Read more in section
General Ukraine, IMF haggle over scale of 2010 deficit Today at 17:57
General Oil and Gas Eurasia: Ukrainian oil transit down 50 percent Today at 14:59
General Alibaba.com: Zaporizhstal owners to sell metallurgical assets Today at 11:41
General Update: Azarov says Ukraine expects serious changes in cooperation program with IMF Today at 11:23
General RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty: Ukraine bans pork imports from Russia Yesterday at 22:09
General Ukraine, IMF mission still unable to agree on 2010 budget deficit Yesterday at 19:43
General Finance Ministry: IMF to revise macroeconomic forecast for Ukraine Yesterday at 18:30
General Naftogaz pays coupon of over $75 million on eurobonds Yesterday at 16:27
General Over 50% of Motor Sich revenues account for engine supply to Russia Yesterday at 15:40
Prosecutors fail to solve biggest criminal casesMarch 25 at 22:47 | Peter Byrne
What about investigations into the theft of billions of dollars in imported natural gas? Prosecutors can’t get to the bottom of it.
Alleged misappropriations of up to billions of dollars more in central bank assistance? The culprits got away.
Who ordered the murder of Georgiy Gongadze in 2000? That’s a tough one, despite hundreds of hours of incriminating audiotapes in the office of ex-President Leonid Kuchma and a reported confession from the policeman who actually strangled the journalist.
The General Prosecutors Office of Ukraine is where criminal cases go to linger and die, not get solved. And corrupt politics, like so much in the nation, is at the root of it all.
A recent example involves Ihor Bakai, the businessman and close ally of Kuchma, who fled to Moscow when investigators started several cases against him following the democratic 2004 Orange Revolution.
Kyiv’s Pechersk district court on March 23 ruled that criminal investigations against Bakai, who headed the state gas and oil monopoly Naftogaz from 1998 to 2000, should be closed for lack of evidence.
Bakai, who in 2003 was appointed head of the State Management of Affairs Department, an institution that manages properties on behalf of the president and cabinet under Kuchma, fled to Russia in December 2004. He was subsequently charged with illegally privatizing state-owned stakes in the Dnipro Hotel, Ukraina Hotel and the Ukraina Exhibition complex in Kyiv.
Yuriy Boichenko, spokesman for the prosecutor’s office, said on March 24 that his office may or may not appeal the court decision to throw out the charges. “We have not received a copy of the Pechersk court ruling,” Boichenko said. “By law, our office will have seven days to study it before deciding to appeal … or not.”
Boichenko said prosecutors will not follow political dictates and will, instead, follow the law in Bakai’s case.
But the critics have a different view. They says dozens of high-profile cases involving former state officials have been thrown out or muzzled by current Prosecutor General Oleksandr Medvedko and his predecessors.
The fault, they say, lies with the unwritten rule of impunity that exists between the rivaling business oligarchs and parties that have all-but-monopolized the country’s politics and economy. They often fight ruthlessly for power, but avoid putting opponents behind bars for fear of retribution. Instead, criminal cases are opened often just to show opponents who is in charge.
Many legal experts say a legal change in the powers of prosecutors is long overdue.
The European Commission for Democracy Through Law, also known as the Venice Commission, has over the years compared Ukraine’s prosecutor’s office to the Soviet (and Czarist) style “prokuratura.” The general prosecutor controls a very powerful institution whose functions considerably exceed the scope of prosecutors in democratic nations.
According to the Constitution adopted in 1996, the authority of the prosecutor’s office is as follows: "Prosecution in court on behalf of the state; representation of the interests of a citizen or of the state in court cases determined by law; supervision of the observance of laws by bodies that conduct detective and search activity, inquiry and pre-trial investigation; and supervision of the observance of laws in the execution of judicial decisions in criminal cases, and also in the application of other measures of coercion related to the restraint of personal liberty of citizens."
A fifth function was added in constitutional amendments adopted in December 2004: “To supervise over the observance of humans’ and citizens’ rights and freedoms and the observance of laws on these matters by bodies of state power, local self-government, their officials and functionaries.”
Parliament made another step to broaden the prosecutors’ function through a new law adopted in first reading on March 14, 2009. The law would make it a very powerful and excessively centralized institution whose functions considerably exceed the scope of functions performed by a prosecutor in a democratic country, the Venice Commission opined in June 2009.
“The draft does not bring Ukraine any closer to complying with the commitment towards the Council of Europe that ‘the role and functions of the Prosecutor’s Office will change, transforming this institution into a body which is in accordance with Council of Europe standards,” the opinion said.
In other words, don’t expect any changes for the better anytime soon.
Kyiv Post staff writer Peter Byrne can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org