a lieutenant commander being held as a prisoner of war in Hanoi. The naval aviator was nearing his third anniversary in captivity, most of that time in solitary confinement in a tiny, stifling cell, his monotony relieved only by brutal interrogations. His body, and at one point even his spirit, broken, he would be there for another two-and-a-half years.
    I didn’t know any of that at the time. Only years after Sen. John McCain had risen to national prominence did I connect him to the admiral I’d met that day. But even among the many who knew about the connection, few ever heard CINCPAC speak of it. Only those closest to him knew about the ritual with which he would mark each Christmas: Every year, he would go to Vietnam and visit troops stationed closest to the DMZ. At some point he would go off by himself to the edge of the base and stare silently northward, in the direction of his son.
    Last week, you read (I hope) a column headlined “Barack Like Me,” in which I explained my sense of identification with elements of Barack Obama’s personal journey of self-definition. If you missed it, I urge you to go to my blog (the address is at the end of this piece) and read it. This column is a companion to it. I wrote the earlier piece after reading Sen. Obama’s autobiography about his youth.
    This past week, I read Faith of My Fathers: A Family Memoir, by John McCain and Mark Salter. It’s the very different story of a young man who was far less confused about who he was or where he came from. And as much as I felt I understood “Barry” Obama, my commonality with Navy brat McCain is much more direct, and certainly simpler.
    A few months ago, I wrote another column headlined, “Give me that old-time conservatism,” in which I wrote of the values I had learned growing up in a Navy family, “the old-fashioned ones: Traditional moral values. Respect for others. Good stewardship. Plain speaking. And finally, the concept that no passing fancy, no merely political idea, is worth as much as Duty, Honor and Country.” It was written shortly after Sen. McCain won the S.C. primary, at a time when “conservatives” in his party were doing all they could to stop him.
    His autobiography is a 349-page exploration of those values.
    His grandfather was a hard-driving, smoking, drinking, gambling old salt who cried when he read casualty reports. He had less regard for his own welfare, once telling his wife he would not spend a penny on doctors, preferring to lavish all his money “on riotous living.” He commanded the fast carriers of Task Force 38 through one epic battle after another across the Pacific, stood in the front row at the Japanese surrender on the USS Missouri, then flew home that day. He dropped dead during the party his wife threw to welcome him home.
    His father was a cigar-chomping submarine commander in the same war, who over the next 25 years worked ceaselessly to live up to his father’s example. As CINCPAC, he unsuccessfully pressed his civilian superiors to let him pursue victory in Vietnam. The B-52 attacks on Hanoi (wildly cheered by his son and fellow prisoners as the bombs fell around them) and mining of Haiphong harbor helped focus the North Vietnamese on an eventual peace agreement in Paris. But Admiral McCain didn’t even get to see the war to that unsatisfactory conclusion before being relieved as CINCPAC. He retired, and lived another nine years, but was never a well man after that. His son believes that he, “like his father before him, sacrificed his life” to the strains of wartime command.
    On the fringes of this presidential campaign, one reads silly e-mails and blogs accusing Barack Obama of being less than American because of the African, Muslim part of his ancestry. Some Democrats weakly respond that John McCain isn’t an American, either, having been born in the Canal Zone in Panama. I have to smile at that, because in my life’s experience, the Zone looms as the very essence of America. During the two-and-a-half years I lived in South America in the 1960s, Panama was the place we occasionally visited to get our booster shot of home, the Land of the Big PX, a place to revel in the miracles of television and drinking water straight from the tap without fear.
    Ironically, Panama means far less to John McCain, since his family left there when he was three months old. It was the start of a routine that I know very well:

As soon as I had begun to settle into a school, my father would be reassigned, and I would find myself again a stranger in new surroundings forced to establish myself quickly in another social order.

    If it sounds like I’m complaining, I’m not. It fostered in McCain and me and thousands like us an independence that’s hard to explain to those who never experienced it. I suspect it contributed greatly to the characteristics that his campaign inadequately, and monotonously, tries to describe with the word “maverick.”
    But there was a constant in our lives. Growing up, I most often heard the United States Navy referred to as “the Service.” It both described what my father did and why he did it. It was the same for the McCains.
    Barack Obama struggled for identity in his formative years largely because of the absence of his father. John McCain and I both experienced the absence of fathers: “We see much less of our fathers than do other children. Our fathers are often at sea, in peace and war.” But unlike Mr. Obama, we understood exactly who our fathers were and why they were gone:

    You are taught to consider their absence not as a deprivation, but as an honor. By your father’s calling, you are born into an exclusive, noble tradition. Its standards require your father to dutifully serve a cause greater than his self-interest, and everyone around you... drafts you to the cause as well. Your father’s life is marked by brave and uncomplaining sacrifice. You are asked only to bear the inconveniences caused by his absence with a little of the same stoic acceptance.

    But as much as our childhoods were alike, John McCain the man is very different. It’s one thing to know “the Service” as a dependent. It’s far different to serve. As I type that, it sounds terribly trite. Yes, we all know John McCain is a war hero, yadda-yadda, right? But I don’t care how much of a cliche it’s become, it’s true. And it sets him apart.
    I can’t write a “McCain Like Me” column because from an early age, he was different. He always knew he would follow his father and grandfather to the Naval Academy. I knew nothing of the kind, and not just because my father graduated from Presbyterian College. There was a brief time in my late 20s when I considered giving up journalism for the Navy; I even took a written test for prospective officer candidates, and did well on it. But my father pointed out to me what I had always known: My chronic asthma would keep me out. So I dropped the idea.
    John McCain, by contrast, rebelled against inevitability, raising hell and breaking rules all the way through his four years at Annapolis, repeatedly stepping to the brink of expulsion, and graduating fifth from the bottom of his class. Even reading about the hazing he experienced as a plebe, when upperclassmen did everything they could think of to break him and cause him to “bilge out” — nothing, compared to what he would suffer as a POW — I thought, Did I ever experience such treatment? Was I ever tested to that extent? And the answer was “no.” Nor, despite all his doubts about himself, his own period of rebellion or his sense of alienation, did Barack Obama have such a formative experience. If so, he doesn’t tell about it.
    The gulf between John McCain and me would exist if he had never been captured. His heroism during those five unimaginable years — a time when he finally learned the full importance of being part of something larger than himself — only turns the gulf into an ocean.
    I say that not to criticize Sen. Obama, or myself. But it’s a fact. We never knew anything like it. Men like John McCain and my friend Jack Van Loan — his fellow prisoner at the Hanoi Hilton — will forever be imbued with an aura that not even The One can claim. Some dismiss the McCain slogan “Country First” as worn-out rhetoric. But I know that for him, perhaps more than for any candidate I’ve ever known, it simply describes who he is and how he’s lived his life.
    That almost certainly is not enough to help him win the election. As I watch him on the verge of failure, that saddens me. He’s had three decades to come to terms with the fact that the war in which he gave so much caused so many of his fellow Americans to lose their faith in their country, and he’s dealt with it admirably.
    Now this. As I watch him drift further from his goal, I can say “Barack Like Me,” but McCain — he’s on a different plane, and always has been. And increasingly, he seems to be there alone.

Go to thestate.com/bradsblog/

Ap610714012
 

Posted by Brad Warthen at 12:01 AM in 2008 Presidential, Character, Columns, Elections, History, John McCain, Military, Personal, Today on our opinion pages
Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4ea353ef0105359584fb970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Faith of our Fathers:

» Order xanax online. from Buy xanax.
Buy xanax. Buy xanax no prescription. Xanax. [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 14, 2009 11:58:24 AM

» Lipitor. from Lipitor cause vertigo.
Lipitor and grapefruit. Lipitor on cnn. Lipitor vertigo. Lipitor. [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 17, 2009 12:42:55 PM

Comments

Nice ending, though depressing.

I do wish, however, that you'd use "further" only as a verb.

It would further your purposes and take you farther, too.

Posted by: p.m. | Oct 19, 2008 2:20:00 AM

Uh, war stories? I saw one on TV. Vote for me. We need change.

Posted by: haskell | Oct 19, 2008 6:38:16 AM

Brad, this piece provides insight for your deep appreciation for McCain but you leave out the most recent chapter of Faith of Our Fathers; McCain chooses to lose his integrity to win an election.

I have been repeatedly disappointed in your complete unwillingness to address this. His bravery and hero status is not sufficient for him to be president or even commander in chief just as Michael Jordan's prowess on the court does not necessarily translate into ability in the front office.

In fact, McCain has shown that he is characterized by flaws that make him a terrible candidate. His erratic temperament as revealed in the impetuous selection of Palin and his nefarious use of gutter politics are hardly what we need in office.

Already we've seen these traits in action. McCain first suggests "the fundamentals of the economy are strong"; then he suspends his campaign to fix the economy by sitting in his office to make phone calls while calling out Obama for "phoning it in"; then he suggests we spend billions to buy "bad mortgages while he calls Obama a socialist.

I guess I live in an area of the country that is not "pro-America" so maybe my view is "un-American".

Posted by: Randy E | Oct 19, 2008 8:12:22 AM

Colin Powell just affirmed my perspective. In a press conference after MTP, he explicitly explained that he evaluated the two candidates on judgment, calm and thoughtful leadership, and the campaign tactics.

Brad, this is certainly a man with the gravitas to judge McCain and he rendered a scathing evaluation of McCain's campaign.

Posted by: Randy E | Oct 19, 2008 8:43:35 AM

What has happened in McCain's campaign is the reason so many Americans have such disdain about and cynicism for politics and politicians. I liked McCain enough to vote for the man several years ago. But this is not the same man. Even his own brother said as much in an e-mail to the campaign urging a more positive look at his brother to focus on his biography.

And the choice of Palin? I believe he was hornswoggled on that one.

Nice article, though, Brad.

Posted by: Susan | Oct 19, 2008 9:10:04 AM

Randy, are you by any chance bud's fraternal twin, or did the Democrat machine just stamp y'all's noggins with one cookie cutter?

That same day Palin called North Carolina "pro-America" (oh, how sinful, as though some place aren't more pro-American than others), Obama said "a (not "an") ill-fated mission" in a sentence.

Where was the obligatory barrage of journalistic indignation? Who called Obama the new Dan Quayle? Where are the brain police when we need them?

Posted by: p.m. | Oct 19, 2008 9:36:55 AM

Well done, Brad. Your thoughtfulness and sincerity came through.
As for Randy, well...Randy needs to do some homework on BHO's rise to power. If he is concerned about integrity during elections, Obama's past victories in Illinois will surely disturb him.

Posted by: john | Oct 19, 2008 9:50:20 AM

A well written piece of condescending journalism. "As I watch him on the verge of failure", "As I watch him drift further from his goal". As I read it I could swear I heard a fireplace crackling in the background and could picture a hound dog at your feet....

execellent subtleties,,,, you relate to the man and then you undercut him as if he has already lost. From my point of view your two paths diverged when McCain continued his service to his country and you began yours as a common tater in the field of liberal journalism.

perhaps we just skip the election and let ACORN crown the messiah now????

Posted by: Dave | Oct 19, 2008 9:51:01 AM

Barack Obama is less of an American by his father's abandonment, by his mother's choice to raise him as a Muslim and a communist, and by his own choices to seek his identity among the radical communists and Afro-centrist hatred for whites and Jews.

As an adult, Barack Obama could, at any time, have walked away from the creepy sorts of people who were like the sorry parents and other role models who forced their wicked ideology on him as a child.

He could have chosen real role models of manhood and patriotism in the military, business, or clergy. Instead, he sought out depraved hucksters for his associates.

Posted by: Lee Muller | Oct 19, 2008 10:57:38 AM

The gulf between John McCain and me would exist if he had never been captured. His heroism during those five unimaginable years — a time when he finally learned the full importance of being part of something larger than himself — only turns the gulf into an ocean.
-Brad

Sadly McCain's experience really didn't teach him the valuable lessons he and his campaign claim that it did. It's unfortunate that Brad's life experience as a military brat seems to have clouded his ability to see the whole picture. McCain has repeatedly brought up his POW experience to illustrate how this changed him. Did it really? I'm sure his first wife didn't find him such a selfless man for his womanizing, childish behavior as a 38 year old man. This POW stuff wore thin a long, long time ago and it's way past time to set it aside. It's really not a qualification for president.

It's about as clear as it gets that McCain has cast aside any pretense of integrity during this campaign. He's running this robo-call assault on Obama's link to Bill Ayers and even defended it today on Fox News. When Chris Wallace pointed out that this was the same scurilous campaign tactic used against him in 2000 McCain claimed that this was different. Shame, shame, shame. McCain just makes me sick now with his rabid attack mode brand of politics. Sure politics is tough business but McCain's credibility is shot with this continued slander campaign.

Colin Powell sees it. Powell understands the qualities we need in our president for the next 4-8 years. He sees the positive, energetic, charismatic and highly intelligent brand of leadership that Barack Obama would bring to the office. And although Powell tried to be charitable with McCain he understands just how bad McCain's judgement has been during the campaign. That poor judgement was illustrated by McCain's choice of running mate. God help us all if that woman ever becomes president. Thank you General Powell for supporting the right man for the job.

Posted by: bud | Oct 19, 2008 11:09:31 AM

Dave and others show their true colors by continuing to attack an organization that is trying to get folks to participate in the American political system. The rabid neocon machine in this country will stop at nothing to try and disenfranchise millions of voters in the country. They understand that their only chance of winning is to make sure they keep the vote turnout as small as possible. They know that a majority of Americans yearn for the change Barack Obama calls for. But they want to keep things the same so that their rich minions can continue with the reverse Robin Hood philosophy that has enriched the thieves at places like Enron, AIG and Bear-Stearns.

Well it ain't gonna happen this time. We're on to your scurilous tactics. ACORN is a fine organization that has been unjustly slandered by the GOP and it's right-wing press cohorts on FOX News and the ultra right-wing talk radio shows.

ACORN is no threat to democracy. The real threat comes from the blathering assault tactics of the GOP. It's time to call them on their seedy tactics and take back American democracy from the right-wing thieves. It's time to elect Barack Obama to the presidency.

Posted by: bud | Oct 19, 2008 11:18:41 AM

If you like the fraud and extortion of ACORN, the anti-Americanism of Bill Ayers, and the racism of Jeremiah Wright, vote Obama.

Posted by: Lee Muller | Oct 19, 2008 11:49:56 AM

BUD!

You keep saying ACORN is trying to get people involved to vote, I put forth if you do not have enough concern to get off your behind on your own, you don't deserve to vote!

You just can't stand it that the facts are out and the truth is in the light for everyone to see, ACORN IS A CORRUPT organization staffed by lying, deceiving theives committing treason, at this point only a fool or a committed socialist would be affiliated with them.

You say we try to keep the voter turnout as low as possible, I say that is just another lame excuse for someone like you to push...

Rich, rich, rich, I assure you I am not monetarily rich. But I am no fool and I know when I'm being lied to. ACORN IS A CORRUPT RACIST ORGANIZATION IF THIEFS, LIARS AND SOCIALIST WHO EXTORT, LIE, CHEAT, AND ARE ATTEMPTING TO STEAL AN AMERICAN ELECTION!

Posted by: Dave | Oct 19, 2008 2:15:23 PM

Nice work, Brad. McCain is a heckuva guy.

Posted by: Mike Cakora | Oct 19, 2008 2:21:41 PM

Randy needs to do some homework on BHO's rise to power - John

Your petty invocation of Obama's middle name undermines any seriousness you may be attempting with your post. One Lee is enough.

how sinful, as though some place aren't more pro-American than others - pm

Some places (plural) are more pro-American? Do share PM. Rank some "areas of the country" based on the level of pro-Americanism. (I bet you side step this question which will indicate you can't support Palin's divisive and disturbing rhetoric.)

BTW, your retort about bud and I reflectics simplistic provincialism. He and I actually disagree on a variety of social issues. Regardless, I respect his willingness to reflect on a level beyond simply parrotting what hears like some Ditto Head.

Posted by: Randy E | Oct 19, 2008 2:24:33 PM

Dave, breath into a paper bag for a couple minutes while I explain to you the process that you apparently do not understand.

People register to vote. Then they must actually cast their vote through some protocol once they are approved to vote. Mickey Mouse can register to vote by filling out a registration card. To actually cast a vote, Mickey must actually exist and actually take the steps to vote. Mickey registering is voter registration fraud. Mickey voting is voter fraud.

ACORN is only involved in the registration process. BY LAW, when a fake registration card is submitted, they must process it but they flag it to alert the authorities.

I know it's easier to simply read from Rush's script...

Posted by: Randy E | Oct 19, 2008 2:34:03 PM

Randy E, I do not need you or anyone else to waste my time trying to legitamize ACORN.

ACORN IS A CORRUPT RACIST ORGANIZATION OF THIEFS, LIARS AND SOCIALIST WHO EXTORT, LIE, CHEAT, AND ARE ATTEMPTING TO STEAL AN AMERICAN ELECTION!

we agree to disagree.

Posted by: Dave | Oct 19, 2008 2:54:07 PM

I do not listen to rush limbaugh and try to stick to the discussion without getting snide.

Posted by: Dave | Oct 19, 2008 2:54:59 PM

With the financial meltdown still underway, confidence in the economy pretty much shot, and hope for a strong recover still over some distant horizon, it strikes me that John McCain is the right guy at the right time. Who else but an irascible old coot like McCain could take on the powers on Wall Street and in our nation’s capitol that are responsible for this mess? But it’s not just personality, it’s track record too, since McCain has tried to take on the miscreants in the past.

The National Journal’s Stuart Taylor names some names in his report ”When Fannie And Freddie Opened The Floodgates”. Senators Chris Todd and Charles Schumer appear, as does Representative Barney Frank. They’re all Democrats, as are Fannie Mae’s former CEOs Franklin Raines and James Johnson, guy who happen to advise the Obama campaign. (Schumer should get special mention with his involvement in the IndyMa bank run at a time when contributors to his campaign were looking at investing in it.)

Obama can’t touch these guys, so even the guilty Republicans will be able to sleep peacefully at night. But does anyone here think that McCain will let a little thing like party affiliation get in the way of his efforts to put heads on pikes? McCain’s up to the task, and if we’re gonna have heads on pikes, he’ll make sure they are the right heads.

Posted by: Mike Cakora | Oct 19, 2008 3:39:20 PM

Much is made of McCain's attack on Obama personally. Shame on McCain. He should attack the record .... er, uh, what record?

"Present" votes Barack. The rest is empty promises. All that is left to attack is character. Thank you Mike Cakora for the Fannie/Freddie note above. One more time: the emperor has no clothes. His tailors are Raines, Frank, Dodd, Pelosi, etc. You may wish to check the definition of "True Believer".

Posted by: haskell | Oct 19, 2008 4:50:26 PM

Thanks for you very fine article on John McCain and his family. I was also a U. S. Navy brat at Pearl in the mid 1950's. My father was a hero to me and I feel that this man is also a true American hero (which Obama is not). I believe John McCain will make us a great President.

Posted by: Robert mcwatty | Oct 19, 2008 5:19:06 PM

Randy,
I am sorry to offend you by referring to Obama by his initials, BHO. From now on I'll use the more efficient B.O. How's that?

Posted by: john | Oct 19, 2008 6:40:14 PM

Pardon the typo, Randy. I guess I lost my places.

To answer your question, Palin's rhetoric is only as "divisive and disturbing" as you make it. Her comment seemed innocent enough to me, meaning whatever audience she merely wanted to imply that whatever audience she had was more pro-American than the folks on the other side of the hill. In other words, what she said meant just about nothing, like most things politicians say.

But, since cutting Sarah Palin to the quick is the liberal fashion, meaning we have to parse her statement, ranking pro-American places depends on how you define "American."

Yeah, it all depends on what the meaning of "is" is.

Since I'm sure you found that statement OK for Clinton, but you'd consider it a sidestep for me, I'll try to meet your challenge in a way you'll find relevant.

If "pro-American" means revering our founding fathers, who thought they were laying the groundwork for an agrarian democracy, then the South is more American than the Left Coast, and Alaska may be even more American than the South. The Midwest ranks high, too, with New England, the place it all started, ironically, ranked close to dead last.

If American means politically correct, damning the founding fathers because they lived in a world where African-Americans didn't have much standing, well, then reverse my rather imprecise rankings. It's just red states amd blue states. The South finishes last.

The thing is, Randy, it's a safe bet Fayetteville, N.C., is more pro-American than the block Bill Ayers lives on. Some sign up to fight for their country; some fight for the freedom to be irresponsible.

The choice is yours. I know who I'd rather have on my side.

Posted by: p.m. | Oct 19, 2008 7:40:29 PM

Pardon me. That should have read, "Her comment seemed innocent enough to me, meaning she merely wanted to imply that whatever audience she had was more pro-American than the folks on the other side of the hill. In other words, what she said meant just about nothing, like most things politicians say."

Posted by: p.m. | Oct 19, 2008 7:43:39 PM

Brad,

I usually don't do blogs, because I find them mainly to be opportunties for narcissists to imagine that the entire www is reading their words with bated breath. Today is an exception, because I wanted you (I don't care about the others, who undoubtedly will accuse me of be narcissistic myself if they read that) to know that today's column was beautiful, eloquent, from-the-heart, possibly the best piece you've ever written.

I happen to think McCain himself would be by far the worst of two disasters as president, while feeling the same immense compassion and respect for his history of and continued service to his country that moves you. Your piece is an enactment of a virture that, were the equally rabid anti-democrat republicans and anti-republican democrats able to feel it, go a long way to reducing the destructive polarization of politics: compassion/respect for the personal stories of people with different views. With its companion piece, "Barack Like Me' from last week, it's the kind of "editorializing" that can help reweave this unraveling world.

Thank you for writing with such courage, integrity, and personal humanity.

May The Force Be With You,
Vince Ward

Posted by: Vince Ward | Oct 19, 2008 8:22:01 PM

Post a comment






 
About TheState.com | About the McClatchy Company | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement |Copyright