SUBSCRIBE TO NEW SCIENTIST

Life

Feeds

Home |Life |Environment |Tech | In-Depth Articles

For sustainable architecture, think bug

Continue reading page |1 |2

IN THE heart of Africa's savannah lies a city that is a model of sustainable development. Its buttressed towers are built entirely from natural, biodegradable materials. Its inhabitants live and work in quarters that are air-conditioned and humidity-regulated, without consuming a single watt of electricity. Water comes from wells that dip deep into the earth, and food is cultivated self-sufficiently in gardens within its walls. This metropolis is not just eco-friendly: with its curved walls and graceful arches, it is rather beautiful too.

This is no human city, of course. It is a termite mound.

Unlike termites and other nest-building insects, we humans pay little attention to making buildings fit for their environments. "We can develop absurd architectural ideas without the punishment of natural selection," says architect Juhani Pallasmaa of the Helsinki University of Technology in Finland. As we wake up to climate change and resource depletion, though, interest in how insects manage their built environments is reawakening. It appears we have a lot to learn.

"The building mechanisms and the design principles that make the properties of insect nests possible aren't well understood," says Guy Théraulaz of the CNRS Research Centre on Animal Cognition in Toulouse, France. That's not for want of trying. Research into termite mounds kicked off in the 1960s, when Swiss entomologist Martin Lüscher made trailblazing studies of nests created by termites of the genus Macrotermes on the plains of southern Africa. It was he who suggested the chaotic-looking mounds were in fact exquisitely engineered eco-constructions.

Specifically, he proposed an intimate connection between how the mounds are built and what the termites eat. Macrotermes species live on cellulose, a constituent of plant matter that humans can't digest. In fact, neither can termites. They get round this by cultivating gardens of fungi that turn wood into digestible nutrients.

These fungus gardens must be well ventilated, and their temperature and humidity closely controlled - no mean feat in the tropical climates in which termites live. In Lüscher's picture, heat from the fungi's metabolism and the termites' bodies causes stagnant air laden with carbon dioxide to rise up a central chimney. From there it fans out through the porous walls of the mound, while new air is sucked in at the base.

Giant lungs

So simple and appealing was this idea that it spawned at least one artificial imitation: the Eastgate Centre in Harare, Zimbabwe, designed by architect Mick Pearce. Opened in 1996, it boasts a termite-inspired ventilation and cooling system. Or at least it was thought to. It turns out, however, that few if any termite mounds work this way.

Keeping the temperature and humidity within termite mounds constant while at the same time getting rid of CO2 demands a very efficient process of gas exchange. A typical mound with about 2 million inhabitants needs to "breathe" about 1000 litres of fresh air each day. To investigate further what might drive such an exchange, Scott Turner, a termite expert at The State University of New York in Syracuse, and Rupert Soar of Freeform Engineering in Nottingham, UK, looked into the design principles of Macrotermes mounds in Namibia. They found that the mounds' walls are warmer than the central nest, which rules out the kind of buoyant outward flow of CO2-rich air proposed by Lüscher. Indeed, injecting a tracer gas into the mound showed little evidence of steady, convective air circulation.

Turner and Soar believe that termite mounds instead tap turbulence in the gusts of wind that hit them. A single breath of wind contains small eddies and currents that vary in speed and direction with different frequencies. The outer walls of the mounds are built to allow only eddies changing with low frequencies to penetrate deep within them. As the range of frequencies in the wind changes from gust to gust, the boundary between the stale air in the nest and the fresh air from outside moves about within the mounds' walls, allowing the two bodies of air to be exchanged. In essence, the mound functions as a giant lung.

This is very different to the way ventilation works in modern human buildings. Here, fresh air is blown in through vents to flush stale air out. Turner thinks there is something to be gleaned from the termites' approach. "We could turn the whole idea of the wall on its head," he says. We should not think of walls as barriers to stop the outside getting in, but rather design them as adaptive, porous interfaces that regulate the exchange of heat and air between the inside and outside. "Instead of opening a window to let fresh air in, it would be the wall that does it, but carefully filtered and managed the way termite mounds do it," he says.

Turner's ideas were among many discussed at a workshop on insect architecture organised by Théraulaz in Venice, Italy, last year. It aimed to pool understanding from a range of disciplines, from experts in insect behaviour to practising architects. "Some real points of contact began to emerge," says Turner. "There was a prevailing idea among the biologists that architects could learn much from us. I think the opposite is also true."

Continue reading page |1 |2
Issue 2748 of New Scientist magazine
  • Like what you've just read?
  • Don't miss out on the latest content from New Scientist.
  • Get New Scientist magazine delivered to your door, plus unlimited access to the entire content of New Scientist online.
  • Subscribe now and save

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say
Comments 1 | 2 | 3

Ventilation

Sat Feb 20 15:08:24 GMT 2010 by Eric Kvaalen

If there are winds blowing on the nest, then I think the most important effect will be from the average wind, not from the eddies. This average wind will push air into one side of the nest and air will exit from the leeward side.

But porous walls are not a good idea for us. We can do much better with counter-current heat exchange ventilation. Unfortunately it hasn't been used much in most countries.

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

Ventilation

Tue Feb 23 21:48:22 GMT 2010 by Rupert Soar
http://www.freeformengineering.co.uk

Measured airflows induced within the mound are highly oscillatrory (AC). They are neither steady-state pressure differential, circulatory or convective driven (all DC). The mound is an impedance device, intercepting broadband potential enegy within light eddy currents passing over its surface. It's like termites constructing a bottle, only when they construct the neck does its Helmholtz capability emerge, i.e. it hums, and it will not hum if you blow too hard over it. It is genuinely breathing, not with muscles but with sound. It is recordable and we have been playing these sounds to the public. Importantly, this is partial gas exchange, as it preserves temperature and humidity levels within the nest, and is the reason why all mammals use it and not stack effects or thermal recovery bulk airflow..

Ventilation

Wed Feb 24 17:53:16 GMT 2010 by Eric Kvaalen

Thanks for the reply.

Can you explain why there isn't a "DC" component to the air circulation (or why it's so weak)?

I don't see how partial gas exchange preserves temperature and humidity. It seems to me that it simply mixes outside air with inside air, making the inside air more like the outside air.

Animals with a windpipe and nasal passages do effect a certain amount of heat exchange (and perhaps moisture exchange) with the flesh around the passages acting as a storage medium, transferring heat from the outgoing air to the incoming air. But in our homes we can do this more efficiently with counter-current heat exchangers.

Magnetic Tombstones

Mon Feb 22 10:48:24 GMT 2010 by James Webley
http://TalkingNature.com

It really is amazing to think that a colony of insects can work together to build structures like the 'magnetic' termite mounds in the Northern Territory, Australia, and all the time working on 'local rules'.

This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed.

Act Now

Mon Feb 22 10:49:05 GMT 2010 by Matg

We could start with wind funnels/towers. In some cases, these can incorporate wind turbines. If the tower is designed to send out hot air, a tower top that swivels with the wind will help. Dynamic (computer-controlled) flexibility in configuration will produce returns faster. Dynamic window control for day-time lighting is already available.

Comments 1 | 2 | 3

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Fit for the environment (Image: Image Source/Rex Features)

Fit for the environment (Image: Image Source/Rex Features)

ADVERTISEMENT

Happiness ain't all it's cracked up to be

17:22 26 February 2010

Being cheery can make you selfish, and that's just the latest in a series of findings that happiness changes you – not in a good way

The real Avatar: ocean bacteria act as 'superorganism'

18:00 24 February 2010

Bacteria in muddy ocean sediments may shuttle energy back and forth via a network of nanowires – a striking parallel with the movie Avatar

Monster crocodile was ancient human nightmare

14:29 24 February 2010

Our ancestors would have been no more than a snack for a newly identified man-eating croc

Jane Goodall: 'There is no problem in having empathy'

13:08 24 February 2010

Fifty years after she began studying chimps, the conservationist explains why emotional involvement helped her understand them – and could save them

Latest news

Smart CCTV raises bush-fire alarm

10:00 28 February 2010

An early warning system for fires detects the first signs of danger by recognising a flame's telltale colour and flicker in a video feed

Robots to rescue soldiers

12:00 27 February 2010

The US military is seeking ideas on how to build an autonomous robot that can rescue injured personnel from the battlefield

A quiet sun won't save us from global warming

10:00 26 February 2010

Even if there's a "grand minimum" in the sun's output over the next century, it won't be enough to counter rising temperatures caused by humans

Today on New Scientist: 26 February 2010

18:00 26 February 2010

All today's stories on newscientist.com at a glance, including: the unstoppable rise of spam, the failure of Arctic ice arches, and why happiness ain't all it's cracked up to be

TWITTER

New Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

ADVERTISEMENT

Partners

We are partnered with Approved Index. Visit the site to get free quotes from website designers and a range of web, IT and marketing services in the UK.