Hero Complex

For your inner fanboy

« Previous Post | Hero Complex Home | Next Post »

James Cameron: The 'Avatar' sequel will dive into the oceans of Pandora

April 20, 2010 |  3:43 pm

On Thursday, which is Earth Day, Fox will release "Avatar" on DVD and Blu-ray, but James Cameron saysa longer version of the film will be back in theaters in August -- and that the franchise will return with aseagoing sequel. Hero Complex contributor Patrick Kevin Day recently spoke with the filmmaker.

James Cameron blue

PD: Will we see an "Avatar" theatrical re-release this summer?

JC: We’re working on finishing an additional six minutes of the film -- which includes a lot of Weta work -- for a theatrical re-release in August. We were sold out of our Imax performances right up to the moment until they were contractually obligated to switch to “Alice in Wonderland,” so we know we left money on the table there. And the 3-D really helped “Avatar” right up until the moment that it hurt it. And it hurt it at the moment “Alice” and then “How to Train Your Dragon” and “Clash of the Titans” came in and sucked up all the 3-D screens. We went from declining 8% a week to declining 50%. Clearly, it wasn’t market forces directly; it was the availability of theaters. So we’re going to wait until there’s a time to come back in, inject the new footage into the mix and see if we can interest people in the “Avatar” experience in theaters.

Avatar bluray It’ll be interesting because it’ll be on DVD by then, but I think “Avatar” is kind of a unique category where people are enjoying the unique theatrical experience even though they may have seen it on the small screen. They want to have that immersive, transportive experience. “2001: A Space Odyssey” played for three years at the Loews cinema in Toronto. I remember that. It just kept playing. People wanted to return to that experience. That may not be the best example because I think “2001” took 25 years to break even.

PD: What goes through your mind when you hear that officials in China changed the name of a peak in Zhangjiajie peak to Avatar Hallelujah Mountains or that Palestinian protesters are dressing as Na’vi?

JC: I think it’s really interesting that these people see their reality reflected in the movie. And of course this is what’s caused all of these [environmental] groups to come to us and say, “Can you help us? Can we do fundraising? Can you help with awareness? Can we associate our website? Can we link to ‘Avatar?" All of these things. Right now, my challenge is to orchestrate this in a way that “Avatar” can continue to do some good. I think the movie itself is reaching people all over the world, which it clearly did by the amount of money it made.It created a sense of an emotional response to this environmental crisis and I think it even may have made it an emotional call to action. The next step is people need to know what to do -- what do I specifically do in my life next so that I don’t feel helpless and powerless.

Navi protester

PD: Does it change your outlook as a creator of entertainment?

JC: Well, I think it makes certain projects that I liked as potential films seem trivial by comparison. I think it makes the idea of making another “Avatar” film more attractive. Because not only is it good business, but it’s good for the environment. I think every model we should use in evaluating any environmental project moving forward should be: Is it good business and is it good for the environment? Because there’s this idea promoted by the right and by special interest groups that you have to choose. You can either have a strong economy or you can help the environment, but you can’t do both at the same time.That’s ridiculous. In fact, as a sustainable vision for a healthy economy has to involve changing our energy policy and changing with respect to the natural world. Because we’re hitting nature’s thresholds, we’re hitting nature’s limits with respect to water and crop yields and energy use and fossil fuels heating the atmosphere at the same time we’re past global peak and running out of that. So we’ve got to change anyway. The people embracing the change earliest are the ones facing the most vigorous economies in 10, 20 years. The nation that leads in renewable energy will be the nation that leads the world 10, 20 years from now. And right now, based on current trends, that’s going to be China. We’re not in any way competing with China in terms of renewable energy. That’s where it shows the proof that you have to choose between economy or energy. China has clearly chosen economy at the expense of everything else with 8% GDP growth a year as a mantra and yet 60% of the solar panels in the world are made in China. They are the most aggressive leaders in the renewable energy sector. So clearly those two are going hand in hand.

Avatar floating mountains

PD: Is your interest movingfrom cinema towardpublic policy?

JC:Not specifically. Look, I’m an artist. I’m just going to be a big mouth and blather my opinions around, as artists are wont to do. That’s fine. In the particular case of “Avatar,” I found there’s a call to action and a sense of duty that’s emerged from it. It wasn’t my intention going into [the film] to do that. I figured I’d be on vacation right now. I figured I’d make my big statement with the movie and let everyone else sort out what to do. Turns out there aren’t that many people figuring out what to do. The leaders have been scared off, people of conscience in our leadership in Washington have been scared off by the right and the fossil fuel lobbies. They won’t even use the term "sustainability" or "climate change" in an energy bill, which is ludicrous on its face. It completely ignores the elephant in the room that we’re all dealing with. The average American doesn’t even believe climate change is real, they think it’s all a hoax. Two years ago, 50% of Americans thought climate change was real and thought it was human caused. Now we’re down to a third. That’s the work of a very well-funded campaign to create a climate of denial in the media. You’ve got to work against that. Here’s my philosophy in life: If there’s a fire, you put it out. If there’s a flood, you fill sandbags and you build a dike. You roll up your sleeves and you get to work. I think we’re facing that kind of crisis and I’m not going to stand around and leave it to someone else to deal with it.

James Cameron on Avatar set I tried [being a mogul]. It bores me. I don’t really want to produce other people’s movies. Because they’re either grown-up filmmakers like Steven Soderbergh or Kathryn Bigelow that didn’t really need me -- and I’ve produced both of them. It’s fun to sit around with them and be collegial, but they don’t need me. They can make the film without me. Or it’s a new filmmaker starting out and I’ve got to hold their hand and lead them through the whole thing. I don’t get anything out of it in either one of those configurations. I don’t get anything out of putting my name on a movie as producer. It doesn’t do anything for me. I make my own stuff. There are tons and tons of other things I’m interested in that have nothing to do with movies or are documentary projects. So I pick my feature film battles very carefully. They’re going to be personal and they’re going to take a lot of my energy. I’m not going to be some big production company and be Jerry Bruckheimer or something like that. It doesn’t interest me.

PD: When you embark on your next film project, do you know what the challenge will be? Something on par with filming underwater for “The Abyss” or perfecting the performance capture technology in “Avatar”?

JC: Well you’ve already defined what the challenge will be on the next “Avatar” picture, which is to do what we did before at half the price and in half the time. Again, that’s an impossible goal, we won’t accomplish that, but if we can reduce by 25% in both categories, we’ll have really accomplished something. We know our methodology works. We also know it took two years to come up with. It didn’t even become efficient until the last two months of the production. So we were four years into a project before we had this machine running smoothly. So we take a snapshot of that moment in our production and say that’s what we look like on Day 1, we’re going to do better. Now, none of that has anything to do with coming up with a great story or great characters or great new settings and so on. That all is a given. That’s not to say that it’s done yet, it’s a given that we have to do that. But for me, the technical challenge is in improving the process having proved that it works.

We created a broad canvas for the environment of film. That’s not just on Pandora, but throughout the Alpha Centauri AB system. And we expand out across that system and incorporate more into the story – not necessarily in the second film, but more toward a third film. I’ve already announced this, so I might as well say it: Part of my focus in the second film is in creating a different environment – a different setting within Pandora. And I’m going to be focusing on the ocean on Pandora, which will be equally rich and diverse and crazy and imaginative, but it just won’t be a rain forest. I’m not saying we won’t see what we’ve already seen; we’ll see more of that as well.

Avatar bow and arrow

PD:Are you still an avid science-fiction reader?

JC:No, not so much an avid science-fiction reader anymore. I probably spend more time writing than reading science fiction. I find that science-fiction literature is so reactive to all the literature that’s gone before that it’s sort of like a fractal. It’s gone to a level of detail that the average person could not possibly follow unless you’re a fan. It iterates upon many prior generations of iterations. The literature now is so opaque to the average person that you couldn’t take a science-fiction short story that’s published now and turn it into a movie. There’d be way too much ground work you’d have to lay. It’s OK to have detail and density, but if you rely on being a lifelong science-fiction fan to understand what the story is about, then it’s not going to translate to a broader audience. Actually, literary science fiction is a very, very narrow band of the publishing business. I love science fiction in more of a pop-culture sense. And by the way, the line between science fiction and reality has blurred a lot in my life doing deep ocean expeditions and working on actual space projects and so on. So I tend to be more fascinated by the reality of the science-fiction world in which we live. I read real science voraciously. I read science magazines. Lay science magazines. I don’t read science papers per se unless it’s been sent to me by a friend in the science community that they’re working on and is a subject that I’m conversant about. Like whether it’s the thickness of ice on Europa. Something specific. And if I need clarification on something, I can call the author and ask them. But generally speaking, I read Scientific American and Discover and Popular Science and that sort of thing.

--Patrick Kevin Day


James Cameron, blue in the face James Cameron: Avatar is my most personal film

The filmmaking magic behind blue-face emotion

ESSAY: Avatar may winOscar credibility for sci-fi

Cameron on Avatar: Like Matrix, it opens doorways

Dont tell Stephen Lang hes the villain in Avatar

REVIEW: Avatar restores sense of wonder

Matrix, Star Wars -- coming soon in 3-D?

Sigourney Weaver: Outer space has been good to me

Meet the USC prof who created Navi language

Cameron,cinema prophet: Moving amountain is nothing

PHOTOS: Top, James Cameron at the Fabiolus Cafe on Jan. 6, 2010 (Lawrence K. Ho / Los Angeles Times). Second, the box-art for the "Avatar" Blu-ray (Fox). Third,a demonstrator against Israels barrier near the village of Bilin, West Bank, is dressed as a character from the film "Avatar," likening the Palestinians land struggle to the films fight (Bernat Armangue / Associated Press). Fourth and sixth, scenes from "Avatar" (Fox). Fifth, Cameron on the set of "Avatar" (Fox). Bottom, James Cameron goes native (illustration by Kevin Lingenfelser)

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

Comments (13)

Almost every movie Ive seen that takes place under water has been slow moving and somewhat boring. Several Bond movies, Lara Croft, 20,000 Leagues, The Abyss, Fantastic Voyage, Finding Nemo, Star Wars 1, Harry Potter 4, Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, Sky Captain, etc. The only good that came out of these movies was Raquel Welch in a diving suit!
All the drama, fast paced action and dialogue takes place in submarines (i.e. out of the water), where people arent hindered by breathing apparatus and aquatic gear.
Of course, Avatars inhabitants will be free of diving suits and face masks. Even Cameron recognized this when he made The Abyss. Thats why the actors had newly designed face masks that revealed much of their face.

The first half of the interview has him obsessed with how much money the movie has made and can keep making. I still hate the massive ego that just oozes out of every other sentence he says.

This is the kind of irony that is just absurd. Hearing Cameron talk of "sustainability" begs the question: How sustainable is his own filmmaking? I am not only speaking of the environment, the economy and the culture but the fact that his own practice as a blockbuster filmmaker precludes him from any serious attempt at changing how films are made from a sustainability perspective, mostly, because of how all large-scale films are made today.

I for one do not believe in a film that merely traffics in "sustainability metaphors" without a real discussion about making Hollywood more sustainable and future-minded.

For example, why cant a film like Avatar off-set its carbon footprint; achieve a more non-profit model for research and education; and help instill civic responsibility in Hollywood? These arent metaphors its just smart business. If paying for this so-called immersive experience is so necessary, then, again, why not make the gain of such an experience something more than idolatry? Imagine a Hollywood that rebuilds; refinances; and revitalizes neighborhoods, communities and cultures that it has been shooting in for decades. If we knew that for every movie crew we saw on the street there was a building being fixed, a school being revitalized or a park created, then, yes, I could probably deal better with the metaphors because at least then I would know they werent idle!

Lets see if Hollywood can go "cradle-to-cradle" before accepting the notion that "profit" is in our rights as individuals, because profit should mean something to everyone directly or indirectly involved! From creator to consumer profit is meant to be shared not spoiled.

What a bloviating idiot. Hes too good to read science fiction? Avatar was a crufty pastiche of the works of his betters, minus the pacing and humor.

JAMES CAMERON really is appearing to be more and more "THE ARTHUR C. CLARKE" of our age . . . (seeing JAMES CAMERON evolve into the EXPLORER hw is becoming is BREATHTAKINGLY delightful.


"The Ocean Floor" and "Sidereal Space" are both ULTIMATE "undiscovered countries" of Humankind.

(Now CELEBRATING THIRTY-NINE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED NINETY-FIVE VISITORS WORLDWIDE!!!!!) I may not be the "pop Icon" here in America, but close to 40,000 people from various countries have "been-by" to visit my slide presentations; I Thank You All Very Much for visiting.)

maybe 80% of the AVATARS (no frills dvd release can go to EARTHDAY)--because releasing a "worthless" 2-D edition of AVATAR is going to "fool" a lot of consumers into WASTING MONEY when they buy the 2-D AVATAR and then will have to buy an anaglyph 3-D Avatar DVD in November .

Yeay, we get to be preached too about the oceans next (again most likely with awsumn special effects). Whooot :D

Sooooo what did ever happen to entertainment that didnt have a heavy-handed messages attached to it?? (wink)

Avatar sucked. It was the same story as every other movie: guy has to kill species, guy come to appreciate species, guy falls in love with someone in the species. Oh, wow, wait, what? Special effects? Doesnt make it a good movie. Plain and simple. Everyone just fell in line and said, "WOW, Cameron made a movie! Hmmm. Its the same plot as every other movie, but it looks cooler. I shall now like this movie. Hooray!" Baaaa... Baaaa. Baaaaa. Get over it.

you suck gtj

Wow if he thinks Avatar is better than 2001 then he is mistaken.

Also if he thinks his movies are environmental he is also sorely mistaken. If he wanted to be green he would make public speeches by cycling around the country and talking to people.

Avatar required possibly billions of computing hours to render and every hour takes a massive amount of energy to make. Not to mention the carbon footprint of a movie is off the walls if you go from start to finish. If he wanted to be green he would take all of Avatars earnings and invest it into green energy not 3D camera companies to make more billions for non-green message movies.

It plain and simple he is a failure at writing and panders off green washing his movies like a typical marketer. All he is really good at is tricking the masses into giving him billions of capital to do whatever he pleases.

Comparing James Cameron to Arthur C. Clarke is a little like comparing a Hersheys chocolate kiss to a steak dinner. Sure, the candys sweet and tasty, but its gone in a flash and theres nothing terribly satisfying about it, while a steak dinner is satisfying, fills you up and can even be nutritious.

Camerons got a terrific sense of whats visually stunning, and he embraces just enough "newage" (rhymes with "sewage") to make his maudlin and overwrought "Avatar" storyline appealing to the "save the Earth" folks out there, the Ed Begley, Jr.s and Al Gores of the world.

If someone with Camerons technical know-how got together with someone who was really creative when it comes to storytelling and character development, then you might possibly just have one of the greatest movies of all time. And not just one that made the most money because its ticket prices were jacked up for 3D theaters.

A well conducted interview, and some very good insight from James Cameron.

A movie when well-done and having a subtle but thought provoking underlying message is a great way to galvanize us towards getting our act together. There is no doubt that in hind-sight after leaving a Cinema from a viewing of Avatar, the sense of immersion that the powerful visuals combined with 3D and the story’ message, impresses on our minds how it’s sad to destroy life and a beautiful planet… simply because we can.

This article looks at how a movie such as Avatar, along with it’s “digital assets” could go a long way and help educate the younger generation in saving our planet – Earth. http://bit.ly/dr839z

I cant believe the whiners who continuously complain about Cameron. I hear what he says and I sense 1) Competence 2) Opinion and 3) Pride

There is nothing wrong with 1) and 2), although people with opinions seem to be villainous. I like people with opinions, particularly if they have some credibility. Hes made excellent movies, and has sold more tickets than probably any other director. Hes credible.

Now Pride... A lot of people confuse it with arrogance, but I only get a little of that from him. Far less than almost any rapper or model or rock star.

And if he has a little excess pride, well, I support that. Hes made d*mn good movies and has proven to be one of the most successful directors ever.

So drop this shock because he comes across strong with opinions.

Fool me once Shame on you.. Fool me twice shame on me...

If I wanted to see far left political spin I will just stay home and hope CNN starts broadcasting in 3D.


About the Bloggers