Goldsmith's advice on treatment of Iraqi prisoners is censored
The Government has blocked the release of the former attorney general Lord Goldsmith's advice about whether human rights law applied to British troops in Iraq when handling prisoners.
Lawyers for Iraqi detainees allegedly abused by UK soldiers claim Lord Goldsmith's legal opinion would cast light on allegations being considered by a public inquiry into the death of the Basra hotel receptionist Baha Mousa. But the inquiry's chairman, Sir William Gage, has accepted the Ministry of Defence's argument that it must remain secret.
Lord Goldsmith's advice on whether the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) applied to UK operations in Iraq is contained in seven documents dated between 16 February and 16 April 2003.
The MoD argued in submissions to the inquiry that the papers were covered by legal professional privilege, which protects communications between lawyers and their clients. But lawyers for Mr Mousa's family said the advice was important because the ECHR made it clear that prisoner-handling techniques employed by British troops in Iraq should not have been used.
Lord Goldsmith summarised his position when he gave evidence to the Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq war in January this year. He said: "Fundamentally, my advice was that the obligations about the proper treatment of people, which are contained in the European Convention, did apply in relation to detainees." The inquiry is currently looking at who in the chain of command told British soldiers serving in Iraq in 2003 they could use these banned methods. Lord Goldsmith, the Government's chief legal adviser at the time, insisted the authorisation did not come from him.
Sir William read the seven documents drawn up by the former attorney general before giving his ruling. He said: "In my opinion the documents which form the advice remain confidential and I cannot direct that any of them be produced by the MoD."
The inquiry is investigating allegations that British soldiers beat Mr Mousa to death in Basra, southern Iraq, in 2003.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited
Comments
On 29 May 2007, the Independent reported: "Previously confidential emails .....between London and British military head-quarters in Iraq soon after the start of the war suggest Lord Goldsmith's advice was to adopt a "pragmatic" approach when handling prisoners and it was not necessary to follow the "higher standards" of the protection of the Human Rights Act".
According to human rights lawyers, (that) was tantamount to the Attorney General advising the military to ignore the Human Rights Act and to simply observe the Geneva Conventions. It was also contrary to advice given by the Army's senior lawyer in Iraq, who urged higher standards to be met. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/cr