Wikileaks spills ACMA blacklist

Whistle-blower web repository Wikileaks has published what appears to be the Australian Communications and Media Authority's blacklist of banned websites.

Many of the sites clearly contain only run-of-the-mill adult material, poker tips or nothing controversial at all.

EFA vice-chair Colin Jacobs

The anonymous posters have justified the release of the list as a protest against ACMA's threat to fine people $11,000 a day for linking to sites that have been included on its secret list.

Last week The Australian had reported that ACMA had issued an "interim link-deletion notice" to online telecommunications industry forum Whirlpool's host, Bulletproof Networks, after a member of the forum had posted a link which was on its blacklist. The notice gave Bulletproof Networks 24 hours to respond with a threat that non-compliance would result in hefty fines.

"While Wikileaks is used to exposing secret government censorship in developing countries, we now find Australia acting like a democratic backwater," the group states on the ACMA blacklist page that was posted on Wikileaks.

"This week saw Australia joining China and the United Arab Emirates as the only countries censoring Wikileaks. We were not notified by ACMA," the group wrote, referring to a claimed decision by the Federal Government to ban access to Wikileaks.

The list that has been posted contains 2,395 web pages derived from ACMA's list of banned URLs, which are used by government-endorsed filter makers, which are installed on a voluntary basis by parents.

The list, however, has also been planned as a key element of the government's mandatory ISP-filtering scheme, which would see all ISPs blocking attempts to access pages on the list if current trials are deemed successful.

While some arguments for the mandatory filtering scheme have been based on the premise that child sex offenders should be stopped from accessing child porn from within Australia, the group which posted the list on Wikileaks has argued such blacklists are "dangerous to 'above ground' activities such as political discourse, [but] they have little effect on the production of child pornography". They have also provided a link to an alleged insider's account on the subject of censorship and the crime.

Internet freedom group Electronic Frontiers Australia immediately hailed the leak as "a wake-up call for Australians concerned about secret censorship".

"The leaking of the list has confirmed some of our worst fears," said EFA vice-chair Colin Jacobs. "This was bound to happen, especially as mandatory filtering would require the list to be distributed to ISPs all around the country. The government is now in the unenviable business of compiling and distributing a list which includes salacious and illegal material and publicising those very sites to the world."

EFA said the list contained surprising additions such as YouTube videos, a MySpace profile, online poker parlours and a site containing poison information, as well as harmless sites such as that of a tour operator.

"Now that we have seen the list, it is clearly not the perfect weapon against child abuse it has been made out to be," said Jacobs. "Many of the sites clearly contain only run-of-the-mill adult material, poker tips or nothing controversial at all. Even if some of these sites may have been defaced at the time they were added to the list, how would the operators get their sites removed if the list is secret and no appeal is possible?"

Advertisement

Talkback 28 comments

    Catch 22 Brian -- 19/03/09

    You can be fined $11,000 a day for linking to a web site that is on a list you are not allowed to see. According to the SMH, you can even get 10 years in the slammer for surfing to one of the web sites on this list you are not allowed to see.

    "ACMA said Australians caught distributing the list or accessing child pornography sites on the list could face criminal charges and up to 10 years in prison."

    So, how do you know they host child pornographY? Do they all have URLs like www.getyourkiddiepornhere.com?

    Can anyone think of a better definition for the word "stupid"?

    At least... Mel Sommersberg -- 19/03/09 (in reply to #320126105)

    It takes 'ignorance of the law is no excuse' to a whole new level. If you are barred from knowing what you aren't allowed to do then how can you consciously obey the law?

    Kafkaesque Anonymous -- 19/03/09 (in reply to #320126107)

    Somebody at ACMA must have read The Trial recently.

    They need to learn a lesson Brian -- 19/03/09 (in reply to #320126107)

    Given the number of people who submit tax returns over the Internet, what if the Tax Office IP address got on the blocked list just before tax time? The governement may discover that the inadvertent blocking of web sites can be more than just a mild inconvenience.

    Wikileaks edit? Rob Byrnes -- 19/03/09

    How do we know that wikileaks is really blacklisted, and this just wasn't an edit on the wikileaks page?

    This is looking very bad for us Australians... Anonymous -- 19/03/09

    For me, the last sentence of this article really spells out the trouble:

    "Even if some of these sites may have been defaced at the time they were added to the list, how would the operators get their sites removed if the list is secret and no appeal is possible?"

    This process is so clearly either not thought through (best case - which says really great things about our gov) or such a complete transgression of what we might commonly call 'democratic values' that it can't possibly be accepted by the Australian public...

    Can it?

    What Else to Ban? Jasper -- 19/03/09

    Guaranteed that bittorrent sites like pirate bay, ISO Hunt, mininova, etc�. will make the black list once it gets fully implemented. Gov always wants to play nice with big media.

    All part of the plan Anonymous -- 19/03/09

    Next step. To protect you from accessing the blacklisted sites the Gov'munt will require us all to access the Net through a single proxy server housed in a leaky basement in the bottom of the NSW police dept. It will require you to install a totally harmless piece of software "roodkcab.exe" so that you can ..... ummm.. be authenticated.

    All part of the plan Proxies Rule!! -- 20/03/09 (in reply to #320126118)

    Well if that is the best you can come up with, I guess they will use it.... lol

    Wikileaks Anonymous -- 19/03/09

    As of 2:00 on Thursday the Wikileaks site cannot be accessed. Has it been blocked for all Australians already?

    and Conroy is unrepentant Anonymous -- 19/03/09

    No comment at all from Senator Censor about the perfectly legal sites on the list.

    Just a heads up, www.wikileaks.org is a little busy right now.

    504 gateway timeout for wikileaks... Anonymous -- 19/03/09 (in reply to #320126123)

    Gateway Timeout

    The following error occurred:
    [code=GATEWAY_TIMEOUT] A gateway timeout occurred. The server is unreachable. Retry the request.
    Please contact the administrator

    wtf Dr Zen -- 19/03/09 (in reply to #320126139)

    They have even censored the list of sites they're censoring. Only in Australia would the gov't self-parody so spectacularly.

    504 gateway timeout for wikileaks... Quick, use a workaround! -- 20/03/09 (in reply to #320126139)

    Quick, use a workaround! Connect via VPN! Better still P2P to the site...!
    Easy, anyone can do it.... Google it and get an anon proxy up and running....
    Hohoho, no-one will stop us from accessing any site we want...

    Welcome to communist China, I mean Australia Anonymous -- 19/03/09

    What the hell is happening to his country? There are over 100 government departments that "Freedom of Information" laws do not apply to.
    The Child Support Agency can sell everything a defaulting parents owns, throw the person (family and all) on the street and the Media is not allowed to report this occurring by law!
    The Anti-Terrorism laws mean anybody can be locked up without legal representation for 2 weeks, no calls, nothing. Their children can be interrogated and their friends as well. If the friends talk about it, they are locked up for 5 years!
    Now they want to secretly block sites with no right of appeal? God I hope someone hacks (with porn) the ALP sites and gets them blacklisted too!

    How not to do it Anonymous -- 19/03/09

    Hopefully this will show that this scheme is of no use at all and not effective.

    There are many better ways of censoring, and I hope they will be taken into consideration now.

    On a plus side many ISPs ended up with some very nice equipment courtesy of the Government and our tax money.

    The ISPs had to buy the equipment themselves Anonymous -- 19/03/09 (in reply to #320126130)

    This why Telstra and other ISPs were not included in the trials, as they wanted the equipment for free.
    Obviously, we will pay for the equipment either way, through taxes or higher Internet Access plans.
    When people start changing their accounts down to 500meg (from say, 20gig) as they can only email and web surf, the ISPs will have to raise the charges on these tiny plans to cover costs.
    Therefore we will soon paying $60-$80 for a piddly 500meg plan.
    Australia is going to be a IT backwater due to these restrictions and have no reason to innovate with things like streaming TV, as the P2P technology these systems use, will be blocked.

    How not to do it Ballbreaker... -- 20/03/09 (in reply to #320126130)

    Gotcha! It was a fake list... But you kinew that already, right?
    So someone puts up a fake copy of the ACMA list and the scheme don't work?
    Your logic just breaks my balls mate....

    Doh! Tarrax -- 25/03/09 (in reply to #320126205)

    No silly, it proves how easy it is for both the list & the filter to be used for the wrong purposes. But I guess you completely trust the government to always do the right thing don't you? Forever?

    Just sad.. Anonymous -- 19/03/09

    Its fast approaching the time for serious civil disobedience in this country. Aside from the never ending state based corruption and total loss of infrstructural services, they now want to control what we think, what we see and what information we access.

    Well stuff these christian fundamentalist control freaks. This is a declaration of war on the people of Australia by our politicians! Time for Australians to fight back before its too late.

    I couldn't agree more... Anonymous -- 19/03/09 (in reply to #320126138)

    The French government cares a lot more for what people think due their previous "revolution". We need something similar here to show the government who is actually their boss and BS promises just don't cut it anymore.

    Just Sad - Protest - REVOLUTION- REBELLION! Anna Howie -- 20/03/09 (in reply to #320126138)

    We need another Rum Rebellion and Eureka!

    And as I typed "revolution" I saw Vivian from the Young Ones waving an icepick in the air and saying it in his crazy voice.

    Suppose they would ban The Young Ones too, huh?

    Not good enough K_RUDD

    I didn't vote for you (nor you LIberals either BTW!!) yet I have to cop your ludicrous morals, beliefs and ethics. Get a grip!

    Rudd plus Howard equals the current situation Anonymous -- 20/03/09 (in reply to #320126236)

    I agree, people need to make a stand. Unfortunately though, it may be a case of shutting the gate once the horse has bolted.

    You see although the Labor government are contemptible in relation to this issue, our civil rights have been eroded over the last 10-15 years by the Howard government. They banned strikes, demonstrations/gatherings, sent in hooded terrorists to the waterfront - whether you love or loathe docks workers, put yourself in the same boat, being manhandled, by government sanctioned terrorists trained in the middle east. Then we had/have the threat of terrorism and laws to hold people in custody, without charge, for indefinite periods, because they 'look' like a terrorist.

    Not only did we let the government diminish our rights, but some even encouraged them to do so. I still see people here condoning what has occurred previously, but now unable to make the connection, to what is currently occurring? As someone said, you reap what you sow.

    We can't have it both ways, we either want the government to interfere with our civil liberties, or we don't. We can't pick and choose the ones we like and the ones we dont. Sorry if I sound melodramatic, but yes Rudd has a lot of explaining to do, but as politicians of all persuasions inevitably do, give them an inch and they will take a mile!

    Unfortunately we gave Howard a mile and Rudd now wants that plus extra inches too.

    PROTEST! Keith Styles -- 19/03/09

    Australians had better work fast if they are going to stop our dumb Senator from banning anything he or ACMA don't like.

    Wikileaks has been blocked!

    and Conroy hasn't even had the censorship laws passed by parliament!

    ...What next ?

    This government is as bad or worse than the last.

    DO YOU WANT YOUR ISP TO FILTER YOUR INTERNET CONNECTION WITHOUT YOUR AUTHORITY?

    ***STOP INTERNET CENSORSHIP***

    http://nocleanfeed.com/

    Voltaire got it right way back in the 18th Century..

    "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" - Voltaire (1694- 1778)

    Another beuracratic joke Anonymous -- 20/03/09

    Im not surprised at all...just another collection of power hungry "business people" - BORING. Who has $11,000 to give to them anyway?

    Internet Filtering Geoff King -- 23/03/09

    We should all support Getup.org.au, as they seem to be the only ones interested in kicking this pathetic legislation out. A Tv campaign is about to begin. Don't bet on much support from the other side of politics. Make your voices heard !

    War Mark -- 25/03/09

    The future of this World is war by governments against their own people to keep us docile, uninformed and controllable. It's just so much easier to manage than all that chaotic democracy.

    Why the blacklist is "confidential"? Anonymous -- 02/04/09

    In my opinion the issue here is not that a "blacklist" exists, but that it's kept "confidential" and hence no transparency exists.
    As a person trying to go to the "blacklisted sites" would be prevented to do so, I can't see why the govt assumes publishing the blacklist would be similar to "advertising" those malicious sites.

    Cheers.

Add your opinion

Latest Videos

Blogs

  • Phil Dobbie iiNet and TPG battle for bronze
    TPG and iiNet are neck and neck in terms of customer numbers, battling it out for the position of third largest provider. Will the company that comes out on top with the most customers be the ultimate winner, or will other factors come into play?
  • Array iiNet case dealt filter a body blow
    While a court absolves iiNet from responsibility for what users do with its internet services, Senator Stephen Conroy is exploring yet another way to control what Australians do on the internet. But with the forces of net neutrality seemingly gaining strength, is Conroy's case for filtering losing steam?
  • Array Telecom NZ savings damage prospects
    If Telecom NZ wants to have any of the NZ$1.5 billion the government intends to spend on its new broadband network, it had better think long and hard before offshoring 1500 jobs.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured