Skip to content

Monday, Mar 22nd 2010

Call Centre Workers in Northern Ireland, Stream and Invest NI

The news that between 450 and 600 jobs are to go in Derry at call centres operated by US-owned outsourcing firm Stream has come as another blow to the economy of Northern Ireland. According to the local press, Stream’s decision to cut back on its Derry operation stems from the loss of an important Post Office contract to rival firm Convergys. Stream Northern Ireland’s Managing Director Jeff Jennings told the BBC that these are “tough times for the call centre sector”. The illusion is maintained that in the cut and thrust of the open market Stream had no choice but to “shed” jobs in Derry.

According to the Derry Journal, Stream International have received £2.32 million worth of Invest NI assistance since 2000, including £1.2 million in taxpayer’s money which was paid to the company for several projects, including a number of job creation programmes.

The most recent payment was a £60,000 award in 2007 £32,000 of which was used to hire a “Business Improvement Agent”, who by all accounts saved Stream £1 million.

In the light of Stream International’s recent decisions Alastair Hamilton, Chief Executive of the neo-liberal quango, Invest NI, confirmed to SDLP leader Mark Durkan, that Stream was in a position to apply to the EU-funded Short-term Aid Scheme which, according to Durkan, “can assist a small number of core staff to be retained by companies facing severe short-term difficulties, as a bridge out of those”. (Incidentally, Hamilton’s predecessor as Chief Executive at Invest NI earned £160,000 in 2008.)

Should Stream International fail to hold to its promises of job creation, Invest NI is in a position to claw back some of the public money that has been thrown at the company but according to the quango this option is not yet on the table.

Call Centres in Northern Ireland

In the UK an estimated 750,000 people work in call centres and over 17,000 workers are employed in the sector in Northern Ireland constituting 2 per cent of the population.

Call centres are notoriously exploitative and authoritarian working environments. Research has shown that call centre work is more stressful than work in other fields. In early 2001, the TUC set up a short-term hotline for call centre workers. Among the 500 staff who called many spoke about bullying, long hours, impossible sales targets and general job dissatisfaction. The calls documented employers in the industry using various techniques to drive up the exploitation of staff. Some call centre workers are forced to work under constant surveillance. Workers also complained of suffering from “acoustic shock” (damage to hearing caused by sudden loud noises during calls) that had left them suffering from depression and other health problems. The most stressful aspect of the job is on the caller operator’s emotions. Workers are required to remain constantly pleasant and attentive callers while under intense pressure to meet sales targets within strict time limits. Only Union activism has tempered exploitation and even humiliation by management in Call Centres. One Union activist in England tells of how in one company sales and service mangers and team leaders came up with “this wonderful idea of making dunce’s hats for sales and service advisers which they were forced to wear if they did not make a sale within an hour’s period.”  Pressure on the part of the Union ensured that the hats were gone within 24 hours.

In relation to salaries, conditions in Northern Ireland call centres are the worst in the UK. Northern Ireland call centre workers receive salaries over 26 per cent below the overall average. Wages in call centres in Northern Ireland are 15 per cent lower than Wales, 14 per cent lower than Scotland and 13 per cent lower than the lowest English region. Even the East Midlands, England’s lowest paid region, has salary levels more than 14% higher than Northern Ireland’s. According to International recruitment firm Beeswax, the average salary paid to an entry-level customer service agent in Belfast, for example, is £13,000 per annum, while a team leader would expect £19,000. In 2008 R. Scott Murray, CEO of Stream International earned $418,923.00 (£253,000), including bonuses and other compensation.

Stream International (Again)

While Mark Durkan may believe that Stream is “facing severe short-term difficulties” and Stream NI’s Jeff Jennings bemoans the current state of the sector, Stream’s US-based headquarters is much more upbeat about the business. In mid August Stream Global Services, Inc., and EGS Corp., the indirect parent company of eTelecare Global Solutions, jointly announced that they have combined. The deal will be completed later this year. As a result of this combination, Stream Global Services expects to generate revenues approaching $1 billion for the year ending December 31, 2010 and maintain financial sponsorship from a group of equity and hedge funds - institutions that collectively manage over $50 billion in investments.

Call Centre Jobs - the Way Forward?

Beyond crucial questions of terms and conditions of work, there is the broader question of whether the setting up of call centres should be touted as a model of economic development, here and around the world.

According to the Communist Party of the Philippines, call centres “cannot help develop the economy, and in fact worsen … imperialist exploitation … , mainly through the exploitation of cheap labor. They thwart genuine economic progress founded on the development of the country’s basic industries. Just like the massive exodus of migrant workers to other countries, rising employment in call centres merely obscures a backward economy, the lack of genuine national industrialization and widespread unemployment in the country.”

Although the issues here are somewhat different to those of a third world country like the Philippines, we also have to ask whether call centres should be encouraged to set up here by quangos such as Invest NI, which are in the business of giving tax payers’ money to fantastically rich multinationals.

Justin O’Hagan is a a member of the Workers’ Party’s Ard Comhairle and Northern Regional Executive

Photo of a Newry Call Centre courtesy of the BBC


We welcome and encourage lively discussion from the public about articles on Irish Left Review. You can leave a comment using the form at the bottom of the page. Please read through the existing comments before posting your own.

  1. Comment by: Terence Whelan

    Mar 9th 2010 at 19:03

    I currently work in one of these call centres and have done so for two years now. The stress of dealing with difficult customers is a hard thing to control but what gets to me is the treatment of staff by the employers. Unrealistic expectations and extra pressure are loaded on staff and being polite & solving the issues is never enough. The support agent is at the cold front and should be supported well in their job. Support agents are expected to subject customers to a barrage of questions and extract every detail possible from them before they can even ask a question!!.
    But the worst element by far is the ‘Feedback’ sessions’ , here is where any illusions you had about your proficiency are torn to shreds. The criteria by which the calls and emails are judged are ridiculous and often times demoralising. The criteria for the call\email scoring is changed on a regular basis causing stress and confusion for the support agents. It seems like there are a group of people who in order to justify their jobs have to constantly chop & change the rules. These rules are often extremely unrealistic and despite the customer being very satisfied and having given them the right answer you can still fail the call\email!!. Non compliance with these silly rules could see you singled out and possibly layed off. There was also a recent case where an employee almost lost their job based on a complaint from a customer when there wasn’t even a recording of the call to verify what was said!!.
    All this and the fact that the company have used the recession as an excuse to skip a pay review in 2009 makes staying on very hard. Given that the wages are so meagre in the first place this was doubly insulting. Were it not for the fact that work is so scarce I’d be out the door in the morning. The work contract also states that they don’t recognise unions. It’s like they never want you getting too ahead of yourself. For the sake of my mental and physical health I might have to leave soon enough.

  2. Comment by: Justin

    Mar 11th 2010 at 17:03

    Thanks for sharing this Terence. Your description of your working environment makes it easy for me to understand why you might have to leave.

    Your contract may say that the company doesn’t recognise unions but there is a mechanism which forces them to do so.

    According to the statutory trade union recognition provisions of the Employment Relations Act 1999. where a union claim for recognition for collective bargaining purposes cannot be resolved bilaterally with the employer concerned, the union may refer the matter to the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC) for determination.

    The CAC is a statutory body organised on a “tripartite” basis with a chair (and a number of deputy chairs who are academics or lawyers, and two groups of members with experience as employer or worker representatives respectively. The role of the CAC is to declare whether the union should be recognised on the basis that a majority of the workers concerned are members of the union or that a (qualified) majority support recognition in a ballot.

    In other words, if a majority of the workers in a workplace become members of a union, the CAC may force the owners to recognise Unions. And, of course, unionised workers tend to gain better pay and conditions.

    The Communication Workers Union has some information on Call Centres on its website at, includuing occupational health risks associated with the job.

    And the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) has a charter for Call Centre workers’ rights at

    Best wishes to you.

Leave a Comment


(required, will not be published)

Best of the Web

  • Taking Sides| John Mearsheimer | London Review Blog

    John Mearsheimer on wobbles in the Special Relationship(tm)
    "The central message Petraeus sent to Mullen, according to Perry, was that ‘Israeli intransigence on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was jeopardising US standing in the region… and could cost American lives.’ "

    No comments »
  • Haiti Liberte: Hebdomadaire Haitien / Haitian weekly

    Jean Anil Louis-Juste, a much loved Haitian professor and political who was assassinated in Haiti on Jan 12th - just before the earthquake- writing on what social communication actually means. What he says could easily be an explanation of what happens here too. Police have yet to start an investigation into this murder.

    “There is a tendency in Haiti for people to associate social communication with journalism. When one talks about communication, people think of radio, newspapers, television, etc. If we could only communicate via the mass media, there wouldn’t be any communication. When we look at the news media’s programs, we find that they give the politicians’ messages priority over every other aspect of life. But it isn’t a political message. It is the message of opportunists only fighting to occupy a state post. It is only momentous social events when the mainstream press allows union leaders, popular organization leaders and peasant movement coordinators to talk.

    No comments »
  • Hugh Green | Lost Boys And Girls

    Hugh Green’s excellent post on the Boys of St Columb’s documentary makes a couple of points that are worth highlighting. The now famous Northern Irish men featured - Hume, Heaney, Deane, McCann, Coulter etc, were the first generation to benefit from the 1947 British Act of Parliament which granted free secondary education to Northern Irish children. The trick of getting an education that was transformative, however, was that you had to pass the 11 plus.

    The documentary was focusing on those that had, of course, otherwise they wouldn’t have become pupils of St. Columb’s. But while there was an awareness of those who ‘had not succeeded’ among the participants,  the documentary itself ignored this majority.

    So here’s the first point worth highlighting:

    “Most of the children of the generation portrayed here, as with today’s generation, didn’t pass the 11 plus to go on to grammar school and university. These were the other Boys and Girls of St. Columb’s, who were as much a product of the education system as any of the men featured. They also took part in civil rights activism and resistance to official discrimination, but there was no account of them given here, other than in the men’s awareness that they had been picked out as the ’successes’.”

    Perhaps this documentary was not the one to examine the other side of the coin, not those who were cultivated to become leaders of the community, but rather those “deemed to be there simply to be administered to, represented and led”. But if it had, and this is the second point worth highlighting…

    “A good starting point would be in the fact that the 1947 Education Act may have led to the formation of the SDLP, but it also led to its disdainful characterisation as the ‘Schoolteachers, Doctors and Lawyers Party’. What’s more, the grouping that eventually took its place in Northern nationalist politics, having waged a decades long war against the Northern state, was led in Derry by Martin McGuinness, who had failed the 11 plus. Nearly his first act as minister for Education was to try and initiate its abolition.”

    No comments »
  • / Global insight - Franco-German dynamics make EMF a distant goal

    Of course, the idea floated at the weekend by Wolfgang Schäuble is a double-edged weapon. It would give that fund the same very tough tools of conditionality and intervention in the fiscal policies of individual countries as the International Monetary Fund. From the German perspective, that would be its primary purpose.
    But just as surprising is the fact that the initiative, with the promise of other unspecified measures to bolster economic policy co-ordination in the eurozone, should have come first from Berlin rather than Paris.

    Normally, the more dramatic flights of fancy in the European Union are a French prerogative. The German tradition is far more cautious. French fuites en avant are regarded with irritation. But only if Berlin signs up does anything usually happen.

    In the end, big European initiatives seldom come to pass at all unless the two largest founding states bury their differences and do a deal.

    No comments »
  • The Iceland Weather Report | On the Icelandic Prime Ministers Thoughts on the Referendum tomorrow

    Iceland is facing a referendum tomorrow on whether to accept the deal carved out between Iceland, The Netherlands and Britain on the Icesave debt, and its likely to vote no. But will it make any difference. "As if the government wasn’t in enough trouble with public opinion here at home, Prime Minister Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir has publicly announced that she plans to shun the referendum tomorrow.

    “To me it is pointless and I find it is very sad that the first referendum since the founding of the republic revolves around legislation that is already obsolete. Consequently I see no point in taking part in this referendum,” Jóhanna told Fréttablaðið.

    Granted, that opinion is shared by many people. However, in the view of a large proportion of the Icelandic nation, and even of the world*, this referendum is about so much more. Even if this is Jóhanna’s personal opinion, stating it so publicly seems like political harakiri."

    1 comment »
  • Key Trends in the World Economy | Germany’s ‘continental economy’ - comparisons to the US, India and China

    John Ross on how Germany's trade figures shows that their economy is 'continental', that is its similiar to the US, India and China as it relies solidly on its European market.
    "The fact that Germany is operating in a continental scale economy, Eurozone Europe, with a fixed exchange rate, allows it to gain or maintain tremendous economies of scale. Conversely introduction of unstable exchange rates,including the possibility for major European trading partners to carry out competitive devaluations, would almost certainly make it impossible for Germany to maintain such a high proportion of exports in its economy - that is it would greatly weaken the 'continental' scale of its economy." Meanwhile…Handelsblatt reports that German Chancellor Angela Merkel yesterday rejected a call from Spanish PM Jose Luis Zapatero for "EU-solidarity" for Greece. She also warned that the euro would not be stable without radical cuts in the budget deficits of member states.

    No comments »
  • Interview with Green Isle hunger strikers

    Interview with Green Isle hunger strikers from Frank Schnittger on Vimeo.

    No comments »
  • Eamon Devoy, General Secretary TEEU outlines background to hunger strike

    Eamon Devoy, General Secretary TEEU outlines background to hunger strike from Frank Schnittger on Vimeo.

    1 comment »
  • Juan Cole | Harvard Professor’s Modest Proposal: Starve the Gazans into Having Fewer Babies

    Cole dismantles Martin Kramer's astonishing claim that forcing the Palestinians to have fewer children by starving them would resolve the conflict between Israel and Palestine.
    "Martin Kramer revealed his true colors at the Herzliya Conference, wherein he blamed political violence in the Muslim world on population growth, called for that growth to be restrained, and praised the illegal and unconscionable Israeli blockade of civilian Gazans for its effect on reducing the number of Gazans.

    M. J. Rosenberg argued that Kramer's speech is equivalent to a call for genocide. It certainly is a call for eugenics."

    No comments »
  • Charity worker safe after mob’s adoption anger |

    Haitian's concerned about foreign nationals taking advantage of the catastrope in their country to take children - a justifiable concern - are described as an 'angry mob of Haitian men' when confronting an Irish female 'charity worker' (as opposed to an agent of a private adoption agency).
    "When we arrived at the airport we were surrounded by an angry mob of Haitian men," she told the Irish Independent. "They started getting very aggressive and were shouting at us. It was very scary, especially for the kids."

    No comments »

Link Archives »